| "金牌优先"法则应用于科研人才评价的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邱均平,朱少强,刘永."金牌优先"法则应用于科研人才评价的思考[J].图书情报知识,2006(4):101-104. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邱均平 朱少强 刘永 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科研评价中普遍存在的简单量化倾向,导致了一系列不良后果。受奥运金牌榜排名规则的启示,本文主张以科研人员的最优成果来代表和评价科研人员的学术水平,引导科研人员更多地追求学术质量,多出精品,防止学术浮躁。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科研评价 科研人才 定量化方法 "金牌优先"法则 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-2797（2006）04-0101-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-01-16 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月16日 |
Thoughts on the Criterion of Gold Medal Priority for Scientific Faculty Evaluation |
| |
| Qiu JunPing;Zhu ShaoJiang;Liu Yong.Thoughts on the Criterion of Gold Medal Priority for Scientific Faculty Evaluation[J].Document,Information & Knowledge,2006(4):101-104. |
| |
| Authors: | Qiu JunPing;Zhu ShaoJiang;Liu Yong |
| |
| Institution: | Qiu Junping etc. |
| |
| Abstract: | The inclination of putting too much importance on the quantity instead of quality in nowadays scientific research evaluation,has resulted in a series of abnormal consequences.Inspired by the criterion of Olympics medals ranking,it is suggested in this paper to evaluate scientific faculty according to the level of their best works instead of the amount of their works, so that the quality of their research works and better outputs can be encouraged. |
| |
| Keywords: | Scientific research evaluation Scientific faculty Quantitative methodology the Criterion of Gold Medal Priority |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
