共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 486 毫秒
1.
针对一些论文初稿中摘要编写出现的问题,结合有关国家标准和论文摘要撰写要求,阐述了科技论文摘要的写作方法、撰写要求、标准格式及注意事项,以期助于提高学术论文的规范化水平。 相似文献
2.
有不少的自然科学论文摘要中,要么出现数学公式,要么缺乏独立性,不管怎么写都会违反摘要编写规则,这是由编写规则本身的缺陷所致．解决的办法是对编写规则进行修改．修改原则为：①不强求中英文摘要的统一．②中文摘要可不强调其独立性．这样修改符合科技论文本身的特性及大多数作者的意识和习惯;符合科技期刊本身的特点;也使编辑们所面临的问题迎刃而解了,是必要和可行的． 相似文献
3.
王海科 《佳木斯教育学院学报》2013,(2):313-314
英文摘要是科技论文的必要内容,对科技论文在国际上的学术交流起关键作用,已成为提升科技论文影响力的重要因素。阅读了大量科技论文英文摘要,对其中的常见问题进行总结,提出了正确书写科技论文英文摘要的建议,为英文摘要的书写与编辑提供一定的参考作用。 相似文献
4.
为了帮助中文学术期刊论文作者提高英文摘要的写作水平,分析了写作中的两个常见问题：英语表达上的问题和摘要编写中的主要问题。提出了要深入了解和掌握的英文摘要及其写作方面的主要知识：学术期刊论文英文摘要与其它英文摘要的区别、学术期刊论文英文摘要的结构和撰写要求以及学术期刊论文英文摘要的语言表达。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
目的：实现科技论文摘要统一和规范撰写的目标。方法：主要以《大理学院学报》2002至2004年间发表的311篇科技论文摘要为背景，分析当前科技论文摘要撰写中存在的问题。结果：311篇论文中，233篇医学论文使用四项结构式摘要，占74．92％；78篇科技论文使用传统式摘要，占25．08％；论文摘要撰写不统一、质量参差不齐的现象与国内众多科技期刊情况相似。就此提出对策和建议。结论：倡导科技论文采用规范的结构式摘要是期刊走向国际化的需要。 相似文献
9.
为了快速、准确的撰写科技论文的英文摘要,在归纳和总结科技论文摘要特点和写作规律的基础上,应用人工智能技术对科技论文英文摘要撰写专家系统的构建作了尝试性探讨,其主要内容包括专家系统内涵、知识库的构成、推理、推理机构以及工作示例等。 相似文献
10.
摘要是论文内容的浓缩,很多研究对摘要进行了体裁分析,但将摘要的体裁分析和摘要写作教学相结合的研究并不多见。本文将体裁分析理论应用到农业科技论文摘要教学中,将体裁教学法与多种教学方法相结合,构建了从摘要阅读到摘要写作的教学模式,以提高学生对农业科技论文摘要这一体裁语篇的阅读和写作能力。 相似文献
11.
对科技论文写作规范化的几点认识 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
宋晓露 《贵州教育学院学报》2002,18(3):68-70
针对科技论文写作中存在的问题，提出了科技论文写作的规范化问题，并对科技论文的写作要求作了介绍。 相似文献
12.
13.
梁成林 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2003,(1)
科学研究的成果要通过具体的文章来体现。应用科学的研究与应用写作学是相互影响,相互促进的。应用科学的研究离不开应用写作学,应用科学的发展,又必将大大促进应用写作学的发展。 相似文献
14.
喻互助 《武汉工程职业技术学院学报》2013,(4):68-72
科技论文摘要汉英翻译在内容上要忠实原文,在行文上又要符合英文科技文献的习惯表达。针对科技论文摘要汉英翻译的一些实例,指出其中某些译文在句法、词法、逻辑关系等方面存在的错误,对原译展开评论,并提出了修改建议。 相似文献
15.
Few systematic efforts have been reported to develop higher degree by research student skills for writing publishable articles in science and technology fields. There is a need to address this lack in the light of the current importance of publication to science research students and the high supervisor workload entailed in repeated draft correction, especially when students use English as an additional language. An interdisciplinary teaching approach to address this need has recently been developed featuring analysis frameworks from applied linguistics (AL) research, with successful outcomes in short, stand-alone workshops facilitated by an applied linguist teaching alone or in teams with scientists. Its use by a scientist alone has not previously been investigated, although scientists are well placed to address this development need. We investigate the suitability and effectiveness of this approach for use by a scientist to embed training, in the context of the first two years of operation of a school-level writing group programme, and identify features of the approach that align with participants’ perceptions of benefit. Student response to the programme has been strongly positive, with increased confidence to write for publication and complete their degrees, and high activity towards publishing papers on their degree research. The presenter reports maintenance of his own publication output in spite of the time spent on this training, as a result of increased writing efficiency. Features of the approach that map to perceived benefit include its basis in AL frameworks for analysis of student-provided example papers; incorporation of relevant aspects of English usage and grammar in the frameworks; and inclusion of response to reviewer comments as an integral part of article writing. 相似文献
16.
We tested the hypothesis that engagement in a few, brief writing assignments in a nonmajors science course can improve student ability to convey critical thought about science. A sample of three papers written by students (n = 30) was coded for presence and accuracy of elements related to scientific writing. Scores for different aspects of scientific writing were significantly correlated, suggesting that students recognized relationships between components of scientific thought. We found that students' ability to write about science topics and state conclusions based on data improved over the course of three writing assignments, while the abilities to state a hypothesis and draw clear connections between human activities and environmental impacts did not improve. Three writing assignments generated significant change in student ability to write scientifically, although our results suggest that three is an insufficient number to generate complete development of scientific writing skills. 相似文献
17.
18.
Written and oral communications and the processes of writing and reading are highly valued within the scientific community; scientists who communicate well are successful in gaining recognition and support from members of their own communities, the research funding agencies, and the wider society. Yet how do scientists achieve this proficiency? Are expert scientists equally expert writers in and of science? Do scientists' perceptions of the nature of science influence their writing strategies and processes, and their beliefs about the role of writing in knowledge construction? This study used a questionnaire and semistructured interviews to document these perceptions, strategies, processes, and beliefs in a nonrandom sample of Canadian university scientists and engineers. The results indicate that the scientists subscribed to a contemporary evaluativist view of science, used common writing strategies, held similar beliefs about scientific writing and nonscientific writing, and agreed that writing generates insights and clarifies ambiguity in science. The engineers held a different view of technology than the common views of science or technology as simply applied science. These findings were slightly different than those found for American scientists from a large land‐grant university. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 338–369, 2004 相似文献
19.
以2004年10月21日出版的Nature摘要为例,阐述了Nature摘要的编辑原则及语言特点,为中国科技期刊在英文摘要的学习和写作上提供一些启示 相似文献