共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
版权资源是出版产业的生命之源,因此出版企业应该重视版权业务的战略化管理。本文以部分美国出版企业作为研究对象,从版权获取、版权运营、版权保护三个层面分析其经验,以期对我国出版企业版权战略管理有所启示。 相似文献
2.
网络时代,对数据库版权保护问题的研究越来越重要。传统版权法对非原创性数据库的保护已遭遇困境,反不正当竞争法成为数据库版权保护的重要补充。为了更充分地保护数据库制作者的权利,欧盟建立了数据库特殊保护制度。我国应完善现有的相关立法,在条件成熟时,考虑制订数据库保护的专门法律。 相似文献
3.
著作权法保护图书馆的理论研究 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
著作权法的立法目的构成了著作权法保护图书馆的理论基础。著作权法对平等、公平、公益等价值目标的追求构成了保护图书馆的思想基础。宪法是著作权法保护图书馆的法律基础。参考文献 11。 相似文献
4.
《Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory #》1990,14(3):257
The application of copyright law to electronic resources is receiving more attention as technologies grow in kind and complexity. The function of copyright as a means of protection for software continues to be questioned, and efforts to resolve this issue are further confounded by the industry's use of patents and license agreements. The rapid growth of electronic resources has precipitated revisions in copyright law in the past decade. A new law has been proposed in 1989 which would further define the application of copyright to software. The current and proposed use of copyright law to protect electronic resources, and its effect on educational institutions and libraries, is discussed. Suggestions to meet the challenge of acquiring electronic resources are offered. 相似文献
5.
Sara R. Benson 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2013,20(4):317-327
AbstractThis article delves into a few areas of copyright law that academic authors often overlook: joint author’s rights and the work made for hire doctrine. Scholarly publications produced by university professors often include more than one author. The default copyright laws apply to any such works if there is no specific written agreement to the contrary. Thus, it is important to understand what those default rules are in order to determine whether it is appropriate to deviate from them in an author agreement. Similarly, the work made for hire doctrine would normally apply to make all work produced by professors owned by the university. Luckily, many universities do not wish to own such work and give it back to professors through university statutes and other governing documents. However, it is crucial to understand whether the default rules apply or the university permits professors to negotiate their own author agreements with publishers. Finally, if authors own their own scholarly works, publishers can expect that they will negotiate their rights in the publishing agreements to benefit the terms most favorable to the author. And yet, many faculty members simply sign a standard authorship agreement without asking for concessions on the part of the publisher. Thus, this article empowers professors to exercise their copyright rights to the full extent of the law and to negotiate their author’s agreements to benefit themselves and society as a whole through open access and the use of Creative Commons licenses. 相似文献
6.
《Slavic & East European Information Resources》2013,14(2-3):79-116
SUMMARY Digital technology and global economic trends present fundamental challenges to copyright law in the twenty-first century. On a practical level, librarians need to understand the particulars of current laws in order to make responsible decisions and to utilize to the fullest extent the possibilities that copyright law affords them in their missions. This article will identify the major copyright issues associated with library digital activities, and will discuss copyright protection in the digital environment of material originating in the Slavic, East European, and Eurasian nations. It covers use of Slavic and East European material in the U.S. in various contexts, including Internet activity, preservation and replacement, interlibrary loan, electronic reserves, classroom and educational use, text encoding, digitization of print and microform materials, and creation of digital content and databases. 相似文献
7.
微博作为新兴的网络应用备受网民青睐,但在版权保护方面也提出了新的课题。根据相关法律规定,只要微博内容符合独创性标准,便可主张版权。然而,现实之中由于微博版权意识的普遍缺乏,各种类型的微博版权冲突频频发生,这并不利于微博内容的创新和企业间的和谐竞争。考虑到微博的文化特性及其版权法律保护的实际困难,微博版权治理应秉持自治与法治相协调的基本策略。 相似文献
8.
由于全球信息化进程的加快和科学技术的飞速发展,数字图书馆应运而生,因此需要图书馆引进或自建网络数据库系统,由此涉及到著作权问题。增强著作版权保护意识,已经摆在数据库使用者和数据库开发者面前。我国目前修改后的《著作权法》增加了"信息网络传播权"一款,给中国的数据库著作权的保护,提供了一定的法律依据。 相似文献
9.
Steve Carey 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2008,24(3):156-164
This article looks at the consequences of the 1991 amendment to the Australian Copyright Act, which meant that, for the copyright owner or authorised distributor to attain the right to control imports, it had to make
the book available in Australia within 30 days of first publication overseas; and, to retain that right, it had to notify
the retailer within 7 days of receiving an order whether it could be fulfilled within 90 days, and then in fact do so (. Accessed 28 June 2008). The article discusses the background to that change, what has happened since and what arguments
are marshalled by those in favour of the status quo (restrictions that must be qualified for), and those in favour of a completely
open market. The arguments used say much about the current preoccupations of those in Australian publishing. The debate around
whether booksellers should be free to import copies of a new book from any supplier willing to sell them boils down to four
issues: the availability in Australia of books published overseas; the price of books in Australia; the preservation of Australian
publishing; and the protection of the rights of copyright holders. Those in favour of the open market believe that it would
improve the first two without diminishing the latter two; those who support the status quo, that changing would bring no substantial
benefits, and hurt both publishing and the rights of copyright holders. In summary, the reasons for maintaining the status
quo are that things work fine as they are; that Australian literature (authors, bookshops, publishers) would suffer if things
changed; and that the publisher is entitled to protect its investment through territorial control of copyright. The reasons
for going to a completely open market are that only an open market can determine market price; that booksellers are unfairly
disadvantaged competing against online sellers, on whom parallel importing restrictions are effectively not imposed; that
copyright holders lose their rights when they sell something, and shouldn’t get a secondary chance to protect their investment;
there is already a de facto open market, which unfairly restricts those who obey the law; there is a narrow window of opportunity
for selling a book, which the current restrictions don’t serve; and the current situation is a poor compromise that doesn’t
achieve the benefits of the open market. 相似文献
10.
从署名权、作者稿酬、书籍的复制、古代作者的编辑活动和古代图书市场的出现等方面对我国雕版印刷术发明之前涉及到的书籍版权保护的诸多问题进行探讨。认为我国直到魏晋时期,士人在自己的作品上署名才成为惯例;雕版印刷术发明之前作者们没有真正意义上的稿酬收入;手抄复制书籍现象早在先秦时期就已经存在而且很少被限制;虽然古代学者为校订书籍做出的包括校雠、注释等在内的编辑活动属于二次劳动创作,却得不到封建国家的有效确认和保护;我国宋代出现的现代意义上的版权保护现象与古代图书市场的出现没有必然关系,而是与当时的商品经济发展和士人的个体自主意识增强有关。 相似文献
11.
版权保护与文献资源共享 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
版权保护与文献资源共享柳励和罗素蓉ＡＢＳＴＲＡＣＴＴｈｅｒｅａｒｅｐｏｓｉｔｉｖｅｓｉｇｎｉｆｉｃａｎｃｅｓｏｆｃｏｐｙｒｉｇｈｔｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｏｎｆｏｒｄｏｃｕｍｅｎｔｒｅｓｏｕｒｃｅｓｈａｒｉｎｇ，ｙｅｔ，ｔｈｅｒｅａｒｅａｌｓｏｎｅｇａｔｉｖ... 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义] 图书馆数字资源长期保存过程中的复制行为受到版权法的规制，厘清图书馆数字复制法律边界对图书馆数字保存的开展具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 基于国际版权法与部分国家国内版权法法律文本，采取比较研究的方法，对当前复制权保护和图书馆基于保存或替换目的所享有的复制权例外进行梳理和分析。[结果/结论] 国际公约及各国版权法对图书馆数字资源保存过程中复制权例外法律边界的宏观塑造集中在"图书馆范围""可复制的作品的范围""限制条件"3个方面，并从4个方面对我国今后图书馆数字保存相关立法提出建议。 相似文献
13.
网络著作权中三个基本概念的法律思考 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
作为文化传播第二次革命的网络通讯技术给现有的著作权保护观念形成了冲击，网络环境下一些传统的概念中呈现了新的内涵，使著作权保护出现了新的课题。本文对其中的三个基本概念：数字化、合理使用、数据库保护及其相关问题从法律的角度进行了分析，提出了新的观点。 相似文献
14.
网络环境下多元著作权保护制度的建构——以"Creative Commons"机制与合理使用为视角 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
“Creative Commons”授权许可机制的实施必然在一定程度上对传统著作权制度造成影响，使得著作权学者必须开始考虑现有的著作权体系是否能够支持这一在网络环境下逐步流行的授权许可协议。在一定条件下，这一系列协议形式会在很大程度和范围上，让一般公众和使用者得以规避愈来愈倾向加强网络著作权保护的相关著作权法律。从另一个角度来看，这种网络自发采用的许可合同形式很可能会“改写版权法的规则”，促进建立全新的、多层次的、立体的合理使用法律体系，并在此基础上推动著作权法的相关发展，从而在网络环境下建立更合理、更有弹性的著作权保障模式。 相似文献
15.
This article is the fourth in a series of six emanating from the UK JISC‐funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open archiving). It describes an analysis of 80 scholarly journal publishers' copyright agreements with a particular view to their effect on author self‐archiving: 90% of agreements asked for copyright transfer and 69% asked for it prior to refereeing the paper; 75% asked authors to warrant that their work had not been previously published although only two explicitly stated that they viewed self‐archiving as prior publication; 28.5% of agreements provided authors with no usage rights over their own paper. Although 42.5% allowed self‐archiving in some format, there was no consensus on the conditions under which self‐archiving could take place. The article concludes that author–publisher copyright agreements should be reconsidered by a working party representing the needs of both parties. 相似文献
16.
在当前知识产权保护强化与知识共享趋势并存的国际环境下,图书馆界作为维护知识获取自由的圣坛,在著作权法中具有双重角色：既是著作权法律法规修订的积极参与者,又是著作权法律法规的严格遵守与履行者。 相似文献
17.
Vivienne Dunlop 《Learned Publishing》1999,12(4):245-250
UK Copyright law (CAPD 1988) defines the requirements for qualification for copyright protection in the UK and for many of the permitted acts. A defence against infringement of copyright is provided for under the terms of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review, but use of this defence must be assessed on the nature and extent of the use of copyright material in each case. Industry practice and guidelines exist for use of some text material, but not for the fair dealing use of other copyright material such as images and artwork, the inclusion of which was a major change in the CAPD 1988 act from earlier UK copyright acts. 相似文献
18.
Allison Estell 《Public Services Quarterly》2016,12(3):214-227
Librarians often act as default copyright experts at their institutions and thus must have an awareness of copyright law and practices. Nevertheless, there is little in the scholarly literature about how well informed librarians are about copyright law. Through a national survey of professional librarians, this study illustrates librarians’ self-perceived familiarity with copyright concepts, interests in training, and sources of support for copyright questions. The results will be of interest to library directors and library and information science (LIS) faculty and could inform curricular decisions in LIS schools and may also be applied to local professional development initiatives for librarians. 相似文献
19.
指出固守私权保护向度的技术保护措施已无法全面有效地保护数字时代的著作权,从竞争法向度完善技术保护措施,才能够消解技术保护措施与市场竞争秩序、消费者权益之间的冲突。只有构建符合我国产业发展价值导向的技术保护措施制度,才能实现著作权人及相关权利主体间之利益平衡。 相似文献
20.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(3-4):175-193
ABSTRACT As electronic resources represent a larger percentage of libraries' purchases and services, copyright law, licensing, and other information laws are changing some traditional library functions. This article reviews the law of electronic resources through an outline of affected library services, including acquisitions and collection development; gifts, exchanges, and sales; archiving and preservation; circulation; interli-brary loan and document delivery; reserve; and research, reference, and instructional services. Legal issues considered include copyright, licensing, and database protection. 相似文献