共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
《教师教育研究》2016,(2):68-74
浙江省综合科学课程是由自然科学发展至2002年正式成为国家综合科学课程,因而选择了自2002年以来的13年科学学业水平考试试题("中考"),以PISA2015科学评估框架中的分类指标进行定量计分与定性分析。尽管PISA理念在各地市的试题中有不同程度的体现,历年试题分析在PISA2015"科学知识、科学情境、科学能力"三个维度的表现:科学试题对科学情境关注欠缺,知识维度中"程序性知识"的重视不足,科学能力中的"设计与评价科学探究"与"科学解释数据与证据"不重视。论文进而立足于教育部深化义务教育课程改革意见与浙江省深化义务教育课程改革的契机,提出:基于科学核心素养,建立明确的学业考试评价标准;加强科学工程实践,关注学生实际问题解决能力的提升;扩大国际交流与学习,以研究引领科学学业水平考试的改革。 相似文献
5.
PISA样本试题包括在PISA测量中使用的所有公开可用的试题,以及在开发和试测中使用的试题,主要目的是用来说明评估框架的内容,检验试卷和问卷等测试工具是否有效,检验各参与国家(地区)的组织实施程序是否有效.PISA在从2000年到2018年的七次评估中,公布了34个与生物科学素养有关的样本试题.通过对样本试题进行分析,总结出生物学试题具有以下特点:以单元的形式呈现,以特定的素材创设情境,学科综合性强,关注社会热点问题和生活实际,重视科学态度. 相似文献
6.
7.
2006年PISA重点评价科学素养,其核心目标是"能力",采用基于情境的测试方法,在个人、社会和全球的背景中评价学生知道什么、能做什么以及所持有的价值观.与PISA的评价理念有着类似的精神实质,新课程也要求以知识与技能,过程与方法(科学探究),情感态度与价值观三维目标为依据,全面评价学生的科学素养.以2006年PISA科学评价为例,介绍以"能力"为核心的,以"情境"引发对能力的要求,以"知识"和"态度"作为影响能力形成基础的科学评价框架,重点讨论基于情境的科学素养的评价设计,为正在实施的科学教育新课程的评价提供借鉴与思考. 相似文献
8.
国际学生评价项目PISA认为科学解释能力是中学生核心素养的3种能力之一。科学解释在学科课程中具有迁移知识的能力,发展科学解释能力已成为科学教育的中心。在剖析初中生物学科学解释类试题模式的基础上,提出从素材选取、问题设置和答案编制3个维度阐述此类试题的命题策略。 相似文献
9.
PISA2015科学测试注重考查科学素养,强调考查科学地解释现象、评价和设计科学探究、科学地解释数据和证据。在命题中将科学素养的考查置于真实的情境之中,引导学生关注社会,关注运用所学知识解决实际问题。试题的呈现形式丰富,设问方式力求展现学生的思维水平,着眼于学生未来的发展需求。这与我们国家进行的课程改革高度一致,对课堂教学及评价方式的设计起到了导向作用。 相似文献
10.
PISA科学评价框架主要从"核心概念界定"及"评估框架"两个角度阐述"科学素养"的具体内涵,故本文将从上述两个角度探求PISA 2015科学素养内涵的若干新变化并阐述其价值取向.其内涵的变化主要表现在对能力、知识、态度的重新界定上:能力方面,将科学素养直接定义为能力,认为能力是科学实践与反思的统一;知识方面,将"关于科学的知识"重新划分为两类:程序性知识及认知性知识;态度方面,重视对科学探究方法的评价.其价值取向是:背景,融入真实生活的实际应用需要;能力,基于科学本质的实践与反思需要;知识,直面未来生活挑战的基础性需要;态度,满足社会及个人可持续发展的需要.最后,分析了基于PISA 2015科学素养价值取向的教学启示. 相似文献
11.
Shuichi Ninomiya 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2019,26(1):91-110
PISA presents a new image for academic achievement, which has prompted Japanese education reforms over the past decade to innovate teaching and learning for ‘PISA-style literacy’. Supported by theoretical foundations, particularly with regard to the concept of ‘PISA literacy’ and ‘authentic assessment’, these reforms have accomplished progress in the focus on higher order competencies, such as application and the development of new assessment strategies. However, more recently, various critical discussions of ‘PISA literacy’ are underway in the Japanese academy. They interrogate it more critically and reveal the narrow emphasis on functional application and technical operation. Current assessment practices, which tend to fall into ‘criteria compliance’, are in urgent need of review. There is a need to extend the critical discussions in progress to the new assessment strategies. This paper responds to this, by considering the Japanese acceptance of ‘PISA literacy’ and its assessment, discussing the features and limitations. 相似文献
12.
NINA BONDERUP DOHN 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2007,41(1):1-16
This article gives a critique of the methodology of OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). It is argued that PISA is invalidated by the fact that the methodology chosen does not constitute an adequate operationalisation of the question of inquiry. Therefore, contrary to the claims of PISA, PISA is not an assessment of the 'knowledge and skills for life' of students, but only of 'knowledge and skills in assessment situations'. Even this latter form of assessment is not fully reliable, however, because of problems at the level of concrete test items and because of an inherent confusion of relative and absolute evaluation. 相似文献
13.
唐圣权 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012,48(1):106-108
PISA2009上海项目,开启了用PISA监测我国义务教育质量的先河。继而有关学者主张,借鉴PISA建构我国的义务教育质量监测体系,以提供中国同世界上其他国家或地区间可比较的教育质量指标,从而为国家教育政策的制定和调整提供依据。然而,当我们将PISA移植于中国义务教育质量监测,并将其结果在国际上进行比较的时候,不可无视两个问题:一是学生生存质量问题;二是教育效率问题。前者关注:学生在教育过程中幸福感如何、承受的压力有多强、失去了多少原本不该失去的东西;后者关注:某一PISA成绩的取得,消耗了多少劳动,花费了多长时间。 相似文献
14.
创造性思维是一种复杂的高阶能力,如何测评一直是教育测量的热点和难点之一。PISA2021创造性思维测评基于证据中心设计(ECD)理论设计和研制创造性思维测评工具。介绍ECD理论如何运用于PISA2021创造性思维这一高阶能力的测评,并从证据驱动实现测评标准实证化、信息技术增强促进测评问题情境化、多模态数据收集与证据多元化3个方面为我国基础教育素养测评提供参考建议。 相似文献
15.
Kyriaki Anagnostopoulou Vasilia Christidou Kostas Dimopoulos 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(4):636-662
The paper explores the relationship of the global and the local assessment discourses as expressed by Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test items and school-based examinations, respectively. To this end, the paper compares PISA test items related to living systems and the context of life, health, and environment, with Greek school–based biology examinations' test items in terms of the nature of their textual construction. This nature is determined by the interplay of the notions of classification (content specialisation) and formality (code specialisation) modulated by both the linguistic and the visual expressive modes. The results of the analysis reveal disparities between assessment discourses promoted at the global and the local level. In particular, while PISA test items convey their scientific message (specialised content and code) principally through their visual mode, the specialised scientific meaning of school-based examinations test is mainly conveyed through their linguistic mode. On the other hand, the linguistic mode of PISA test items is mainly compatible with textual practices of the public domain (non-specialised content and code). Such a mismatch between assessment discourses at local and global level is expected to place Greek students at different discursive positions, promoting different types of knowledge. The expected shift from the epistemic positioning promoted in Greece to the one promoted by PISA could significantly restrict Greek students' ability to infer the PISA discursive context and produce appropriate responses. This factor could provide a meaningful contribution in the discussion of the relatively low achievement of Greek students in PISA scientific literacy assessment. 相似文献
16.
17.
大规模教育质量的评价在很大程度上影响着国家和地区教育发展的走向。本文以PISA2006结果报告为中心,解析PISA对大规模教育质量和相关影响因素评价的理念和方法,为研究和开展我国大规模教育质量评价提供借鉴。 相似文献
18.
Many studies have found a strong relationship between the mathematics students study in school and their performance on an academic or school mathematics assessment but not on an assessment of mathematics literacy (ML). With many countries, like the USA, placing emphasis on finishing secondary education being mathematically literate and prepared for college or career, this raises the question about the relationship between the mathematics studied in school and any ML students may have. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) ML assessment is embedded in real-world contexts that provide an important window on how ready students are to tackle the situations and problems that await them whether they intend to pursue further education beyond high school or intend to go directly into the labour force. In this paper, we draw upon the PISA 2012 data to investigate the extent to which the cumulative exposure to rigorous mathematics content, such as that embedded in college- and career-ready standards, is associated with ML as assessed in PISA. Results reveal that both exposure to rigorous school mathematics and experiencing the instruction of this mathematics through real-world applications are significantly related to all the real-world contextualized PISA ML scores. 相似文献
19.
Jens Dolin Lars Brian Krogh 《International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education》2010,8(3):565-592
This article reports a case study that described and analyzed the changes in the Danish school culture induced and encouraged
by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) results. The educational policy and reforms that were temporally
connected with the publication of the PISA 2000 results are outlined and the related socioeconomic and sociopolitical influences
are explicated. Furthermore, we investigated to what degree the PISA science assessment framework and test system were in
accordance with the Danish educational goals in science in order to discuss the relevance of PISA as a catalyst for the educational
actions taken. The results of our inquiry revealed areas of good correspondence and fundamental differences related to values
underlying the Danish school system and PISA, respectively (e.g., Bildung orientation versus cognitive skills/competency orientation, different learning/assessment paradigms). We argue that such
differences are crucial when considering curricular relevance, validity, and the use of PISA as an agent of change on the
national level. 相似文献