共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
电磁学实验课是物理系学生掌握实验知识、实验方法及实验技能的必修课,能够培养学生理论联系实际、实事求是的科学作风和良好的实验素质、动手能力、分析问题和解决问题的能力.然而,目前电磁学实验教学中仍存在一些问题,影响了实验教学效果.在强调素质教育、呼唤加强创新人才培 相似文献
2.
通过调整电磁学实验教学内容,改进教学环节,加强实验考核方面的改革,激发学生的学习热情和求知欲,促进学生实践能力,创新能力等综合素质的培养和提高。 相似文献
3.
电磁学实验要抓住测量电阻这条纲姚燮朋实验课的目的是培养和提高学生实验技能及分析、解决问题的能力。在电磁学买验中如何培养和提高学生的实验技能及分析、解决问题能力呢？笔者认为应抓住“用不同实验方法测及电阻”这个纲，用这个“纲”贯穿电磁学实验教学，这样才能... 相似文献
4.
实验操作考核环节的管理与监控 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
实验操作考核是实验教学的一个重要环节,不仅能够使学生对实验教学加以重视,而且能够真实地反映学生的实践能力.在完善实验操作考核环节的管理基础上,对构建实验操作考核监控体系进行了一定的探索与实践. 相似文献
5.
在电磁学实验中,如何提高学生的能力,是实验教学的主要目的.结合近几年来的教学实践,从提高学生仪器设备的使用能力、测量方法的选择能力、线路故障的排除能力以及实验方案的设计能力几个方面进行了有益的探讨. 相似文献
6.
7.
文中剖析了电磁学实验教学中存在的问题,确立以人为本的教学理念．阐述了预习在实验教学中的重要作用,构建了新的电磁学实验预习模式,实践证明新的电磁学实验预习模式取得了较好的效果． 相似文献
8.
大学物理实验是一门提高学生实验技能、培养科学思维的重要课程.从提高实验教师队伍的素质、更新实验内容、改进实验教学方法、采取科学的实验成绩考核方式、培养学生的创新性5个方面来探讨了实验教学,目的是而改变传统的实验教学模式,提高大学物理实验教学质量. 相似文献
9.
培养和提高学生综合实验能力是实验教学的重要目标之一.通过对生化实验课量化考核标准的制定和实施,结果表明,它既可提高学生实验技能,又可详实体现学生的综合实验能力,并有助于教师对实验教学效果的了解与总结,可进一步提高教学水平和质量.全程量化考核与评价是一种行之有效的实验课考核方法. 相似文献
10.
高中物理新教材比起旧教材有很大的改进,不管是形式、内容和目的都有较大差异。尤其是实验教学与原教材比有极明显的变化和特点,很有利于对学生进行创新教学。实验教学是激发学生的学习兴趣,帮助形成概念,巩固物理知识,获得物理实验技能,培养创新意识和思维能力的重要途径,因此加强实验教学是提高物理教学质量的重要环节。新教材与旧教材的热学和电磁学作比较,可谓耳目一新,对比表如下:一、新教材的实验设计特点1.实验数量增加、力度加强,要求适度从热学和电磁学内容看,实验总数从34个增加到55个,其中有一部分是选做实验。新教材实验课时在… 相似文献
11.
Robyn Preston Monica Gratani Kimberley Owens Poornima Roche Monika Zimanyi 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(1):109-124
AbstractWhat and how students learn depend largely on how they think they will be assessed. This study aimed to explore medical students’ perception of the value of assessment and feedback on their learning, and how this relates to their examination performance. A mixed methods research design was adopted in which a questionnaire was developed and administered to the students to gain their perceptions of assessments. Perceptions were further explored in focus group discussions. Survey findings were correlated with students’ performance data and academic coordinators’ perceptions. Students’ perceptions of the level of difficulty of different assessments mirrored their performance in examinations, with an improvement observed in clinical assessments as students progressed through their degree. Students recognised that feedback is important to allow improvements and seek more timely, better quality and personalised feedback. Academic coordinators identified that some of the students’ suggestions are more realistic than others. Students had a positive attitude towards assessment, but emphasised the need for educators to highlight the relevance of assessment to clinical practice. 相似文献
12.
Farah L. Vallera 《Journal of Research on Technology in Education》2019,51(3):290-310
AbstractThis study explored utilizing augmented reality (AR) and project-based learning (PBL) strategies to increase students’ understandings of sociological paradigms and the theorists’ motivations behind their development. Using a posttest-only quasi-experimental control group design with experimental intervention, three groups of students’ scores were compared on a post-unit assessment. The PBL-only group, the PBL-AR group, and a control group were also compared over time on the post-unit assessment, a quiz, and the midterm. PBL-AR students’ scores were higher on all three assessments. The project’s design, implementation, and findings are discussed, along with implications for future curricular redesign using novel tools and technologies. 相似文献
13.
Ahmed El-Mowafy 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(2):223-241
Fieldwork training is a key component of several practical disciplines. In this study, students’ peer assessment of fieldwork is explored as a method to improve their practical training. Peer assessment theories are first discussed. A framework for peer assessment of fieldwork is proposed, and the steps taken for preparation of students for this task are discussed. A developed marking, feedback and moderation tool of assessment are presented. Application of peer assessment in the field was investigated over a period of two years in one undergraduate unit in the geospatial discipline as an example. Reliability of peer assessment was estimated by measuring the difference between assessments carried out by groups of peer assessors, and its validity was measured by comparing students’ marks with those given by tutors. Results show that students have gained from the peer assessment process, mainly as a formative form of assessment, by better understanding and endeavouring to achieve the objectives of field tasks. Tutors use differences among assessments made by groups of students compared to tutors’ assessments to identify field components that need better explanation of their content and assessment criteria. 相似文献
14.
Mark Huxham Fiona Campbell Jenny Westwood 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(1):125-136
Student performance in and attitudes towards oral and written assessments were compared using quantitative and qualitative methods. Two separate cohorts of students were examined. The first larger cohort of students (n = 99) was randomly divided into ‘oral’ and ‘written’ groups, and the marks that they achieved in the same biology questions were compared. Students in the second smaller cohort (n = 29) were all examined using both written and oral questions concerning both ‘scientific’ and ‘personal development’ topics. Both cohorts showed highly significant differences in the mean marks achieved, with better performance in the oral assessment. There was no evidence of particular groups of students being disadvantaged in the oral tests. These students and also an additional cohort were asked about their attitudes to the two different assessment approaches. Although they tended to be more nervous in the face of oral assessments, many students thought oral assessments were more useful than written assessments. An important theme involved the perceived authenticity or ‘professionalism’ of an oral examination. This study suggests that oral assessments may be more inclusive than written ones and that they can act as powerful tools in helping students establish a ‘professional identity’. 相似文献
15.
The assessment of quality in higher education from the perspective of students has three dimensions: students’ assessment of teaching, students’ satisfaction and students’ learning engagement. These differ in conceptions of quality, evaluation methods, evaluation content, evaluation purposes, traits and priorities. The authors conducted three rounds of empirical investigations to study higher education quality assessment from students’ perspective and concluded that students play multiple roles in higher education evaluation and assessment, all of which can be improved by strengthening students’ objectivity and participation, evaluating the added value of a college education oriented to student development and taking the students’ perspective as an important way to contribute to higher education quality enhancement, assurance and control, and make proper use of higher education evaluations and assessments. 相似文献
16.
Maria Weurlander Magnus Söderberg Max Scheja Håkan Hult Annika Wernerson 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(6):747-760
This study aims to provide a greater insight into how formative assessments are experienced and understood by students. Two different formative assessment methods, an individual, written assessment and an oral group assessment, were components of a pathology course within a medical curriculum. In a cohort of 70 students, written accounts were collected from 17 students and group interviews were carried out to explore the students’ experiences of these two forms of assessment. All students were engaged in both assessment methods, which were conducted a few weeks apart, and data were collected soon after each assessment. Our findings suggest that formative assessments motivate students to study, make them aware of what they have learned and where they need to study more. Thus, formative assessment can act as a tool for learning, contributing to the process and outcomes of learning. A closer look at students’ experiences of each form of assessment reveals interesting differences. 相似文献
17.
18.
Context-based science courses stimulate students to reconstruct the information presented by connecting to their prior knowledge and experiences. However, students need support. Formative assessments inform both teacher and students about students’ knowledge deficiencies and misconceptions and how students can be supported. Research on formative assessments suggests a positive impact on students’ science achievement, although its success depends on how the formative assessment is implemented in class. The aim of this study was to provide insights into the effects of formative assessments on achievement during a context-based chemistry course on lactic acid. In a classroom action research setting, a pre-test/post-test control group design with switching replications was applied. Student achievement was measured in two pre-tests, two post-tests and a retention test. Participants were Grade 9 students from one secondary school in the Netherlands. Repeated-measures analysis showed a significant effect of formative assessments on students’ achievement. During the implementation of the formative assessments, intriguing discussions emerged between students, between students and teacher, and between teachers. Adding formative assessments to context-based approaches reinforces their strength to meet with the current challenges of chemistry education. Formative assessments affect students’ achievement positively and stimulate feedback between students and teacher(s). 相似文献
19.
Ann-Christine Wennergren 《欧洲特需教育杂志》2013,28(4):541-550
The study was conducted in a school for special education with small classes of six to 12 students. The aim was to illuminate how students’ understanding of written assessments could be related to assessment for learning. Twenty-nine students were asked to describe their understanding of written assessment in three different subjects and, further, to describe their perceptions in follow-up interviews. The two-step analysis first focused on individual understanding. Thereafter Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) was used as analytical tool. In the first analysis three categories were identified. Students’ understandings were related to subject matter knowledge, generic skills and attitudes. The findings of the second analysis indicated that written assessment often lacked formative features and cannot be seen as learning in the ZPD. Difficulties with schoolwork were seen as problems of the individual and the measures were directed towards the student. Even though the guidelines ask for a relational perspective a categorical perspective sometimes was adopted in the assessments. The implications of the study relate to the ways teacher’s assessment competences can encompass students’ understanding and how this can be translated into action. 相似文献
20.
States use standards‐based English language proficiency (ELP) assessments to inform relatively high‐stakes decisions for English learner (EL) students. Results from these assessments are one of the primary criteria used to determine EL students’ level of ELP and readiness for reclassification. The results are also used to evaluate the effectiveness of and funding allocation to district or school programs that serve EL students. In an effort to provide empirical validity evidence for such important uses of ELP assessments, this study focused on examining the constructs of ELP assessments as a fundamental validity issue. Particularly, the study examined the types of language proficiency measured in three sample states’ ELP assessments and the relationship between each type of language proficiency and content assessment performance. The results revealed notable variation in the presence of academic and social language in the three ELP assessments. A series of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses also revealed varied relationships among social language proficiency, academic language proficiency, and content assessment performance. The findings highlight the importance of examining the constructs of ELP assessments for making appropriate interpretations and decisions based on the assessment scores for EL students. Implications for policy and practice are discussed. 相似文献