共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 843 毫秒
1.
2.
浅析微博传播过程中议程设置的反作用 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
麦库姆斯和萧于1972年发表题为《大众传播媒介的议程设置功能》一文,对"议程设置"假说进行了实证检验。自此,该理论成为舆论引导行为的主要传播学理论基础之一。成立于传统媒体发展阶段的议程设置理论在新媒体环境下,不仅遭受质疑,而且又有新的进步和拓展。有学者指出议程设置已经从问题设置(想什么)转向属性设置(怎么想),从而反作用于传统媒体内容生产方式。本文即以微博为切入点来探究这一转变背后的某种内在联系和机制,以期进一步揭示舆论引导行为的规律,探讨微博在议程设置过程中呈现的反作用。 相似文献
3.
议程设置理论视角下舆论引导的“度” 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
议程设置与舆论引导的关联性
议程设置理论最早是用于研究大众传播效果的一种假设。所谓“议程”就是对当前问题进行选择性的报道,对选中的事情进行不同程度的报道。1972年,麦库姆斯和肖发表了关于议程设置理论假设的第一项系统研究成果,他们提出：媒介对某一事物的强调程度同公众对同一事物的重视程度成正比。 相似文献
4.
自1972年麦库姆斯和肖明确提出议程设置的概念以来,议程设置就逐渐成为西方大众传播研究领域中最重要的理论之一。Blumler曾经指出议程设置理论是大众传播研究中最值得研究的一种理论。[1]对此,一些传播学者对西方的传播研 相似文献
5.
议程设置理论概览:过去,现在与未来 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
本文对议程设置理论的五个研究领域,即议程设置的基本效果、属性议程设置、议程设置效果的心理学、媒介议程的来源和议程设置效果的后果,自该理论创立以来所取得的主要发现作了简要回顾,并基于此讨论了议程设置理论的几个新研究领域,包括对议程设置理论基本概念与观点的在更多新领域的应用,比如企业声誉、教育、宗教组织等,这些新领域已远不是议程设置理论最初生成的公共事务领域了。作为该理论的创立者之一,作者在文章最后提出了对于议程设置研究的几点个人观察。 相似文献
6.
议程设置是传播效果研究领域的经典理论。研究学者发现,传媒议程在影响公众议程方面具有相当大的作用,充分运用议程设置功能,可更好地实现媒介的舆论引导功能。引申出的研究认为,议程设置可分为政策议程、媒体议程与公众议程三个阶段,而这三个阶段又相辅相成,互相影响。两次参与中三角报道,我一直关注其媒介传播效果。可以发现,在中三角报道中,能清晰地理出一条从媒体议程、公众议程和政策议程的叠加 相似文献
7.
一、研究问题的提出
从1968年查普希尔调查开始,研究学界不断发展和完善议程设置理论,不过专注于该理论的大多数学者兴趣点在于大众媒介的效果,即议程设置理论最成熟的部分是关注媒介议程与公众议程之间的联系.①但是,对于分析研究影响公众议程的因素而言,大众媒介并不是唯一的可考察对象.学者们便开始思考:究竟是谁设置了媒介议程?谁决定了将哪些话题带入公众关注的视野? 相似文献
8.
从“周久耕事件”看网络社区的议程设置 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
自大众媒体产生以来,大众传播的效果问题一直为人们所关注。早期的传播学者认为受众在传播中处于完全被动的地位。但随着传播学的发展,一些传播学者提出了议程设置理论。美国学者塞弗林和坦卡德认为“媒介的议程设置功能就是指媒介这样的一种能力,通过反复播出某类新闻报道,强化该话题在公众心目中的重要程度”。传统媒体里的议程设置理论已经被广泛的研究和证实了,但是网络中特别是网络社区的议程设置理论的研究还较少。本文采用内容分析的方法,通过“周久耕事件”个案来探究网络社区的议程设置。 相似文献
9.
本文从理论渊源、发展历程、取得的突出成果、研究新领域等方面,对议程设置理论的研究概况作了简要梳理。按麦库姆斯的观点,议程设置研究已经进入第二个层次属性议程设置,即由研究议题显著度从媒介议程向公众议程的传播转向检验属性显著度的传播。议程设置理论已经不仅仅是在传播学领域中得以运用,目前的研究已经扩展到了社会其他相关领域。 相似文献
10.
议程设置、框架理论和铺垫理论是三个经常被共同讨论的理论模式。从传播学史看,它们都为研究媒介内容与公众意见的关系提供了新的视角和方法。其中,铺垫理论借鉴了心理学概念,从微观角度探讨了议程设置如何发生的过程。然而,这一理论在从心理学借用到传播学领域的过程中,由于缺乏方法和成熟的范式、以及研究对象的不同,其原初意义和应用环境都发生了迁移,这也使得传播学者对铺垫效果的关注相对有限。 相似文献
11.
Current Critical Problems in Agenda-Setting Research 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
After experiencing steady development over the past three decades,agenda-setting research appears to be in a period of flux. Thispaper discusses three current and critical problems that agenda-settingresearch has been facing recently: the problems of process,identity, and environment. These problems are critical becauseeach has implications that might call into question the valueof agenda-setting theory. The process problem concerns the natureof the agenda-setting process, specifically, the degree to whichthe agenda-setting process is automatic and unthinking. Theidentity problem asks whether the new concept of attribute agendasetting will become indistinguishable from framing or traditionalpersuasion research. The environment problem asks if the developmentof communication technology and the subsequent growth in thenumber and variety of news outlets will minimize the impactof media agenda setting at the social level, leading to fragmentationof the public agenda. After examining each of the problems,I suggest that the agenda-setting perspective is still worthpursuing, and I present an agenda that agenda-setting researchshould address for its future development. 相似文献
12.
议程设置的第二层与媒体政治——从《事关重要的新闻》说起 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
本文通过分析艾英戈与金德的《事关重要的新闻》 ,讨论了这本书在议程设置理论发展中的重要作用。它不仅通过实验的方法从内在效度上印证了议程设置 ,而且促进了议程设置第二层的研究。本文结合该书突出贡献———铺垫效果的评介 ,兼对其理论来源与意义进行了梳理 ,并以此为出发点 ,探讨了议程设置的第二层研究。最后 ,强调了电视的政治传播方面的意义和议程设置理论在中国的适用问题。 相似文献
13.
新媒介环境下议程设置理论研究新进路的分析 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
议程设置理论是传播学和新闻学的关键理论之一。当下媒介环境发生变化,传统的传播模式正在被颠覆,延续传统媒介环境下议程设置思路,研究遇到困境。根据新媒介环境下议程设置形成的新模式,我们提出新的研究假设和新的议题显要性转移图,并做一分析,在新媒介环境下,由多元个体组成的社群通过互联网等新媒介对于人们想什么或者怎么想具有重要作用,个体和社群议程是大众媒介议程的重要补充源,不局限于以媒体议程设置为中心的单一研究方向,把使用新媒介的个体和社群对媒体议程的作用纳入研究的重点范畴,重视新媒介的平台作用,最后提出了新的议程设置的效果地图,归纳出了研究的新重点。 相似文献
14.
As agenda-setting theory moves toward its 50th anniversary, its productivity in the past and at present augurs a highly promising future. In this essay, the original theorists trace the development of agenda setting and identify seven distinct facets. They explore three of the seven facets—need for orientation, network agenda setting, and agendamelding—in greater detail because those are particularly active arenas of contemporary research. Grounded in more than 40 years of productive collaboration among the authors, this inaugural Deutschmann Scholars Essay offers numerous new ideas about recent trends in and future directions for agenda-setting theory and research. The three authors are all recipients of AEJMC's Paul J. Deutschmann Award for Excellence in Research recognizing a career of scholarly achievement. The Deutschmann scholars observed that this may well be the most original article they have ever written together. 相似文献
15.
议程设置功能理论在广告传播中有着广泛的运用。本文从议程设置功能理论入手,具体分析了ADIDAS广告中议题设置的主要方式及其主要特点。 相似文献
16.
Leo W. Jeffres Kimberly Neuendorf Cheryl Campanella Bracken David Atkin 《Mass Communication and Society》2013,16(4):470-491
In an earlier period of mass communication research, scholars were more adventuresome in advancing “new” theories and less hesitant to “create” theory. The 1970s, in particular, bore witness to the emergence of several such theories—from the knowledge gap and agenda-setting to cultivation. Scholars have generated substantial literatures elaborating work in these and other traditions. Those contributions are now sufficiently robust that it is time to direct some of our energies toward synthesizing theories. This article nominates third-person perception as a candidate for such integration. Several prominent theories of media effects in the mass communication literature are selected to illustrate how the theories can or have been integrated. Results from three surveys provided evidence that the theories of third-person perception, agenda-setting and cultivation can be interrelated. The proposition examined here can serve as a model for further integration of other media theories. This integration attempt harkened back to the times when theory building in media effects was more common and perhaps more optimistic about explaining processes of influence. 相似文献
17.
国外新媒体环境下的议程设置研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
新媒体环境下媒体的议程设置功能是否依然有效是议程设置研究领域中迫切需要回答的问题。国外学者近年来对这一问题的研究主要集中在两个方面:一是检验新媒体环境下媒体对受众是否具有议程设置的功能,二是检验新媒体环境下的媒介间议程设置效果。现有研究表明,在新媒体环境下媒体对受众具有议程设置功能;网络媒体与传统媒体之间、网络媒体自身之间存在媒介间的议程设置效果。 相似文献
18.
《Mass Communication and Society》2013,16(2-3):297-316
Agenda-setting, priming, and framing research generally has been examined under the broad category of cognitive media effects. As a result, studies often either examine all 3 approaches in a single study or employ very similar research designs, paying little attention to conceptual differences or differences in the levels of analysis under which each approach is operating. In this article, I revisit agenda-setting, priming, and framing as distinctively different approaches to effects of political communication. Specifically, I argue against more recent attempts to subsume all 3 approaches under the broad concept of agenda-setting and for a more careful explication of the concepts and of their theoretical premises and roots in social psychology and political psychology. Consequently, it calls for a reformulation of relevant research questions and a systematic categorization of research on agenda-setting, priming, and framing. An analytic model is developed that should serve as a guideline for future research in these areas. 相似文献
19.
Yang Cheng 《亚洲交流杂志》2016,26(4):319-332
Through two separate studies in the context of Hong Kong, a Chinese society, this research tests the third-level agenda-setting effects and examines the differences between the explicit and implicit public agendas based on the attributes consciously and unconsciously reported by the public. A total of 1667 news reports and 680 responses to a public survey are collected for analysis. Evidence from both studies shows strong attribute agenda-setting effects at the third level, no matter the focus of the issue is obtrusive or unobtrusive. Results also demonstrate that the media agenda is positively associated at a higher level with the implicit public agenda than the explicit one. Findings well extend the network agenda-setting research. 相似文献
20.
Mike Gruszczynski 《Mass Communication and Society》2017,20(3):378-402
Although the theory of agenda-setting is a pillar of political communication research, understanding the dynamics of public attention remains an important challenge as the communication system becomes increasingly fragmented. The development of ideologically oriented niche media and the ability of the mainstream media to carefully track the interests of their audience suggest that both public interest and niche media attention to an issue could affect the mainstream media’s agenda itself. We develop and test the theory of agenda-uptake to isolate when mainstream media influences both public and niche media attention to issues and when public interest and niche media attention influence the mainstream media to cover an issue. Analyzing mainstream and niche media coverage along with Google Trends individual search data for 4 issues in 2008, we provide evidence that the dynamics of agenda-uptake are crucial to understanding the character and content of the information environment in the 21st century. 相似文献