共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
目录号是表述全宗内各案卷排放序列的代号.通常档案经过系统整理、分类立卷后,就要用档号来反映和巩固其整理的成果.档号包括全宗号、目录号、案卷号、件、页(张)号,每个号直接相关的下位号不允许有重号.目录号作为档号的组成部分,在全宗号与案卷号之间起着承上启下的作用,它不仅巩固了案卷分类排列的顺序,而且为档案的保管利用奠定了基础.因此,目录号的编制,是档号编制过程的一个重要环节. 相似文献
5.
<正>《档号编制规则》(DA/T13-94)中,档号是指档案馆(室)在整理和管理档案的过程中,以字符形式赋予档案的一组代码,由全宗号、案卷目录号、类别号、项目号、案卷号、件号、页(张)号等组成,年度不是其中的构成要件,所以档号中是没有年度这个内容的。随着时间的发展、档案门类的增加、档案整理方法的变化,笔者认为,档案整理中按年度编卷号或件号的档案,其档号中应该加入"年度"这个要素。原因主要有两点: 相似文献
6.
档号是档案馆（室）在整理和管理档案的过程中，用数字或字母表示档案来源、类别、排列次序及其相互关系的一组符号。在档案馆各项工作中，档号作为档案保管单位的标识符号，直接与档案的移交、接收、著录、编目、统计、保护和提供利用等工作环节发生联系。规范档号编制对实现档案科学和现代化管理具有重要的意义。下面，谈些个人的看法。一、档案馆档号规范化标准的选择国家档案局１９９５年发布的“档号编制规则”中明确规定档号有三种结构：（１）全宗号———案卷目录号———案卷号———件（页）号；（２）全宗号———类别号———案… 相似文献
7.
档号编制的基本方法有两种,即流水编号法和分类编号法.运用流水编号法形成的档号体系由全宗号、目录号、案卷号、页号组成;运用分类编号法形成的档号体系由全宗号、分类号、案卷号、页号构成. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
在调查比较中英文献中日益增多的档案多元现象的基础上,归纳了国外档案多元论代表性作者的代表性学术观点,探究了档案多元论与档案中立说及文件连续体管理模式和文件管理信息学的关系,讨论了档案多元论对档案教育与研究的影响以及对档案实践应用的启示。 相似文献
12.
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》1987,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided.This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
13.
A first introduction to archival science 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》2001,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts
of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised
point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as
a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is
anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation
has been avoided.
The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the
Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education
and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996
courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate
and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version
has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a
result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed
as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special
mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who
commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible.
An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman,
F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20. 相似文献
14.
Catherine Bailey 《Archival Science》2005,5(2-4):361-364
The author, who is Guest Reviews Editor for this special issue on macro-appraisal, introduces and provides context for four
review articles, written by archival educators from Canada, the United States, and Australia, that discuss the most important
works they use to teach macroappraisal and why these works are chosen. While each article demonstrates the unique characteristics
of the archival education program in which the author is situated, they are united by a common theme—the need for educators
to prepare students, as best they can, to take their places as practising professional archivists. 相似文献
15.
16.
Terry Cook 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(1):15-37
This essay is a preliminary assessment of David Bearman as the leading archival thinker of the late twentieth century. Bearman has revolutionized thinking in archival circles around the world by offering a defence of traditional archival notions of provenance, evidence, recordness, and contextuality that equals the noblest statements of a Hilary Jenkinson, and by positing a relevant, dynamic, engaged future for archivists to transform the Information Age into a Record-Keeping Age. The essay is both a personal reflection and critical analysis. There are three main themes: an assessment of Bearman's ideas and their overall importance to general archival theory; a more specific exposition of the nature and importance of the University of Pittsburgh Project and of where Bearman sees that its results are leading archivists and their profession and institutions in future; and a critique of some of the implications, if not the conscious intentions, of his ideas and methods that seem to exclude the cultural, historical, and heritage dimensions and uses of archives, public or private. The overall aim of the essay is to push the archival discourse to the next stage by challenging and constructively critiquing as well as extolling the work of this archival pioneer. 相似文献
17.
本文结合文献计量分析法和文献研读法,对2022年《档案学研究》和《档案学通讯》所刊发的207篇学术论文进行研究力量布局与研究主题分布分析,并与2021年分析结果相比较,发现高等院校仍是档案学研究的主体力量,来自业界的研究力量有所增强。2022年中国档案学研究依旧关注“档案学基础理论”“档案治理”“档案与数字人文”“电子文件”“中国古文书学”等主题,但也涌现了“红色档案”和“档案学科建设与发展”等新主题;研究特点上呈现显著的本土化和跨学科性,但在关注“人”的需求、跨学科的双向互动以及研究深度上仍有待加强。未来中国档案学研究仍需立足中国档案工作的实际和需求,对从西方移植的理论进行本土化、中国化的过滤和处理,对中国传统的档案思想进行创新性转化和发展,同时,基于档案工作、档案事业发展的新实践和新需求,提出新的思想和理论。 相似文献
18.
我们在工作总结中，将近15年来的档案利用情况做了一个统计。作为山西日报报业集团的档案室，其档案数赶有限，利用的规模也不大。档案工作的标准化、规范化程度不高，档案利用的记录过于简单，所以统计结果难免有以点盖面、以偏概全之嫌。但多少总能给我们一点启示。 相似文献
19.
企业贯标并不是什么新鲜的事情了,尤其是我国入世以后国内很多企业纷纷向中国认证中心申请认证,目的是提高本企业产品的质量信誉度,顺利进入国际市场。江西铜业集团公司作为省属特大型国有企业在2002年正式向中国认证中心申报了国际标准化认证,即推行ISO9001标准。公司所属档案 相似文献
20.
中国档案学研究内容广博,外国档案学研究内容精深;中国档案学研究主体以高校档案专业教师为主,外国档案学研究主体以档案实际工作者为主;中国档案学研究方法以定性描述为主,外国档案学研究方法以实证研究为主。中外档案学研究的明显差异性不是偶然出现的,它与中外档案事业管理体制、教育体系和各国研究历史传统、档案职业专业化水平等诸多因素都有关系,在本文中,作者对产生这三个方面差异的原因进行了分析。 相似文献