共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 359 毫秒
1.
COUNTER Release 5旨在应对不断变化的电子资源,提供可靠、一致和可对比的使用统计数据。文章分析了COUNTER Release 5的规范并探索其在中国高校图书馆数字资源采购联盟(DRAA)中的应用。研究发现,与COUNTER Release 4相比,Release 5有了明显的变化,包括定义了全新的报告体系、统计指标类型、RESTful SUSHI接口等技术细节。为在DRAA中应用COUNTER Release 5,需要从两个方面改进:一是让统计模块兼容COUNTER Release 5的数据模型,使COUNTER Release 5的统计数据可以融入现有的统计模型;二是需要新增RESTful SUSHI接口的客户端及文件解析器,让系统可以获取并解析到COUNTER Release 5的报告。 相似文献
2.
Peter T. Shepherd 《Learned Publishing》2003,16(3):201-205
COUNTER was formally launched in March 2002. Within a year Release 1 of the COUNTER Code of Practice had been published, and a number of leading publishers were working towards making their usage reports COUNTER‐compliant. This article describes the background to COUNTER, the main features of the Code of Practice, the current status of its implementation and the next steps for the project. It also stresses the particular benefits to publishers of COUNTER compliance and of COUNTER membership. 相似文献
3.
本文通过对比COUNTER第四版与第三版,发现第四版在如下方面具有很多新特征。在文档结构上,使用一个规范代替原来的两个规范;在术语及测量指标方面,新增"金色开放获取"、"多媒体全文内容单元"、"记录浏览"、"结果点击"等术语;在数据元素上,新增数字对象标识符、所有权标识符及机构标识符;在使用报告上,新增开放获取文章的使用统计报告、多媒体资源使用报告及基于移动设备的使用报告,并对原有报告做了不少调整;在审核上,新增对SUSHI协议遵循情况的审核。未来的COUNTER将继续探索与SUSHI的结合应用,探索新的期刊测量指标,增加文章级的使用评价指标。 相似文献
4.
在电子资源利用统计领域具有较大影响的COUNTER规范发布了第五版,探讨其变化、特征及应用趋势,可为图书馆优化电子资源管理提供借鉴。文章从体系结构、报告要素及实施维护等方面对规范的新旧版本进行系统对比,解读关键变化及作用;结合新规范的特性,讨论可能的创新应用场景。新规范具有清晰的体系结构和易于扩展的报告模型,实现了简单性与灵活性的统一。新规范整合了指标定义并细化用户资源访问行为的统计粒度,增强了用户行为统计的一致性。新规范的实施可支撑图书馆开展电子资源利用指标验证和用户行为分析研究,推动研究数据集等领域资源利用统计的标准化,可为我国相关标准的制定与维护提供参照。 相似文献
5.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3):366-372
Since its inception in 2002, COUNTER has given hope to many librarians charged with collecting usage data for their online collections. This hope turned to optimism in 2007 with the release of SUSHI (Standardized Usage Harvesting Initiative) as a NISO standard (Z39.93). In 2009 release 3 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for Journals and Databases takes effect and with it are some significant advances that will turn hopes and optimism into realities. This article describes the changes and their implications. 相似文献
6.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2017,73(3-4):195-207
A new release of the COUNTER Code of Practice, Release 5 (R5), was recently published and becomes the standard that publishers and content providers must comply with when they deliver the January 2019 usage data to their customers. This article provides an overview of what’s new in R5, draws some comparisons to the previous code of practice, and discusses the implications for librarians. 相似文献
7.
8.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3-4):353-365
The Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) Code of Practice and Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI) are two standards whose successful adoption will greatly assist librarians in performing accurate and timely usage analysis of their online collections and thus make more informed collection management decisions. Variations in how these standards have been applied by content providers to their SUSHI and COUNTER implementation are currently impacting their widespread adoption. The standards themselves are not broken—what is needed is concise guidelines on their implementation. This column reviews some of the roadblocks that impede consistent implementation of these standards as well as proposes recommendations that could form the basis of a community profile for these standards. 相似文献
9.
Peter T. Shepherd 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(4):287-293
The article gives an update on the progress with COUNTER to May 2005. In particular it describes the draft Code of Practice for books and reference works and the results of actual use of COUNTER‐compliant data in the journals area. 相似文献
10.
Established in 2014, Usus (Latin for usage), supported by Counting Online Usage of NeTworked Electronic Resources (COUNTER), but editorially independent, is a community-run website designed to provide a space for librarians, consortia, publishers, aggregators, repository managers, and scholars to discuss all aspects of usage, including particular ways that use is measured. In this session, Usus Supervisory Board members provided an introduction to Usus, outlined the purpose of the community-run site, and discussed how librarians may utilize the site to submit ongoing and complex usage issues. In addition, the presenters engaged attendees in discussing specific e-resource usage issues they have encountered as well as report changes and additions in the recently released COUNTER Code of Practice 4. 相似文献
11.
Nancy Beals 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(2):213-228
In May and June 2011, separate surveys were undertaken of scholarly journal publishers and academic librarians, designed to obtain a better understanding of the issues they face when journal titles move between publishers. In addition, the survey aimed to establish the extent to which both groups were aware of the Transfer Code of Practice and, if they were, whether its existence had helped improve the situation. This article summarizes the findings of these two surveys and describes the next steps in the development of the Code of Practice. 相似文献
12.
13.
COUNTER--网络化电子资源使用统计的新标准 总被引：20，自引：2，他引：18
自《COUNTER实施规范》于2002年3月发布以来,已为越来越多的出版商所采用,作为规范电子资源利用统计数据的采集、报告和传递的标准,图书馆有了更可靠、稳定的依据来评价和比较本馆电子资源的价值和使用情况。文章详细介绍了该规范的起源、核心内容及其发展动向。 相似文献
14.
Oliver PESCH 《Learned Publishing》2007,20(1):23-29
In 2005, SUSHI became the latest buzzword in the library community. This article (and this kind of SUSHI) refers to usage data, not raw fish. The growth of online collections has resulted in libraries demanding that publishers provide detailed usage data to allow them to better manage their collections and purchases. The Project COUNTER Code of Practice was created in response to this need; however, it did not address the painstaking task of collection and management of the usage data. SUSHI is a new protocol developed to allow for automated retrieval of COUNTER usage reports from publishers and other content providers. 相似文献
15.
[目的/意义]介绍Make Data Count与COUNTER联合推出的《研究数据使用统计实施规范》，为数据级别计量提供新指标与新视角。[方法/过程]通过对标准文本的分析，介绍该规范的提出背景、目标、范围、相关概念及核心内容，通过案例剖析Dash、DataONE、Zenodo及其他7个数据存储库对《规范》的应用情况。[结果/结论]研究数据的使用统计具有其独特之处，《规范》的推出可对数据引用及数据替代计量形成补充进而描述完整的科研学术影响力。目前遵循该规范的数据存储库还不多，为推动数据使用计量的应用，需要标准组织、科研人员、机构库及数据存储库、出版商、科研机构及资助机构、图书馆等不同利益相关者在数据产生、管理、传播与利用等环节的相互合作。 相似文献
16.
依据中国学科分类国家标准《学科分类与代码》,揭示了我国学术期刊的学科分布状况,并从人均期刊数和论文产出率两个角度对各个学科的期刊进行横向比较和评价,对部分学科还进行了中美两国之间的论文生产率比较研究。结果表明,中国学术期刊存在着学科结构不合理的现象。 相似文献
17.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(2):107-125
Project Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) released its first code of practice in 2002. Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI) was introduced in 2007 as a way of automating the harvesting of COUNTER reports. Both initiatives have been well adopted yet there is still confusion about how to implement SUSHI. This column offers a primer for library staff wanting to take advantage of the benefits of SUSHI. It starts with a quick review of both COUNTER and SUSHI, then covers options for SUSHI clients, examines SUSHI configuration requirements, demonstrates how to use SUSHI to obtain a COUNTER report and shows an example of working with a COUNTER Journal Reports in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format to create a spreadsheet with a simple cost-per-use and package analysis. By the end the reader should gain enough knowledge to configure a SUSHI client, successfully harvest COUNTER statistics and to perform some basic analysis on that usage. 相似文献
18.
COUNTER与电子资源的使用评估 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
概括介绍COUNTER的实施规范及其统计机理,详细阐述COUNTER的统计内容、统计方法、报告的交付等,并结合国家图书馆电子资源的订购情况,对不同电子资源系统的统计功能进行比较。 相似文献
19.
Eti Herman John Akeroyd Gaelle Bequet David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(3):213-229
This article presents an up‐to‐date portrayal of the greatly changed landscape of scholarly journal publishing and identifies the emerging trends characterizing it. We consider the attributes, novelty, and disruptive potential of different models, which range from improvements to the extant model to attempts at reconfiguration and transformation. We propose that journal transition can be seen as falling into three categories. The first is enhanced models of the traditional scholarly journal, which typically afford enriched functionality that breaks the bonds of the printed page whilst otherwise remaining wholly traditional in their offerings. The second category is innovative models of the traditional scholarly journal, which aim at supporting the journal in performing its traditional roles through convention‐altering ways. The third category is the possible alternatives to the traditional journal, which represent a move towards alternative modes of knowledge dissemination. This review shows that each of the models identified makes contributions to enriching the reporting and showcasing of scholarly output. They also make it more effective and more efficient. However, we conclude that none of the possible alternatives being discussed can serve as a full‐fledged alternative to the journal. 相似文献
20.
Jill O'Neill 《Learned Publishing》2000,13(2):105-109
The journal impact factor, as a metric developed in the mid‐1960s by Dr Eugene Garfield and Dr Irving Sher, represents the influence that an ‘average article’ published in a specific journal has on the scholarly discipline and audience that it serves. Originally intended to serve as an equalizer for use by the Institute for Scientific Information® (ISI®) in making comparative evaluations of large and small journals in a particular discipline, the impact factor now has numerous applications for publishers, librarians, and researchers. Ideally, the journal impact factor should be seen by publishers as a useful tool in gauging the effectiveness of their publication product in serving the needs of a particular scholarly community. The significance of a journal impact factor, its appropriate usage by the scholarly publishing community and its extension into the electronic environment are discussed. 相似文献