共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Academic dishonesty has been an important issue. However, only few researches had been done in Asian countries, especially
a nationwide study. A sample of 2,068 college students throughout Taiwan was selected and surveyed on four domains of academic
dishonesty, including: cheating on test, cheating on assignment, plagiarism, and falsifying documents. The major findings
of this study were: (1) the prevalence rate for all types of dishonesty behaviors among college students in Taiwan was 61.72%;
(2) the top five most practiced academic dishonesty behaviors in Taiwan are provided paper or assignment for another student,
gave prohibited help to others on their assignment, copied others’ assignments, passed answers to other students, and copied
from other students; (3) students’ attitudes correlated with behaviors in all four domains of academic dishonesty; (4) females
reported less acceptable to and behaved less academic dishonesty behaviors than males; and (5) freshmen had more dishonest
practices than other class ranks. 相似文献
2.
加强高校考试管理促进考风考纪建设 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
蒋伯棋 《福建师大福清分校学报》2006,(1):113-117
本文针对高校学生考试作弊现象,分析作弊原因与危害,探讨如何有效地防范高校学生考试作弊。 相似文献
3.
通过调查研究,对大学生考试作弊现象运用心理学的方法与理论进行了剖析,指出大学生考试作弊现象的形成及其愈演愈烈,是外因与内因共同作用的结果。 相似文献
4.
基于大学生考试作弊的现实演变,本文运用问卷调查和访谈的方法对西部某高校大学生作弊的现状、成因及行为发生机制进行了相关研究。结果表明:(1)大学生考试作弊具有普遍性,作弊行为已经进入到一些学生的基本价值体系,形成一种"作弊文化";(2)来自城乡的学生,在"对作弊的认识倾向"、"作弊动机"变量上有显著差异;(3)不同性别的学生,在"对作弊的认识倾向"、"作弊动机层面"、"管理制度层面"、"作弊原因"等方面有显著差异;(4)不同年级的学生,在"对作弊的认识和态度"上有显著差异;(5)不同专业的学生,在"作弊动机"变量上有显著差异;(6)作弊方式多样,并带有明显的时代技术特征;(7)学生对作弊的认识和态度有不同的倾向、攀比心理的影响、考试试题的结构与性质、教学管理过程的松懈、考试与评价方面的不合理性、教师监考的松懈等是促成学生作弊的重要因素。作者在指出作弊现状、分析作弊成因及其发生机制的基础上,提出了防止作弊或尽量减少作弊的干预性建议。 相似文献
5.
高师生考试作弊现象分析及对策 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
考试是教学工作中的重要环节，是检查教学质量，评价学生学业水平的重要手段。然而考试过程中的作弊现象严重地损害了考试的公正性和严肃性，使考试失去了应有作用。就此，本文对高师生考试作弊现象进行较为全面，深入的分析，并结合师院院校的特点提出具有针对性的，可操作性的放对策。 相似文献
6.
7.
在历时1300年的科举考试当中,始终存在舞弊与防弊的尖锐斗争。科举考试中的舞弊行为可以分为考前舞弊、考试当中的现场舞弊和考后阅卷录取舞弊三大类。少数违规者的舞弊行径,不仅累及绝大多数清白士子,甚至在一定程度上挟持了整个科举考试的管理理念、管理制度和管理措施。今天,考试中的舞弊行为有愈演愈烈之势,舞弊行为也表现出一些新的动向和特点,如高科技化、团伙化、职业化、内外勾结等。治理考试舞弊,需要多管齐下,使考生不想舞弊、不敢舞弊、不能舞弊、不需舞弊。在防范和打击舞弊的同时,还需科学处理严格管理与以人为本的关系、防范舞弊与代价适度的关系、考试内容与管理手段的关系。 相似文献
8.
Studies suggest that people who cheat on a test overestimate their performance on future tests. Given that erroneous monitoring of one's own cognitive processes impairs learning and memory, this study investigated whether cheating on a test would harm monitoring accuracy on future tests. Participants had the incentive and opportunity to cheat on one (Experiments 1, 2, and 3, with N = 90, 88, and 102, respectively) or two (Experiment 4, N = 214) of four general-knowledge tests. Cheating produced overconfidence in global-level performance predictions in Experiment 2 (Cohen's d ≥ 0.35) but not in Experiments 1 or 4. Also, cheating did not affect the absolute or relative accuracy of item-level performance predictions in Experiments 3 or 4. A Bayesian meta-analysis of all experiments provided evidence against cheating-induced overconfidence in global- and item-level predictions. Overall, our results demonstrate that people who cheat on tests accurately predict their performance on future tests. 相似文献
9.
大学生考试作弊处理中的法律保护 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
当前,考试作弊现象愈演愈烈,对作弊学生的处分也越来越严重,但忽视了对作弊大学生的法律保护。处分是手段而不是目的,加强高校管理的宗旨是为了培养具有健全人格、创新精神、实践能力的各种专门人才,而不是对学生动辄采取诸如开除学籍等严厉处分,处理作弊考生时应予以法律保护。 相似文献
10.
COLLEGE CHEATING IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Diekhoff George M. Labeff Emily E. Shinohara Kohei Yasukawa Hajime 《Research in higher education》1999,40(3):343-353
This paper reports the results of a survey onacademic dishonesty given to samples of 392 American and276 Japanese college students in 1994 and 1995. Our datarevealed both cross-cultural differences and similarities in cheating behavior andattitudes. Compared to American students, Japanesestudents reported a higher incidence rate of cheating onexams, a greater tendency to neutralize (i.e., justify) cheating, and a greater passivity in theirreactions to the observed cheating of others. Amongcheaters of both nationalities, Japanese students ratedsocial stigma and fear of punishment as less effective in deterring cheating than did Americanstudents. Our data also revealed cross-culturalsimilarities. Among noncheaters of both nationalities,guilt was the most effective deterrent. Among cheatersof both nationalities, fear of punishment was the mosteffective deterrent. And students of both cultures,cheaters and noncheaters alike, viewed social stigma asthe least effective deterrent to cheating. In both cultures, most students react to cheating byignoring it, about one-third react by resenting it, andactive reactions (i.e., reporting the cheating orconfronting the cheater) were seldom reported.Explanations for cross-cultural differences are suggested,and implications of these findings for efforts to reducecheating are discussed. 相似文献
11.
The purpose of this research was to examine student perceptions of academic integrity among faculty and peers at a sample
of public universities in Romania. The study explores the factors that influence academic dishonesty among college students
and compares the relative importance of faculty influences and peer influences on students’ intent to cheat. The study differs
from the existing literature on academic integrity in that it examines the degree to which student cheating in college is
influenced by the quality and relevance of instruction and the academic dishonesty of instructors and peers. 相似文献
12.
Today’s economics and business students are expected to be our future business people and potentially the economic leaders
and politicians of tomorrow. Thus, their beliefs and practices are liable to affect the definition of acceptable economics
and business ethics. The empirical evaluation of the phenomenon of cheating in academia has almost exclusively focused on
the US context, and non-US studies usually only cover a narrow range of countries. This paper presents a comprehensive, cross-country
study on the magnitude and determinants of cheating among economics and business undergraduates, involving 7,213 students
enrolled in 42 universities located in 21 countries from the American (4), European (14), Africa (2) and Oceania (1) Continents.
We found that the average magnitude of copying among economics and business undergraduates is quite high (62%) but there was
significant cross-country heterogeneity. The probability of cheating is significantly lower in students enrolled in schools
located in the Scandinavian, and the US and British Isles blocks when compared with their Southern European counterparts;
quite surprisingly this probability is also lower for the African block. On a distinctly different level, however, students
enrolled in schools in Western and especially Eastern European countries reveal statistically significant higher propensities
towards committing academic fraud. 相似文献
13.
通过简单的师生间的博弈分析,结合东华理工大学实际情况简要分析学生常用的作弊方式,提出一些解决及改进的对策。 相似文献
14.
Few studies investigating student cheating havereported statistical tests of difference regarding theeffects of variables across gender. Using scenario-basedsurvey data from 598 university students, this study examined differences between womenand men in mean levels and effects of explanatoryvariables on intentions to cheat on a college exam.Findings showed significant gender differences in mean scores on measures of low self-control, shame,perceived external sanctions, grades, and cheatingintentions. Regression analyses showed that the effectsof morals and grades were more pronounced in predicting women's cheating intentions, whereas men weremore affected by prior cheating and perceived pleasureof cheating. Analyses further showed that higher levelsof anticipated shame among women and less self-control among men accounted for most of the variationin cheating intentions between women and men. 相似文献
15.
考试舞弊本来只与考试本身有关,但是,高考作为连接中学教育与高等教育的桥梁,历来就对教育和社会发挥着重大而深远的影响。因此,大规模高考舞弊事件的发生,不仅意味着考试本身出现了问题,同时也清楚地折射出在教育和社会的某些方面正预示着某种程度的危机。了解这些危机,有助于从本质的层面认识高考 相似文献
16.
Phillip Dawson Wendy Sutherland-Smith Mark Ricksen 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(4):473-482
AbstractContract cheating happens when students outsource their assessed work to a third party. One approach that has been suggested for improving contract cheating detection is comparing students’ assignment submissions with their previous work, the rationale being that changes in style may indicate a piece of work has been written by somebody else. This approach is time consuming, but recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing suggest that it may be well suited to computerization. We trialed an early alpha version of Turnitin’s Authorship Investigate tool, which compares students’ submissions against their previous work. Twenty-four experienced markers from five units of study were asked to make decisions about the presence of contract cheating in bundles of 20 student assignments, which included 14 legitimate assignments and six purchased from contract cheating sites. We asked markers to determine if each assignment was contract cheating, then provided them with an Authorship Investigate report and let them change their decision. Marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating increased significantly, from 48% to 59% after using the report, with no significant difference in false positives. These findings suggest that software may be an effective component of institutional strategies to address contract cheating. 相似文献
17.
Although many studies have examined individual difference predictors of cheating, insufficient attention has been given to several important personality variables (the Big Five, perfectionism, and subclinical psychopathy). Moreover, insufficient use has been made of concrete indicators of naturalistic scholastic cheating. Using a computer-based behavioral measure, we examined the correlates of multiple-choice exam cheating in several large undergraduate classes. In Study 1, 291 participants completed a comprehensive battery of personality measures. Their cheating on several subsequent exams was best predicted by their level of subclinical psychopathy. A possible artifact is that those high in subclinical psychopathy are less scholastically competent—a factor known to predispose cheating. To address this possibility in Study 2 (N = 150), we included measures of cognitive ability and a pre-course knowledge test. After controlling for both ability and prior knowledge, subclinical psychopathy remained a significant predictor of cheating behavior. Demographic variables such as gender, ethnicity and major did not add significantly to the prediction of cheating. Implications for educators and researchers of cheating are discussed. 相似文献
18.
在当前各类考试中,作弊现象时有发生,而且大有愈演愈烈的趋势。如果任其发展,必然会败坏整个社会风气。因此,如何从根本上扭转考试作弊的现状,促进考风考纪的良性发展,已成为考试管理中急需解决的重要任务。本文在对考试作弊现象透析的基础上,力求做出较为深刻的原因分析,探索根治考试作弊的对策。 相似文献
19.
黄丽 《黄冈职业技术学院学报》2010,12(5):31-33
考试作弊破坏了考试的正常规则,通过对学生作弊原因、形式进行了分析,提出了加强诚信教育、营造公平竞争环境、改变教学和考试方法、加强考试管理、提高学生心理素质等几方面有力对策来防范学生考试作弊现象。 相似文献
20.
Charles B. Shrader Sue Pickard Ravenscroft Jeffrey B. Kaufmann Kyle Hansen 《Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education》2021,19(1):40-62
Although classroom cheating violates academic standards of behavior, it occurs frequently. Although the research on cheating is extensive, few researchers have interviewed students directly involved in cheating behaviors. We explore interview responses gathered from a cohort of graduate accounting students, some of whom colluded on an assignment, whereas others did not. We use Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a powerful text mining algorithm, as our primary tool to explore the underlying topical structure of the interviews and to demarcate subtle differences among students’ reactions to and explanations of their experience. Because LDA does not impose or require a priori theories, we use it to provide ideas for future research rather than to test extant theories about classroom collusion. We identify five primary topics that emerged from the accounting students’ reflections: (1) general course context (including honor code), (2) the rigor of the assignment, (3) student teams as support mechanisms, (4) the perceived repercussions of cheating (colluding), and (5) personality differences between the tax and audit track students. We find subtle language differences between colluders and noncolluders. Colluders considered the nature of the assignment and the difference between tax and audit majors more significant than noncolluders did. Additionally, the role of teams and the general institutional context were somewhat less relevant for colluders than for noncolluders. We conclude by exploring ethical and pedagogical implications of structuring courses as heavily team based for teaching and future research purposes. 相似文献