共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Despite the general consensus on the positive impact of formative assessment on student learning, researchers have not shown the underlying mechanisms between specific formative assessment strategies and academic performance on an international sample. This study examines the link between student and teacher reports of teachers’ formative assessment strategies (i.e. clarifying goals and monitoring progress, providing feedback, and instructional adjustments) and students’ reading achievement, based on data from 151,969 fifteen-year-olds in 5,225 schools in 19 countries/regions in PISA 2018 via multilevel analysis of plausible values. The results show that clarifying goals and monitoring progress, and instruction adjustments are positively linked to reading achievement, but providing feedback alone has no significant impact. These findings highlight the complexity of formative assessment as a multifaceted concept and the different impacts of formative assessment strategies on student learning. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed. 相似文献
2.
Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Ian Clark 《Educational Psychology Review》2012,24(2):205-249
The article draws from 199 sources on assessment, learning, and motivation to present a detailed decomposition of the values,
theories, and goals of formative assessment. This article will discuss the extent to which formative feedback actualizes and
reinforces self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies among students. Theoreticians agree that SRL is predictive of improved
academic outcomes and motivation because students acquire the adaptive and autonomous learning characteristics required for
an enhanced engagement with the learning process and subsequent successful performance. The theory of formative assessment
is found to be a unifying theory of instruction, which guides practice and improves the learning process by developing SRL
strategies among learners. In a postmodern era characterized by rapid technical and scientific advance and obsolescence, there
is a growing emphasis on the acquisition of learning strategies which people may rely on across the entire span of their life.
Research consistently finds that the self-regulation of cognitive and affective states supports the drive for lifelong learning
by: enhancing the motivational disposition to learn, enriching reasoning, refining meta-cognitive skills, and improving performance
outcomes. The specific purposes of the article are to provide practitioners, administrators and policy-makers with: (a) an
account of the very extensive conceptual territory that is the ‘theory of formative assessment’ and (b) how the goals of formative
feedback operate to reveal recondite learning processes, thereby reinforcing SRL strategies which support learning, improve
outcomes and actualize the drive for lifelong learning. 相似文献
3.
Philip Vickerman 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2009,34(2):221-230
Peer assessment is a common form of shared learning in which students provide feedback on each others work. Peer assessment takes many forms; and involves students and tutors taking various roles at different stages of the process. This study explores the views and opinions of undergraduate students in relation to their perceptions and experiences of formative peer assessment introduced as a learning development opportunity for the first time. The study found that on the whole formative peer assessment was a positive experience in enhancing students learning and development. However, consideration needs to be taken to address individual learning styles, as a limited number of students found the process to be less useful. Consequently, when tutors are constructing peer assessment strategies they should be cognisant at the planning stage of the variety of learning styles that are evident in order to maximise the development opportunities this can bring to students. 相似文献
4.
Richard K. Morton 《College Teaching》2013,61(4):136-137
Planning time for giving students effective feedback is an important and challenging aspect of the teaching and learning process. In our article we describe and analyze how we engage students as partners in providing formative feedback in time for students to modify their own thinking or behavior to improve learning. We have found ways to provide formative feedback more frequently and to involve students in providing effective formative feedback to each other. The four techniques we describe are the following: a) three-color group quiz with feedback on product, process, and progress; b) midterm student conferencing; c) shared revision of student generated questions and statements; and d) timely feedback using collaborative assignment blogs. These techniques give feedback in time for revisions to occur, provide scaffolding for learners, inform instruction, and most importantly, involve students as partners in assessment. These pedagogical strategies show that the resulting benefits of improved instruction, enhanced student learning, and better student products are worth the time and effort and contribute to a productive classroom climate where the focus is on learning more than on grading. Formative feedback involving students as partners is a key strategy to enhance the teaching and learning process. 相似文献
5.
形成性评价模式因其注重学生学习过程中的态度、策略、进展和师生间的及时反馈而被较多地应用于学习评价中。为建构一套以形成性评价为主的英语专业阅读课的评价体系,进行了为期一年的实证研究,结果表明新闻共享与互评、课堂测试与自我反思和教学互动等环节的形成性评价活动能够快速有效地提高学生的英语阅读能力。 相似文献
6.
伴随多媒体网络环境下大学英语教学改革的逐步深入,大学英语多媒体网络自主学习成为大学英语教学改革的重点。但目前许多普通高等院校大学英语多媒体网络自主学习缺乏较为完善的形成性评价体系,未能对学生的学习进程进行有效的监督和评估,影响了大学英语教学改革的成效。针对此项大学英语教学改革中的薄弱环节,文章在分析大学英语多媒体网络自主学习的形成性评价体系建构的必要性及其建构原则的基础上,考究了其形成性评价体系建构的模式,指出形成性评价体系的合理建构已成为大学英语网络自主学习的必要保证,有利于增强学生的英语学习动机,促使学生优化学习策略,有效培养学生的英语语用能力。 相似文献
7.
Tess Miller 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2009,34(2):181-192
A formative computer‐based assessment (CBA) was one of three instruments used for assessment in a Bachelor of Education course at Queen’s University (Ontario, Canada) with an enrolment of approximately 700 students. The formative framework fostered a self‐regulated learning environment whereby feedback on the CBA was used to support rather than measure student learning. The four types of feedback embedded in the CBA included: (a) directing students to a resource, (b) rephrasing a question, (c) providing additional information and (d) providing the correct answer. Although students originally reported positive experiences with the formative CBA, two follow‐up surveys revealed that they found the four types of feedback to be moderately effective in supporting their learning. 相似文献
8.
Team assessment has been suggested as a competency-based collaborative learning technique. Critical to the success of an assessment for learning, in competency-based education, is the use of formative feedback. This study reports on the development of, and the students’ experience of, a Team Assessment with Immediate Feedback (TAIF), in which immediate formative feedback is provided to the students by their peers and the assessment instrument (the IF-AT® form). Results of the quantitative and qualitative data, collected in a survey, suggest that the majority of the students experienced the TAIF positively. Many students highlighted that they had constructed new knowledge and understanding of the content and practiced numerous skills during the team assessment. The learning benefits of the immediate feedback component of the team assessment were widely acknowledged by the students. The study also provided some initial evidence that team assessment in a culturally diverse student cohort may enhance intercultural collaboration. Team assessment may also contribute towards re-establishing the link between professional accounting education and practice. 相似文献
9.
自主学习要求学习者监控学习进程和评价学习效果,传统的终结性评估不适用于自主学习。构建了适用于自主学习的形成性评估模式,该模式由"学习档案袋评价""教师评价"及"学生自评和他评"构成。经过在两个教学班级一学期的教学实验,结果表明:通过对学生自主学习过程的监控和管理,形成性评估激发了学生语言学习的动机和兴趣,促进了学生学习策略形成,有效培养了学生自主学习能力。 相似文献
10.
形成性评价对大学英语教学的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
陈微 《北京城市学院学报》2011,(1):94-98
本文介绍了形成性评价与终结性评价的区别以及国内外形成性评价研究现状,用实验研究的方法分析了形成性评价对大学英语教学的影响。通过实验研究,结果显示:形成性评价方法有利于增强学生的英语学习动机,促使学生使用学习策略,有效培养学生的英语应用能力。 相似文献
11.
Lene Nordrum Katherine Evans Magnus Gustafsson 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2013,38(8):919-940
This study compares students’ experiences of two types of criteria-based assessment: in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback, in an assessment design combining the two feedback channels. The main aim is to use students’ responses to shed light on how feedback strategies for formative assessment can be optimised. Following action research methodology, the study discusses key categories of student responses from three sources: reflective texts, a questionnaire, and interviews. Results show that different functions were attributed to the two feedback channels: in-text commentary to lower-order concerns related to language proficiency, and rubric-articulated feedback to higher-order concerns related to an overview of writing achievement. We argue that the different functions have the potential of creating a sufficiently balanced assessment design with the possibility of serving both short-term and continuous learning goals. On the other hand, some students found it difficult to navigate between the two feedback channels. The article therefore ends with a ‘lessons learned’ section where we list possible ways in which the current assessment design can be improved for optimal use of the synergy effects emanating from a combination of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback for formative purposes. 相似文献
12.
13.
ABSTRACTFeedback is an essential formative assessment practice that has the potential to influence student learning and achievement positively. Providing effective feedback, however, is a challenging task for teachers. Especially beginning teachers struggle with the provision of information that supports students in developing and improving their competences. Learning to provide feedback thus is an important aspect of teacher education. The present exploratory study investigates pre-service chemistry teachers’ practices regarding the judgement of students’ level of achievement and the provision of feedback in the context of the control-of-variables strategy. A sample of N?=?40 bachelor and master students at Kiel University judged students’ written artefacts and provided feedback with the aim to support students in their progression towards the learning goals. The quality of the feedback was coded with respect to its correct judgement of the students’ current levels of achievement and the support it provided regarding next steps in learning. The results show that only a few of the pre-service teachers could correctly judge students’ current levels of achievement and provide feedback that is expected to be effective. Overall, the findings indicate a need for more research in this field and a need for the implementation of formative assessment practices as a topic in pre-service teacher education. 相似文献
14.
学习性评价:涵义、方法及原理 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
学习性评价是以"促进学生发展、教师提高和改进教学实践"为目的的内部非正式评价,也是有效教学的一个有机组成部分.学习性评价的主要方法可以概括为:(1)改进课堂提问方式,增加回答"等待时间";(2)提高作业反馈质量,促进学生深入反思;(3)加强同伴与自我评价,形成自主与责任意识;(4)两种评价结合并用,优化评价教育功能.在科学课堂上实施学习性评价,首先改变了科学教师的教学方式,其次促进了学生学习方式的转变,提高课堂互动的效果和教学质量,从而有效地促进师生的共同发展. 相似文献
15.
韩春英 《邢台职业技术学院学报》2013,(4):16-18
在进行分级教学模式的改革实践中,构建了以促进学生发展为目标、反复循环的动态评价体系,该体系采取形成性评价与终结性评价相结合的形式.其中,形成性评价占40％,终结性评价占60％.形成性评价由课堂表现、网络自主学习、作业、月考和竞赛构成,各指标分别占20％.评价体系实施后,学生在英语学习兴趣、学习态度、学习策略以及自信心方面都得到了明显提升和改进. 相似文献
16.
Jacqueline P. Leighton 《Journal of Educational Measurement》2019,56(4):793-814
If K‐12 students are to be fully integrated as active participants in their own learning, understanding how they interpret formative assessment feedback is needed. The objective of this article is to advance three claims about why teachers and assessment scholars/specialists may have little understanding of students’ interpretation of formative assessment feedback. The three claims are as follows. First, there is little systematic research of K‐12 students’ interpretations of feedback. Systematic research requires gathering substantive evidence of students’ cognitive and emotional processes using psychological methods and tools. Second, there is an overemphasis on the external assessment process at the expense of uncovering learners’ internal reasoning and emotional processes. This overemphasis may be due to vestiges of behavioral approaches and lack of training in social cognitive methods. Third, there are psychological tools such as the clinical interview, pioneered by Piaget and used by psychologists to “enter the child's mind,” which may be helpful in uncovering students’ interpretation of feedback and associated behavioral responses. If the purpose of formative assessment is to change student learning, and feedback is delivered as a conduit to help with this long‐term change, understanding students’ interpretation of feedback plays a central role in the validity of the process. 相似文献
17.
在对高职英语教学评价现状及所存在的问题进行分析的基础上,提出高职英语教学应有效地采用形成性评价,在教学过程中对学生的学习情况进行评价,为教师与学生提供反馈信息,评价中收集到的信息用于调整教学以满足学生需求,提高教学质量。文章结合高职学生英语学习的特点,探讨了在高职英语教学中开展形成性评价的有效形式。 相似文献
18.
反馈作为形成性评价的核心部分,在中小学教学管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。在中小学教学管理中,教师为学生提供形式多样的反馈,可以帮助学生更好地利用反馈信息,提高学习效果;教师为学生提供具体和有针对性的反馈,可以让学生认识到自己应该改进的地方,提升学习成绩;教师为学生提供多方位、多层次的反馈信息,可以最大化地促进学生进步;教师为学生提供个性化的反馈,使学生更好地根据自身的特点提升学习能力。 相似文献
19.
Evaluating a technology supported interactive response system during the laboratory section of a histology course 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Monitoring of student learning through systematic formative assessment is important for adjusting pedagogical strategies. However, traditional formative assessments, such as quizzes and written assignments, may not be sufficiently timely for making adjustments to a learning process. Technology supported formative assessment tools assess student knowledge, allow for immediate feedback, facilitate classroom dialogues, and have the potential to modify student learning strategies. As an attempt to integrate technology supported formative assessment in the laboratory section of an upper‐level histology course, the interactive application Learning CatalyticsTM, a cloud‐based assessment system, was used. This study conducted during the 2015 Histology courses at Cornell University concluded that this application is helpful for identifying student misconceptions “on‐the‐go,” engaging otherwise marginalized students, and forming a new communication venue between students and instructors. There was no overall difference between grades from topics that used the application and grades from those that did not, and students reported that it only slightly helped improve their understanding of the topic (3.8 ± 0.99 on a five‐point Likert scale). However, they highly recommended using it (4.2 ± 0.71). The major limitation was regarding the image display and graphical resolution of this application. Even though students embrace the use of technology, 39% reported benefits of having the traditional light microscope available. This cohort of students led instructors to conclude that the newest tools are not always better, but rather can complement traditional instruction methods. Anat Sci Educ 10: 328–338. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists. 相似文献
20.
Qi Wu 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(7):1019-1031
In this study, we analysed survey data from 386 third year undergraduate students on 14 programmes within three UK universities. The universities are characterised as teaching-focused or research-intensive: a ‘plate-glass’ and ‘red-brick’ research-intensive; and a ‘new’ teaching-intensive university. We used the Assessment Experience Questionnaire Version 4.0 (AEQ 4.0), designed to understand students’ perceptions of programme assessment environments. The AEQ contains scales constructed from theories about assessment, feedback and deep learning. We performed exploratory factor analysis on AEQ 4.0 and identified five salient domains: how students learn; quality of feedback; internalisation of standards; student effort; and formative assessment. These domains were compared across the three universities. Formative assessment was the weakest domain in all three university assessment environments, followed closely by students’ internalising standards. Students at the new teaching-focused university had significantly higher scores on scales about deep learning, student effort and the quality of feedback than students in the two research-intensives. Findings show that theories about the virtue of formative assessment have yet to play out in practice; and that the teaching-focused university seemed to be encouraging deeper approaches to learning through its feedback and assessment tasks. 相似文献