共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
一、概述:厘清当下学测背景与目的1.学测背景。教育质量是衡量一个国家、地区基础教育发展水平的重要指标,而学业质量是教育质量的重要组成部分。20世纪60年代以来,很多国家或组织对教育质量进行了跟踪监控。著名的有国际数学与科学评价项目(TIMSS)、国际学生评估项目(PISA)、美国国家教育成就评价项目(NAEP)、国际成... 相似文献
2.
由国际教育成就评价协会（IEA）组织的国际数学和科学教育的比较研究（简称TIMSS）以及国际经济合作与发展组织（OECD）主持的国际学生评价项目（简称PISA）,是当前国际间最著名的学生评价项目,它们所提供的指标在国际上具有广泛的影响,已经引起世界各国的高度关注。这些评价项目关注数学、科学等领域,代表国际上学生评价的先进水平。 相似文献
3.
国外中小学数学教育评价研究述评及其启示 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
张华 《课程.教材.教法》2007,(10)
数学是基础教育中最为重要的学科之一,世界各国政府和教育部门对数学教育评价都十分重视。美国国家评价管理委员会、国际教育成就评价协会、国际经济合作与发展组织等近年来分别开发了NAEP、TIMSS以及PISA等多个评价项目,对中小学数学教育质量进行系统测查。相关研究中恰当的目标设置、明确的评价范畴以及科学、严格的研究设计等多个方面对我国的数学教育质量评价研究均具有重要的启示和借鉴意义。 相似文献
4.
5.
PISA:数学素养的界定与测评 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
数学素养是国际学生评价项目(The Programme International Student Assessment,以下简称PISA)2003年的重点测评项目。PISA认为数学素养这一领域不仅要求学生掌握适应未来社会挑战的数学技能,而且要求学生学会分析、推理,在各种情境、领域中,通过提出问题,分析问题和解决问题来有效地传递观点。因此,PISA对数学素养的测评重点与以前的其它测评不同,如第三次国际数学和科学教育研究(IEA/TIMSS),他们的评价结构是基于成员国的国家课程的共同要素而进行,但PISA评估的重点不是 相似文献
6.
数学与科学学习国际比较研究(TIMSS)和学生评价国际比较研究项目(PISA)是关于各国中小学生学业质量与中小学教学质量评估方面全球公认的国际比较研究。TIMSS跟学校数学与科学课程的联系似乎更为密切,主要评价四年级、八年级学生达到课程目标的情况。PISA主要是针对工业化国家与地区15岁学生的阅读素养、数学素养和科学素养的项目,在评价学生素养时,更多地考察学生的实践能力——“运用所学知识与技能解决实际问题的能力”。据TIMSS2003和PISA2003最新调查数据显示,新加坡、韩国、日本、中国香港等亚洲国家与地区基础教育质量优异,学生不仅考分高,解决生活中实际问题的能力也很强,并非“高分低能”。相反,美国中小学生总体的学业成绩与问题解决能力却并不突出,这可能与美国学生经济、文化和语言背景差异较大有关,但近年来其总体学业成绩有所提高。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
赖小琴 《广西教育学院学报》2008,(2):59-62
TIMSS和PISA评价都是大规模跨国学生表现评价.TIMSS主要评价4年级和8年级学生在数学和科学课程上的成就,PISA主要评价15岁学生在义务教育将近结束时为成人生活做准备的数学、科学和阅读素养.它们循环的评价周期、时代性的评价内容和新颖的题型设计吸引了众多国家参加,成为了参与国进行教育决策和研究的指示器. 相似文献
10.
国际学生评价项目(PISA，全称Programme for International Student Assessment)是由OECD设计并实施的一项教育评价项目，其评价对象为15岁的“年轻人”(处于义务教育末)。评价内容包括阅读、数学和科学三种素养，除此以外，PISA也收集有助于解释评价结果的背景信息，这些信息包括个人、家庭和学校因素。 相似文献
11.
Margaret Wu 《Prospects》2009,39(1):33-46
This study compares the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 Mathematics results with the Trends in
International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 Grade 8 mathematics results, using country mean scores for 22 participants
of both studies. It is found that Western countries generally performed better in PISA than in TIMSS, and Eastern European
and Asian countries generally performed better in TIMSS than in PISA. Furthermore, two factors, content balance and years
of schooling, can account for 93% of the variation between the differential performance of countries in PISA and TIMSS. Consequently,
the rankings of countries in the two studies can be reconciled to a reasonable degree of accuracy. 相似文献
12.
Elena C. Papanastasiou Michalinos Zembylas Charalambos Vrasidas 《Journal of Science Education and Technology》2003,12(3):325-332
A surprising result of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is that computer use was negatively associated with high student achievement in some countries. More specifically, the students from all three countries who indicated that they use computers in the classroom most frequently were those with the lowest achievement on the TIMSS in 1995. For the purpose of this study, a similar comparison was made for 15-year-old U.S.A. students, based on the data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). The results of this study show that it is not computer use itself that has a positive or negative effect on the science achievement of students, but the way in which computers are used. For example, after controlling for the student's socioeconomic status in the United States of America, the results indicated that the students who used computers frequently at home, including for the purpose of writing papers, tended to have higher science achievement. However, the results of this study also show that science achievement was negatively related to the use of certain types of educational software. This indicates a result similar to that found in the TIMSS data, which might reflect the fact that teachers assign the use of the computer and of educational software to the lower achieving students more frequently, so that these students can obtain more personal and direct feedback through educational software. 相似文献
13.
国际教育评价中的科学探究能力测评简介及启示 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
朱行建 《课程.教材.教法》2007,(2)
科学探究能力测评已经成为世界科学教育专家关注的焦点。国际上目前采用了三种测评方法,分别为TIMSS、PISA和NAEP。通过对这三种测评中科学探究的能力目标分类体系的介绍,指出了三种测评在考查科学探究能力各个方面的特点,提出了可供我们借鉴的有关启示。 相似文献
14.
专业视野中的PISA 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
近来,国际学生评估项目(PISA)备受国内外关注。PISA项目缘于发达国家对基础教育质量的反思,是一项以改善教育政策为导向的跨国测试研究。本文解读了PISA测试独创的素养及其内涵结构,探究了PISA研究试图解释的学生素养形成与学生个人参与及学习策略间的关系,分析了PISA研究试图发现的学生素养与家庭影响、学校均衡、教育公平的关系。本文认为,公平而卓越正在成为发达国家和国际组织衡量基础教育质量的新尺度;多维度、多学科、重数据与国际参照已经成为教育研究与教育评价的重要发展方向;教育政策的制定应该建立在研究、数据和证据的基础上。 相似文献
15.
国际数学和科学成就趋势研究(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study,TIMSS)和国际学生评价项目(Programme for International Student Assessment,PISA)是两项著名的国际学生学业成就比较研究,参与国家多达数十个,对全球的教育具有广泛的影响。为了使国内的教育工作者更好地了解和利用这两个项目的研究成果,本文将对这两个项目基本情况加以介绍,并着重分析两者在测评目的、理论模型、测评工具上的异同。 相似文献
16.
María Domínguez Maria-José Vieira 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2012,19(4):393-409
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) on international scientific journals. A bibliometric analysis was conducted of publications included in three main scientific publication databases: Eric, EBSCOhost and the ISI Web of Knowledge, from 2002 to 2010. The paper focused on four main questions: who carried out these studies, in which academic journals have the articles been published, what has been the evolution of these publications and what were the main article topics? The study concludes that PISA has had a considerable impact on the scientific research, reflected primarily by university-based authors from the areas of education and social sciences analysing student performance. The evolution since 2007 seems to indicate that more articles will be published in coming years through the initiative of researchers (rather than the editorial boards), even from other scientific areas, thus increasing the number of topics of analysis. 相似文献
17.
NAEP美国公民教育进步评估 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
全国教育进步评估组织(NAEP)是美国测试学生学业的权威机构。1998年和2006年NAEP美国公民教育进步评估发现,美国中小学学生的公民课程成绩不理想,经过研究发现,主要原因在于政策支持不够、课程要求不充分、评价项目不够、师资准备不足、教学缺乏等。 相似文献
18.
Paul Andrews Andreas Ryve Kirsti Hemmi Judy Sayers 《Educational Studies in Mathematics》2014,87(1):7-26
Finnish students’ success on all three content domains of each of the four cycles of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has created much international interest. It has also prompted Finnish academics to offer systemic explanations typically linked to the structural qualities of Finnish schooling and teacher education. Less well-known has been the modest mathematics performance of Finnish grade 8 students on the two Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) in which Finland has participated, which, when compared with its PISA successes, has created something of an enigma. In this paper, we attempt to shed light on this enigma through analyses of Finnish mathematics classroom practice that draw on two extant data sets—interviews with Finnish teacher educators and video-recordings of sequences of lessons taught on standard topics. Due to the international interest in Finnish PISA success, the analyses focus primarily on the resonance between classroom practice and the mathematical literacy component of the PISA assessment framework. The analyses indicate that Finnish mathematics didactics are more likely to explain the modest TIMSS achievements than PISA successes and allude to several factors thought to be unique to the Finns, which, unrelated to mathematics teaching practices, may be contributory to the repeated Finnish PISA successes. Some implications for policy-borrowing are discussed. 相似文献
19.
Matthias von Davier Kentaro Yamamoto Hyo Jeong Shin Henry Chen Lale Khorramdel Jon Weeks 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2019,26(4):466-488
ABSTRACTBased on concerns about the item response theory (IRT) linking approach used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) until 2012 as well as the desire to include new, more complex, interactive items with the introduction of computer-based assessments, alternative IRT linking methods were implemented in the 2015 PISA round. The new linking method represents a concurrent calibration using all available data, enabling us to find item parameters that maximize fit across all groups and allowing us to investigate measurement invariance across groups. Apart from the Rasch model that historically has been used in PISA operational analyses, we compared our method against more general IRT models that can incorporate item-by-country interactions. The results suggest that our proposed method holds promise not only to provide a strong linkage across countries and cycles but also to serve as a tool for investigating measurement invariance. 相似文献