首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 593 毫秒
1.
通过文献计量方法分析2010年~2015年中国图书情报学SCI论文,了解中国图书情报学研究的发展情况及现状。利用社会科学引文索引(Social Sciences Citation Index)数据库检索并统计了2010年~2015年中国图书情报学相关的论文,从文献量、著者、机构、核心期刊、引文、研究主题等方面进行了分析。研究结果:中国图书情报学SCI论文数量在不断增多,但是高被引论文依然以与国外学者合作为主,论文的研究主题以图书情报学方法相关研究论文为主等。  相似文献   

2.
高被引文献是同学科领域中被高度认可的文献,也在一定程度上体现了论文的质量。而对高被引文献施引规律的探究可以在一定程度上探析高质量论文的理论基础和知识构成。以中文社会科学引文索引( CSSCI)中的图书情报学来源期刊作为检索对象,在CSSCI数据库中遴选出图书情报学的高被引论文,获取这些论文的参考文献信息。然后,用文献计量学的相关方法研究高被引论文的参考文献的被引特征,得出了高被引论文倾向于引用高被引文献的结论。结论一定程度支持了牛顿假说,即“我看得之所以比别人远是因为我站在巨人的肩膀上”,亦即“学术精英”(高被引论文)在学术科研领域起到了中流砥柱的作用。  相似文献   

3.
2006~2010年《作物学报》载文被引情况分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
《作物学报》是作物科学领域的领衔期刊,分析其载文被引情况可以了解该刊近年来的变化和发展。利用中国知网“中国引文数据库”的引文检索功能,统计了该刊2006~2010年5年间的被引用情况,从被引论文篇数、篇均被引频次、被引论文年代分布、被引论文作者分布和引用期刊及分布等方面进行综合分析。以期为本刊和农学类期刊的编辑出版提供参考。  相似文献   

4.
利用CNKI引文数据库和期刊全文数据库,对2008版《中文核心期刊要目总览》中食品工业类20种核心期刊在2005~2010年发表论文的被引次数进行检索,选各刊被引次数≥30的高被引论文为研究对象,对高被引论文的发表年份、论文作者、科研机构、研究方向等进行了统计与分析,为期刊编辑选题、组稿、约稿提供依据。  相似文献   

5.
基于中国引文数据库,检索2008年发表的汶川地震论文在2008~2009年的被引频次,分析了相关论文的高被引学科分布,得出地学、医学、建筑学类等期刊的被引频次较高。在此基础上,分学科对高被引论文进行了探讨,再现了科技期刊的导向作用。  相似文献   

6.
图书情报学17种核心期刊载文被引分析   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
应用CNKI中《中国期刊全文数据库》和《中国引文数据库》网络版作为统计源,采用文献计量学方法,对《中文核心期刊要目总览》2004年版所确定的17种图书情报学核心期刊2006至2008年的载文被引情况进行统计,对载文量及被引篇数、被引基金论文比、被引基金论文的基金分布、期刊被引频次、单篇被引频次区间分布和高频次被引论文等指标进行了调查研究与分析解读,以了解我国图书情报领域学术成果交流、渗透和利用情况,并与前期的评价结果进行比较,客观评价本学科核心期刊的学术影响力。  相似文献   

7.
选取我国6种较有影响力和代表性的省级图书情报期刊,对其在2002和2011年发表的论文,从引文总量、绝对和相对引文率、引文语种、引文类型、引文被引与自引情况等方面进行引文分析。结果表明,6种省级图书情报期刊的质量及学术水平在10年间有了飞跃发展。以期使图书情报学界对我国省级图书情报学专业期刊发展趋势及情报吸收能力等方面有新的认识和了解。  相似文献   

8.
选取我国中东部三省的三种省级图书情报类期刊,对其在2002~2011年的论文进行引文分析,主要从引文总量、绝对和相对引文率、引文语种、引文类型、引文被引与自引情况等方面进行研究。研究结果表明,三种图书情报期刊十年间的期刊质量及学术水平有了飞跃的发展。  相似文献   

9.
《图书情报工作》期刊指标分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
利用CNKI的《中国引文数据库》,对《图书情报工作》期刊的载文、引文数据进行统计,并就该刊被引、作者被引频次等情况进行了分析比较,对《图书情报工作》作为核心期刊在图书情报领域中的地位和学术影响力进行评价。  相似文献   

10.
两种引文数据库的比较研究   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
徐平  赵萍 《情报杂志》1999,18(6):70-71
从检索入口、检索效率等方面分析比较了《中国科学引文数据库》、《中国科技论文与引文数据库》这两种引文数据库,结果发现《中国科技论文与引文数据库》检索入口多,而《中国科学引文数据库》检索效率却高于CSTPC。  相似文献   

11.
任静  孙建军 《现代情报》2012,32(4):174-177
在调研近年来国内外有关不同学科文献对网络信息利用率研究成果的基础上,从引文数量和引文域名类型的角度对各学科文献对网络信息的利用率进行了比较,并总结了影响不同学科对网络信息利用率的因素,文章最后提出了网络引文研究的前景与存在的问题。  相似文献   

12.
华薇娜 《科学学研究》2006,24(3):332-341
本文运用文献计量方法,通过美国ISI公司的核心期刊论文数据库,检索了中国大陆在世界一流刊物上自1900年至1949年间发表的几乎全部的论文。并从文献量、著者、机构、学科主题、核心期刊、引文等角度进行了归类统计和分析,用定量数据从一个侧面反映了20世纪上半叶中国科学研究的历史实况、研究水平、科研布局等实证信息。  相似文献   

13.
Although the citation relationships among papers can help in tracking and understanding the development of knowledge, few studies have noted that the content and sentiments of citations of a paper differ. Here, we use sentiment-labeled citation data to construct a directed signed citation network, in which an author may agree with or criticize the cited paper and these represent different ways of inheriting knowledge. The dataset we use consists of 9,038 papers in the field of Computational Linguistics, including 25,275 citations, with 20.8% positive citations, 8.6% negative citations and 70.6% neutral citations. We systematically quantify the structural patterns of negative citations, impact assortativity of involved papers, occurrence time distribution and consequences of receiving negative attention. Remarkably, we find that papers with different impacts have a similar probability of receiving negative citations, and highly cited papers tend to give negative citations to low-impact papers around but avoid giving negative citations to high-impact papers. Our research also reveals the random occurrence rules and colocation patterns of negative citation distribution. In addition, we show that, in the short term, around 60% of multiple negative citations is positively related to the impact of the cited paper while more than 80% are negatively related to the impact in the long run. Our findings explain the pattern by which negative citations occur and deepen the understanding of negative citations.  相似文献   

14.
[目的]重视研究论文中引文的学术论证作用,提高引文质量。[方法]根据引文在研究型论文中所起论证作用不同,将其分为关键论证作用与非关键论证作用2大类,进而提出"关键引文"的概念和标注方法。[结果]关键引文是指在论文中所引用的起到关键性学术论证作用并对论文核心内容具有不可或缺意义的参考文献。提出了关键引文的确定方法和标注方法。[结论]正确认识和把握关键引文,对科学著述中参考文献的合理引用、论文审稿以及引文分析都具有参考指导意义,其有利于促进学术交流质量的提高。  相似文献   

15.
This paper looks at how citations are perceived among scientists. Based on a questionnaire survey it traces the repertoire of views and experiences about citations that could be found among Norwegian scientists that had published highly cited papers. Their views circle around three issues: the relation between the quality (or importance or significance) of a paper and its citation history; the importance of visibility and how different sorts of factors play a role in determining citation in general and high citation in particular; and the fairness (or lack of fairness) of the system. Taken together, the respondents’ answers and comments offer an informal (and fragmented) sociology of citations and their role in the world of science. In the final section we discuss the relevance of our findings in respect to the increasing use of citation indicators in science policy and research evaluations.  相似文献   

16.
鞠秀芳 《现代情报》2018,38(11):14-17
真实性、准确性、直接性与完整性是引用参考文献的首要准则,然而种种研究表明,当前的研究论著中引而不注、过度引用、模糊标注甚至虚假引用等不当引用行为日渐增多,这极大地影响了科学研究领域的学术风气,给读者阅读、期刊审稿及成果评定等工作带来了许多不便。本文利用文本相似度算法建立期刊引文有效性识别方法,试图从海量期刊引文数据中识别出期刊引文的真实有效性。实验表明,本文的期刊引文有效性识别方法在引文有效性方面实现了较好的识别效果,可为虚假引文的识别工作提供可靠的依据,从而为编辑人员发现、修正虚假引用问题提供帮助,彰显科学研究的严谨务实精神。  相似文献   

17.
《Research Policy》2022,51(4):104484
Although citations are widely used to measure the influence of scientific works, research shows that many citations serve rhetorical functions and reflect little-to-no influence on the citing authors. If highly cited papers disproportionately attract rhetorical citations then their citation counts may reflect rhetorical usefulness more than influence. Alternatively, researchers may perceive highly cited papers to be of higher quality and invest more effort into reading them, leading to disproportionately substantive citations. We test these arguments using data on 17,154 randomly sampled citations collected via surveys from 9,380 corresponding authors in 15 fields. We find that most citations (54%) had little-to-no influence on the citing authors. However, citations to the most highly cited papers were 2–3 times more likely to denote substantial influence. Experimental and correlational data show a key mechanism: displaying low citation counts lowers perceptions of a paper's quality, and papers with poor perceived quality are read more superficially. The results suggest that higher citation counts lead to more meaningful engagement from readers and, consequently, the most highly cited papers influence the research frontier much more than their raw citation counts imply.  相似文献   

18.
The rate of citation duplication was examined in three databases: MEDLINE, BIOSIS, and LIFE SCIENCES COLLECTION. Duplicate citations were found to be more pertinent than unique citations. The duplicate citations came from a highly compact literature, while those from a single database were very widely scattered. The pertinent duplicated citations were more likely to be retrieved in searches that had more terms overall, had a higher percentage of thesaurus terms, and had terms which appeared in both title and abstract. These results suggest that the rate of duplication of citations in multidatabase searches may be used to rank output according to probable pertinence.  相似文献   

19.
《Research Policy》2019,48(7):1771-1780
Science’s main norms prescribe scientists to use citations as acknowledgements of cognitive content irrespective of geographical location. Previous studies, however, suggested that there is a considerable geographical bias in scientific citations. We argue that this geographical bias does not, in itself, falsify the notion that citations reflect acknowledgement of cognitive content, because cognitively related knowledge may be geographically concentrated as well. We analyse the role of organizational, regional and national co-location on citation likelihood for 5.5 million article pairs, and find that the geographical bias in citations is weak once cognitive relatedness is accounted for. Furthermore, we find that the effect of co-location on citation likelihood is strongest at the organizational level, weaker at the regional level, and weakest at the national level. In addition, we show that geographical co-location particularly increases the citation likelihood between two papers when knowledge relatedness between articles is low, suggesting that interdisciplinary research benefits most from co-location. Finally, we find that, when knowledge relatedness is high, the effect of geographical co-location on citation likelihood is non-existent. We discuss the implications regarding policies aimed to discourage strategic citations and to foster interdisciplinary research.  相似文献   

20.
[目的/意义]论文发表时间和所属学科的不同会对论文在后续的引文产生稀释效应的影响,发生在不同时间的引文也代表了不同的学术价值。从时序动态的视角设计一种学术影响力的评价指标,消除稀释效应的影响并能够体现不同时期的引文价值。[方法/过程]引入参考文献集合的篇均被引次数作为论文集合的基准值,消除由于发表时间和所属学科不同造成的稀释效应,进而再对不同统计时间点的被引次数赋予不同的权重,用以表征发生在不同时期的引文的不同价值。[结果/结论]以四川大学为例,选取ESI学科和研究人员作为评价对象进行实证研究,结果表明这一指标可以对学术影响力发展趋势不同的研究实体进行有效的区分。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号