共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
本文旨在揭示跨学科战略规划对人文社会科学科研的国际化发展的促进作用。通过文献计量学方法,以早稻田大学人文社科创新计划为具体案例,对科研战略规划实施前后,高质量英文文献产出情况进行对比,从学校和学院2个层次出发,围绕论文数量、影响力、合作度、主题分布等维度,揭示科研战略规划对科研产出国际化的促进作用。研究表明跨学科战略规划在宏观层面可以有效促进大学的人文社会科学的国际化产出,但在微观学科层面,跨学科战略更可能是大学人文社会科学学科国际化发展的一个重要诱因。 相似文献
4.
顾亮亮朱亮寇远涛金慧敏叶飒赵瑞雪 《数字图书馆论坛》2017,(11):21-27
本文系统介绍论文产出分析的研究思路,以及数据的采集、处理与分析等内容,并以中国农业科学院为例,对其论文产出进行分析研究,重点选取发文趋势、优势学科、高被引论文、机构领军人物、科研合作网络多个维度,充分展示中国农业科学院的科研实力及国际影响力,以期为其他机构开展论文产出分析提供实践参考,为相关部门的管理决策与科研工作提供借鉴。 相似文献
5.
基于SciVal科研管理分析工具,以北京师范大学为定标对象,江苏师范大学为需要学习对象,选取2009—2018年的科研数据,从科研产出、科研影响力、学科建设和科研合作4方面进行科研绩效比较分析,旨在为与江苏师范大学属同一层次的国内普通高校进行"双一流"大学建设,提升科研绩效,挖掘优势及潜力学科,促进科研合作交流,提出相应策略。 相似文献
6.
分析图情档学科高校教师群体的科研论文产出性别差异的现状及原因,对高校教师学术能力的提高和高校科研事业的发展具有重要的意义。文章基于图情档学科高校教师的履历信息和中国知网科研论文产出数据,从人力资本和机构资源视角出发,从资源欠缺和资源回报欠缺等2个层面提出10个假设,采用SPSS 24.0对数据进行组间差异检验、相关性分析和回归分析等,探讨教师学术产出的性别差异。结果表明:5个假设得到验证,5个假设未得到支持。研究发现:图情档学科高校教师科研论文产出的分布结构呈金字塔型,女性教师表现出底层人数过多、中层不足、顶层略占优势的特征,整体看男性和女性教师科研论文的合著规模不存在显著的性别差异;男性教师的科研论文产出数量显著高于女性,女性教师在人力资本和机构资源方面有所欠缺;女性教师在正高级职称和院系中介中心性上的欠缺是导致其论文产出低于男性的重要原因;女性教师从人力资本和机构资源中获取的科研论文产出回报与男性基本上不存在差异。 相似文献
7.
8.
[目的/意义]对科研产出高峰期研究现状进行剖析,分析存在的问题,提出可改进方向及研究重点.[方法/过程]总结现有科研创造峰值和科研创造峰值年龄概念,进一步提出科研产出高峰期的概念;对几种研究模型,如威布尔分布模型、对数正态分布模型、两步认知模型等进行剖析,总结优缺点.[结果/结论]当前研究模型在数据统计及处理误差和科研产出衡量指标的选取方面存在严重不足.未来研究思路和方向是科研产出衡量指标构建、数据处理误差克服、产出影响因素作用机理研究. 相似文献
9.
[目的/意义]了解上海市6所应用技术型大学的科研学术水平和学术支撑能力,以更有效地提升理工类院校教学科研水平,发挥理工类院校对地区发展的推动作用。[方法/过程]采用文献计量学方法,以Web of Science收录的科研论文数据为依据,从被引次数、学科分布、作者分布、国际合作等角度,对上海市6所理工类高校近年来的科研论文产出情况进行统计分析。[结果/结论]开展对上海市6所理工类高校,基于文献计量的科研水平评价工作,不仅是为了了解6所理工类院校的科研学术水平及研究方向,更希望通过分析评价,进一步了解科研学术水平对学校学科发展的帮助与支撑关系,为我校学科专业设置及未来学科发展定位等提供借鉴。 相似文献
10.
[目的/意义]概述科研众筹模式发展现状,以Experiment平台为研究对象,设计计量评价指标,分析科研众筹项目的基本特征、产出成果影响力和内容特征;研究科研众筹平台的特征,对探索与发展科研众筹模式、理解开放科学环境下的新型科研活动模式都具有重要意义,还可为项目申请者和资助者提供相应的建议。[方法/过程]首先,基于科研众筹平台--Experiment众筹项目网站,设计数据获取流程和评价指标;其次,针对科研众筹项目,分析其总体规模及成功率、人员规模、研究周期、参与国家、参与机构、经费额度等特征,并且进一步针对科研众筹项目的产出成果--实验记录,结合学科特征对其记录数、浏览数、点赞数和评论数进行分析,以揭示其产出规模与影响力;最后,对众筹成功项目和众筹失败项目进行内容分析,以挖掘影响众筹成功的因素。[结果/结论]Experiment平台的科研众筹项目具有小规模、短周期、强参与的特征,相比其他学科,科研众筹成果的产出规模和学术影响力在生物学和生态学领域表现突出;科研众筹项目的申请成功率与项目研究主题无直接关系,而与项目的经费预算计划、项目的研究实力以及研究方案的周详性和可行性有较强的联系。 相似文献
11.
基于知识流动的体育亲缘学科定量识别探索 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
运用文献资料调研、数理统计、巴雷托分析等研究方法,从知识流动的角度对体育学的亲缘学科从静态和动态两个维度进行分析。结果为:体育学科为知识输入型学科,其开放性和综合性不断提升;体育亲缘学科主要包括知识互惠型、知识来源型和知识输出目标型三类;在动态维度上又可分为稳定型、消退型和增长型三类。不同维度、不同视角体育亲缘学科的数目和内涵具有一定的差异性,但其知识输入或知识输出的比例要达到其知识输入或知识输出总量的1%以上。 相似文献
12.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2023,49(5):102766
Institutional repositories aim to capture the intellectual output of a specific institution. Previous scholars explored the content and disciplinary breakdowns of IR holdings; however, these studies often exclude the creative output of the arts, especially performing arts. This study uses a systematic content analysis of collection development statements or similar policies to understand whether IRs accept creative works. A review of IR collections shows the presence of performance output in a sample of 30 repositories at doctoral universities with very high research activity. Many IRs name creative work as acceptable content, and many of the sample IRs include content from performance-based disciplines. While many institutions collect performance materials in some way, text-based documents continue to be the primary method of performing arts representation in IRs. Shared examples of the successful inclusion of performance in IRs would further promote IRs as a platform for hosting all types of performance content, while also assisting others in outreach to artist-scholars in performing arts disciplines. 相似文献
13.
14.
科研领域的迭代创新是一项原始创新得以扩散和发展的主要创新形式。该研究以共被引分析方法为典型案例,探索科研领域迭代创新的基本特征。通过对共被引分析方法迭代创新的整体趋势、创新阶段、迭代路径和跨学科迭代创新的分析,发现其特征包括对原始创新核心内容的不断调用以及对相关知识的引进与整合;面向问题的反复调整迭代;微创新的累积促生原始创新;在迭代创新形成规模之前存在"沉寂期";学科间的广泛扩散不仅促进迭代创新,而且不同学科在迭代创新中的"角色"不同,存在创新源发学科、创新助力学科和创新采纳学科;另外,持续的迭代创新有赖于外部环境的支撑。 相似文献
15.
16.
György Csomós 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(2):547-566
In tandem with the rapid globalisation of science, spatial scientometrics has become an important research sub-field in scientometric studies. Recently, numerous spatial scientometric contributions have focused on the examination of cities’ scientific output by using various scientometric indicators. In this paper, I analyse cities’ scientific output worldwide in terms of the number of journal articles indexed by the Scopus database, in the period from 1986 to 2015. Furthermore, I examine which countries are the most important collaborators of cities. Finally, I identify the most productive disciplines in each city. I use GPS Visualizer to illustrate the scientometric data of nearly 2200 cities on maps. Results show that cities with the highest scientific output are mostly located in developed countries and China. Between 1986 and 2015, the greatest number of scientific articles were created in Beijing. The international hegemony of the United States in science has been described by many studies, and is also reinforced by the fact that the United States is the most important collaborator to more than 75% of all cities. Medicine is the most productive discipline in two-thirds of cities. Furthermore, cities having the highest scientific output in specific disciplines show well-defined geographical patterns. 相似文献
17.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(1):29-42
Within the field of bibliometrics, there is sustained interest in how nations “compete” in terms of academic disciplines, and what determinants explain why countries may have a specific advantage in one discipline over another. However, this literature has not, to date, presented a comprehensive structured model that could be used in the interpretation of a country's research profile and academic output. In this paper, we use frameworks from international business and economics to present such a model.Our study makes four major contributions. First, we include a very wide range of countries and disciplines, explicitly including the Social Sciences, which unfortunately are excluded in most bibliometrics studies. Second, we apply theories of revealed comparative advantage and the competitive advantage of nations to academic disciplines. Third, we cluster our 34 countries into five different groups that have distinct combinations of revealed comparative advantage in five major disciplines. Finally, based on our empirical work and prior literature, we present an academic diamond that details factors likely to explain a country's research profile and competitiveness in certain disciplines. 相似文献
18.
认为传统的科研绩效定量评价指标,如发文量、被引频次、引用率,由于受规模效应以及学科引用差异的影响,在不同团体或不同学科间并不具备可比性。通过引入个体、整体以及比较基准的概念,应用归一化方法,得出具有可比性的3个绩效评价指标:产出指数、影响指数、效率指数。为说明3个绩效指标的实用价值及有效性,给出机构以及国家层面的绩效水平评价实例。最后,分析讨论这3个指标在表征个体绩效水平变化方面所具有的优势以及推广应用的可能性。 相似文献
19.
高校图书馆重点学科网络信息导航库的建设构想 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
本文在分析高校图书馆建设重点学科网络信息导航库的相关概念的基础上,具体阐述了如何建设先进、科学的高校图书馆重点学科网络信息导航库。 相似文献
20.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether scientific mobility, either between countries or between affiliations has an effect on researchers’ productivity and impact. In order to investigate this issue, we examined the relationships between the number of institutional affiliations and countries of the top 100 authors in seven disciplines. The selected authors’ profiles contained the number of affiliations and countries each author is assigned. We studied the number of affiliations and countries and compared them to three bibliometric indicators: the number of publications in international, peer-reviewed journals, h-index and Field Weighted Citations Impact. Our findings show that although there are differences in the relationship between mobility, productivity and impact between disciplines, mobility between at least two affiliations has an overall positive effect on both output and impact while mobility between countries does not. Therefore, in most disciplines positive impact and productivity effects are tracked in affiliation mobility within a single country. 相似文献