共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
《中国中药杂志》根据现阶段期刊发展需求,探索出一套特色化、全方位的绩效考核管理机制。将编辑分为纸质版编辑、网络与信息编辑2种类型,并分设了不同的管理考核标准。对纸质版编辑的考核综合了选题组稿,文章的下载频次、被引频次、刊用周期,举办或参加会议与培训,参与基金项目,创收等多个方面;对网络与信息编辑的考核则侧重于激励研发与创新。对于编委会,也打破常规,采取量化考核与竞争机制。通过对编辑部和编委会实行特色化的量化考核、绩效管理制度,将编辑和专家的个人贡献与期刊整体发展紧密结合,充分发挥了其潜能和资源优势,使期刊综合实力得到迅速提升。 相似文献
2.
3.
学术期刊编者如何把好期刊的学术质量关 总被引：18，自引：6，他引：12
论述学术期刊编者参与期刊学术把关的必要性和可能性.编者依靠辩证思维方法、专业学科知识以及编辑加工技能,高度重视并切实做好文稿的初审工作,准确选定审稿人,正确送审,实现高质量审稿,严格把住终审关,做一个合格的终审者,做好稿件退修,确保修回稿件质量,培养一支稳定的、高水平的撰稿队伍,从而实现对期刊的学术把关.要提高期刊质量,编者必须参与学术把关. 相似文献
4.
科技期刊应加强编辑团队建设——以《生态学报》编辑部为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
编辑团队是科技期刊的宝贵资源,编辑团队建设是期刊健康、稳定发展的基础。以《生态学报》为例,全面、系统分析并总结编辑部在编辑人才引进和培养、实施有效激励机制和完善编辑部组织文化建设等方面采取的措施和获得的经验。多年来,《生态学报》本着以人为本的原则,较好地实现了编辑个人发展与期刊发展的结合,充分调动了每名编辑的主观能动性,提高了刊物质量,促使刊物稳定、快速发展。加强编辑团队建设使《生态学报》获益良多。 相似文献
5.
为解决检验医学研究不断深入和细化而引起的传统"大定稿会"作用的淡化问题,《检验医学》编辑部尝试用6个专业的"专业组定稿会"代替以往的"大定稿会"。实践证明,这种分专业定稿的形式细化了定稿会的职能,无论是对于提高终审效率和专题组稿成功率,还是对于激发编委和编辑的工作积极性均取得了良好的效果。 相似文献
6.
7.
优秀作者群是提升科技期刊质量的重要保障。数字出版时代下,英文版科技期刊编辑应善于发现和培养优秀作者群。针对国内外不同的作者群,本文采用了不同的培养策略:举办英文科技论文写作培训班、稿件处理过程中与作者互动、移动平台等方式培养国内优秀作者群;发挥国际编委主动性、期刊带头举办国际学术会议、选取重要国外作者为审稿人以及科技期刊编辑参加国际学术会议等方式培养国外优秀作者群。 相似文献
8.
根据国外Cochrane手册、PRISMA声明、PRISMA-P声明等指南,结合实际工作经验,提出医学编辑在审查中应当注意的事项。探讨在系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿量大增的背景下,如何加强编辑审查。对于系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿,编辑应当加强对文献检索、文献筛选、文献的纳入和排除、文献质量、潜在的利益冲突和报告中干预措施的伤害性等方面的审查。不要认为专家外审通过的来稿,便一定是可以发表的合格稿件。目前,系统综述/meta分析类论文泛滥,加强对该类论文的编辑审查刻不容缓。 相似文献
9.
10.
In this paper, we propose a novel framework for a scholarly journal – a token‐curated registry (TCR). This model originates in the field of blockchain and cryptoeconomics and is essentially a decentralized system where tokens (digital currency) are used to incentivize quality curation of information. TCR is an automated way to create lists of any kind where decisions (whether to include N or not) are made through voting that brings benefit or loss to voters. In an academic journal, TCR could act as a tool to introduce community‐driven decisions on papers to be published, thus encouraging more active participation of authors/reviewers in editorial policy and elaborating the idea of a journal as a club. TCR could also provide a novel solution to the problems of editorial bias and the lack of rewards/incentives for reviewers. In the paper, we discuss core principles of TCR, its technological and cultural foundations, and finally analyse the risks and challenges it could bring to scholarly publishing. 相似文献
11.
科技期刊编辑的工作效率直接影响期刊的质量与编辑自身的发展。作者根据数年编辑工作实践,从找到并强化编辑工作的内部动力,树立正确的时间管理理念并善用时间与知识管理工具,优化、规范化工作流程,系统管理电脑重要资料,提高电脑、手机常用软件及网络搜索的使用效率共5个方面,论述提高科技期刊编辑工作效率的途径与方法,以期助力期刊的良性发展及编辑的个人职业发展。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
Simon Wakeling Valérie Spezi Claire Creaser Jenny Fry Stephen Pinfield Peter Willett 《Learned Publishing》2017,30(4):313-322
This paper is the second of two Learned Publishing articles in which we report the results of a series of interviews, with senior publishers and editors exploring open access megajournals (OAMJs). Megajournals (of which PLoS One is the best known example) represent a relatively new approach to scholarly communication and can be characterized as large, broad‐scope, open access journals, which take an innovative approach to peer review, basing acceptance decisions solely on the technical or scientific soundness of the article. Based on interviews with 31 publishers and editors, this paper reports the perceived cultural, operational, and technical challenges associated with launching, growing, and maintaining a megajournal. We find that overcoming these challenges while delivering the societal benefits associated with OAMJs is seen to require significant investment in people and systems, as well as an ongoing commitment to the model. 相似文献
15.
科技期刊编辑是科技成果公开的首位介入者、交流的重要推动者,不仅应拥有丰厚精深的专业知识,而且其稿件处理艺术也直接影响编辑水平和刊物声誉。科技期刊编辑应具备的稿件处理艺术包括:客观公正、诚实守信、积极主动处理来稿;急作者之所急,想作者之所想;多一份对作者的包容与耐心,少一点苛责;有创见地对待个性品质鲜明的来稿;关注社会进步,将社会需求和刊物选题用稿的方向紧密结合起来。高明的稿件处理艺术,从根本上说,是科技期刊编辑深厚的人文素养在实际工作中的体现。 相似文献
16.
17.
《Journal of Informetrics》2023,17(1):101382
The COVID-19 pandemic and its resultant lockdowns have interrupted the way scientists live and work. This nevertheless caused an unforeseen impact of COVID-19: the pandemic substantially increased editorial speed. Here, we causally identify the impact of the pandemic on the editorial decision time, based on a quasi-experimental regression discontinuity (RD) design that compares (N = 339,199) papers submitted in the lead-up to and aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that editors make acceptance decisions significantly quicker after the pandemic, reducing the editorial decision time of revised papers by 8.9 days on average. The pandemic, however, has unequal impacts on editors. The results reveal a larger reduction in editorial decision time for editors of high-tier journals, in the field of social science, or with busy work schedules. Finally, our findings also allude to the potential for the increase of editorial speed, and will stimulate policy changes in scientific enterprises that strive for accelerated publishing. 相似文献
18.
19.
医学期刊编辑审稿方法与高影响力论文的策划 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
医学期刊学术质量的提高有赖于刊登稿件的学术水平和影响力,因此,编辑审稿时应筛选高质量的论文并主动进行高影响力论文的策划.医学期刊编辑审稿时要了解稿件的一般情况,并对论文选题属性、选题质量和选题的影响力及传播力进行判断,大力提高编辑审稿质量.高影响力论文策划时要掌握高影响力论文的选择方法,以及基于数据库的高影响力论文主题分析方法,从而提高期刊的学术质量. 相似文献