共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 577 毫秒
1.
Hamedi M. Adnan 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2011,27(3):268-276
Photocopying of reading materials, especially from holdings in libraries is common practice among Malaysian university students.
It is unusual to find a student not making photocopies from books or journals. Photocopying machines are easily found in the
campus, especially in the libraries with full cooperation from the machine operators. This article will discuss the copyright
law in Malaysia with regard to photocopying practices, especially on the controversial term of “fair use” or “fair dealing”
as stated in the act. The second part relates to the main findings from a survey conducted in 2009 about photocopying among
university students, and the last part provide alternatives available to publishers on ways to control and to overcome this
problem. 相似文献
2.
Selling journals to consortia and other large customers is increasingly difficult for small publishers, and yet libraries want their journals. The ALPSP Learned Journals Collection (ALJC) was put together, after considerable research, as an attempt to overcome this problem for ALPSP member publishers. Working through Swets Information Services, 247 journals from 25 publishers can be sold as a single package. Despite the difficulties, a single publisher agreement, customer licence, and pricing and revenue‐sharing model were all agreed upon. Customer reactions indicate that this is a real win–win solution for publishers and libraries. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
David J. Brown 《Learned Publishing》1997,10(3):207-219
9.
10.
[目的/意义] 合作是开展学术出版素养教育的必经之路。出版商、论文润色机构与高校图书馆建立了紧密的合作关系，共同参与到学术出版素养教育实践中来。本文系统分析了出版商、论文润色机构设计积累的形式新颖、内容前沿的学术出版素养教育资源，为探索多方机构合作开展学术出版素养教育提供更多可能性。[方法/过程] 利用网络调研方法，详细调研分析7家知名出版商和论文润色机构提供的4类14种教育资源在类型、内容和学习方式上的特点。[结果/结论] 出版商和论文润色机构已经设计了多元化的学术出版教育资源类型、结构化的资源内容和交互式的资源学习方式。未来，高校图书馆应与这些机构充分合作，丰富学术出版素养教育资源。 相似文献
11.
12.
John Cox 《Learned Publishing》1999,12(3):173-178
STM represents 250 publishing companies and learned societies, and recognizes that the advent of digital networks affects authors, publishers, librarians, and readers. Dialogue between publishers and librarians is essential to creating the sense of partnership and open-mindedness needed to meet the future needs of scholarship and research. Publishers and librarians have complementary roles and responsibilities, serving the same needs and facing similar challenges. The interests of publishers and librarians need to be rebalanced in order to seize the benefits of digital information flow. Legislation provides a framework of copyright, privacy, competition, and consumer law that protects against misuse while facilitating the flow of information from author to reader. If laws need to be amended, such changes should be made on the basis of the mutual agreement of all members of the community. There is much to be achieved without legislative change. Neither publishers nor librarians should shy away from the issues that divide them, especially the scope of fair use and the exchange of copyright information between libraries. A more detailed analysis of the impact of copyright exemptions is needed. The development of a predictable licensing environment and the testing of new business models requires co-operation between publishers and librarians, and leads to better mutual understanding. STM seeks dialogue with libraries and with other members of the research and scholarly communities in order to meet the challenges, opportunities, and expectations created by the digital environment. 相似文献
13.
《Journal Of Access Services》2013,10(1):179-191
Abstract Publishers and librarians do not agree on the use of electronic journal files as a source for interlibrary loans. The efficiency possible in electronic ILL is valued by the supplying libraries and of concern to publishers. Publishers do not accept CONTU photocopying guidelines as applicable to electronic ILL. This position is based on the historical context in which CONTU occurred and the specific wording of the CONTU report. No agreement on new guidelines has been possible to date, resulting in the need for individual license negotiations. Copyright-cleared document delivery is one alternative. Alternate models for broad database access to electronic journals is another. A new attempt to define guidelines for resource sharing is a third possibility. 相似文献
14.
15.
受最近Science网站的一则报道“科学家揭开期刊订阅的秘密”的启发,介绍目前传统纸质版、数字化和移动平台的期刊订阅模式,阐述捆绑式订阅价格差异较大的秘密是为了盈利,也是为了保护引用率少的期刊免遭淘汰.认为:模糊的我国专业期刊订阅盈利模式成为阻碍期刊发展的瓶颈,但其经营模式也出现了新的趋向;因此,寻找一种成熟、合理、适合自己期刊发展的经营模式,对于专业期刊既是挑战,也是机遇. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Mike Shatzkin 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2008,24(4):251-254
To pursue emerging revenue opportunities in the most cost-efficient way (or sometimes to be able to pursue them at all), book
publishers are going to have to adopt a StartwithXML workflow. That means their content needs to live in an XML-structured
document from the earliest possible moment, which could be “inception”, and carry within it metadata about the document structure,
the content itself, and the rights to all components. The tools exist to do this, but the organizational challenges of changing
workflows and inventing new procedures are daunting. This project explores the business case and the implementation challenges,
including case studies of companies who have already begun to work this way. 相似文献
19.
《Library & information science research》2006,28(2):208-234
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the concept of book self-publishing for fiction and nonfiction began to loom large in the North American publishing universe. As traditional mainstream publishers consolidated and were often loathe to take chances on unknown writers whose books might not turn immediate profits, some authors found that fewer and fewer publishing venues were open to them. As a result, new self-publishers—collectively called “author services” or print-on-demand (POD) publishers—appeared alongside subsidy (or vanity) publishers. Against the background of an increasing corporatization of mainstream publishing, book self-publishing can theoretically be situated as one of the last bastions of independent publishing. This article examines how academic and public libraries dealt with the book self-publishing phenomena during 1960–2004. To what extent did libraries collect fiction and nonfiction published by self-publishing houses? Can any patterns be discerned in their collecting choices? Did libraries choose to collect more titles from “author services” publishers than subsidy publishers? 相似文献
20.
Teruzo Kubota 《Learned Publishing》2001,14(2):139-143
The market for electronic journals and CD-ROMs in Japan is analysed. The electronic journal is changing the roles of the main players: publishers, libraries, and agents. Publishers go directly to libraries, while agents are trying to survive as coordinators for libraries to finalize licence agreements. CD-ROMs are selling as an alternative to books although not all the advantages of their digital format are yet being fully exploited. The time, however, is close when CD-ROMs will generate revenue by usage through a campus local area network. 相似文献