共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 890 毫秒
1.
《图书馆管理杂志》2012,52(8):672-698
ABSTRACT Health sciences librarians work within a complex environment, one that quickly adopted access to electronic resources. The open access movement evolved as an alternative to traditional publishing as prices for STM e-journals steadily increased, but it also raised issues and concerns for authors within the more traditional biomedical culture. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access policy provided an opportunity to support researchers’ compliance with the policy, while advocating for open access and author rights. As an outgrowth of the NIH policy, health sciences libraries have promoted open access through a variety of activities within their academic health centers. 相似文献
2.
《Curator: The Museum Journal》2017,60(4):489-503
A decade ago, East (2008) examined the coverage of major museum studies journals by two major databases and one academic search engine, concluding that bibliographic control of the museum studies literature was inadequate and posed a barrier to further development of the field. In this article, we revisit the issues raised by East. We reevaluate the availability of core journals in museum studies through traditional venues and identify alternative access and discovery points, including academic citation search engines, journal content alerts, social media, and field‐specific websites. We then consider the open access movement and present five recommendations for leveraging open access to enhance discovery and access for the museum studies literature: maximize authors’ rights to their own content; publish scholarship in open access or hybrid journals; develop an open access fund for museum studies researchers and scholars; deposit work in open access repositories; and create new open access resources. 相似文献
3.
Claire Creaser 《New Review of Academic Librarianship》2013,19(1):4-25
This paper presents the results of two complementary surveys undertaken in 2008 as part of a wider project investigating the effects and impact of open access to research outputs in the UK. The institutional view, from a survey of academic librarians, is compared to researchers' perceptions and practices. Researchers were largely unaware of their institutions' policies with regard to open access, or whether they had an institutional repository. Reasons for making research outputs available on open access, or not doing so, were sought, and the role of open access material as a research resource investigated. The surveys found that many researchers maintained a suspicion of open access publications, both as authors and as users of scholarly material, together with a degree of ignorance about open access and the role of institutional repositories. This suggests that a degree of culture change may be needed, as institutions develop repositories with a view to future research assessment requirements, and more funders adopt open access mandates for the outputs from research which they fund. 相似文献
4.
Lotta Haglund Annikki Roos Petra Wallgren‐Björk 《Health information and libraries journal》2018,35(3):251-255
Librarians in Sweden are facing huge challenges in meeting the demands of their organisations and users. This article looks at four key areas: coping with open science/open access initiatives; increasing demands from researchers for support doing systematic reviews; understanding user experiences in Swedish health science libraries; and the consequences of expanding roles for recruitment and continuing professional development. With regard to changing roles, there is an increasing shift from the generalist towards the expert role. The authors raise the issue as to how to prepare those new to the profession to the changing environment of health science libraries. 相似文献
5.
6.
Jie Xu Chen He Jing Su Yuanxiang Zeng Zixian Wang Fei Fang Wenhui Tang 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(3):246-258
This paper reports the results of a survey on Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals (OAJs). A total of 381 Chinese researchers from different universities and disciplines were investigated through an online questionnaire survey in August and September 2018. The results showed that most Chinese researchers are familiar with and have positive attitude to OAJs. They know OAJs mainly through their peers, colleagues, and friends. PubMed Central, PLoS, and COAJ (China Open Access Journals) are the most well‐known OAJ websites among Chinese researchers. As for use, most of the respondents read and cite OAJs frequently and have experience of publishing in OAJs. However, they strongly prefer to use OAJs indexed in reputable databases (e.g. Web of Science, WoS) when making publishing decisions. Significant differences can be seen among disciplines, with researchers in HSS areas using OAJs less frequently than researchers from other disciplines, although they have the same positive attitudes and are equally well informed about them. Younger researchers preferred to rely on prestigious institutions and authors when using OAJs. 相似文献
7.
Using data from Web of Science, this research investigates how physical science researchers funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research complied with its open access policy, and compares the citation counts of articles published through gold and green models.It was found that, for articles published between 2008 and 2015, 9% were available through gold open access routes and 13% were available through green routes; most were not openly accessible. Citation rates were comparable for green open access and non-open access articles, but citation rates for gold open access articles were lower. After controlling for publication year, citation rates of gold, green, and non-open access articles were comparable. Among gold open access articles, citation rates were highest for open access journals with article processing charges, but after controlling for publication year, articles published in hybrid journals, followed by those in open access journals with article processing charges, achieved the highest citation rates. Articles published in free open access journals had the lowest citation rates. The results suggest that green open access is the most economical approach to comply with open access policies, and that it provides researchers with at least as much research impact as gold open access. 相似文献
8.
David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson Abdullah Abrizah Blanca Rodríguez‐Bravo Cherifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri Jie Xu Marzena
wigo&#x; Eti Herman 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):132-141
A study from the Harbingers research project provides a comprehensive assessment of the main features of the scholarly communications system as viewed by early career researchers (ECRs) in the final year of the study (2018). Aspects covered are: discovery and access, authorship practices, peer review, publishing strategies, open access publishing, open data, sharing, collaboration, social media, metrics, impact, reputation, libraries, publishers, and scholarly transformations. Nearly 120 science and social science researchers from seven countries were questioned about these 16 aspects. It was found that some scholarly features work well for ECRs, and in this category can be included: discovery and access, authorship practices, sharing, collaboration, and publishers. Reputation, publishing strategies, and impact are more problematical, and they, in turn, cause tensions regarding some other factors – social media, open access, and open data. Of the rest, libraries are largely invisible, and ECRs have conflicting views concerning ethical behaviour. Few envisage that transformational change will take place in the next 5 years. 相似文献
9.
Heather Joseph 《期刊图书馆员》2017,72(1-4):36-41
ABSTRACTIn a vision session at the 31st NASIG Annual Conference, Heather Joseph provided an assessment of the Open Access movement addressing how far it has come since its inception, how well it has met its original goals, what has and has not worked well, and what is not happening at all. She talked about the importance of open (in all senses—open access, open education, and open data) as a public good, and shared feedback from a recent strategic review of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition and the Open Access movement. Joseph also explored the implications of using open as an enabling strategy for researchers, scholarly publishers, policymakers, and the larger academic community, and emphasized the importance of deliberately considering what outcomes open can help each community achieve—rather than thinking about open as an end to itself. 相似文献
10.
David NICHOLAS Anthony WATKINSON Rachel VOLENTINE Suzie ALLARD Kenneth LEVINE Carol TENOPIR Eti HERMAN 《Learned Publishing》2014,27(2):121-134
The paper provides the results of the first phase of the research project Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition. It provides for an examination of the behaviours and attitudes of academic researchers as producers and consumers of scholarly information resources in the digital era in respect to how they determine authority and trustworthiness in the sources they use, cite, and publish in. The first phase of the study utilized focus groups to formulate research questions for the project as a whole. It provided the direction for the literature review, interviews, and questionnaires studies that would follow. Fourteen focus groups were held in the UK and US in order to obtain this information. A total of 66 science and social science researchers participated. The main findings were: (a) researchers play down difficulties of establishing trustworthiness, not because there are none, but because they have well‐developed methods of establishing trust; (b) citation‐derived metrics are becoming more important in regard to where researchers publish; (c) social media are ancillary to research, but are used for promotion of research and idea generation; (d) researchers are suspicious and confused about open access, but less so if produced by a traditional publisher; (e) there was a uniformity of perceptions/behaviour of researchers irrespective of differences in subject, country, and age; (f) although some early career researchers behave the same as their more senior colleagues this is because of a fear of the system: they actually think differently. 相似文献
11.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(1):58-82
This article reports results from an empirical usability evaluation of Human-Animal Bond Research Initiative Central as part of the effort to develop an open access research repository and collaboration platform for human-animal bond researchers. By repurposing and altering key features of the original HUBzero system, Human-Animal Bond Research Initiative Central hosts previously published materials from related disciplines and an extensive bibliography, in addition to traditional hub materials such as tools and datasets. Seven graduate students in the College of Veterinary Medicine at Purdue University participated in the usability evaluation. Tasks included exploring the system, finding an article in the repository, submitting an article to the repository, adding bibliographic information of an article to the repository, and using interaction features such as user groups. Participants also answered open questions regarding their overall experience and rated Human-Animal Bond Research Initiative Central's usability using the System Usability Scale. Response measures included task successfulness, navigational steps, task time, participant comments, and behavior notes recorded by the researcher. Results of the evaluation showed that the overall user experience of Human-Animal Bond Research Initiative Central was satisfactory but also indicated a number of usability issues. Participants had difficulty inputting metadata such as resource type and author information when submitting an article to the repository. There were also interface design issues regarding layout and consistency. It is expected that findings from this study and the evaluation methodology can be extended to the development and evaluation of similar research repository systems. 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义] 随着开放获取运动的持续推进，欧洲部分国家相继开启了国家级开放获取协议制定战略研究。通过研究不同国家开放获取协议内容与特点，以及对全球学术生态的影响，提出我国应对国家级开放获取协议兴起的对策。[方法/过程] 以德国、挪威、法国等国的国家级开放获取协议内容为分析重点，着重介绍分析上述三国国家级开放获取协议的内容、发起背景、愿景目标与主要工作机制；介绍芬兰、瑞典、荷兰、瑞士等国的国家级开放获取进程。基于上述分析，归纳国家级开放获取协议的主要特点以及对全球学术生态的影响。[结果/结论] 无论我国是否采取国家级开放获取协议模式，都应及早建立相关研究并采取应对措施：一是尽快启动我国国家级开放获取协议战略研判工作；二是培育具有全球竞争力的期刊出版商；三是加大对高价值学术期刊的扶持力度；四是积极牵头并组建东亚三国开放获取协议项目组；五是加大对图书馆等文献服务机构的支持力度。 相似文献
13.
通过问卷调查了解我国科研人员对学术信息资源开放获取的参与现状及影响因素等,在此基础上,主要从科研人员整体及有参与经历的科研人员两个角度,根据影响较大的因素分析科研人员参与开放获取的主要推动力,包括:保证科研人员对OA有足够的认知程度,建设具权威性和影响力的OA资源,保持OA出版模式的优势,避免知识产权纠纷,将OA资源纳入学术评价体系,对OA期刊投稿提供经费支持。 相似文献
14.
15.
Conclusions We are living a deep change in the information transfer process involving the different actors of the editorial scene (from
authors to editors, web-editors, e-publishers and readers), who occasionally play different roles at the same time (e.g.,
authors sometimes bypass the editor thus assuming direct responsibilities in the diffusion of documents in the Internet).
Furthermore, information producers, managers or seekers often show twofold personalities like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. They
would like to find all documents free on the Internet and be able to read original, reliable, and high quality information,
but they are sometimes reluctant to spread their papers through online nonofficial channels as they care for the impact factor,
prestige, and career advancement.
It is a revolutionary period in which new and alternative forms of scholarly communication live together with more traditional
ones and the future is difficult to define. Recent initiatives of open access—such as Pubmed Central, Public Library of Science,
Budapest Open Access Initiative—are contributing to define new trends in the editorial market, challenging the traditional
distribution channels, mainly managed by commercial editors, and placing the authors’ role and publication copyrights under
severe discussion.
In this landscape, GL now has new dignity and becomes closer and closer to innovative scientific publications supported by
researchers in view of a generalised movement towards open access. The nuances of grey are becoming lighter and lighter. The
questions are many, the answers few, but, in any case, the ethical responsibility of producing and issuing quality documents
can never be disregarded. 相似文献
16.
[目的/意义]澳大利亚是开放获取（OA）运动的引领者和积极践行者,研究澳大利亚大学开放获取政策的现状和特点,对国内开放获取运动的顺利推进有积极借鉴意义。[方法/过程]搜集澳大利亚38所大学和2个官方资助机构的共计40份开放获取政策原文,以此为基础对原文进行统计分析和文本解读,从澳大利亚开放获取政策的发布时间、产生机制、实现途径、政策目的、实施范围、概念定义、存缴类型、开放要求、各方职责、版权声明这10个方面,较为全面地揭示澳大利亚大学开放获取政策的现状和特点。[结果/结论]澳大利亚大学开放获取政策有以下特点：澳大利亚的大部分大学都发布了开放获取政策,占比88.6%的高普及率归功于政府科研资助机构的政策示范和经费推动;各大学对开放获取政策持积极态度,自上而下推进政策发布与实施;各大学偏向于支持和鼓励绿色OA的发展之路,对科研成果的OA自存储规定偏强制性;对OA政策的相关概念给出了明确定义,内容完整规范清晰,可操作性强。以此为基础提出了推动我国开放获取运动的建议。 相似文献
17.
Business faculty were surveyed to determine their attitudes toward institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and open access journals. The majority of faculty was unaware of institutional repositories at their local institutions. However, approximately one third are using disciplinary repositories and are receiving encouragement from their departments to do so. Likewise, many faculty are unaware of open access journals. Open access journals are seen as lacking prestige and being lower quality publications in the business field due to the lack of prestigious publishers and editors. Many faculty believe their prestige would fall if they published in an open access journal. 相似文献
18.
开放存取期刊的影响力分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
从著名期刊影响力分析工具（JCR）、OA期刊目录、OA期刊出版者和著名的图书情报学OA期刊D-Lib Magazine的质量这四个角度分析开放存取期刊的影响力。具体来说,首先以JCR数据为依据绘制2004-2006年来ISI收录的生物学OA期刊的影响因子等指标随时间变化图。其次,利用著名OA期刊目录Open Science Directory统计最新版ISI收录的生物学期刊中OA期刊的种数。再次,根据著名生物医学OA期刊出版机构BioMed Central的统计数据分析其出版的OA期刊影响力。最后,以图书情报学领域著名的OA期刊D-Lib Magazine为例进行具体阐述。 相似文献
19.
开放存取期刊质量的学科差异与动态变化研究 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
采用平均影响因子、平均即年指数、平均IF百分位数和平均ImInd百分位数等指标,对2001年-2005年的9个学科领域596种OA期刊进行统计分析。研究发现,OA期刊的质量总体上处于中等偏上水平,但是存在学科差异。其次,OA期刊的质量稳步增长,并逐渐被科研人员所接受,已成为科研人员进行学术交流的重要工具。 相似文献
20.
Elizabeth Laera Karen Gutzman Angela Spencer Charlotte Beyer Saskia Bolore John Gallagher Sean Pidgeon Ryan Rodriguez 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2021,109(1):126
The Medical Library Association''s InSight Initiative provides an open and collaborative environment for library and industry partners to discuss vexing problems and find solutions to better serve their users. The initiative''s fifth summit, continuing work from the previous summit, focused on understanding how users discover and access information in the clinical environment. During the summit, participants were divided into working groups and encouraged to create a tangible product as a result of their discussions. At the end of the summit, participants established a framework for understanding users'' pain points, discussed possible solutions to those points, and received feedback on their work from an End User Advisory Board comprising physicians, clinical researchers, and clinical faculty in biomedicine. In addition to the pain point framework, participants are developing MLA InSight Initiative Learning content with modules to educate librarians and publishers about critical aspects of user behavior. The 2020 Insight Initiative Fall Forum will serve as a virtual home for constructive dialogue between health sciences librarians and publishers on improving discovery and access to information. 相似文献