共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
阅读方式的变化在方方面面影响着加拿大国民的生活.2011年,加拿大图书馆的电子书流通率不足1％,许多出版商并未对图书馆进行电子书授权,许多出版商对专业电子书籍的借阅许可和电子书的流通方式还不熟悉.2011年至2013年间国民的电子书借阅需求不断增长.2013年加拿大城市图书馆电子书流通率已达到了10％.为适应国民的新兴阅读习惯,加拿大公立图书馆也积极引进了不同的电子书借阅平台以适应大众的需求.这些电子书借阅平台大致可分为非专业书籍借阅平台和专业书籍借阅平台,它们提供了各具特色的服务以方便读者的使用. 相似文献
2.
随着电子阅读方式的普及,图书馆电子借阅服务日益成为图书馆的主要业务工作。近年来,在读者电子借阅服务需求的刺激下,美国图书馆电子借阅服务广泛开展,更加重视电子书购置经费的投入,馆藏电子书数量和流通量双双增长,同时加大手持电子阅读设备的应用,电子书采集模式类型多样。但是,在服务开展过程中,也不可避免地面临诸多障碍,如主要出版商的反对、法律障碍、技术障碍、商业模式不成熟、用户利用电子书的意识和能力不高等。面对障碍,美国图书馆、出版商、供应商、作者等不同利益群体从自身发展出发,采取不同的策略,共同推动图书馆电子借阅服务的发展,其中,图书馆是主导力量,作者是重要力量,用户是原动力。 相似文献
3.
近年来,美国图书馆电子书借阅服务虽然得到了较快发展,但也面临着在馆藏数量、阅读媒介、流通政策和功能使用方面的一些限制,基于此,从合作和博弈视角探讨出版商和图书馆在电子书借阅中应发挥的作用。 相似文献
4.
[目的/意义]了解加拿大电子书的发展情况,调研梳理加拿大图书馆电子书购买许可模式与借阅政策,为国内图书馆电子书借阅政策的制定提供参考。[方法/过程]通过文献调研和个案分析的方法总结加拿大图书馆电子书购买许可模式及借阅规则,通过网站调研的方法了解和分析加拿大2012年电子书支付费用前15名公共图书馆的电子书借阅政策。[结果/结论]加拿大图书馆电子书购买实践中存在5种以上的购买许可模式,电子书借阅也制定了非常完善的借阅政策。国内图书馆界需借鉴加拿大的成功经验,丰富电子书购买许可模式,强化相关学协会作用并从实际出发制定本馆较为完善的电子书借阅政策。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
为适应国民的新兴阅读习惯,加拿大公立图书馆积极引进了不同的电子书借阅平台以适应大众的需求。阅读方式的变化在方方面面影响着加拿大国民的生活。2011年,加拿大图书馆的电子书流通率不足1%,许多出版商并未对图书馆进行电子书授权,许多出版商对专业电子书籍的借阅许可和电子书的流通方式还不熟悉。2011年至2013年间国民的电子书借阅需求不断增长。2013年加拿大城市图书馆电子书流通率已达到了10%。为适应国民的新兴阅读习惯,加拿大公立图书馆也积极引进了不同的电子 相似文献
8.
电子书的发展改变了图书馆的文献借阅方式,电子书服务正成为高校图书馆一项新的业务项目。对高校图书馆电子书服务面临的主要问题进行分析,提出高校图书馆电子书服务建议。 相似文献
9.
与传统资源及电子期刊的馆藏建设相比,学术电子书的馆藏建设发展缓慢,其主要原因是出版商对学术电子书的销售限制和使用限制与图书馆采购诉求之间存在矛盾。解决这一矛盾并达到双方的利益平衡,需要图书馆与出版商共同努力,寻求有效的合作模式,既可以保障图书馆采选、使用与保存电子书的权利又可以保障出版商的商业利益。参考文献23。 相似文献
10.
中美图书馆电子书服务模式比较研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义] 随着电子书数量的增加与普及,图书馆电子书服务需求日益增加,将电子书的收集、整理、借阅、管理等服务纳入到图书馆的服务体系中来,成为各类型图书馆重要的服务内容。[方法/过程] 采用网络调研与比较分析的方法,对中美主要图书馆的电子书及电子书阅读器的借阅政策及服务模式进行比较,从中美图书馆电子书的流通、推广和电子书服务平台3个方面进行电子书服务的对比分析。[结果/结论] 借鉴美国图书馆电子书服务经验,提出我国图书馆电子书服务的发展战略,为我国图书馆开展电子书服务提供参考。 相似文献
11.
This study investigates the current status and attitudes towards academic e-book publishing by mainland Chinese academic publishers through an online survey. This study collected survey data from 49 authoritative academic publishers in China, focusing on their e-book sales profiles and their perceptions of how e-book sales affect publishers and libraries. The data reveals that China's academic e-book industry is still at an early development stage and has a relatively small market. The findings show significant differences in the willingness and attitudes towards e-book publishing between SSH publishers and STEM publishers, and also demonstrate that the enhancement of the demand for e-books by academic libraries promotes the process of the digital transformation of academic publishers. This study then argues that Chinese academic publishers need to further improve the quality of academic e-books, accelerate the transition from academic content providers to academic content service providers, and strengthen their cooperation with stakeholders. 相似文献
12.
Xiaohua Zhu 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(3):343-351
In spite of the widespread trend of e-book adoption by U.S. academic libraries, interlibrary loan (ILL) of e-books is significantly lagging behind because of license agreement restrictions, unstandardized platforms, library policies, and technological barriers. More recently, the long-cherished tradition of ILL has been further challenged, because an increasing number of academic libraries are adopting user-based e-book purchasing models that have the potential to bypass ILL. This paper compares the findings of two longitudinal surveys on e-book ILL practices in U.S. academic libraries, based on random sampling. The results from inferential statistical analyses reveal that, while inter-library lending of entire e-books is seldom practiced and shows no growth, e-book chapter ILL is becoming more prevalent in U.S. academic libraries. Librarians have grown more knowledgeable about licensing and technological issues, but their perceptions of these barriers are mixed. The study also shows that larger institutions are more likely to perform e-book ILL services, and their librarians tend to be more positive about the future of e-book ILL. 相似文献
13.
E-book management in academic libraries is examined, and a framework of the stages in the e-book management process is generated; the framework summarizes the key activities and associated issues and challenges for each stage. Academic libraries are one of the main markets for textbooks and other e-books. As such, the relationships that they forge with e-book vendors (publishers and aggregators), and the resolution of some of the challenges that they currently face in managing their collections of e-books, will have significant consequences for the adoption of e-books in learning. An interview-based study with a purposive sample of interviewees working as managers, subject librarians, metadata officers, and e-resources coordinators from seven academic libraries in the UK was conducted to investigate the libraries' experiences and perceptions of e-book management. The resultant e-book management framework identifies the processes associated with the management of e-books, and also offers insights into the challenges and issues associated with each stage. The stages in the framework are: collection development policy, budget, discovery, evaluation and selection, license negotiations, cataloging and delivery, marketing/promotion, user education, monitoring and reviewing, and renewals and cancellation. 相似文献
14.
A panel which included a librarian, publisher and e-book providers presented issues confronting the growth of e-books in the academic library marketplace. The e-book market projections are a small part of the higher education book market. Frontlist titles are demanded by libraries with suppliers eager to supply such titles. However, publishers are feeling their way through various rights and contract issues as well as business models as they determine which frontlist titles to provide in electronic form. The instability of business partners has contributed to publisher delays in releasing titles as e-books. No one, (librarians, suppliers, publishers) is throwing in the towel on e-books but the position this format takes in the publishing industry and therefore in library collections in the near future is unsettled. 相似文献
15.
国外高校图书馆电子书利用权益相关问题探究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
电子书在国外高校图书馆的使用主要存在如下问题:①对于图书馆读者使用电子书的限制:对于浏览、打印、下载和传送文件的限制;数字版权管理的限制。②图书馆文献流通和馆际互借的限制:对于用户数量和用户类型的限制;对于流通的限制;对于以课程储备为目的的电子书使用的限制和对于馆际互借的限制; ③电子书阅读器在高校图书馆的借阅限制:专有软件和文件格式的限制;不能离线访问的限制;用户设备上的电子书存在被撤销的潜在可能。应对许可限制最直接的方法就是从供应商处获取不限制使用的电子书、与其他图书馆和联盟合作从为用户争取最大权益的角度出发与出版商谈判对图书馆界有利的许可条款,并尽量购买供应商提供可接受的条款的电子书,同时培养用户良好的电子书使用习惯。 相似文献
16.
Lucy A. Tedd 《New Review of Academic Librarianship》2013,19(1):57-79
This paper provides a broad international overview of e-books in academic libraries. The inconsistent terminology relating to e-books is noted in the first section and a brief history of e-books and some current definitions are given. The stakeholders within the e-book industry are described, with details of some of the services offered. For users and staff in library and information services, e-books can provide a variety of advantages as well as challenges, and these are outlined for those in academic libraries. Findings from various studies on e-books are presented and some of the issues involved in managing e-books in academic libraries are described. Finally an overview is presented of the e-Books Working Group in the United Kingdom. The paper is illustrated with a number of screenshots related to e-books in academic libraries in various parts of the world. 相似文献
17.
文章利用扎根理论方法,对读者使用电子书意愿的影响因素进行探究,并分析各因素间相互作用的机理。通过对访谈资料的编码、译码,得到概念范畴和逻辑关系,再借助使用与满足理论和UTAUT2模型构建读者使用电子书意愿的影响因素模型。研究结果显示,产品因素、读者因素和外部情景因素均对使用意愿产生影响,其中产品因素和外部情景因素还对读者需求和阅读习惯产生影响。文章基于分析结果提出出版单位优化电子书出版、图书馆提升电子书服务等措施。 相似文献
18.
电子图书出版商的著作权来源 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
在说明电子图书出版商的著作权只能来源于著作权人的基础上，列举了三家电子图书出版商在继受取得著作权方式上的不同之处，指出了这些做法存在的问题并提出了初步的对策；同时还指出了现行著作权法在电子图书方面的几个立法空白点，特别是指出了信息网络传播权对图书馆借阅电子图书和出版社出版电子图书的制约，并提出了要适当限制著作权人权益以保证公众合理获取信息的权利。 相似文献
19.
[目的/意义] 随着数字出版物利用率的提高,文献信息资源的可共享性和知识产权之间的矛盾加剧。如何解决这种矛盾,对著作权人的合法权益进行补偿,使信息资源公共供给合法化是迫切需要解决的问题。[方法/过程] 采用比较研究和文本分析法,对英国的电子书公共借阅权相关法案进行分析,总结电子书公共借阅权以及补偿金的特点等。[结果/结论] 英国电子书公共借阅权具有准版权模式和版权模式并行,以版权模式为主、率先将电子书纳入权利客体以及给予权利主体较大权限的特点;补偿金具有来源为政府财政拨款、计算以借阅次数为依据等特点。我国可以借鉴英国电子书公共借阅权和补偿金的细则等来实行数字出版物公共借阅权补偿金。 相似文献