共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 718 毫秒
1.
部分中华医学会系列杂志基金资助课题成果刊出情况分析 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
通过检索中文生物医学期刊数据库 ,分析部分中华医学会系列杂志基金资助课题成果刊出情况 ,探讨中华医学会系列不同杂志在我国医学发展中的作用和相互关系。提出基金类论文数量与杂志质量、核心期刊效应、实验研究课题及综合性刊物优势相关 相似文献
2.
论文中文献标注格式不规范、甚至标注不当导致表达意思错误的情况仍较普遍。列举一些中华医学会系列杂志刊登的论文文内参考文献标注不当的问题,并对这些问题进行归纳和分析。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
中华医学会杂志社的数字化实践与发展 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
一、中华医学会系列杂志数字化的实践 经过多年的传承、发展和品牌积淀,中华医学会系列杂志已拥有相当高的品牌效应、固定的读者群、完善的出版管理制度和成熟的专业编辑出版团队. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
领跑行业打造精品医学期刊"航母" 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
近年来,文化体制改革如火如荼,面对汹涌而来的改革浪潮和激烈的竞争业态,中华医学会系列杂志勇立潮头,在行业内起着风向标和晴雨表的作用.在"传承发展,开放融合、创新创优"的理念指导下,系列杂志始终保持学术水平和出版质量"专、精、特、新"的品牌特色,屡获国家最高荣誉,成为医学期刊传媒的领跑者和翘楚. 相似文献
10.
科技期刊举办庆典活动所引发的思考 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
通过对中华医学会系列杂志创刊庆典活动的分析,探讨科技期刊庆典活动对其发展的影响.认为举办期刊庆典活动对宣传杂志、扩大影响、总结经验、确立杂志发展新目标都具有重要意义. 相似文献
11.
中国知网数据库中高被引文献与高下载文献类型分析——以医药卫生科技类文献为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在中国知网数据库中检索医药卫生类2011年1月1日至2014年8月31日下载与被引频次排位前100名的文章并对其进行分析,发现下载排名前100篇文章中这2类合计占56.7％,被引排名前100篇文章中述评类和规范类合计占55.2％,两者重叠的23篇中,规范类和述评类合计占69.6％.认为规范类和述评类文献具有较高的权威性、参考价值大,是能够产生较高下载和较高被引的文献类型,应是期刊组稿的重要方向之一.观察下载次数与被引次数发现,两者没有明显的相关性,无规律可循.认为单纯以一两个数据库的下载、被引数据来做定量分析是不科学的,仅可作为定性参考之用.在研究的100篇文献中,有4篇为一稿多发,均属于规范类文章.认为这类文章承担着行业指导性任务,传播理应更广泛,故应与一般意义上的一稿多投、一稿多发的学术不端行为相区别. 相似文献
12.
《Journal of Informetrics》2023,17(1):101379
We performed a citation analysis on the Web of Science publications consisting of more than 63 million articles and over a billion citations on 254 subjects from 1981 to 2020. We proposed the Article’s Scientific Prestige (ASP) metric and compared this metric to number of citations (#Cit) and journal grade in measuring the scientific impact of individual articles in the large-scale hierarchical and multi-disciplined citation network. In contrast to #Cit, ASP, that is computed based on the eigenvector centrality, considers both direct and indirect citations, and provides steady-state evaluation cross different disciplines. We found that ASP and #Cit are not aligned for most articles, with a growing mismatch amongst the less cited articles. While both metrics are reliable for evaluating the prestige of articles such as Nobel Prize winning articles, ASP tends to provide more persuasive rankings than #Cit when the articles are not highly cited. The journal grade, that is eventually determined by a few highly cited articles, is unable to properly reflect the scientific impact of individual articles. The number of references and coauthors are less relevant to scientific impact, but subjects do make a difference. 相似文献
13.
Lisa Gonzalez 《期刊图书馆员》2016,70(1-4):247-259
This study focused on how serials information for journal articles is presented based on a sampling of institutional repository platforms at a variety of institutions. Since metadata on journal articles in institutional repositories can often be incomplete and haphazard, not only due to the difficulty of entering the metadata in the first place, but due to the difficulty of adapting existing metadata schemes to represent a journal article accurately, how can libraries increase the discoverability of these individual articles from a wide variety of journals? By examining existing metadata schemes and how they are used to represent articles currently in institutional repositories, libraries can look for a way forward to better represent articles though adapting schemas, exploring possibilities for standardization of metadata for articles, and promoting good practices. 相似文献
14.
15.
Mike Thelwall 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(1):1-9
Microsoft Academic is a free academic search engine and citation index that is similar to Google Scholar but can be automatically queried. Its data is potentially useful for bibliometric analysis if it is possible to search effectively for individual journal articles. This article compares different methods to find journal articles in its index by searching for a combination of title, authors, publication year and journal name and uses the results for the widest published correlation analysis of Microsoft Academic citation counts for journal articles so far. Based on 126,312 articles from 323 Scopus subfields in 2012, the optimal strategy to find articles with DOIs is to search for them by title and filter out those with incorrect DOIs. This finds 90% of journal articles. For articles without DOIs, the optimal strategy is to search for them by title and then filter out matches with dissimilar metadata. This finds 89% of journal articles, with an additional 1% incorrect matches. The remaining articles seem to be mainly not indexed by Microsoft Academic or indexed with a different language version of their title. From the matches, Scopus citation counts and Microsoft Academic counts have an average Spearman correlation of 0.95, with the lowest for any single field being 0.63. Thus, Microsoft Academic citation counts are almost universally equivalent to Scopus citation counts for articles that are not recent but there are national biases in the results. 相似文献
16.
17.
《Journal of Informetrics》2022,16(2):101293
We study the effects of an article featured on the cover of the journal Nature on citations to all articles published by its authors. Based on 30 years of bibliometric data, we find that cover articles are cited significantly more than non-cover articles, with this difference being long-lasting. However, when considering all articles (past and future) by Nature authors, we find that the publication of a cover article causes citations to previous articles by its authors to decline relative to citations to articles by non-cover authors. 相似文献
18.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(4):912-916
This paper examined the citation impact of Chinese- and English-language articles in Chinese-English bilingual journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). Two findings were obtained from comparative analysis: (1) Chinese-language articles were not biased in citations compared with English-language articles, since they received a large number of citations from Chinese scientists; (2) a Chinese-language community was found in Scopus, in which Chinese-language articles mainly received citations from Chinese-language articles, but it was not found in WoS whose coverage of Chinese-language articles is only one-tenth of Scopus. The findings suggest some implications for academic evaluation of journals including Chinese-language articles in Scopus and WoS. 相似文献
19.
《Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services》2004,28(2):180-195
This study examines how the social sciences' debate between qualitative and quantitative methods is reflected in the citation patterns of sociology journal articles. Citation analysis revealed that quantitative articles were more likely to cite journal articles than monographs, while qualitative articles were more likely to cite monographs than journals. Quantitative articles cited other articles from their own quantitative-dominated journals but virtually excluded citations to articles from qualitative journals, while qualitative articles cited articles from the quantitative-dominated journals as well as their own qualitative-specialized journals. Discussion and conclusions include this study's implications for library collection development. 相似文献
20.
This paper considers a new model for forming ranked lists of scientific journals on the basis of a bibliometric analysis. The model is based on searching in anabstract database of a set of articles that is semantically equivalent to a set of articles of a user or group of users, for whom a repertoire of scientific periodicals is selected. In other words, a query must result in an assembly of articles with the same thematic orientation, which is expressed in the articles of an author. To achieve this goal, KeyWords Plus were used as a query for articles by workers from three scientific organizations in different scientific fields (biomedical, geological, and physico-mathematical fields). KeyWords Plus, which give a short retelling of each article, are joined in a query into groups, whose number was correspondingly equal to the number of articles of workers from these organizations. The query yielded lists of articles withthe same sequences of keywords, which proved their semantic proximity. Using different filters we analyzed the groups of journals that focused articles that are of interest to us to the greatest extent. The obtained lists were compared with the lists of journals that are most cited by the authors of the articles; the similarity of the lists in the field of natural sciences was ascertained to be significant and the similarity in the field of exact sciences was shown to be less. The possible spheres for the application of the KeyWords Plus method, which is an alternative to an analysis of citations, as well as the applicability of a new model to the Scopus database, where controlled thesauri are used as additional keywords, are described. 相似文献