共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
S计划的提出将开放获取(Open Access, OA)提升到一个新的高度,对于中文学术期刊的OA必须深入思考。在OA2020的推进过程中,学术出版不同环节经历着长期的博弈和努力,而绝大多数中文学术期刊由于存在着主观和客观上的障碍,只在自建网站上实施了OA。为了推进高质量中文学术期刊金色OA并达到知识普惠社会发展的要求,笔者认为应该允许相关期刊收取合理的文章处理费,充分利用现有的OA平台,并探索在期刊集成平台上的OA。 相似文献
3.
随着开放科学运动轰轰烈烈地开展,旨在将支付给学术期刊出版社的费用由订阅费转为出版费的转换协议成为关注的焦点。文章首先从电子期刊价格问题、开放获取的进展状况两个方面梳理开放获取转换协议兴起的背景、转换协议的类型,在此基础上阐述为推动开放获取转换协议的签署,各国所采取的措施及签约实例。研究表明,依靠APC实现完全即时的开放获取很难实现,国家层面可以考虑加入S计划,并采取措施在与出版商的谈判中占据主导地位。 相似文献
4.
《Curator: The Museum Journal》2017,60(4):489-503
A decade ago, East (2008) examined the coverage of major museum studies journals by two major databases and one academic search engine, concluding that bibliographic control of the museum studies literature was inadequate and posed a barrier to further development of the field. In this article, we revisit the issues raised by East. We reevaluate the availability of core journals in museum studies through traditional venues and identify alternative access and discovery points, including academic citation search engines, journal content alerts, social media, and field‐specific websites. We then consider the open access movement and present five recommendations for leveraging open access to enhance discovery and access for the museum studies literature: maximize authors’ rights to their own content; publish scholarship in open access or hybrid journals; develop an open access fund for museum studies researchers and scholars; deposit work in open access repositories; and create new open access resources. 相似文献
5.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(2-3):65-84
The intent of this investigation was to learn what factors may have contributed to low usage of a small set of reputable open access scholarly journals, as evidenced in graduate student reference lists. Inquiry into differences among open access sources referenced between 2005 and 2014 revealed that non-indexed journals were being used notably fewer times than their commercially indexed counterparts. A comparison of HTML source code between indexed and non-indexed journals illustrated that certain metadata and other coding features may have affected the visibility of non-indexed journal content. The study suggests to librarians the presence of less visible empirical literature on the web and to smaller, independent academic publishers, the need to apply better quality metadata and optimization strategies to their open access journal content. 相似文献
6.
依据《Budapest Open Access Initiative》,确定我国开放存取型学术期刊判定标准,以CNKI所收录的1 094种医学期刊为范围,从中遴选国内医学领域开放存取型学术期刊;将传播学传播效果评价理论融入期刊评价之中制定评价指标体系,并统计相关数据,采用定性与定量相结合的方式,从认知效果、态度效果、行为效果三个层面对我国医学领域开放存取型学术期刊传播效果进行实证研究。 相似文献
7.
Business faculty were surveyed to determine their attitudes toward institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and open access journals. The majority of faculty was unaware of institutional repositories at their local institutions. However, approximately one third are using disciplinary repositories and are receiving encouragement from their departments to do so. Likewise, many faculty are unaware of open access journals. Open access journals are seen as lacking prestige and being lower quality publications in the business field due to the lack of prestigious publishers and editors. Many faculty believe their prestige would fall if they published in an open access journal. 相似文献
8.
开放获取(OA)为用户方便快捷地了解同行研究成果,清除知识传播壁垒提供了契机。根据样本数据分析当前国内对OA的认知度和认同度原因:科研管理部门对网络文献的态度对用户是否选择OA出版有影响;OA文献的质量是影响用户认同度的另一主要因素;不同学科的发展程度造成了学科内OA发展的不均衡;OA的付费模式是其发展的影响因素之一:国内OA的发展状况在一定程度上影响了用户对OA的认同度。建议对OA文献进行质量控制,建立OA期刊的评价制度,寻求新的评价方法;改革当前成果认定指标,承认网络文献成果;减少OA出版过程中的花费,促进OA整体发展等。表10。图1。参考文献6。 相似文献
9.
基于出版流程的开放存取期刊学术质量控制 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
从强化出版流程管理这一开放存取期刊学术质量控制的基本思路出发,按照组稿、审稿和编辑加工出版流程的三个主要环节分别论述开放存取期刊学术质量控制问题。指出基于出版流程控制开放存取期刊学术质量,主要应做好三个方面工作:加强主动约稿,提高稿源质量;创新审稿方式,严把质量关;强化编辑加工,提升形式与技术规范。 相似文献
10.
开放存取期刊质量的学科差异与动态变化研究 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
采用平均影响因子、平均即年指数、平均IF百分位数和平均ImInd百分位数等指标,对2001年-2005年的9个学科领域596种OA期刊进行统计分析。研究发现,OA期刊的质量总体上处于中等偏上水平,但是存在学科差异。其次,OA期刊的质量稳步增长,并逐渐被科研人员所接受,已成为科研人员进行学术交流的重要工具。 相似文献
11.
[目的/意义] 随着开放获取运动的持续推进，欧洲部分国家相继开启了国家级开放获取协议制定战略研究。通过研究不同国家开放获取协议内容与特点，以及对全球学术生态的影响，提出我国应对国家级开放获取协议兴起的对策。[方法/过程] 以德国、挪威、法国等国的国家级开放获取协议内容为分析重点，着重介绍分析上述三国国家级开放获取协议的内容、发起背景、愿景目标与主要工作机制；介绍芬兰、瑞典、荷兰、瑞士等国的国家级开放获取进程。基于上述分析，归纳国家级开放获取协议的主要特点以及对全球学术生态的影响。[结果/结论] 无论我国是否采取国家级开放获取协议模式，都应及早建立相关研究并采取应对措施：一是尽快启动我国国家级开放获取协议战略研判工作；二是培育具有全球竞争力的期刊出版商；三是加大对高价值学术期刊的扶持力度；四是积极牵头并组建东亚三国开放获取协议项目组；五是加大对图书馆等文献服务机构的支持力度。 相似文献
12.
高校图书馆推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的困境与出路 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义] 开放获取进程中的"双重收费"问题引起了出版商、图书馆及科研人员的关注与讨论。本文在此背景下分析探索学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的中国路径，以期引起高校图书馆对开放获取进程中"双重收费"问题的关注，为新时期高校图书馆文献资源建设的转型发展提供启示。[方法/过程] 通过文献调研与网络调研，梳理高校图书馆推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的必然性和可行性，以及当前学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的相关实践，分析总结高校图书馆在推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化过程中的困境，并就如何实现转化提出相关建议。[结果/结论] 高校图书馆应从观念上认识到学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的重要性，把研究全面开放获取作为图书馆文献资源建设的重要工作之一，以高校联盟的形式主动开展评估调研，参与国家层面的规则制定，积极研究定价模式，推进相关政策落地，推动科研成果共建共享最大化。 相似文献
13.
Having found a business opportunity in exploiting the open access publishing model, predatory journals and publishers have been spamming authors with emails, inviting them to submit articles for publication. Authors may be misled by the names of prestigious authors and editors that predatory journals and publishers use to advertise their publishing services, either by claims that those scientists serve on the editorial boards or by sending invitations in their names. Given the fact that detailed knowledge of a journal is required to make an informed decision of whether the inviting journal is predatory or not, junior scientists are not likely to possess the knowledge or skill to make such decisions. In addition, analysis of the details of new suspicious journals and publishers can be a lengthy process or even a waste of time. Therefore, in this paper, we provide an analysis of a likely scenario that many authors are facing nowadays when they take on the difficult task of studying the details of suspicious journals as possible venues for the publication of their research findings. The analysis takes the form of an analysis of the Kenkyu Publishing Group, which is listed on Jeffrey Beall’s list of “predatory” open access publishers. 相似文献
14.
[目的/意义] 对文献订购经费转化为开放出版资助经费实现学术期刊从订阅获取模式向开放获取模式转化的经济可行性进行分析,以期引起科研管理机构、科研教育机构、图书馆及学者对国际发展趋势和有关行动计划的关注,促进开放获取学术交流环境的发展。[方法/过程] 分析期刊论文全面开放获取所需APC经费与当前期刊订购体系总体投入比较的案例,对国家层面参与学术期刊向开放获取转化国际行动计划所面临情况评估、判断的基础数据需求和有关监控、报告、共享机制及规范的建立提出建议。[结果/结论] 国家有关部门应支持图书馆开展有关基础性分析研究,为文献订购经费向支持开放出版转化的策略和措施的制定提供重要支持和参考。 相似文献
15.
国外学术期刊OA出版论文处理费(APC)调查 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
调查了国际知名出版商Elsevier、Springer、Taylor & Francis、Wiley-Blackwell、NPG和国际知名OA期刊社BMC、PLoS、Hindawi、MDPI等OA期刊的论文处理费(APC)的收费标准.2015年度主要商业性出版社完全OA期刊的APC主要分布在1 000 ～5 000美元之间,混合型OA期刊的APC相对高些,分布较窄,基本在3 000美元左右.以瑞士MDPI公司为案例,分析该公司OA期刊的创办、期刊载文量、期刊经营、APC收取策略等.还简要讨论APC和OA出版机制,以期为我国的科研管理部门和期刊管理部门提供参考. 相似文献
16.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3):31-41
Abstract Using the BUBL Journals service as a rich source of data, this article outlines different methods of measuring usage of electronic journals, suggests that different types of access may be mapped to the user activities of browsing, reading and searching, and draws some inferences about why different titles have differing patterns of usage. It also proposes that by measuring the ‘search-to-browse’ ratio of a journal it is possible to assess whether journals are being used primarily for research and reference purposes or mainly for current awareness and casual browsing. 相似文献
17.
在开放存取蓬勃发展和高校图书馆馆藏电子化的大趋势下,高校图书馆的文献保障工作如何适应新的趋势,需要深入研究。本文以武汉大学2013年被SCIE、SSCI和A&HCI所收录文章的期刊类参考文献为研究样本,采用一种针对期刊类参考文献的以年为单位的引文检查方法,匹配世界主要开放存取期刊目录以及武汉大学图书馆馆藏电子和印本期刊目录,研究当前这三类期刊对样本参考文献及来源期刊的收藏和缺藏情况。以此探讨三类期刊在高校图书馆文献资源保障中的特征与趋势,以及开放存取期刊对馆藏资源建设的影响,为高校图书馆进一步优化期刊馆藏体系和提高文献保障率提供科学依据。 相似文献
18.
This article explores the evolution of the role of academic journal articles submitted to the UK's Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). By reviewing their role, it is possible to see how the changes from quantitative to qualitative assessment (and the resulting problems surrounding the definition of ‘quality’ journals) has impacted both on the journals selected by academics for publishing their research and the assessment of them. Although only one part of RAE submissions, the listing of published research outputs provides the primary evidence for research quality to most RAE panels, and is a significant driver of the final grade awarded, and thus the funding received by submitting institutions. The RAE, being a peer‐reviewed assessment exercise, mirrors in some ways the peer‐review process immured within scholarly publication. The developing role of journal publications as a vehicle for academic research output is examined via the chronology of the RAE, before assessing the current situation in which published journal output formed almost 70% of all output assessed by RAE panels in the latest exercise. The impact of this increased importance of academic journals in the assessment process is considered not only for academics but also for the wider community, i.e. publishers and libraries. 相似文献
19.
20.