国外网络分类法的发展及对我国网络分类法理论与实践的启示   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

张忠秋 《新世纪图书馆》2005,(6):16-20

论文在分析网络分类法与传统文献分类法差异的基础上，阐述了国外网络分类法的特点、问题、发展趋势以及对我国网络分类法理论与实践的几点启示。  相似文献   

我国信息资源共享实践及理论研究进展   总被引：53，自引：0，他引：53  

马费成  裴雷 《情报学报》2005,24(3):277-285

本文通过回顾信息资源共享的历史发展,研究信息资源共享的实践和理论进展,提出了信息资源共享的关键和目前存在的问题  相似文献   

国际学科教学知识的文献计量研究     

徐金雷 《课程.教材.教法》2018,(3):132-138

学科教学知识(PCK)自舒尔曼1986年提出以来,受到了广泛关注。通过在Web of Science核心合集中对"PCK"进行文献计量研究,辅以CiteSpace进行关键词共现等分析,可以从整体上了解国际PCK的研究现状、研究热点与研究前沿问题。通过分析发现,在研究方法上,文献计量方法的综合使用有利于形成科学而准确的结论;在研究内容上,国际PCK的研究热点与研究前沿特征词较相似,体现了创新研究的不足。  相似文献   

我的小学语文教育研究历程     

田本娜 《课程.教材.教法》2018,(2):116-123

历经多年的小学语文教改实验研究,在理论与实际相结合的基础上构建了"小学语文教学理论体系",形成了语文教育的基本观点:确定母语教育价值与定位;从语言学,解析"小学语文课程的性质、功能";从语文学科的性质,确定"语文教学发展语言能力、思维能力、思想、情感的发展目标";从汉字、汉语特点,"提升汉字教学的基本理论和方法";从语言学、文学及教学论,提出"读写教学的本真"以及"读写教学的基本原理和方法";从历史经验中,明确"我国的语文教育必须走中国的道路",要在继承传统语文教育基础上,吸取世界先进教学理论,发展我国的语文教育。  相似文献   

立足学科特色 增强核心竞争力 推进北京化工大学一流学科建设     

谭天伟 《高等工程教育研究》2018,(6):87-91

Tan Tianwei  相似文献   

论教育研究中的深度思维     

邵泽斌 《高等教育研究》2018,(10):48-54

研究者分析教育问题、解释教育现象、概括教育特征和阐释教育思想能力之间的差别,体现了其深度思维品质的差异。教育研究者的深度思维品质主要体现在基于对教育现象之想象力的联想思维、基于对教育行为之合理性的透视思维、基于对教育权威之超越性的批判思维、基于对教育思想之涌动性的具身思维四个方面。培植和发展研究者的深度思维,引导研究者进入观点触类旁通、反思深邃深刻、批判合理合情、思想诗性灵动的思维新境界,应当成为教育者的自觉担当。  相似文献   

一流大学建设高校海归教师科研表现自我评价的调查分析     

朱佳妮  吴菡 《高等教育研究》2018,(12):55-60

高校海归教师是归国留学人员的重要组成群体,他们知识储备丰富、国际化视野宽广。本研究基于跨文化再适应视角,采用问卷调查的方式,对41所一流大学建设高校的1417名海归教师回国后的科研表现及其主要影响因素进行调查分析。调查结果显示,海归教师对其在课题申报和成果发表方面的评价不高;其在海外学习和工作期间的适应情况、对院系工作氛围的认同程度以及与海外导师、同事或同门开展合作的频率,对海归教师的科研表现具有显著的正向影响。  相似文献   

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation     

Theocharis Katrakazis  Cath Dillon  Petra Juvan  Stavroula Golfomitsou 《文物保护研究》2018,63(8):450-465

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.  相似文献   

Turning a Service Learning Experience into a Model of Student Engagement: The Lighthouse Heritage Research Connections (LHRC) Project in Hong Kong     

Steve H. Ching 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(2):196-206

The digital shift has provided easy access to academic library users, and yet, the usage of archival collections continues to be low. At the same time, the need for innovation in library services for cultural heritage scholarship and its advancement is emerging. This paper outlines a library-led service-learning program that connects students with lighthouse artifacts, archival collections, scholars in global academia, and wider communities. Student engagement cases are provided to illustrate the way in which the librarian utilizes the Framework of Information Literacy for Higher Education by ACRL to work closely with students. These cases also demonstrate how students can contribute to knowledge creation and preservation efforts for a specific cultural heritage topic that is not static, but which keeps receiving new contributions or additions to the depository. Thus, this paper is an answer to the ACRL's call for pilot projects to be assessed and shared with the wider community of academic librarians and support staff. It also builds on emerging roles for academic libraries like engaged learning. Librarians must move beyond simply seeing themselves as partners. Instead, librarians should see themselves as prime facilitators that co-create and co-develop cultural heritage research and historical projects by connecting actors and resources more effectively than any single actor can do alone.  相似文献   

Ecological Study of Graduation Rates and GPA in a Library Credit Course     

Christina Heady  Megan M. Morrison  Joshua Vossler 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(5):642-649

The purpose of this ecological study was to examine the impact of a library credit course on graduation rates and GPA using pre-existing records. Over 20?years of aggregate institutional data were analyzed to evaluate the course's impact on first-time-full-time, white, and black students. Results were mixed: students who took the course were less likely to graduate than their peers who did not take the course but enjoyed slightly higher GPAs at graduation. It was discovered that students taking the course are not representative of the overall student body and struggle academically. Implications for revisions to the library credit course are discussed.  相似文献