In addition to a substantial drop‐out rate, there was a striking absence of students in classes, a moderate rate of participation, and an equally moderate amount of study activity on the part of the students. The teaching activities were uniform and predictable; the social interaction involved has a sermon ‐‐ like character; the investment, satisfaction, and benefits to the students were reduced. A deeper understanding of the phenomenon is sought through an analysis of organizational patterns and interests (antagonistic or colliding) at three systemic levels. The meta‐learning or hidden curriculum of the teaching seems to be one of fulfilling latent goals or functions that might have invalidating consequences for the qualification process. 相似文献