排序方式： 共有8条查询结果，搜索用时 14 毫秒
1
1.
科技评价体系是一个复杂的,多目标评价体系。当今科技评价已逐渐从强调科研产出,转向同时关注资源的使用效率,注重科技创新能力的提升和对国民经济发展的贡献。如何建立一个客观、公正、健全、规范的,且具备可操作性的科学评价体系引起了政府和科技界的广泛关注。本文以SSM系统分析为基础,从3E出发探讨了评价指标体系的构建和评价系统的设计。基于系统分析基础上形成的指标体系,既考虑了直接的产出,又分析了内部运行机制,形成的指标体系相对更全面、完整,在此基础上针对具体评价内容选择适宜的评价方法,可定量或定性,软硬结合,具有透明性和延展性,同时易与决策管理部门交流。 相似文献
2.
基于SSM分折的科研评价系统探讨 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
科技评价体系是一个复杂的,多目标评价体系。当今科技评价已逐渐从强调科研产出,转向同时关注资源的使用效率,注重科技创新能力的提升和对国民经济发展的贡献。如何建立一个客观、公正、健全、规范的,且具备可操作性的科学评价体系引起了政府和科技界的广泛关注。本文以SSM系统分析为基础,从3E出发探讨了评价指标体系的构建和评价系统的设计。基于系统分析基础上形成的指标体系,既考虑了直接的产出,又分析了内部运行机制,形成的指标体系相对更全面、完整,在此基础上针对具体评价内容选择适宜的评价方法,可定量或定性,软硬结合,具有透明性和延展性,同时易与决策管理部门交流。 相似文献
3.
The Leiden methodology (LM), also sometimes called the “crown indicator”, is a quantitative method for evaluating the research quality of a research group or academic department based on the citations received by the group in comparison to averages for the field. There have been a number of applications but these have mainly been in the hard sciences where the data on citations, provided by the ISI Web of Science (WoS), is more reliable. In the social sciences, including business and management, many journals and books are not included within WoS and so the LM has not been tested here. In this research study the LM has been applied on a dataset of over 3000 research publications from three UK business schools. The results show that the LM does indeed discriminate between the schools, and has a degree of concordance with other forms of evaluation, but that there are significant limitations and problems within this discipline. 相似文献
4.
The 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK involved the peer review of over 12,500 research outputs in Business and Management, of which 92% were journal articles. Each output was graded on a 4-point scale from “world leading” to “national” with a fifth point being unclassified. These grades were accumulated for each department to provide an overall quality profile in terms of the proportions of its outputs in each category. The assessments of individual papers were not made public but the papers submitted by each department were. This data provides a major opportunity for addressing issues of concern about the evaluation of research and the effects of journal rankings, as well as the possibility of reconstructing the judgements made by the Panel about journal quality. Given the submission details and the resulting grade profile for each department, we have used linear programming to produce the best estimate of the grades awarded to papers from each journal that had more than three entries. This provides both a grade profile for each journal and a single quality estimate. The results are shown to have good validity in comparison with other journal rankings. Apart from providing a ranking of 700 journals based on the RAE results, the paper is also able to shed light on issues such as the accuracy and coverage of the ABS ranking; the degree of selectivity of submissions; the dispersion of grades for a journal; and differences between different subject areas. 相似文献
5.
Knowledge Management Research & Practice - This paper addresses the issue of truth and knowledge in management generally and knowledge management in particular. Based on ideas from critical... 相似文献
6.
This paper considers the use of the h-index as a measure of a journal’s research quality and contribution. We study a sample of 455 journals in business and management all of which are included in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) and the Association of Business School’s peer review journal ranking list. The h-index is compared with both the traditional impact factors, and with the peer review judgements. We also consider two sources of citation data – the WoS itself and Google Scholar. The conclusions are that the h-index is preferable to the impact factor for a variety of reasons, especially the selective coverage of the impact factor and the fact that it disadvantages journals that publish many papers. Google Scholar is also preferred to WoS as a data source. However, the paper notes that it is not sufficient to use any single metric to properly evaluate research achievements. 相似文献
7.
In this work we develop new journal classification methods based on the h-index. The introduction of the h-index for research evaluation has attracted much attention in the bibliometric study and research quality evaluation. The main purpose of using an h-index is to compare the index for different research units (e.g. researchers, journals, etc.) to differentiate their research performance. However the h-index is defined by only comparing citations counts of one’s own publications, it is doubtful that the h index alone should be used for reliable comparisons among different research units, like researchers or journals. In this paper we propose a new global h-index (Gh-index), where the publications in the core are selected in comparison with all the publications of the units to be evaluated. Furthermore, we introduce some variants of the Gh-index to address the issue of discrimination power. We show that together with the original h-index, they can be used to evaluate and classify academic journals with some distinct advantages, in particular that they can produce an automatic classification into a number of categories without arbitrary cut-off points. We then carry out an empirical study for classification of operations research and management science (OR/MS) journals using this index, and compare it with other well-known journal ranking results such as the Association of Business Schools (ABS) Journal Quality Guide and the Committee of Professors in OR (COPIOR) ranking lists. 相似文献
8.
Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed. 相似文献
1