互依联盟何以可能?——中国枢纽型社会组织与国家之关系及其改革走向     

张荆红  丁宇 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2018,(6):131-140

中共十九大政治报告明确提出,要根据国情改革中国的社会组织,有效改善社会组织内部的结构功能和运行效率,以及它们与国家和政府的关系,这给我们重新审视中国的社会组织及其与国家、政府的关系提供了新思维。西方多元主义理论认为,作为整体的国家与社会组织之间是此消彼长的零和博弈关系。然而,中国枢纽型社会组织与国家的互依联盟实践表明,国家和社会组织之间也可能是合作共赢关系。国家和枢纽型社会组织构筑互依联盟的内在动力在于,互依联盟有助于确保双方获得各自所需的资源。互依联盟的国家法团主义本质,具有以下优势:促进国家社会的良好合作、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化以及提升社会组织公共服务能力等。同时,互依联盟也存在以下不足:枢纽型社会组织的"政治化"和"行政化"倾向、抑制其他社会组织的成长以及发展方向的不确定等。因此,枢纽型社会组织应采取去行政化、社会化、具有相对独立性的相互依存等改革措施,推进国家法团主义向社会法团主义转型。  相似文献   

浅析企业战略联盟的共同愿景调节机制   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

张嵩  黄立平 《科技与管理》2002,4(4):57-59

在先进管理理论的指导下，企业内部生产力潜能已逐渐被挖掘，而通过企业间不同的合作方式结成的战略联盟，成为改善和增强企业生产力和竞争能力的重要方式。从战略联盟的核心要素－共同愿景出发，分析了联盟企业共同愿景的一般形成过程，并给出了共同愿景的调节机制模型。  相似文献   

基于第三方担保的研发联盟风险防范机制研究     

张宝贵 《科学学研究》2007,25(1):138-140

以分析研发联盟中的风险为切入点,借用第三方担保在主权国家间条约或联盟中的风险防范机制,研究第三方担保对于研发联盟风险防范的有效作用。  相似文献   

美国社区学院校际联盟的主要模式分析     

丁辉  司首婧 《河北大学成人教育学院学报》2011,13(1):49-51

随着经济和社会的发展,美国社区学院面临着巨大的压力和挑战,如非传统学生人数的剧增、高校合并的弊端以及终身学习的要求。为整合各种资源,争取有利的竞争位置,社区学院开始建立联盟合作以化解危机。其联盟的主要模式包括垂直式合作模式、水平式合作模式以及混合式合作模式,联盟合作对各方都产生了深远的影响,其经验值得借鉴。  相似文献   

Strategic alliances in sport tourism: National sport organisations and sport tour operators     

《Sport Management Review》2014,17(4):407-418

This qualitative case study provides a sport-oriented perspective of sport tourism. It examines a strategic alliance between an Australian national sport organisation (NSO), the Australian Rugby Union (ARU), and a sport tour operator (STO), FanFirm. The study contributes insights into how NSOs can facilitate and develop sport tourism for major events through alliances with STOs. Findings indicate that by collaborating with the STO, the ARU accrued a range of intangible and financial benefits, which in turn provided an impetus for ongoing maintenance of the strategic alliance. In addition, the alliance was perceived to deliver advantages beyond the NSO–STO nexus, with rugby fans and host governments of rugby events also benefiting. The study demonstrates that sport organisations can play a role in maximising the tourism outcomes of major events and also suggests that smaller-scale, ‘bottom-up’ cross-sector alliances can contribute to maximising tourism outcomes of major sport events.  相似文献   

知识联盟动态发展的结构性影响因素研究     

马国强  张诚  张成洪 《科学学与科学技术管理》2007,28(2):158-165

知识联盟是企业获取外部知识尤其是隐形知识，提高自身竞争力的重要手段。针对知识联盟失败较多的现象，对影响知识联盟动态发展的联盟维持费用、知识资源特征、社会相客性等结构性因素作了分析。建立博弈模型，分两阶段研究了影响知识联盟形成和发展的结构性因素对企业行为决策的影响，并研究了这些因素之间的关系。  相似文献   

规避技术战略联盟运行风险：自主合作还是政府扶持？#br#     

杨震宁  吴晨 《科研管理》2021,42(5):21-30

技术战略联盟是合作伙伴资源共享、提高技术创新效率和共同创造价值的组织,但其创新活动往往伴随着各类风险,在实践中很多联盟的运行没有达到预期效果。如何降低联盟的运行风险,优化合作路径既是理论的前沿问题,也是实践亟待解决的难题。本文研究了技术战略联盟运行风险、协同合作与联盟稳定的关系,通过实证研究,结果表明：第一,技术战略联盟运行过程中利益冲突风险和分歧冲突风险会降低联盟的稳定性,而联盟依赖风险初期会提高联盟绩效,但随着依赖程度的逐渐加深,参与各方的自主开拓创新能力有可能受损,从而降低联盟绩效;第二,联盟内部的自主合作可以正向调节技术战略联盟运行中利益冲突风险、分歧冲突风险与联盟绩效的关系,并且削弱联盟依赖风险对联盟绩效的倒U型效应,从而起到协同优化的作用。政府扶持对技术战略联盟运行风险与联盟稳定关系的调节作用并不明显。  相似文献   

Gay–straight alliance (GSA) members’ engagement with sex education in Canadian high schools     

Alicia Lapointe 《Sex education》2014,14(6):707-717

This paper offers an examination of gay–straight alliance (GSA) members’ engagement with sex education, sexual health, and prejudice and discrimination in Canadian public high schools. It explores how five students’ (four straight and one gay-identifying) participation in GSAs served as a springboard for learning about and challenging stereotypes; prejudice; and discrimination directed at lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) people. Queer theory provided the theoretical underpinnings of the study, offering a lens through which to examine the heteronormative underpinnings of education, and a means to interpret how homophobic discourses circulate in school and society. Empirical data were obtained via observational notes from visits to nine GSAs and semi-structured interviews with the five GSA members. Findings suggest that straight allies can use their heterosexual privilege to address LGBTQ issues with their peers. Through GSA involvement, participants learned to interrogate and combat stereotypes about LGBTQ people and HIV-related myths, as well as to engage in queer discussion and political action.  相似文献   

A queer circle of friends,indeed! The school social as intervention or as movement     

S. Anthony Thompson 《International Journal of Inclusive Education》2013,17(10):985-1000

The purpose of this paper to present two approaches intended to support the social lives of those typically on the borders of school life. Circles of friends (CoFs) was designed to assist students labelled with disabilities, while Gay-straight alliances (GSAs) addresses needs of supporting students who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, two-spirited (gay/lesbian/bisexual First Nations people), queer and/or those questioning their sexual identity (LGBTTQQ). In laying out these approaches side by side, I argue that CoFs constitute a dis/abling pedagogy breed acquiescence, further pathologise students and create essentialised identification for all students. GSAs, in contrast, are constitutive of a queer pedagogy and promote active, agentive, healthy more complex identities. In short, CoFs are critiqued through GSAs and implications for inclusive schooling are explored.  相似文献   

Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems     

《Research Policy》2019,48(8):103766

Organizations build strategic alliances with other firms with the intent of tapping into partners’ resources and capturing long-term value from these relationships. Such partnerships are typically governed by contractual or equity arrangements with clear mutual obligations. More recently, however, organizations have begun to seek strategic partnerships with open innovation communities, which are novel digitally enabled forms of organizing, and where contractual commitments are not possible. Thus, selecting the right open innovation community as an alliance partner becomes a more complex decision. We follow how the organizational decision makers, in two technology firms that were pioneers of forming strategic alliances with open innovation communities, developed metrics around making such decisions. We build upon Shah and Swaminathan’s (2008) contingency model of alliance partner selection and consider how it applies to the case of partnering with open innovation communities. This framework was useful in to frame our findings, yet our work recognizes and builds upon two key differences: 1) the evaluation metrics used in selecting an open innovation community were more focused on value creation than value capture; and 2) open ecosystem considerations, and not just partner-specific metrics, featured prominently in this type of alliance partner evaluation. We develop the notions of community and ecosystem health to refer to these new metrics.  相似文献