我国优秀青少年女子羽毛球运动员身体形态特征研究     

尹少丰  朱〓伟 《广州体育学院学报》2019,(6):83-85

CUBA联赛经过20年的开展，其职业水平和影响力不断提高，对于开展高校篮球运动、储备篮球后备人才、传播校园体育文化及提高高校知名度都起到积极的作用。通过文献资料法、数理统计法、录像观察法和逻辑分析法，对第20届CUBA男子四强在整个赛程的攻防指标进行对比分析，对于四支队伍存在的优劣势，提出合理化建议。  相似文献   

面向学术图书的Altmetrics指标分析     

韩雨彤  周雨涵  杨伟超  刘晓娟 《图书情报工作》2018,62(14):91-97

[目的/意义] 探讨Altmetrics指标对学术图书影响力进行评价的有效性,为学术图书评价工作提出合理建议。[方法/过程] 获取Twitter提及量、Mendeley阅读量、在线书评数量以及馆藏量指标数据,对数据集的覆盖率、分位数等统计量分析后,将被引频数与Altmetrics指标进行了指标间相关系数检验,再对高Altmetrics指标值的学术图书进行年份分布、学科差异及图书主题等实证分析,探究各指标在学术图书影响力评价中的应用。[结果/结论] 传统计量指标被引频数与Altmetrics指标之间的相关性较低,说明Altmetrics可以作为学术图书评价的一个新视角,不同Altmetrics指标反映了学术图书影响力的不同维度。未来的学术图书影响力评价建议结合学术图书的年份、学科等特征,将传统的引文与Altmetrics指标相结合,探索更全面有效的评价机制。  相似文献   

Altmetrics工具的起源、质疑、改进与发展     

刘春丽 《图书馆杂志》2018,(3):84-91

对Altmetrics的发展过程及现状进行了较为系统的总结,主要包括Altmetrics工具的起源、危机和转型三方面,厘清Altmetrics工具的产生背景,系统阐释了其面对来自科学共同体内、外的质疑和挑战,采取的积极应答、改进和发展的具体策略。  相似文献   

基于主题关联的Altmetrics演进动态识别     

赵蓉英  魏绪秋 《图书馆杂志》2018,(3):92-99

Altmetrics是Web2.0时代一种新兴的计量方法并受到国内外学者的认同、关注与研究。识别国际Altmetrics主题演进动态,发现国际Altmetrics知识演化规律,从而为我国Altmetrics的研究提供借鉴或参考。基于此,本文运用Sci MAT软件绘制了Wo S中的2012—2015年Altmetrics研究文献的覆盖图、演进图、战略图三种知识图谱,以期识别出国际Altmetrics演进动态。研究发现:Altmetrics研究以传统计量学的理论方法为基础,其理论体系覆盖文献计量学、科学计量学、信息计量学和网络计量学;研究主题由学术影响研究向学术影响研究和社会影响研究转变;计量数据由引文数据向引文数据和社交媒体数据转换。因此,Altmetrics有着广泛的研究、应用与发展空间,值得研究人员尤其是计量研究人员的关注、重视及研究。  相似文献   

Author ranking evaluation at scale     

Marcel Dunaiski  Jaco Geldenhuys  Willem Visser 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(3):679-702

We evaluate author impact indicators and ranking algorithms on two publication databases using large test data sets of well-established researchers. The test data consists of (1) ACM fellowship and (2) various life-time achievement awards. We also evaluate different approaches of dividing credit of papers among co-authors and analyse the impact of self-citations. Furthermore, we evaluate different graph normalisation approaches for when PageRank is computed on author citation graphs.We find that PageRank outperforms citation counts in identifying well-established researchers. This holds true when PageRank is computed on author citation graphs but also when PageRank is computed on paper graphs and paper scores are divided among co-authors. In general, the best results are obtained when co-authors receive an equal share of a paper's score, independent of which impact indicator is used to compute paper scores. The results also show that removing author self-citations improves the results of most ranking metrics. Lastly, we find that it is more important to personalise the PageRank algorithm appropriately on the paper level than deciding whether to include or exclude self-citations. However, on the author level, we find that author graph normalisation is more important than personalisation.  相似文献   

Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?     

Mike Thelwall  Tamara Nevill 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(1):237-248

Altmetrics from Altmetric.com are widely used by publishers and researchers to give earlier evidence of attention than citation counts. This article assesses whether Altmetric.com scores are reliable early indicators of likely future impact and whether they may also reflect non-scholarly impacts. A preliminary factor analysis suggests that the main altmetric indicator of scholarly impact is Mendeley reader counts, with weaker news, informational and social network discussion/promotion dimensions in some fields. Based on a regression analysis of Altmetric.com data from November 2015 and Scopus citation counts from October 2017 for articles in 30 narrow fields, only Mendeley reader counts are consistent predictors of future citation impact. Most other Altmetric.com scores can help predict future impact in some fields. Overall, the results confirm that early Altmetric.com scores can predict later citation counts, although less well than journal impact factors, and the optimal strategy is to consider both Altmetric.com scores and journal impact factors. Altmetric.com scores can also reflect dimensions of non-scholarly impact in some fields.  相似文献   

Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers     

Zhigang Hu  Wencan Tian  Shenmeng Xu  Chunbo Zhang  Xianwen Wang 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(4):1133-1145

InCites Essential Science Indicators is becoming increasingly used to identify top-performing research and evaluate the impact of institutes. Unfortunately, our study shows that ESI indicators, as well as other normalized citation indicators, have the following flaws. First, the publication month and the online-to-print delay affect a paper’s probability of becoming a Highly Cited Paper (HCP). Papers published in the earlier months of the year are more likely to accumulate enough citation counts to rank at the top 1% compared with those published in later months of the year. Papers with longer online-to-print delays have an apparent advantage for being selected as HCPs. Research field normalizations lead to the third pitfall. Different research fields have different citation thresholds for HCPs, making research field classification important for a journal. In addition, the uniform thresholds for both articles and reviews in ESI affect the reliability of HCP selection because, on average, reviews tend to have higher citation rates than articles. ESI’s selection of HCPs provides an intuitive feel for the problems of normalized citation impact indicators, such as those provided in InCites and SciVal.  相似文献   

Making Video News Visible: Identifying the Optimization Strategies of the Cybermedia on YouTube Using Web Metrics     

Carlos Lopezosa  Enrique Orduna-Malea  Mario Pérez-Montoro 《Journalism Practice》2020,14(4):465-482

  相似文献   

温州经济发展存在的问题及对策——基于温杭甬台绍金经济指标的比较     

郑文秀 《温州职业技术学院学报》2014,(2):42-46

温州经济发展面临着“追兵渐近、标兵渐远”的态势。通过温杭甬台绍金在总量指标、质量指标、投资指标、出口指标和消费指标五大经济指标的比较分析发现，温州经济发展存在高商务成本、投资生态圈未戍形、中心城市扩容窄、物流平台拓展落后、深陷民间借贷和联保等问题。在当前重大转型升级期，温州应采取打好互保链这张牌，改善软环境，借城市经济“外推”服务业等切实有效的措施，用以助推温州经济进一步发展。  相似文献   

新浪微博替代计量指标特征分析   总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3  

余厚强  Bradley M.Hemminger  肖婷婷  邱均平 《中国图书馆学报》2016,42(4):20-36

通过对新浪微博替代计量指标进行统计分析,探索中文环境下替代计量指标的特征和规律。研究发现:新浪微博替代计量指标覆盖率不足1%,但由于追踪时间和追踪对象的局限,该数字可能被严重低估;新浪微博关注和讨论较多的论文来自"综合""生物化学、遗传学与分子生物学""保健科学""医学"及"生命科学"等学科;新浪微博替代计量指标的期刊分布满足对数曲线规律,除著名的综合性期刊如Nature等,预印本平台arXiv和开放存取期刊PLoS ONE等也获得了较多关注,生物学和医学的"明星期刊"最多;新浪微博主要关注最新论文,正式出版180天内受到关注的论文比例高达68.66%,同时也会关注经典论文;新浪微博发布者倾向宣传、推介和评论贴近生活、趣味性强、实用性高、涉及生命健康的学术论文,传递出引文无法体现的社会价值和学术价值;新浪微博替代计量指标呈现出显著的离散和集中分布特点,5.1%的学术论文获得了50%的新浪微博关注。此外,受新浪微博关注的论文在全球范围内获得远高于平均水平的关注度。  相似文献