| 略论行政诉讼中的证明标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孔繁华.略论行政诉讼中的证明标准[J].郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2004,24(2):111-115. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孔繁华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华南师范大学,政法学院,广东,广州,510631 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 证明标准是诉讼中与推定和自由心证密切相关的一个重要问题 ,而我国行政诉讼法及司法解释并未对此作出明确规定。确立我国行政诉讼的证明标准应考虑诉讼模式、行政诉讼的目的、审理对象、举证责任、审理程度、案件复杂程度以及国际上的通行作法等因素综合确定。我国行政诉讼的证明标准应是盖然性优势标准 ,这一标准又可分为一般盖然性、确信盖然性与必然盖然性三种优势等级。对原告与被告以及法律问题和事实问题的盖然性优势要求不同
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政诉讼 证明标准 盖然性优势 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6072(2004)02-0111-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年7月16日 |
On Proof Standard in Administrative Litigation |
| |
| KONG Fan-hua.On Proof Standard in Administrative Litigation[J].Journal of Yunyang Teachers College,2004,24(2):111-115. |
| |
| Authors: | KONG Fan-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Proof standard is one of the most important issues closely related to presumption and principle of free intention, but in China the Administrative Procedural Law and judicial interpretation have no provisions about this point. In the establishment of proof standard in administrative litigation,the following factors should be taken into account: litigation pattern, purpose, object of hearing, burden of proof, the extent of hearing, the complexity of the case, the international practice and so on. Therefore, Chinese proof standard in administrative litigation is preponderance of probability. It can be divided into three preponderant degrees: common, convincing and necessary. There exists difference in the application of preponderance of probability to plaintiff and defendant, and the legal question and factual question. |
| |
| Keywords: | administrative litigation proof standard preponderance of probability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
