首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论科技期刊审稿专家的选择与管理及其审稿积极性的调动
引用本文:詹燕平,游滨,陈移峰,侯湘.论科技期刊审稿专家的选择与管理及其审稿积极性的调动[J].编辑学报,2014,26(6):572-573.
作者姓名:詹燕平  游滨  陈移峰  侯湘
作者单位:重庆大学期刊社;
基金项目:2013年重庆市高校期刊研究会重点资助项目(CQXK201311)
摘    要:欲打造精品期刊,必须多元化选取合适的审稿专家,加强审稿专家队伍的管理,增强编辑与审稿专家的协作。加强与审稿专家的沟通,提高其审稿责任心。利用审稿专家的专业优势组约稿件,采取激励措施提高他们的积极性。

关 键 词:科技期刊  审稿专家  学术质量
收稿时间:2014/4/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/4/25 0:00:00

Selection,management and arousing enthusiasm of reviewers in academic journals
ZHAN Yanping,YOU Bin,CHEN Yifeng and HOU Xiang.Selection,management and arousing enthusiasm of reviewers in academic journals[J].Acta Editologica,2014,26(6):572-573.
Authors:ZHAN Yanping  YOU Bin  CHEN Yifeng and HOU Xiang
Institution:Journals Department of Chongqing University, 400044, Chongqing, China,Journals Department of Chongqing University, 400044, Chongqing, China,Journals Department of Chongqing University, 400044, Chongqing, China and Journals Department of Chongqing University, 400044, Chongqing, China
Abstract:Peer review process in sci-tech journal publishing is an important task to editorial departments, which determines the academic quality of the journals. Editors should diversify the selection of reviewers, strengthen the management of peer reviewers, and enhance the collaboration between editors and peer reviewers. Also, they should communicate timely with peer reviewers and strengthen their sense of responsibility, give full play to the positive effects of their journals, and take appropriate incentives to improve their enthusiasm.
Keywords:sci-tech journal  peer reviewers  academic quality
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号