| “四大索引”与科技评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄建军,王蔚良.“四大索引”与科技评价[J].编辑学报,2001,13(2):118-119. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄建军 王蔚良 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学学报自然科学与医学版编辑部, |
| |
| 摘 要： | 美国的《科学引文索引》（SCI），《科学评论索引》（ISR），《科技会议录索引》（ISTP）和《工程索引》（EI）等“四大索牙”编辑出版的意图是人们提供科技信息服务，而不是充当评定刊物或论文学价值高低的权威裁判，过分强调“四大索引”数据对科技工作评价的作用，会产生一些不可忽视的负面影响，只有公正，全面地认识“四大索引”的作用，才有利于我国期刊事业的健康发展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学技术评价 高校学报 《科学引文索引》 《科学评论索引》 《科技会义录索引》 《工程索引》 负面影响 《中国科技期刊引证报告》 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年7月4日 |
Influences of four index journals on collegiate journals in sci-tech evaluation in China |
| |
| Huang Jianjun,Wang Weiliang.Influences of four index journals on collegiate journals in sci-tech evaluation in China[J].Acta Editologica,2001,13(2):118-119. |
| |
| Authors: | Huang Jianjun Wang Weiliang |
| |
| Institution: | Huang Jianjun,Wang Weiliang author's address\ Editorial Department of Journal of Jinan University,510632,Guangzhou,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The information from the four index which include SCI,EI,ISR and ISTP has in recent years been widely accepted as an important guide line in evaluation of sci tech works and sci tech paper. However,such overemphasis of the evaluation function of these journals seems to have overstepped reasonable limits,resulting in some adverse efects, one of which is the impact on collegiate journals. A discussion about this and a brief introduction of the original function of the four index journals are given in this paper. |
| |
| Keywords: | four index journals sci tech evaluation collegiate journals First |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
