| 基于AMLC的科技期刊论文学术不端特征分析及对策研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蒋晓,杨锐,张凌之,田江.基于AMLC的科技期刊论文学术不端特征分析及对策研究[J].编辑学报,2021(6):652-656. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蒋晓 杨锐 张凌之 田江 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 《电子科技大学学报》编辑部,610054;四川省科技促进发展研究中心,610041;《四川大学学报工程科学版》编辑部，610065：成都 |
| |
| 基金项目： | *中国高校科技期刊研究会专项基金课题(CUJS2021-015)；四川省社会科学重点研究基地四川学术成果分析与应用研究中心资助科研项目(XSCG21QK-002)；国家社会科学基金西部项目(20XZZ011) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以2011—2021年《电子科技大学学报》投稿论文基于AMLC的检测结果为研究对象,对文字复制比、作者信息、文章信息等进行特征分析和讨论。统计结果显示,疑似学术不端的论文占10年总投稿论文的11.7%,且10年来呈现整体递减趋势；在读研究生和副高职称研究人员是学术不端的高发人群；学术不端行为以剽窃文字表述为主,第一作者本人或者团队的前期研究成果是其主要来源,通常不加引注。由此得出:1)文字复制不再是科技论文学术不端的显著特征,学术不端的表现形式越来越隐蔽且多样化,对此学术不端检测系统的作用有限；2)缺乏针对合理引用的判断标准；3)高校科研诚信和学术出版伦理建设亟待加强。因此,编辑部可分类型依托期刊协会统一制定明晰透明的学术不端判定标准、处置流程和内控制度,以学术不端检测系统为基础,加强发文要求和编辑规范,充分发挥专家和学术共同体的作用,协同应对学术不端,共建科研诚信体系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术不端 出版伦理 科研诚信 高校科技期刊 |
Analysis on the characteristics of academic misconduct of papers in scientific journals based on AMLC |
| |
| JIANG Xiao,YANG Rui,ZHANG Lingzhi,TIAN Jiang.Analysis on the characteristics of academic misconduct of papers in scientific journals based on AMLC[J].Acta Editologica,2021(6):652-656. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Xiao YANG Rui ZHANG Lingzhi TIAN Jiang |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 610054, Chengdu, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Taking the duplicate checking data based on AMLC of the papers in the Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China from 2011 to 2021 as the research object, this paper analyzes and discusses the characteristics of text copy ratio, author information, article information and so on. The statistical results show that the proportion of papers suspected of academic misconduct is 11.7% with an overall decreasing trend over the past decade; graduate students and researchers with deputy senior titles are high incidence of academic misconduct; and academic misconduct is mainly plagiarism, especially plagiarism of the first author or the team. As a result, we concluded that:1) text reproduction is no longer a significant feature of academic misconduct in scientific and technological papers, and the forms of academic misconduct are becoming more and more hidden and diversified; 2) judgment criteria for reasonable citation is insufficient; 3) the construction of scientific research integrity and academic publishing ethics in colleges and universities need to be strengthened. Editorial department can take the following measures in coping with misconduct:relying on periodical associations to formulate clear and transparent standards for judging and disposing academic misconduct, strengthening the publishing requirements and editorial standards on the basis of academic misconduct detection system, and jointly building a scientific research integrity system based on giving full play to the role of experts and the academic community. |
| |
| Keywords: | academic misconduct publishing ethics research integrity university scientific journal |
|
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
