共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 106 毫秒
1.
2.
西部面对“数字鸿沟”应注意消除观念上的误区，理性地跨越数字鸿沟．政府和教育机构要着实抓好教育信息化建设。师范院校图书馆要注意抓住教育信息化进程中的“数字机遇”，消除信息孤岛，促进资源共享，探求可持续发展之路。 相似文献
3.
消除数字鸿沟,构建和谐信息社会 总被引：16，自引：0，他引：16
文章分析了数字鸿沟的本质表现以及数字鸿沟对和谐信息社会的破坏,从图书馆的角度出发,提出了图书馆在消除数字鸿沟,构建和谐信息社会工作中的相应措施。 相似文献
4.
信息不公平主要表现为数字鸿沟和信息歧视。数字鸿沟和信息歧视现象为社会带来了诸多危害。为了消除信息不公平现象，应该采取的策略有：建立政府信息公开制度、大力发展和普及信息技术、提高人们的信息能力、发展和普及公共信息服务业等。 相似文献
5.
数字鸿沟与网络时代公共图书馆的职能 总被引：18，自引：1，他引：18
论文介绍了数字鸿沟研究中的图书馆。因特网发展导致的“数字鸿沟”使公共图书馆的保障信息公平的作用被重新认识。数字鸿沟问题使人们对公共图书馆职能有了新的认识，公共图书馆在消除数字鸿沟方面的特殊作用有：提供公共计算机因特网接入、进行基本信息技能教育、提供合适的网络信息资源。 相似文献
7.
信息通过网络进行传播,从而导致网络信息分布的严重失衡,进一步造成了难以逾越的数字鸿沟。提出消除由网络信息传播形成的数字鸿沟策略。 相似文献
8.
文章阐述了数字鸿沟本质上虽然是信息鸿沟,但数字鸿沟与信息鸿沟不能完全等同。信息鸿沟是数字革命之前就已存在的现象,数字鸿沟问题的实质是数字革命扩大、加剧了信息鸿沟。 相似文献
9.
针对我国东西部网络信息数字鸿沟问题,重点从经济,文化,人才、政策等几个方面分析原因,并提出消除数字鸿沟的意见和建议。 相似文献
10.
网络时代数字鸿沟的出现有其必然性,是世界经济发展不平衡、信息不公平的体现。文章认为资源共享将是消除数字鸿沟的有效途径,并探讨了图书馆在这一方面应肩负的责任以及为此而做出的积极努力。 相似文献
11.
对江苏省部分高校图书馆电子资源接入情况及参考咨询馆员的组成情况进行了对比研究,指出高校图书馆之间存在较大的电子资源接入沟和使用沟,进一步影响了高校之间的知识沟。提出要缩小信息时代的三道数字鸿沟——接入沟、使用沟和知识沟,高校图书馆应该多方参与图书馆联盟,加强人员培训,构建“学习型组织”。 相似文献
12.
对江苏省部分高校图书馆电子资源接入情况及参考咨询馆员的组成情况进行了对比,指出高校图书馆之间存在较大的电子资源接入沟和使用沟,进一步影响了馆与馆之间的知识沟。要缩小三道数字鸿沟,高校图书馆应该多方参与图书馆联盟,加强人员培训,构建"学习型组织"。 相似文献
13.
《资料收集管理》2013,38(3-4):327-330
SUMMARY The electronic resources (ER) librarian has a social responsibility to be knowledgeable about the digital divide. Discourse on the digital divide began in the mid-1990s and continues today. Data analysis reveals that divides still exist, particularly when considering income, education, region, disability, age, and race. Librarians face many challenges to take on the digital divide. These challenges include issues of access, content, technical literacy, privacy, civic participation, education, employment, non-use, and political debate. Yet for each challenge, there is an opportunity for the ER librarians to thrive while they face down the digital divide. 相似文献
14.
区域“数字鸿沟”形成原因分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
区域"数字鸿沟"在全球普遍存在,严重影响了和谐世界的建立,要想从根本上弥合区域"数字鸿沟"就必须分析其形成原因。信息资源的差距和信息技术使用技能的差距是区域"数字鸿沟"形成的直接原因,二者分别从"信息拥有"和"信息使用"方面发挥作用;经济发展水平的差距、政府相关政策的差异和社会文化的差异是区域"数字鸿沟"形成的间接原因,分别从"信息化需求"、"信息化环境"、"信息化意识"方面发挥作用。这5种原因以特定结构系统地结合起来,最终导致区域"数字鸿沟"的形成。 相似文献
15.
John Cox 《Learned Publishing》1999,12(3):173-178
STM represents 250 publishing companies and learned societies, and recognizes that the advent of digital networks affects authors, publishers, librarians, and readers. Dialogue between publishers and librarians is essential to creating the sense of partnership and open-mindedness needed to meet the future needs of scholarship and research. Publishers and librarians have complementary roles and responsibilities, serving the same needs and facing similar challenges. The interests of publishers and librarians need to be rebalanced in order to seize the benefits of digital information flow. Legislation provides a framework of copyright, privacy, competition, and consumer law that protects against misuse while facilitating the flow of information from author to reader. If laws need to be amended, such changes should be made on the basis of the mutual agreement of all members of the community. There is much to be achieved without legislative change. Neither publishers nor librarians should shy away from the issues that divide them, especially the scope of fair use and the exchange of copyright information between libraries. A more detailed analysis of the impact of copyright exemptions is needed. The development of a predictable licensing environment and the testing of new business models requires co-operation between publishers and librarians, and leads to better mutual understanding. STM seeks dialogue with libraries and with other members of the research and scholarly communities in order to meet the challenges, opportunities, and expectations created by the digital environment. 相似文献
16.
《Journal Of Access Services》2013,10(1):53-60
ABSTRACT As librarians confront the Information Age, it is imperative that they remain aware of the issues that affect the profession. Traditional library skills are no longer adequate for maintaining a competitive edge in the field. Post-graduate education in digital libraries offers information professionals an opportunity to broaden their knowledge of the new technologies utilized in libraries, as well as the issues generated by their use. This article surveys current educational opportunities with regard to digital libraries. 相似文献
17.
数字鸿沟是信息技术开发与应用领域中的障碍,目前它已成为构建和谐社会、实现社会公平正义的巨大障碍。通过加强信息资源共享、提高广大用户的信息素质、优化图书馆的服务质量、提升馆员自身的信息素养,高校图书馆可以而且应当在缩小甚至消弭社会性数字鸿沟中发挥重要作用。 相似文献
18.
Mamathole Margaret Lediga 《Public Library Quarterly》2018,37(3):296-305
ABSTRACTThe information and knowledge society has resulted in the exponential growth of information and communication technologies (ICTs), thus creating a gap between those who use ICTs and those who do not; hence the emergence of the term “digital divide” in the 1990s. One of the milestones of South Africa’s National Development Plan, a policy that charts the country’s development up until 2030, is to ensure that high-speed broadband internet is universally available at competitive prices. Notwithstanding the importance of ICTs in public libraries, the provision of such is still taking place on a limited scale in South Africa. This article investigates the use of ICTs in public libraries in South Africa as a tool in bridging the digital divide. It also examines the inequalities in access and use and suggests ways in which ICTs may be used to reduce the digital divide. A qualitative research methodology was adopted. In order for public libraries to function as an important tool in bridging the digital divide, there is a need to standardize the provision of public library services with regard to the digital divide. 相似文献
19.
20.
The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether a digital divide exists among European Union (EU) members, new members, and candidate countries. Beyond this, the second goal is to find out if a digital divide has a significant association with the process of becoming an EU member. First, member, new member, and candidate countries are classified into three groups, and MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) is applied to determine differences among these groups in terms of Information Society levels. Then, Information Society variables are analyzed using Discriminant Analysis. According to the results of the research, there is a significant level of digital divide in the EU and a certain information society level currently is not associated with EU membership. The EU must address the digital divide among member countries if they are to become a close-knit community, and to continue to be one of the most competitive economic powers in the world. Finaly, the EU might consider using information society level as an objective criteria along with other objective and subjective criteria currently being used as EU membership criteria. 相似文献