共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Yi‐hsiu Lai 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2010,41(3):432-454
The purpose of this study was to investigate problems and potentials of new technologies in English writing education. The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation (AWE) (MY Access) and of peer evaluation (PE) was compared. Twenty‐two English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Taiwan participated in this study. They submitted their draft to MY Access, received feedback from this automated grading system and then made some revision. In addition to the AWE, they also had peer revision in writing class. Three issues, including how writers used the feedback from these two kinds of evaluation, what progress they made in writing and how they perceived these two kinds of evaluation, are discussed. Results showed that EFL learners in Taiwan generally opted for PE over AWE. These findings raise several relevant issues, including social learning, feedback strategies, computer anxiety and cultural impact. 相似文献
2.
Mark D. Shermis 《教育实用测度》2018,31(3):177-190
ABSTRACTThis article employs the Common European Framework Reference for Language Acquisition (CEFR) as a basis for evaluating writing in the context of machine scoring. The CEFR was designed as a framework for evaluating proficiency levels of speaking for the 49 languages comprising the European Union. The intent was to impact language instruction so that “mastery” of one language has the same meaning as it does in another. A second objective is to provide a crosswalk for what one automated writing evaluation (AWE) system does in attending to the dimensions of the framework. The CEFR Framework is divided into five traits and different proficiency levels. The question then becomes: Does the AWE system attempt to measure these dimensions of writing? And, if so, how is this operationalized? Is it measuring aspects of communication that are not specified? The goal here is to create a common vocabulary between the writing community and those interested in AWE systems as to what is actually being measured by their software, and mapping that to a developmental scale of writing performance. 相似文献
3.
本研究以自动评分系统反馈和范文反馈为例,探讨纠错反馈与非纠错反馈对大学生英语作文语言复杂度的影响。借助 LCA､L2SCA和CohMetrix 3.0等在线分析器,对词汇复杂度和句法复杂度共10个代表性指标进行测量和分析。发现系统反馈能提高词汇复杂度但降低句法复杂度,而范文反馈对学生作文的词汇和句法复杂度均有显著的提升作用。由此可见,不同反馈方式对语言复杂度产生错综复杂的影响,相比而言范文反馈能促进文本质量在更多维度上的提升｡ 相似文献
4.
Kelley Regan Anya S. Evmenova Reagan L. Mergen Courtney Verbiest Amy Hutchison Reagan Murnan Sara Field Boris Gafurov 《Learning disabilities research & practice》2023,38(1):40-56
Rubrics can be used to give students targeted feedback on their writing and, therefore, teachers should be able to use them as a type of formative assessment to guide writing instruction. This article describes an exploratory study of how three teachers provided instruction for fourth, fifth, and seventh graders with learning disabilities and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in using a technology-based graphic organizer (TBGO) to compose persuasive essays. Given professional development inclusive of online modules, long-range plans, and virtually facilitated professional learning communities, the teachers used a digital dashboard to (a) monitor students’ writing progress with a genre-specific analytic rubric, (b) target a specific instructional skill, and (c) document their instructional decision(s). The article illustrates how educators can effectively use genre-specific writing rubrics in practice to make data-driven decisions about student writing. 相似文献
5.
白桂香 《北京教育学院学报》2001,15(3):37-41
研究借鉴了加涅的教学设计原理 ,把小学生阅读 -习作能力图式同化训练的教学设计成由九个教学环节组成的一个反馈教学系统 ,把小学生自主阅读 -习作能力的习得和赖以产生的条件作为各环节教学设计的基础 ,把教学干预与学生主体参与结合起来。同时分析了儿童的自主学习过程。与传统的教学设计相比 ,本教学设计更符合现代认知学习论的要求和小学生不完全自主学习的特点 ,更有利于促进学生自主阅读 -习作能力的发展 相似文献
6.
Modern instructional theory and research suggest that the content of instruction should be closely linked with testing. The
content of an instructional program should not focus solely on memorization of facts but should also include higher level
thinking. Three uses of tests within any instructional program are: (1) practice on objectives, (2) feedback about mastery
of those objectives, and (3) summative evaluation. The context-dependent item set is proposed as a useful tool for measuring
many higher level objectives. A generic method for developing context-dependent test item sets is proposed, and several examples
are provided. The procedure is useful for developing a larger number of test items that can be used for any of the three uses
of tests. The procedure also seems to apply to a wide variety of subject matter. 相似文献
7.
8.
作文批改与反馈是英语写作教学的一个重要环节,对提高学生的写作能力有着不可低估的作用,句酷批改网以其优势而深受广大师生的喜爱。句酷批改网的作文评分有很高的信度,但评分显著地高于教师的评分,尚不能反映学生英语作文的真实水平。从效度上看,以句子为单位,在词汇和语法等方面进行详细的评价,但在篇章结构、文体修辞、内容逻辑性和连贯性方面不能给学生充分的反馈。在运用批改网的同时,我们还要同其他的评估方式结合起来。 相似文献
9.
韩国汉语写作教学有着自身的特点,从韩国汉语写作教学的现状出发,以学生的作文为基础,通过课堂实践以及对学生反馈情况的分析,对韩国写作教材编写提出建议:教材编写应针对韩国学生和初学者,应和综合课汉字课教材紧密结合,只列出常见错误语法点,切忌不要把作文教材编写成语法教材。对韩国汉语写作教学提出建议:一是将格式和标点作为知识点先行讲解,二是写作教学从汉语初学者开始。 相似文献
10.
A random sample of 1102 grade 4–6 Chinese language arts teachers in Beijing, Macao, and Taipei City were surveyed about their instructional writing practices. Seventy-eight percent (n = 857) of the teachers completed the survey. Teachers were generally positive about the usefulness of their college teacher preparation program. They slightly agreed that they liked to write, teach writing, and were effective writing teachers. Their beliefs about writing were related to the instructional practices they reportedly applied, and textbooks along with school guidelines played a prominent role in shaping their overall writing program. Teachers’ programs emphasized product-based instruction, but also placed considerable emphasis on writing process and content. They further indicated an average writing class lasted 69 min, but almost 80 % of teachers indicated they taught writing only once every 2–4 weeks, raising a concern about amount and timing of writing instruction. Consistent with social/cultural theory, Chinese writing teachers in these three urban locations evidenced differences on almost every variable studied. We expected such differences as macro-level features involving government and educational policy varied across locations. The observed differences were mostly a matter of degree (i.e., teachers applied certain practices more or less frequently) versus a more general difference in how writing was taught. 相似文献
11.
Huahui Zhao 《Assessing Writing》2010,15(1):3-17
Existing comparative studies between peer and teacher feedback in English writing classes have predominantly used frequency measures of peer and teacher feedback in learners’ revisions to suggest their relative values for developing learners’ writing proficiency. However, learners do not necessarily understand the feedback that is used in their redrafts.This study distinguished learners’ use from their understanding of peer and teacher feedback. Eighteen Chinese university English learners participated in the study for sixteen weeks. Three research methods were adopted: (a) content analyses of learners’ use of feedback, (b) stimulated recall interviews on learners’ understanding of feedback, and (c) interviews on the factors that affected learners’ responses to feedback.The findings suggested that the learners used more teacher than peer feedback in their redrafts. However, interviews with these learners revealed that they used a larger percentage of teacher feedback than peer feedback without understanding its significance or value. Student interviews uncovered learners’ passive acceptance of teacher feedback and the facilitative role of first language use in peer interaction.This study suggests that learners’ understanding of feedback should be taken as at least an equally important factor as learners’ use of feedback in examining the relative value of peer and teacher feedback for developing learners’ writing proficiency. 相似文献
12.
Bart Huisman Nadira Saab Jan van Driel Paul van den Broek 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(6):955-968
Within the higher education context, peer feedback is frequently applied as an instructional method. Research on the learning mechanisms involved in the peer feedback process has covered aspects of both providing and receiving feedback. However, a direct comparison of the impact that providing and receiving peer feedback has on students’ writing performance is still lacking. The current study compared the writing performance of undergraduate students (N = 83) who either provided or received anonymous written peer feedback in the context of an authentic academic writing task. In addition, we investigated whether students’ peer feedback perceptions were related to the nature of the peer feedback they received and to writing performance. Results showed that both providing and receiving feedback led to similar improvements of writing performance. The presence of explanatory comments positively related both to how adequate students perceived the peer feedback to be, as well as to students’ willingness to improve based upon it. However, no direct relation was found between these peer feedback perceptions and students’ writing performance increase. 相似文献
13.
14.
David W. Denton 《TechTrends》2014,58(6):51-56
Feedback is an effective instructional practice for improving achievement. The importance of feedback has been understood by teachers for many years, yet recent research has elevated its status. One characteristic of effective feedback is personalized comments, which assist students in understanding their performance. Most research analyzes the effects of written feedback. Some current studies have examined the effects of alternative delivery methods, such as audio. One new approach for creating and delivering feedback is through screen capture technology. A case study was conducted to examine the effects of this method on the academic performance of 36 undergraduate students in a teacher education course. Results showed that screen capture feedback is effective for guiding corrections on a writing assignment. Students also reported that feedback was useful for knowing what they were doing right or wrong and that they would prefer more feedback of this type. 相似文献
15.
Jamie Y. Fearrington Patricia D. Parker Pamela Kidder‐Ashley Sandra G. Gagnon Sara McCane‐Bowling Christy A. Sorrell 《Psychology in the schools》2014,51(1):85-96
Many studies have found gender differences in certain areas of academic achievement, such as reading and math. Fewer studies have examined gender disparities in writing skills. The current study explored gender differences in written expression performance. Participants were 1,240 male and female students in third through eighth grade, representing five schools in a rural southeastern school district. Each student was administered an AIMSweb curriculum‐based measurement writing probe during the district's regularly scheduled fall, winter, and spring benchmarks. All measures were scored for total words written and correct writing sequences. Two‐way repeated measures analyses of variance were used to determine whether differences existed in the sample. A significant female advantage was found on both scoring indices at each grade level. These findings have strong instructional and theoretical implications for practicing school psychologists and other educators. 相似文献
16.
There does not appear to be consensus on how to optimally match students during the peer feedback process: with same-ability peers (homogeneously) or different-ability peers (heterogeneously). In fact, there appears to be no empirical evidence that either homogeneous or heterogeneous student matching has any direct effect on writing performance. The current study addressed this issue in the context of an academic writing task. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, 94 undergraduate students were matched in 47 homogeneous or heterogeneous reciprocal dyads, and provided anonymous, formative peer feedback on each other’s draft essays. The relations between students’ individual ability or dyad composition, feedback quality and writing performance were investigated. Neither individual ability nor dyad composition directly related to writing performance. Also, feedback quality did not depend on students’ individual ability or dyad composition, although trends in the data suggest that high-ability reviewers provided more content-related feedback. Finally, peer feedback quality was not related to writing performance, and authors of varying ability levels benefited to a similar extent from peer feedback on different aspects of the text. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for the instructional design of academic writing assignments that incorporate peer feedback. 相似文献
17.
通过对湖南中医药大学非英语专业学生的两篇习作的研究表明：在纠正学生写作中所犯的逻辑错误方面,相比教师反馈,同级反馈效度低。因此,教师在对学生习作进行反馈时,尤其要指出学生逻辑思维方面的漏洞,以提高他们的逻辑思维能力,从而从根本上提高学生的写作应用能力。 相似文献
18.
在线写作自动评改系统在大学英语写作教学中的应用研究——以句酷批改网为例 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
作文批改与反馈是英语写作教学的一个重要环节,对提高学生的英语写作能力有着不可低估的作用。将在线写作自动评改系统与课堂教学整合是英语写作教学改革的重要途径。本研究以句酷批改网为例,以学生的作文样本为研究语料,以问卷调查和访谈等为研究手段,着重探析了在线写作自动评改系统的有效性,并提出应增强在线自动评改系统的智能性及构建多元写作反馈机制。 相似文献
19.
Many states are implementing direct writing assessments to assess student achievement. While much literature has investigated minimizing raters' effects on writing scores, little attention has been given to the type of model used to prepare raters to score direct writing assessments. This study reports on an investigation that occurred in a state-mandated writing program when a scoring anomaly became apparent once assessments were put in operation. The study indicates that using a spiral model for training raters and scoring papers results in higher mean ratings than does using a sequential model for training and scoring. Findings suggest that making decisions about cut-scores based on pilot data has important implications for program implementation. 相似文献
20.
Peer response is viewed as an important aspect of writing instruction. Several meta-studies indicated that peer response is effective. However, these studies did not focus on the specific aspects of peer response that made it effective. The present review analyzes the effects of instructional factors accompanying peer response in 26 studies on writing proficiency. Three theoretical perspectives are distinguished: a cognitive, a social-cognitive, and a genre perspective underlying the reviewed studies. In all studies, additional instruction in strategies, rules for interaction, genre knowledge, or a combination of these instructional aspects to writing with peer response is provided. Peer response with such additional instruction seems effective compared with individual writing. Recommendations for future investigations are directed to methodological issues for comparing the effects of separate instructional components for writing with peer response. In addition, it is advised to direct future studies towards more controlled research into the effects of instruction in genre knowledge on writing with peer response. 相似文献