共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Rachel E. Scott 《The Reference Librarian》2017,58(1):19-32
The second part of this exploratory study compares student pretest and posttest responses conducted at the beginning and end of a semester-long research methods course to measure the evolution of undergraduate students’ comprehension of information literacy concepts as presented in the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education’s Frames. 相似文献
2.
[目的/意义] 《高等教育信息素养框架》是美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)2015年最新颁布的信息素养指导文件,通过对其内容的详细解读,可以了解美国高等教育信息素养标准的发展动态,为新时期我国信息素养教育理论与实践提供参考。[方法/过程] 分析《高等教育信息素养框架》的具体内容,建立框架结构模型,并与2000年版《高等教育信息素养能力标准》进行对比,剖析其显著特征与改进之处,思考高校信息素养教育的变革方向。[结果/结论] 认为《框架》拓展了信息素养的内涵与外延,重新界定了信息素养教育的核心内容,并强调元认知培养的重要性,指导新信息环境下高等教育信息素养教育向融入学术、注重能力、促进学术交流的方向发展。 相似文献
3.
Lorelei Sterling Jennifer McKay Christine Ericson 《Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning》2017,11(1-2):140-157
ABSTRACTIn states with limited road accessibility, rural students can feel isolated from library services. This article explores the creation, implementation, and results of an on-going longitudinal study assessing the library service needs of rural students in eLearning courses. To align with current practices in online pedagogies, including the Association of College and Research Libraries' Standards for Distance Learning Library Services and recent revisions to the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, this survey has been designed to help the library identify and improve services to enhance rural student success. 相似文献
4.
Amanda Ziegler 《Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning》2019,13(1-2):235-241
This case study evaluates the process of developing modules for inclusion in a learning management system that are informed by the Association of College and Research Libraries Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education (2015). A replicable, transparent process was used to match more task-oriented topics suggested by librarians and teaching faculty to the Framework. As more and more students receive instruction online it is important for academic libraries to provide robust services to those users within the LMS as well as outside of it. By providing instruction within the LMS that is tied to the Framework, and by using digital badges to make the exploration of information literacy more obvious to students, instructors, and librarians, libraries can develop instruction that meets users at their point of need and provides content while lowering the need for direct librarian involvement in all online courses. 相似文献
5.
ACRL的《高等教育信息素养框架》解读与启示 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义]2014年11月美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)发布的《高等教育信息素养框架》(第三版),取代2000年制定的《高等教育信息素养能力标准》,将成为国际范围内信息素养教育重要的指导性文件.通过对其内容的解读,为新信息环境下的国内信息素养教育提供参考. [方法/过程]阐述《高等教育信息素养框架》以及相关附件的内容,并与《高等教育信息素养能力标准》进行比较,分析其内容特点,进行总结归纳,在此基础上对信息素养教育的实践进行思考.[结果/结论]认为在新信息环境下,高校信息素养教育内容要与学术过程进一步融合,并注重Web 2.0环境下的信息交互参与,建立相应的教学内容与评价体系.此外,借鉴其他信息素养指导性文件,使信息素养教育内容、目标明朗化. 相似文献
6.
高校图书馆元素养教育体系模型构建研究 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：2
[目的/意义] 在信息技术迅猛发展和信息环境急剧变迁的背景下,信息素养的内涵和标准在不断变化,需要构建一个与之相适应的教育体系,以完善信息素养教育体系和全面提升大学生的信息素养。[方法/过程] 在对元素养理论研究及实践发展的相关文献和我国高校图书馆信息素养教育体系的现状进行调研后,以元素养理论为基础,以美国《高等教育信息素养框架》的核心理念为参照,结合我国高校图书馆信息素养教育的实际,构建出“A-B-C-D”元素养培育体系模型。[结果/结论] 我国元素养教育应该注重元素养的阶段培育,依据目标深化教育内容体系,拓展教育模式和方法体系,协同教育资源和教育主体。同时高校图书馆元素养教育的实施,应灵活参照《框架》,立足于学生的实际需求和信息素养教育成果,建立专门的元素养培养队伍及合理的发展管理机制等。 相似文献
7.
将美国的《高等教育信息素养能力标准》、《科学、工程与技术领域信息素养标准》和《人类学与社会学学生信息素养标准》3套学科信息素养标准与《高等教育信息素养能力标准》（通用）从依存关系、框架设计、成果指标3个方面进行了比较,指出了在制定学科标准时必须将信息素养教育目标与专业学科教育目标有效结合,并反映出学科特色;尽量运用实例对指标进行解释说明,以便于理解;必须适应信息素养教育的要求,拓展教学内容,改革教学方式,以更好地提升学生信息素养。 相似文献
8.
中、美大学生信息素养能力标准管窥 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
信息素养是个体能认识到何时需要信息、有效地搜索、评估和使用所需信息的能力。美国ACRL颁布的《美国高等教育信息素养评价》和中国清华大学颁布的《北京地区高校信息素质能力指标体系》为评估大学生的信息素养提供了理论框架,设立了教育标准。 相似文献
9.
[目的/意义]探索如何在《高等教育信息素养框架》的指导下,开展面向学生成功的大学生信息素养评估工作。[方法/过程]通过嵌入创新项目的信息素养课程开展实证研究,从信息素养思维观念和实践能力两个层面分3个角度在时间维度和质量维度上进行评估,采集创新项目过程信息素养思维观念变化、实践能力评估及创新项目过程后个人信息素养实践能力评估数据。[结果/结论]研究显示嵌入创新项目的信息素养评估起到了两方面作用：一是通过评估促进学生信息素养思维观念转变和实践能力提升,培养元认知能力;二是评估能有效分析面向学生成功的信息素养教育成效,展示图书馆对学生成功的贡献度。 相似文献
10.
[目的/意义]为提高国内高校信息素养教材编写质量,以2015年ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》为切入点,研究该框架对高校信息素养教材建设的指导作用。[方法/过程]通过解读2015年ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》理念,总结构建高校信息素养教材评价模型,并分析该框架对教材评价模型中各指标的影响。[结果/结论]针对具体评价指标给出编写建议,提出国内高校信息素养教材内容在新颖性、范围、重点方面的调整方向以及在意识目标、立体化结构、互动性体验、成效评估、图式外观等设计方面的改进策略。 相似文献
11.
Lyena Chavez 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(3):213-223
This report describes the creation of a library research center, where a team of librarians provide flexible, convenient, and personalized research assistance to students. A research center creates a positive user experience for students and places collaboration—both among librarians and students—at its core. Next-generation reference models must provide spaces and environments for students and librarians to engage in meaningful and deep information literacy conversations as outlined in the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. 相似文献
12.
Sara D. Miller 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(3):412-418
The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education combined with the Decoding the Disciplines model provides a structure for critical reflection to help unearth and clarify tacit, or unspoken, expert disciplinary processes and values related to information literacy. This article details a pilot project designed to explore the process of unearthing unspoken assumptions about disciplinary information literacy through reflective questions designed using the theory of Decoding the Disciplines and the structure of the Framework, and details themes which emerged from several of the author's experiences with librarians and teaching faculty working through the reflections. The themes are presented as potential further sites for inquiry and to generate ideas for identifying and addressing discipline-specific roadblocks, both practical and cultural, through the Framework. 相似文献
13.
Krista White 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2017,24(2-4):393-417
ABSTRACTVisualizing Oral Histories: Comics and Graphic Novels/Digital Humanities Lab, is a new model for digital humanities scholarship that other librarians can follow to create and teach similar DH labs attached to humanities courses at other institutions. The model includes a preliminary syllabus and preliminary assignment rubrics designed to integrate the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education” (ACRL Framework) into course assignments. Incorporation of a DH lab into a humanities course curriculum reimagines librarian roles and creates a pedagogical strategy that explicitly incorporates information literacy standards into the undergraduate course curriculum. 相似文献
14.
对"高校大学生信息素质指标体系"的评价分析 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
分析了《高校大学生信息素质指标体系》(讨论稿)的特点,从指标体系的结构和内容两方面,将北京地区高校信息素质能力指标体系和中国科学技术信息研究所的中国国民信息素质教育研究项目进行了比较,从而提出高校大学生信息素质指标体系应该包含信息道德这一指标,其制订应该考虑不同层次对象,并要求定性分析与定量分析相结合。以期对信息素质教育的研究起到较强的指导作用,并作为适合我国国情的信息素质评价标准的正式文件早日发布。 相似文献
15.
[目的/意义] 2015年2月美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)发布《高等教育信息素养框架》(正式文件),ACRL建议各图书馆将其与2000年《高等教育信息素养能力标准》配合使用,以继续探索变化中的新信息生态圈,希望通过分析其创新之处及思考存在的问题,为国内信息素养教育提供参考。[方法/过程] 阐述《高等教育信息素养框架》理论基础及各子框架内容,分析其创新之处和存在的问题,在此基础上对信息素养教育的实践进行思考。[结果/结论] 认为面对新交流技术及网络协同环境,, 高校信息素养教育要重视信息活动的情感因素,能指引社交网络化的信息活动并通过加强元认知教育培养学生的批判性思维。指出《高等教育信息素养框架》目前面临3个主要问题,即是否废止旧标准存在争议,图书馆员对其的接纳需要时间以及《高等教育信息素养框架》的可操作性有待进一步完善。 相似文献
16.
[目的/意义] 美国大学与研究图书馆协会（ACRL）2015年通过了《高等教育信息素养框架》,如何依据文件因地制宜地展开实践是高等学校图书馆和信息素养教育馆员关注的焦点。[方法/过程] 采用案例研究方法,研究南开大学图书馆信息素养教育团队根据ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》开展的嵌入式信息素养教育活动,展示包括对文件内容的解读、可行性分析、与合作者开展实践教学和分享成果等从宏观到微观的一系列实践路径。[结果/结论] 提出实践《高等教育信息素养框架》必须要结合高校实际情况,确定适宜的教学内容和实践方式,注重与院系合作者的深入协作,现场教学中应通过分析学术情境引入“阈概念”等实施要点。 相似文献
17.
Service learning connects learning in the classroom to real-world experience and presents opportunities for deeper library engagement in the curriculum and the teaching of critical information literacy. We present a model for teaching research and information literacy skills in the service learning context, making use of the evidence-based practice paradigm and engagement with community partners and practitioners in the field, connecting academic research to real-world practice and problem-solving. This model addresses some of the challenges of ACRL's Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education and is adaptable to various disciplines and educational environments. 相似文献
18.
Kim Leeder Reed 《图书馆管理杂志》2015,55(3):235-248
Column Editor's Note. Community college libraries are deeply underrepresented in the professional literature and organizations of academic librarianship. As a result, the challenges and successes that take place in the community college world are largely invisible to others. This JLA column lifts the curtain to reveal the uniqueness of community college libraries as described by their most passionate advocates: the librarians who work there. Articles in this column pay tribute to the commitment and creativity of community college librarians by providing a platform where they can share their professional perspectives and stories. Want to write for this column? Interested authors are invited to submit articles to the editor at kimreed@cwidaho.cc.Standards, frameworks, or threshold concepts? The Association of College &; Research Libraries’ efforts to update and revise the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) have opened extensive dialogue not only about the content of the new standards, but about the very nature of the document. Its proposed replacement, The Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education (2014) took a more theoretical path to describing what an information literature individual understands and how they behave. One common objection to the Framework, however, is that it is too advanced to be applicable in the undergraduate environment, and particularly in community colleges. In this essay, a community college library director takes a critical approach to the Framework to assess its relevance to the two-year college curriculum, grounding the discussion by mapping Knowledge Practices to Performance Indicators in the original Standards. The author recommends that community college librarians take an à la carte approach and integrate relevant elements of the Framework where they are useful without trying to address the entire document. 相似文献
19.
Naomi Hafter 《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2013,18(2):131-135
This study compares business librarians' information literacy practices and perceptions in response to the publication of the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education and Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Business librarians from AACSB-accredited institutions were surveyed in 2003 following the publication of the Standards and in 2015 following the publication of the Framework. This article discusses changes in business information literacy practice, including the use of professional guidelines, collaboration, and assessment activities over 12 years. 相似文献
20.
The new Framework for Information Literacy is a dramatic break from the previous Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards, but it does not depart as radically from actual library practice. Many librarians have already been trying to help students acquire a deeper, more contextual understanding of “information” and research. In this article, we review some of the practice-based literature on information literacy instruction that reflects efforts to teach this more nuanced view of “information,” and we highlight examples of ongoing instructional practices from a number of college and university libraries that teach in ways that are compatible with the new Framework. 相似文献