共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 896 毫秒
1.
以CSSCI数据库中来源于档案学的4269条文献为研究对象,利用CitespaceⅡ软件对相关引文数据和关键词数据进行分析和处理,以知识图谱的方式,梳理了近些年我国档案学研究的热点领域、前沿主题以及关键知识节点。 相似文献
2.
本文以中国学术期刊全文数据库为数据统计源来统计,对我国近10年档案学文献产出量的时间动态分布、相邻学科文献量对比、档案学分支学科和研究领域文献量年度变化情况及档案学期刊地区分布进行了统计分析,并对我国档案学各分支学科和研究领域的重点与热点问题进行了分析探讨。 相似文献
3.
本文以CSSCI数据库中收录的二级学科为“档案学”的2421篇来源文献为研究对象,借助信息可视化工具Cite Space V对所采集的相关数据进行共现分析和聚类分析,绘制出近十年我国档案学领域的研究机构知识图谱、研究主体知识图谱,直观展现我国档案学领域的研究力量分布,确定我国档案学领域的领袖人物。通过软件提供的词频探测技术绘制我国档案学领域的研究热点与研究前沿知识图谱,揭示档案学领域的主流研究领域和热点研究问题。 相似文献
4.
我国图书馆管理研究现状的知识图谱分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
以CSSCI数据库中来源于图书馆管理的1268条文献为研究对象,利用CitespaceⅡ软件对相关引文数据和关键词数据进行分析和处理,以知识图谱的方式,梳理了我国图书馆管理领域的研究力量分布、学术代表人物、期刊分布以及相关的重要学术文献,分析了近些年图书馆管理研究的热点领域和前沿主题。 相似文献
5.
1 引言
利用引文分析法对学术期刊进行测定和评价,其目的是从文献引证的角度透视期刊的学术水平和总体质量[1].<档案管理>(以下简称<管理>)作为档案学的核心期刊,多年来在我国档案学研究领域发挥了重要的作用.本文依据<中国学术期刊网>(CNKI)的档案学、档案事业库作为文献数据统计源,对<管理>创刊以来载文被引的年代、高频被引论文、高频被引作者和基金论文四个方面进行了统计分析,试图从文献引证的角度透视<管理>的学术水平和期刊质量,为了解评价该刊的学术水平和质量提供一些量化数据参考. 相似文献
6.
为进一步了解档案学实证研究方法的运用现状,以档案学核心期刊所载相关文献为样本,利用内容分析法和文献计量分析法,从相关文献分布、数据收集、主题内容等方面揭示档案学实证研究方法的运用状况,发现档案学实证研究方法运用中存在诸如研究主题范围较为狭小、研究流程不规范、数据收集手段单一且缺乏验证、结论过于简单或无结论等方面的问题,进而提出相应的改进建议。 相似文献
7.
8.
本文以CSSCI收录的两种档案学期刊《档案学研究》和《档案学通讯》发表于2002-2012年的2704篇学术文献为研究对象,采用共词分析、社会网络分析、多元统计分析和战略坐标分析等研究方法,绘制了2002-2012年我国档案学研究主题的知识图谱,确定了我国档案学研究的16个重要研究主题及其演变趋势。 相似文献
9.
10.
以图书馆学、情报学与档案学领域的11,757篇论文为数据样本,运用信息可视化软件CiteSpace,揭示近15年间该一级学科下的图书馆学、情报学、档案学的主流研究领域、研究前沿、对各学科发展产生重要影响的学者及其代表文献作品,并进行了学科之间的比较分析。结果发现,这15年间,图书馆学表现为4个主流研究领域,情报学3个主流研究领域,档案学1个核心领域;图书馆学与情报学有1个共同的主流研究领域——信息检索,而档案学的研究与二者相脱离。通过研究前沿的分析发现,情报学的直接现实性最强,与企业的联系最为紧密,其各分支领域的发展趋势也较为明朗。文章研究对于促进我国图书情报与档案学的健康发展具有借鉴意义。 相似文献
11.
12.
在调查比较中英文献中日益增多的档案多元现象的基础上,归纳了国外档案多元论代表性作者的代表性学术观点,探究了档案多元论与档案中立说及文件连续体管理模式和文件管理信息学的关系,讨论了档案多元论对档案教育与研究的影响以及对档案实践应用的启示。 相似文献
13.
本文基于研究主题的挖掘与演化分析,对改革开放以来我国档案学研究的主题结构、演化规律、热点变迁与研究前沿进行了透视。发现：①“档案资源建设与服务”是改革开放以来我国档案学领域形成的规模最大且最具发展潜力的核心主题社区;②“档案资源&档案信息资源”主题形成前后,我国档案学领域出现改革开放以来最为明显的主题分化与融合现象;③改革开放以来我国档案学研究热点有很明显的“世纪分割”现象,“互联网+”“大数据”等成为学科研究的前沿。同时指出,档案学研究中存在如下问题：①思维保守以致超前研究较匮乏;②盲目追求热度而研究深度不足;③国外经验与国内实践间的冲突。面对问题,档案界应：①做好规划,树立自信;②稳中求进,逆向思维;③正视差别,回归理性。 相似文献
14.
Carol Couture 《Archival Science》1987,1(2):157-182
This text is essentially based on works carriedout for a research which was subsidized from1997 to 2000 by the Social Sciences andHumanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).The goal of this study was to examine thegeneral tendencies of education and research inarchival science. First, a review of theliterature published from 1985 to 1998 allowedus to establish a state of the art. Then, asurvey was completed with a questionnaire whichhas been sent to educational institutions,national archives institutions and researchers.Answers were received from more than 70different countries. With regards to theeducation program, the analysis of data showsthat there have seen notable progresses. Morethan the growth of the number of programs, wemust especially recognize the constantimprovement of its contents, which is achievedin conformity with the propositions made in theliterature. As for the research, it exists acommunity of ideas about fields and themes tobe privileged even if there is an apparentdivision of the researchers into two groups.The first group distinguishes itself by itscohesion by unanimously recognizing a smallnumber (nine) of priorities in research inarchival science. The second group showsmultiple interests which cover 30 researchthemes. The author conclude in saying that thedevelopment of education and research inarchival science are on their way, but nothinghas yet been won. It is important to accentuatethe efforts to insure a durable life toeducation and research as pillars of thediscipline. 相似文献
15.
Carol Couture 《Archival Science》2001,1(2):157-182
This text is essentially based on works carried out for a research which was subsidized from 1997 to 2000 by the Social Sciences
and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). The goal of this study was to examine the general tendencies of education
and research in archival science. First, a review of the literature published from 1985 to 1998 allowed us to establish a
state of the art. Then, a survey was completed with a questionnaire which has been sent to educational institutions, national
archives institutions and researchers. Answers were received from more than 70 different countries. With regards to the education
program, the analysis of data shows that there have seen notable progresses. More than the growth of the number of programs,
we must especially recognize the constant improvement of its contents, which is achieved in conformity with the propositions
made in the literature. As for the research, it exists a community of ideas about fields and themes to be privileged even
if there is an apparent division of the researchers into two groups. The first group distinguishes itself by its cohesion
by unanimously recognizing a small number (nine) of priorities in research in archival science. The second group shows multiple
interests which cover 30 research themes. The author conclude in saying that the development of education and research in
archival science are on their way, but nothing has yet been won. It is important to accentuate the efforts to insure a durable
life to education and research as pillars of the discipline.
This text is an overview of a project which has been subsidized by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
Canada (SSHRC) from 1997 to 2000. It has been presented in September 2000 in Seville (Spain) at the 10th Symposium of the
Section for Archival Education and Training of the International Council on Archives (CIA/SAE). 相似文献
16.
中国档案学研究内容广博,外国档案学研究内容精深;中国档案学研究主体以高校档案专业教师为主,外国档案学研究主体以档案实际工作者为主;中国档案学研究方法以定性描述为主,外国档案学研究方法以实证研究为主。中外档案学研究的明显差异性不是偶然出现的,它与中外档案事业管理体制、教育体系和各国研究历史传统、档案职业专业化水平等诸多因素都有关系,在本文中,作者对产生这三个方面差异的原因进行了分析。 相似文献
17.
Fernanda Ribeiro 《Archival Science》1987,1(3):295-310
The dominant paradigm in Archival Science, thehistorical-technicist paradigm, has its origins with the French Revolution and raised from the social, economic, political, ideological and cultural
changes that occur during the 19th and 20th centuries. During this last one and due specially to the technological revolution
Archival Science reinforced its technical component and became autonomous in face of History, but the consolidation of the
model, based on a custodial, technicist and documentalist perspective, is associated to a knowledge essentially empirical.
By effect of the new conditions generated by Information Society, the dominant paradigm entered into a crisis and developed
inside itself the factors which, unavoidably, will produce the paradigm shift. The new paradigm — thescientific-informational paradigm — conceives Archival Science as an applied discipline into the scope of Information Science and defines unequivocally
its object of study — the archive, understood as aninformation system — and its scientific method of research. The method tends to find consolidation through quadripolar research dynamics, which
is operated and continuously repeated within the field of knowledge itself, which implies a permanent interaction on four
poles — epistemological, theoretical, technical and morphological. 相似文献
18.
Archival science and changes in the paradigm 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Fernanda Ribeiro 《Archival Science》2001,1(3):295-310
The dominant paradigm in Archival Science, thehistorical-technicist paradigm, has its origins with the French Revolution and raised from the social, economic, political, ideological and cultural
changes that occur during the 19th and 20th centuries. During this last one and due specially to the technological revolution
Archival Science reinforced its technical component and became autonomous in face of History, but the consolidation of the
model, based on a custodial, technicist and documentalist perspective, is associated to a knowledge essentially empirical.
By effect of the new conditions generated by Information Society, the dominant paradigm entered into a crisis and developed
inside itself the factors which, unavoidably, will produce the paradigm shift. The new paradigm — thescientific-informational paradigm — conceives Archival Science as an applied discipline into the scope of Information Science and defines unequivocally
its object of study — the archive, understood as aninformation system — and its scientific method of research. The method tends to find consolidation through quadripolar research dynamics, which
is operated and continuously repeated within the field of knowledge itself, which implies a permanent interaction on four
poles — epistemological, theoretical, technical and morphological. 相似文献
19.