共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 265 毫秒
1.
通过分析比较我国医学核心期刊、统计源期刊和一般期刊的出版参数和主要文献计量学指标,为医学中文核心期刊的编辑出版策划提供参考依据.结果显示: 中文核心期刊的论文平均长度、有英文摘要论文比、影响因子、总被引频次和基金论文比均显著高于统计源期刊和一般期刊.而中文核心期刊的出版频率、年总页码数显著高于统计源期刊,但低于一般期刊.在办刊实践中,必须采取综合措施,根据自身情况合理设置出版周期,在保证稿件质量的前提下适当扩大信息容量,多发表学术水平高的研究原著,论文尽可能附英文摘要,刊登论文适当向基金论文倾斜,以提高期刊的学术水平和影响力. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
学术运营是数字出版平台实现科技期刊的知识价值和学术价值的基础。基于中华医学会杂志社英文数字出版平台Mednexus的运营实践,笔者提出中国英文科技期刊数字出版平台的学术运营的内涵,并阐明数字出版平台可通过网站/数字出版平台服务、文献推送服务、对接知识发现系统、搜索引擎优化技术、对接其他数据库或文献交互平台、对接学术社交媒体等不同的方式开展学术运营活动。进而,笔者分析了中国英文科技期刊数字出版平台的学术运营的现状,并从平台运营、数字出版产业链构建、平台可持续发展的视角分别阐述学术运营过程中的难点,为科技期刊平台的建设和发展提出值得系统性思考的问题。 相似文献
6.
7.
Journal articles are the most common publication format for U.S. academic health sciences librarians. This is consistent with the findings of other researchers. Of the total publications in this study, 68% were in journals. Watson found that 69% of the academic librarians' publications were published in some type of journal [8]. Similarly, Yerkey and Glogowski found that 67% of the publications in their study were journal articles, although their population consisted of all types of authors of library/information science materials [9]. Both the present study and Watson found that monographs were the second most common publication outlet. Watson found that 16% of the total publications were monographs; the current study identified 14.8% of the total publications as monographs [10]. Although Watson's findings are similar to the newer results, it is important to note that Watson's study was conducted in a different manner and included book reviews, which were not counted in the present study. The health sciences librarians in the present study published more than two thirds of their articles in library/information science journals and 27% in health sciences journals. Similarly, in Yerkey and Glogowski's study, the second-largest number of library/information science articles appeared in medical and health sciences journals [11]. Fang also found that 22.57% of the journal articles on health sciences librarianship or by health sciences librarians were in medical journals [12. This seems to demonstrate the desire of health sciences librarians to communicate with the health professionals. Yerkey and Glogowski that library and information science is an interdisciplinary field, "borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines"[13]. 相似文献
8.
9.
Academic librarians tend to publish in traditional “library” journals rather than journals directed at other academic disciplines, thereby missing the opportunity to inform and educate a key audience. This article alerts librarians to publishing opportunities in discipline-specific academic journals in the Arts & Humanities, Sciences, and Social Sciences, both as a means of promoting information literacy (IL) and effecting outreach to faculty. Selection criteria are defined and discussed. The results of the study are presented by discipline in table format with data on each journal including publisher, affiliation, publication frequency, review time, acceptance rate, and ranking indicators. 相似文献
10.
11.
Dario SAMBUNJAK Mirjana HUIĆ Darko HREN Milica KATIĆ Ana MARUŠIĆ Matko MARUŠIĆ 《Learned Publishing》2009,22(1):57-70
Scholarly journals, especially in non‐English‐speaking countries, may perform very different functions depending on whether they are published for national or international audiences. Four hundred and sixty‐six academic physicians and non‐academic general practitioners in Croatia were surveyed on their knowledge about two Croatian medical journals: Lije?ni?ki vjesnik (published in Croatian) and Croatian Medical Journal (published in English). The physicians were also surveyed about the importance of all national and international journals published in Croatia, and the types of articles they thought should be published in these journals. More respondents rated national (n = 329, 72.6%) than international journals (n = 275, 63.5%, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test) as very important for the medical profession. On the other hand, publishing in international journals was more often rated as important than publishing in national journals (n = 184, 42.5% vs. n = 125, 27.8%; P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test). Guidelines for clinical practice were rated as the most important publication item in national journals, and original scientific articles in international journals. 相似文献
12.
研究大学生群体新冠疫苗科普信息搜寻意愿影响因素,有助于更好地开展针对该群体的新冠疫苗科普工作。目前,对信息搜寻行为中情感因素影响的研究并不完善,对恐惧的作用缺乏研究。本文采用问卷调查法和结构方程模型对大学生群体新冠疫苗科普信息搜寻意愿影响因素进行分析。研究发现:感知严重性和感知易感性正向影响恐惧;恐惧、态度、主观规范、知觉行为控制正向影响新冠疫苗在线科普信息搜寻意愿;面对新冠疫苗负面信息,女性恐惧感高于男性,年龄与恐惧和搜寻意愿呈显著负相关,女性、人文社科类学生具有更强的搜寻意愿。因此,基于研究提出如下建议:第一,新冠疫苗科普信息传播应以传播科学知识、回应公众关切、缓解公众恐惧为首要目标,切断“信息疫情”的蔓延;第二,可适当采用恐惧诉求,发挥人际传播的作用,以提升大学生新冠疫苗科普信息搜寻意愿;第三,要提升男性搜寻意愿,针对男性和人文社科类大学生开展精准科普,也要缓解女性恐惧感。 相似文献
13.
Titles are a crucial feature of research papers and have become increasingly important with changes in publishing practices and the explosion of published research. As a result, novice writers seeking to get their work noticed in international journals might benefit from a clear understanding of the features of research titles and an awareness of the relationship between language and disciplinary context. In this study, we explore this relationship and the impact of changing contexts on titles across the last 60 years on the length, form and content of 36,000 titles from the 10 leading journals from six disciplines spread along a soft-hard science continuum. Our results show a considerable increase in the length of titles coupled with more interrogative and compound titles in almost all disciplines. There has also been a growing mention of methods in the titles of hard knowledge papers with more frequent inclusion of results in the softer domains. These diachronic changes can be attributed to different characteristics of the fields and of the changing dynamics of the publishing context. Our findings have important implications for early career academics seeking to publish in English and contribute to studies of diachronic analysis of academic discourse. 相似文献
14.
Internationalization of China's English‐language academic journals: An overview and three approaches
This paper presents data regarding the publication of Chinese English‐language journals (CELAJs), building on previously published information to investigate the status, growth, and international penetration of these journals. The article also presents three case studies of CELJs to demonstrate different strategies for achieving internationalization. We find that there has been rapid growth in CELJs between 2006 and 2011 but mostly in the science, technology and medicine disciplines. There are now 435 CELJs, of which 62.3% are published in association with a western publisher. Partnership has been shown to provide immediate benefits to an established successful journal (Cell Research), has helped to relaunch an established title in English (Bamboo and Silk), and has enabled the successful launch of a new journal (Global Health Research and Policy). The authors conclude that there are three criteria for successful international CELJs: increased visibility, good editorial boards, and international publishing partnerships. 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
从编委、稿源、语言、流通4个方面调查韩国学术期刊的国际化状况,考察NRF、KOFST、KISTI等机构促进学术期刊国际化的一些具体政策措施。研究结果表明:韩国学术期刊总的国际化水准还比较低,但编委国际化、流通国际化方面相对较好,医学期刊国际化水准相对较高;韩国基本形成了一个较为完备的促进学术期刊国际化的支持系统,其期刊国际化资助计划涵盖了期刊的投稿、审稿/编辑、发行、流通等全过程。根据韩国学术期刊国际化进程的经验教训,提出了中国学术期刊国际化路径的建议。 相似文献
18.
Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study of publishing behaviour among a group of Arab scholars in social science and humanities disciplines. The paper also investigated the number of Arab scholars who are publishing in predatory journals and the reasons that drive them to select these journals to share their scholarly findings. The study adopted a mixed methods approach. Eighteen journals that were categorized as predatory journals were scanned to find the number of Arab scholars who published in them. Then, a questionnaire was sent to Egyptian and Saudi scholars as they were found to be the top Arab contributors in these journals. The questionnaire was followed by semi‐structured interviews to gain an in‐depth understanding of the publishing behaviour. The data showed that many Arab scholars prefer publishing in predatory journals as these journals are easier and faster. The results also indicate that there is a need to raise the awareness of the harm that predatory journals can cause to the scholars and how they can avoid these journals. This study was conducted with social science and humanities scholars in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The publishing behaviour may differ in other scholarly disciplines and other Arabic countries. 相似文献
19.