共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 279 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
<纵横>杂志是国内重要的文史类期刊之一,肩负着口述史料征集、整理和刊发的重任.作为<纵横>的一名编辑.作者从征集和整理口述史料的重要性、口述史料征集需要编辑慧眼识珠的能力、口述史料整理中编辑需要把好三关、提高口述史料编辑职业素养四个方面进行了总结,其心得体会可供同行借鉴. 相似文献
5.
说起编辑活动,人们可以联想到的是文化传导实施中多种多样的编辑活动,或编书籍,或编报刊,或编电讯,或编广播电视节目等。这些编辑活动都是一种社会文化现象,从编辑主体来看,又都是人们活动的一种形态。它们既有其个性,也有其共性。编辑学应当从这种共性与个性的区别和联系中探寻编辑活动的道理。编辑活动同人的其他活动一样,都是在与活动对象的特性相联系和比较中显示出自身特性来的。人的活动能力、意识与活动对象都是社会历史发展的产物。编辑活动、编辑意识与编辑活动对象也是如此。在这种与 相似文献
6.
质量是期刊的生命。期刊质量的高低关键在于期刊的编辑。作为期刊编辑,无论在任何时期,首先要有强烈的政治意识、大局意识和责任意识。在此前提下,还应强化如下意识。一、策划意识期刊的关键在于策划。策划的实质是一种从期刊整体的全方位的设计到组织实施的过程,其核... 相似文献
7.
8.
期刊编辑包括组稿、选稿、定稿等几个主要环节,是一个结构复杂的工程,既有认识的问题,又有方法的问题,怎样提高编辑工作的科学性,提高刊物的质量,是编辑长期探索的问题。将系统科学方法引进编辑工作,是探索这个问题的一个新的角度和途径。为什么可以将系统科学方法引进期刊编辑工作呢? 根据系统理论,系统是由有特定功能的、相互间具有有机联系的许多要素所构成的一个整体。世界上所有的事物都以系统的形式 相似文献
9.
10.
期刊应以内容为王,并提高全面质量.纸质期刊与网络期刊或多媒体需要“整合”或“融合”,它们不仅长期共生共存,而且相互依托与转化,从而共创期刊出版事业的繁荣.有期刊就有编辑,编辑会永远存在. 相似文献
11.
There is an overall perception of increased interdisciplinarity in science, but this is difficult to confirm quantitatively owing to the lack of adequate methods to evaluate subjective phenomena. This is no different from the difficulties in establishing quantitative relationships in human and social sciences. In this paper we quantified the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals and science fields by using an entropy measurement based on the diversity of the subject categories of journals citing a specific journal. The methodology consisted in building citation networks using the Journal Citation Reports® database, in which the nodes were journals and edges were established based on citations among journals. The overall network for the 11-year period (1999–2009) studied was small-world and followed a power-law with exponential cutoff distribution with regard to the in-strength. Upon visualizing the network topology an overall structure of the various science fields could be inferred, especially their interconnections. We confirmed quantitatively that science fields are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary, with the degree of interdisplinarity (i.e. entropy) correlating strongly with the in-strength of journals and with the impact factor. 相似文献
12.
论高校自然科学学报在学科建设与发展中的作用 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
高校自然科学学报的功能定位与核心竞争力,决定了它与高校学科建设的紧密关系。高校自然科学学报在巩固优势学科、培育新兴学科、培养学科人才以及宣传学科科研成果等方面起到了积极的推动作用。学报在学科建设与发展中应充分发挥其功能作用,高校自然科学学报与高校的学科建设与发展战略应保持一致,要着力特色栏目的作者队伍建设,要不断提高编辑的素质。在期刊改革过程中务必充分考虑高校自然科学学报的特质,以利于高校教学和科研健康发展。 相似文献
13.
In this study we map out the large-scale structure of citation networks of science journals and follow their evolution in time by using stochastic block models (SBMs). The SBM fitting procedures are principled methods that can be used to find hierarchical grouping of journals that show similar incoming and outgoing citations patterns. These methods work directly on the citation network without the need to construct auxiliary networks based on similarity of nodes. We fit the SBMs to the networks of journals we have constructed from the data set of around 630 million citations and find a variety of different types of groups, such as communities, bridges, sources, and sinks. In addition we use a recent generalization of SBMs to determine how much a manually curated classification of journals into subfields of science is related to the group structure of the journal network and how this relationship changes in time. The SBM method tries to find a network of blocks that is the best high-level representation of the network of journals, and we illustrate how these block networks (at various levels of resolution) can be used as maps of science. 相似文献
14.
基于论文标题的学科结构研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
借助学术期刊探讨学科结构是科学计量学的一个新兴领域,通常是通过期刊之间的引文关系来研究学科结构.而本文是从期刊的论文标题入手,探索期刊之间在研究内容上的关系并由此揭示学科结构.以66种力学期刊中 68 075篇学术论文的标题为样本,利用词频分析、多维尺度分析和因子分析等方法,对力学期刊之间在研究主题上的相似度与区分度进行分析,将66种力学期刊复杂的内部关系转换为少数几个相互独立的综合指标.通过聚类分析对66种力学期刊进行分类,用图谱直观地展现出力学各分支学科在研究主题上的关联状况,深入分析了固体力学、流体力学、理性力学(含力学中的数学方法)、声音与振动力学、计算力学等力学分支学科之间的关系,进而从力学期刊的论文标题这一新颖角度揭示了力学的学科结构. 相似文献
15.
当前的期刊评价研究主要集中在影响力、声誉、质量等方面,针对期刊内容差异性的定量研究相对较少。本文从差异性视角来对期刊进行评价分析,提出期刊区分度指标来对期刊内容的差异程度进行度量。以LIS (library and information science)等5个学科的各20种核心期刊为研究对象,首先对LIS期刊的内容差异性进行定量分析与评价,然后从时间维度对LIS学科期刊区分度的变化规律进行了探测,最后从学科维度对不同学科期刊个体和总体区分度的特征进行了分析和探讨。实验结果表明,利用该指标能够很好地度量期刊研究内容差异性,期刊区分度在时间维度上呈现出明显的变化规律,不同学科期刊个体和总体的区分度均具有显著的学科特征。 相似文献
16.
《资料收集管理》2013,38(1-2):95-110
Science journal managers should exercise care in preparing data for testing correlations between use and citation data. Correlations should be sought only among journals of fairly similar subject specialty, scope, purpose, and language rather than among journals in a broad field, e.g., science overall. Either gross citation ranking or impact factor will usually correlate well with use, except in cases where a journal is either new or characteristically publishes a few papers. In these cases impact factor must be used comparisons. In order for the comparisons to have statistical validity there should be relatively heavy overall use, an average of 25 potential borrowings per title in the subject specialty being analyzed. The authors present tables showing good correlations when these conditions are met and other tables showing poor correlations are analyzed in terms of unmet conditions. 相似文献
17.
18.
This paper reports on a study of social scientists’ information seeking and use of scholarly journals to support scholarly communication and information needs. The goals of the study are: to explore the characteristics of information needs for social scientists; to discuss the importance of scholarly journals to social scientists and their information seeking and access means; to identify article reading patterns of social scientists; and to make comparisons between scholarly journals use and reading patterns of social scientists and other scientists in Taiwan and the USA. The author used a questionnaire survey and interview methods to investigate the information seeking, use and reading of scholarly journals, and article deep reading patterns of social scientists. The target population was social science faculty members from National Cheng-chi University in Taiwan. The article explores the characteristics of information needs for social scientists and shows that scholarly journals are important information resources for university social science faculty. Social science faculty in Taiwan use scholarly journals in multiple languages, mainly English, Chinese, German, and Japanese, which is different from scientists in the United States. In addition, they use electronic journals more than print journals. The number of article readings by social science faculty members was approximately 195 readings per year and nearly 440 h were spent reading per year. In contrast to scientists in the United States, the social scientists in Taiwan read fewer readings, spent more time reading, and read older articles. In addition, the study identifies article reading patterns of social scientists and proposes a six-type taxonomy of article deep reading. The study reports the scholarly journal use and reading behavior model of social scientists and shows there are some differences in scholarly journal seeking and use by social science faculty in Taiwan and scientists in the United States. Further studies of scholarly journal and electronic journal use and reading by social scientists across countries, subject disciplines, and languages of journals are needed. 相似文献
19.
20.
Jennifer Huffman 《期刊图书馆员》2017,73(3-4):248-268
Similar to a study by Nelson and Huffman on the presence of predatory journals in aggregator databases, this study presents the results of a comparison between Jeffrey Beall’s List of Standalone Journals and a group of six commercial publisher and open access journal packages. A subject analysis of the predatory journals listed on Beall’s standalone journal list was also conducted along with an analysis of the trend in predatory publisher and journal growth. In the end, only a small number of predatory journals were found to exist within the publisher packages. The subject analysis of the journals on Beall’s standalone journal list revealed that most of the journals on his list were either multidisciplinary in nature or allied with science, medicine/health, and technology subjects. However, because the number of predatory journals discovered in the publisher packages was too small, a meaningful statement about the predominant subject areas of the predatory content found in the publisher packages could not be made. Finally, within the context of the publishing world at large, based on the historical development of predatory publishers and their journals, a dramatic increase in their growth is forecast. Because Beall’s lists of predatory publishers and standalone journals were often used by authors for guidance but are no longer available, several tools for evaluation of publisher and journal quality are summarized. 相似文献