共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
论本科教学水平评估对高校图书馆的影响 总被引：10，自引：0，他引：10
本文阐述了图书馆在本科教学水平评估中的作用,以及本科教学水平评估对图书馆产生的影响,对本科教学水平评估后高校图书馆需要做的工作进行了论述。 相似文献
2.
分析了2006年9至10月教育部高等教育教学评估中心公布的20所高等学校本科教学工作水平评估自评报告中"图书馆状况"的写法、内容以及办学层次和馆藏数量的相关性,概括、分析了这些高校图书馆服务功能以及说明"管理手段先进,服务效果好"所采用的事实和数据,并就评估对图书馆的实际引导作用进行了探讨。 相似文献
3.
大学图书馆成效评估是对用户在接触图书馆所提供的资源、服务和活动之后所发生的改变进行评估。绩效评估关注图书馆投入与产出的效率,成效评估关注图书馆服务的影响与效果。大学图书馆成效评估的内容主要包括对学习、研究、教学的影响评估。该文结合国外大学图书馆成效评估的实践案例,对大学图书馆成效评估的定义、内容、意义以及评估指标体系等进行探索。成效评估是基于用户为中心的新的评估理论和方法,有利于争取社会各界对图书馆的支持和提高图书馆服务质量。 相似文献
4.
国外高校图书馆对学生学业影响的评估研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
高校图书馆对学生学业影响的评估,是确定图书馆利用与学生学业成效之间关系的研究,是高校图书馆成效评估的重要组成部分。国外高校图书馆对学生学业影响评估的实践受高等教育评估的影响,起步较早。随着图书馆成效评估相关概念的明确,图书馆利用对学生学业影响的研究成果日益丰富,主要内容包括考察高校图书馆资源水平与学生学业之间的关系以及图书馆资源利用与学生最终学位水平之间的关系、高校图书馆利用对本科生教育成果的贡献等。尽管研究的具体结论对于其相关关系呈现规律性特征的佐证较为有限,但为下一步进行更深入和完善的评估提供了丰富的可借鉴的方法。 相似文献
5.
6.
“后评估时代”高校图书馆文献资源建设的思考 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
李晓霞 《大学图书情报学刊》2010,28(6):50-53
随着最新一轮的普通高等学校本科教学水平评估工作的结束,图书馆的发展已进入＂后评估时代＂。然而在本科教学水平评估背景下,高校图书馆文献资源建设产生许多问题,这些问题背离了评估的宗旨和目的。针对这种情况,文章探讨了评估后高校图书馆文献资源建设的策略,目的在于使文献资源建设跟上时代发展的步伐,确保文献资源建设更科学、更合理、更规范,从而更好地服务于高校的教学和科研。 相似文献
7.
高校档案工作与本科教学工作水平评估 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
近几年来,全国高校的连年扩招,致使办学条件趋于紧张.教育部为使教育质量得到保障,对全国各高校进行本科教学工作水平评估,评估的根本目的在于"以评促改,以评促建,评建结合,重在建设".本科教学工作水平评估方案虽没提到对高校档案的评估,而随着评估工作的开展,教学评估依赖了大量档案并形成了大量教学评估档案,也就不得不引起人们对"高校本科教学工作水平评估与高校档案工作关系"的探讨. 相似文献
8.
论文分析了普通高等学校本科教学工作水平评估中图书馆指标的现状及其存在的核心指标不够、等级标准解释不全、电子资源建设重视不足、无统一目录标准以及评估当年数据截取时间规定不清等问题，提出要规范图书馆评估指标，构建可行性评估体系。 相似文献
9.
<正> 一、引言情报教学是高校图书情报工作的重要任务之一。这项工作开展得好坏,对高校的教学、科研工作,对学生的业务素质都有很大的影响。因此,认真地对高校情报教学工作进行科学评估是非常必要的。它可以权衡这一工作在同行业中的水平,提出系统的改进方案,促使该项工作在发挥高校图书馆的教育职能和情报职能方面发挥更大的作用。高校情报教学是一个多层次、多因素的系统。对这个系统工作成效的评估自然是一项十分复杂而细致的工作。评估高校情报教学工作,通常采用定性的方法,这种方法虽然在一定程度上也能反映出教学水平的高低,但是由于影响情报教学工作的因素很多,用定性的方法 相似文献
10.
通过对国内外11家地球科学领域数据中心应用FAIR原则数据的搜集、分析与评估,了解国内外数据中心在数据管理方面的现状与差异,旨在推动FAIR原则在国内的普及与应用。融合国外FAIR评估指标研究成果,制定了评估指标模型;通过人工方式搜集信息,对11个科学数据中心在可发现、可访问、可互操作以及可重用4个方面进行评估分析,展示了国内外数据中心在服务功能、政策规范以及技术标准适用方面的异同。国外科学数据中心在FAIR原则的应用上整体水平较高,得分也较为均衡,显示出对FAIR原则较好的理解与应用水平。国内外数据中心完成度较好的两个属性是可发现性和可重用性,但是在可访问性和可互操作上还有较大的进步空间。 相似文献
11.
Amy Gustavson 《Public Services Quarterly》2013,9(2):97-113
In order to prepare for the 2013 SACS reaffirmation, the Joyner Library instruction librarians developed a systematic assessment program using Oakleaf's Information Literacy Instruction Assessment Cycle (ILIAC) to plan for instruction, assess student learning and improve future student learning by reviewing data and enacting changes. The paper outlines the systematic development, implementation, assessment, and improvement of an information literacy instruction assessment program for freshman classes over a three-year period from 2008 to 2011. It also analyzes student learning outcomes assessment data from 1,956 freshman students using quizzes and formative assessment during the 2010–11 school year. 相似文献
12.
Shannon Kealey MLS 《Medical reference services quarterly》2013,32(4):411-425
This column examines the experience, over three years, of a librarian embedded in an online Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine course, which is a requirement for students pursuing a Master of Science in Physician Assistant Studies at Pace University. Student learning outcomes were determined, a video lecture was created, and student learning was assessed via a five-point Blackboard test during year one. For years two and three, the course instructor asked the librarian to be responsible for two weeks of course instruction and a total of 15 out of 100 possible points for the course. This gave the librarian flexibility to measure additional outcomes and gather more in-depth assessment data. The librarian then used the assessment data to target areas for improvement in the lessons and Blackboard tests. Revisions made by the librarian positively affected student achievement of learning outcomes, as measured by the assessment conducted the subsequent semester. Plans for further changes are also discussed. 相似文献
13.
Lyda Fontes McCartin Andrea Falcone Shannon Marie Smith 《Public Services Quarterly》2013,9(3):214-230
In order to align with university-wide assessment initiatives and to promote a systematic approach to one-shot assessment within our library, a team of five librarians participated in a campus-wide professional development program about student learning assessment. We then implemented library-specific professional development about student learning assessment for one-shot instruction. We provide an overview of the professional development program and discuss our study that explored the impact of the program on librarians’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes about student learning assessment. Our findings indicate that faculty participants had a positive change in practice, knowledge, and attitude after participating in the professional development program. 相似文献
14.
Beth Tumbleson John Burke Jessica Long 《Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning》2019,13(1-2):196-214
Librarians are committed to supporting teaching, learning, and research. They are equally committed to supporting student success and retention. Demonstrating the impact that learning management system (LMS) embedded librarians make on student learning has been difficult to correlate, however. Studies that assess this connection, using qualitative and quantitative data have been undertaken in recent years. In a university regional campus library study conducted in 2016–2017, LMS embedded librarians explored the relationship between student learning and information literacy instruction, relying primarily on a customized LMS embedded librarian page of library resources and learning objects. They used a rubric to assess student research papers and bibliographies, LMS course analytics, instructors’ grades, and student feedback. This article reviews the literature and their methodology, challenges, and findings. They wish to guide colleagues, committed to assessing how librarians contribute to student learning, in selecting assessment approaches and validate their instructional role. 相似文献
15.
Due to the time commitment on the part of the librarian to schedule, prepare, and execute effective research consultations, it is important to continue to evaluate how these consultations impact student learning. The purpose of this investigation was to assess graduate students' perceptions of their learning as a result of working individually with a librarian in a research consultation. A librarian and a member of the teaching faculty collaborated to embed required research consultations with the librarian in two graduate classes. Research journals and a focus group were used to assess the impact the consultations had on student learning. 相似文献
16.
The Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (CIHE) of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) standards places less emphasis on quantifiable and arbitrary inputs and more emphasis on institutional effectiveness and assessment of student learning. NEASC includes the library throughout the standards and also has a long section specifically for the library. The authors advocate use of the ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) Standards for Libraries in Higher Education alongside the NEASC standards to ensure a focus on outcomes and assessment of libraries in the context of other areas of the institution. An effective strategy for streamlining the assessment of library resources and services is provided. 相似文献
17.
[目的/意义]高校图书馆利用状况及其对学生学习结果的影响是图书馆成效评估的重要方面之一，高校如何提升图书馆对学生学习活动的支持水平，学生自身又怎样提高利用图书馆的能力是本研究之价值意义所在。[方法/过程]基于"2017年首都大学生就读经验调查"，研究采用t检验、单因素方差分析、相关分析以及回归分析等方法分析高校图书馆利用现状及其对学生学习结果的影响。[结果/结论]结果显示，不同学生群体对图书馆利用程度存在差异，图书馆利用与学生学业成绩、在校满意度、学习收获呈显著正相关关系，且图书馆利用影响学生学习结果。基于此，建议高校加强对低年级、农村学生等图书馆利用情况较差学生群体的引导；图书馆自身提升综合实力，提升信息化服务质量，加强图书馆学习空间、专业馆员队伍、学生信息素养教育等资源建设；大学生自身要提升利用图书馆资源的意识与能力。 相似文献
18.
Marcia Rapchak 《Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning》2019,13(1-2):150-158
At Duquesne University, freshmen are required to take a one-credit information literacy course. This course has traditionally been offered mostly face-to-face, but has expanded into more online offerings. Unfortunately, the experience for students and instructors online was not as positive as those involved with the face-to-face version of the course. Assessment results on a variety of levels and anecdotal evidence indicated that students did not work as well together to learn as those did in the face-to-face version of the course. Not only did instructors receive lower student evaluation scores, but students did not perform as well on their final, collaborative project. While there will be barriers to learning online, especially when students work together in a group, instructors and instructional designers can take distinct steps to make the experience a positive one. Instructors must use particular interventions to increase student-to-student interaction that leads to learning. 相似文献
19.
Amanda L. Folk 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2014,21(2):177-192
Most libraries have fully integrated cadres of student assistants into their daily operations, including helping at points of service. As libraries rely more and more on student assistants, we must maintain exceptional customer service to our users. This requires our student assistants to possess information literacy skills that exceed those of our users. This assessment investigates the information literacy skills of first-year library student assistants when compared to the general first-year student population, and it examines if first-year library student assistants’ information literacy skills increase more than those of their peers during their first semester at college. 相似文献
20.
Mary O'Kelly 《International Information and Library Review》2017,49(3):225-229
The members of our communities interact with library services, resources, and spaces through a number of touchpoints. In academic libraries, those touchpoints often come through curricular and co-curricular activities. A critical goal of connecting our community to our library via the curriculum is to enhance student learning, which we address through internal activities, such as developing instruction plans and external activities, such as exhibits and workshops. We, then, design rigorous assessments and a multitude of program evaluation projects to measure howwell libraries contribute to student learning so that we can communicate the degree to which we meet that goal. This article is a reframing of that progression—defining our community, what we do for that community, why, and how well—as an invitation to challenge our assumptions about public services and community success. 相似文献