共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 265 毫秒
1.
2.
基于问题的学习（Problem-Based Learning,简称PBL）是将学习活动“抛锚”在具体的问题情境中的以学生为中心的一种教学方法,也是一种符合建构主义教学原则的教学模式。与其他问题教学相比,PBL有着不同的内涵。由于受文化背景、教育资源等因素的影响和制约,在我国教育环境中实施PBL,要综合考虑到学科知识的系统性与PBL知识的随机性、教学资源的局限性与PBL教学内容的灵活性、传统课程问题的良性结构与PBL问题的劣构性之间的关系。 相似文献
3.
为提高“数字图像处理”课程的教学质量,培养学生的自主学习能力和实践能力,在实践教学中引入了基于项目的学习( Project-Based Learning,PBL)的教学模式.简要介绍了基于PBL教学模式的基本特征,阐述了项目的设计原则与教学方案的实施.为配合基于PBL的教学模式,在教学实践中对教材、课堂理论教学、验证性实验及课程考核方式等方面均进行了改革.实践表明,该实践教学模式能够提高学生的实践能力与自主学习能力,并吸引学生积极选修该课程. 相似文献
4.
5.
以问题为基础的学习(Problem Based Learning,PBL)受到的重视程度逐年提升.该方法强调调动学生主动学习积极性,倡导以问题作为教学基础.为深入探索PBL受学法在病原生物与免疫学实验教学中的实际效果,对10级、11级两年的高职护理学生病原生物与免疫学实验教学中尝试性地实施PBL式教学,取得了良好成效. 相似文献
6.
正问题导向式学习(Problem-basedLearning,PBL)是国际上较为流行的教学方法,也是国内医学教育教学方法的改革趋势。PBL教学是以问题为基础,学生为主体,以小组讨论为形式,在教师辅导下进行的教学模式,由美国神经病学教授Barrows1969年在加拿大麦克马斯特大学首次创立[1]。如何灵活地运用PBL教学理念进行教学方法的改革,积极引导学生充分发挥已经学习到的知识,进行主动学习,是进行该课程教学的关键环节。我们在本校2012级药物制剂专业《免疫学基础与病原生物学》课程中开展PBL教学,现将教学过程及初步探索的经验总结 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
《实验室研究与探索》2016,(6):204-207
针对环境工程专业核心课程学时较短和实践性较强的特点,以及目前单独应用LBL、TBL与PBL教学模式的不足,以提高学生自主学习能力和团队合作意识为目标,阐述了利用课外时间实施PBL与TBL组合式教学模式的过程设计;围绕环境监测、物理性污染控制工程和大气污染控制工程三门课程讨论了PBL与TBL相结合的实践教学过程,实践证明该组合式教学模式实现了"以学生为主体,以教师为主导"下的教学相长,可为其他实践性较强课程和专业提供借鉴。 相似文献
10.
PBL教学模式在五年制高职学生教学中的应用效果评价 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
目的:探讨PBL教学模式在高职五年制病原生物与免疫课程教学中的应用效果.方法:将160名2007级护理专业五年制学生分为对照组、实验组,对照组采用传统教学模式,实验组采用PBL教学模式,课程结束后比较两组教学效果的差异.结果:两组期末平均成绩比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论:PBL教学模式更有利于培养五年制学生学习兴趣、自主性,有利于增强其知识迁移、应用的能力. 相似文献
11.
12.
The introduction of a new problem-based Graduate Medical Course with over 230 students and more than 200 staff required a systematic process for induction into the PBL philosophy and tutorial process. The 4SAT (4 Step Assessment Task) was designed for use as an instrument for formative and summative assessment of reasoning ability, elements of the PBL tutorial (group) process and individual learning outcomes. The instrument was developed through evaluative cycles based upon staff and student feedback, reflection and peer review. The 4SAT has face validity with the learning process and emphasises reasoning and integration of knowledge. An unexpected out come of its development was its use as a powerful tool to induct staff and students into the PBL group processes, scaffold development of hypothetico-deductive reasoning and provide guidance on the depth and breadth of learning expected in the course. 相似文献
13.
Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali Jerome I. Rotgans Lucy Rosby Michael Alan Ferenczi Naomi Low Beer 《Anatomical sciences education》2020,13(5):581-590
Anatomical knowledge is commonly assessed by practical examinations that are often administered in summative format. The format of anatomy practical examination was changed at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore from summative (graded; must pass) to formative (ungraded; no pass/fail) in academic year (AY) 2017–2018. Both assessment formats were undertaken online, but the formative mode used a team-based learning activity comprising individual and team assessments. This gave an unique opportunity to investigate: (1) the impact of two different online assessment formats on student performance in practical examination; (2) the impact of new formative practical examination on students’ performance in summative examinations; and (3) students’ opinions of these two practical examination formats. The class of 2021 perceptions was obtained as they experienced both formats. A retrospective cohort study was also conducted to analyze the Year 2 students’ performance in anatomy practical and year-end summative examinations of cohorts AY 2015–2016, AY 2016–2017 (summative format), and AY 2017–2018 (formative format). There were no significant differences in students’ performance between two practical examination formats. The cohort who experienced the formative format, performed significantly better in summative examinations (mean ± SD: 82.32 ± 10.22%) compared with the cohort who experienced the summative format (73.77 ± 11.09%) (P < 0.001). Students highlighted positive features of the formative practical examination, including team reinforcement of learning, instant feedback, and enhanced learning. These findings indicate that students continue to study for anatomy practical examination without the need for external drivers. The team-based learning style practical examination enhances students’ performance in summative examinations. 相似文献
14.
韩春英 《邢台职业技术学院学报》2013,(4):16-18
在进行分级教学模式的改革实践中,构建了以促进学生发展为目标、反复循环的动态评价体系,该体系采取形成性评价与终结性评价相结合的形式.其中,形成性评价占40％,终结性评价占60％.形成性评价由课堂表现、网络自主学习、作业、月考和竞赛构成,各指标分别占20％.评价体系实施后,学生在英语学习兴趣、学习态度、学习策略以及自信心方面都得到了明显提升和改进. 相似文献
15.
杨雪 《四川教育学院学报》2013,29(1):39-41
探索适合PBL教学的学生评价体系是《市场营销学》课程PBL教学改革的一项重要内容,采用形成性评价和终结性评价相结合的方法,把过程评价和结果评价有效结合,取长补短,最大程度地发挥各自的评价效能,构建《市场营销学》PBL教学的学生评价体系。 相似文献
16.
Peer assessment (PA) provides opportunities for authentic assessment, autonomy and collaboration. Several authors advocate that students can benefit from PA and put forward the effects of PA on the students’ learning outcomes. Questions concerning the validity and reliability of PA and PA competences are also addressed by different researchers. This qualitative study is part of a wider project that seeks to develop and test evaluation and assessment strategies in online contexts. In a doctoral module, PA was used for summative and formative purposes. Formative PA aimed to give feedback about the ongoing group work, but also to increase online interaction between the different groups of students. The main module task was to write a literature review, about a selected topic, using a wiki. Criteria and indicators to assess the literature review were negotiated with the students. Different criteria were used to assess the quality of PA, such as, the use of the negotiated criteria, the adequacy of the chosen vocabulary or the provision of constructive feedback. The results show that overall the quality of PA can be improved. Groups did not provide sufficient criticism, questions and suggestions for improvement. 相似文献
17.
评价能够使学生收获自己学习状况的反馈,有利于学生提高学习成绩。形成性评价是教学中的一种评价方式,它与终结性评价有着较为显著的区别。形成性评价目的是激励学生积极学习,使学生在体验学习成就感的同时,为教学提出一份修改方案;而终结评价的目的是提交一份含有结果、建议和理由的报告。根据高职高专大学英语口语教学现状,探讨形成性评价在高职高专大学英语口语教学中的运用。 相似文献
18.
钮佳安 《安徽广播电视大学学报》2015,(3):80-83
选择安徽电大开放教育2013秋季学期护理学本科专业A班26人为对照班,在护理伦理学教学中采用讲授和案例分析为主的传统教学方法;2013秋季学期B班29人为实验班,采用案例讨论法进行教学。采用形成性考核、期末终结性考核、问卷调查等方法对教学效果进行评价。结果显示,实验班学生面授课到课率较对照班高34.1％;实验班学生的形成性考核作业案例分析成绩和期末终结性考核案例分析成绩显著高于对照班（P ＜0.01）;绝大多数学生认为案例讨论教学法能提升学习主动性、自主学习能力、学习态度、课堂学习效率、沟通能力、语言表达能力、参与意识、对护理伦理问题的敏感性以及分析和解决问题的能力;学习效果满意度达84.0％。 相似文献
19.
大学外语教学是人才培养过程中非常关键的一个环节,而教学效果的好坏大多通过评估来实现。如今有些高校开始尝试终结性评估与形成性评估相结合的方式,更科学人性地对教学效果进行评价。问卷调查表明,在大学英语精读教学中运用形成性评估模式,在一定程度上激发了学生的英语学习热情,培养了学习者的自主学习能力,对英语学习效果产生了较为积极的后效作用。 相似文献
20.
Edith Kealey 《Journal of Teaching in Social Work》2013,33(1):64-74
Despite a wealth of tacit knowledge in academia regarding effective teaching strategies and a rich theoretical and empirical knowledge base on student learning, social work instructors wishing to identify appropriate ways to measure teaching and learning have little evidence to guide them. This article presents a framework for assessment of student learning and evaluation of instructor teaching that distinguishes between formative methods, which support an ongoing process of improvement, and summative methods, which represent a measure of competence or mastery. While summative methods are often used to meet institutional or programmatic goals, formative methods bridge assessment and evaluation and can result in a more reflective, constructive, and productive experience for both instructors and students. 相似文献