共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 794 毫秒
1.
通过对《中小学图书馆(室)规程》2003版与2018版比较分析,文章列举了新旧《规程》的相同点以及变化较多的条款,并对这些条款进行逐一的比较,同时分析了《规程》变化的原因以及现实中的不足。在对新旧《规程》的分析与解读的基础上,文章梳理了《规程》十五年后的新使命及愿景,总结了中小学图书馆(室)未来发展的方向与趋势:全面开放、以人为本等理念将全面激活我国中小学图书馆;馆藏资源建设呈现合理化、数字化、多样化趋势,馆藏质量评估将逐步加强;信息技术将不断升级图书馆阅读空间与服务,嵌入教育教学服务将成为服务创新点;馆际合作呈现规模化、标准化趋势,将形成具有长效运作机制的合作模式。 相似文献
2.
将2015年颁布实施的《普通高等学校图书馆规程》与2002年颁布实施的《普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)》进行逐条对比,从形式和内容两个方面对新旧规程进行对比研究,探讨新规程对高校图书馆工作的指导意义. 相似文献
3.
对《普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)》的理解和认识 总被引：26，自引：20，他引：6
河北省高等学校图书情报工作委员会秘书处 《河北科技图苑》2002,15(3):8-10,38
教育部于2002年2月21日印发了《普通高等学校图书馆规程（修订）》。新《规程》的颁布，适应了21世纪高等教育的发展对图书馆的要求。新、旧《规程》相对比，新《规程》在有关高校图书馆的性质、任务、地位方面有了更新的提法；在业务规范方面，以积极应用现代信息技术、做好服务工作为基点；在服务水平、队伍建设、运行机制等方面提出了更高、更合理的要求。新《规程》的颁布，必将有利于我国高校图书馆事业的建设和发展，也是对我们的挑战。 相似文献
4.
通过分析浙江省中小学图书馆管理员队伍的现状和新《中小学图书馆规程》对图书馆员的具体要求,从目标建立、课程设置、培训特色等方面介绍了浙江省中小学图书管理员骨干教师培训的做法和经验。 相似文献
5.
教育部以教高[2015]14号印发并实施了《普通高等学校图书馆规程》,文章以一个高校图书馆馆员的视角,对新《普通高等学校图书馆规程》与《普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)》进行对比,对新《普通高等学校图书馆规程》中涉及高校图书馆建设发展的若干重要问题进行了分析、归纳和总结.在《普通高等学校图书馆规程》的指导下,高校图书馆在未来要重点做好以下工作:注重图书馆专业人才培养,支持学术研究,以促进图书馆事业的可持续发展;嵌入教学科研,开展学科化服务;重视数字资源建设,做好本校学术资源数字化工作;积极参与学校人才培养,提高学生综合素质,利用现代化技术,完善和创新信息素质教育的形式和内容,创造实践机会,锻炼学生社会实践能力;积极参与校园文化建设,引领校园文化;共享协作,服务社会. 相似文献
6.
学习《普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)》的点滴体会 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
《普通高等学院图书馆规程（修订）》是高等学校图书馆工作的法规性文件,适应了21世纪高等教育的发展对图书馆的要求。新《规程》读者服务方面的条文比重增大了,内容也几乎是全新的。对照新《规程》,华北电力大学新落成的图书馆的建设和规划思路,与新《规程》的精神基本相符,突出了读者第一、服务育人的宗旨。 相似文献
7.
文章从福建省中小学图书馆实情出发,就少年儿童图书馆应如何从教育部、文化部、国家新闻出版广电总局联合印发的《关于加强新时期中小学图书馆建设与应用工作的意见》出发,主动作为,拓展思路,开展多元化的合作与创新,在中小学图书馆建设中发挥职能,共同营造全民阅读,建设书香社会。 相似文献
8.
9.
从形式和内容两个方面对2002年颁布实施的《普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)》与旧规程进行比较分析和研究．重点讨论新规程在网络资源建设、读者服务等方面的新举措和新要求。 相似文献
10.
李惠珍 《大学图书情报学刊》1996,(2):39-41
《中国图书馆图书分类法(儿童图书馆、中小学图书馆版)》(以下简称为《中图法(儿版)》)是为适应儿童图书馆、中小学图书馆图书分类工作标准化规范化的要求，遵循儿童和中学生利用图书的特点和检索习惯，在化部图书馆司、国家教委条件装备司、电教司、普教司的亲切关怀和支持下，在中图法编委会的直接领导下，由《中图法(儿版)》分编委会编成。它突出儿童与中小学献的保证原则，所列的类目是客观事物和问题的反映，有类可用，有类就有书，类不虚设；它突出儿童和中小学读的保证原则，它依据儿童与中小学图书馆馆藏献的内容和特点而编制， 相似文献
11.
中小学图书馆馆藏是重要的课程资源。为适应中小学图书馆发展新形势、新任务、新要求,提高中小学图书馆服务教育教学能力,应当以课程方案和课程标准、《中小学图书馆(室)规程》和教育行政部门的推荐目录为依据,根据中小学校的教育教学实际,在入藏标准、馆藏数量、馆藏质量、馆藏结构和馆藏使用等方面开展探索,建立起校本化的馆藏评价机制。 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义]通过对大陆与台湾地区中小学图书馆建设标准进行比较分析,发现其各自的优劣,吸取台湾地区的经验和优良做法,以期推动大陆中小学图书馆的标准化建设与发展。[方法/过程]对大陆和台湾地区中小学图书馆建设标准化进程进行梳理和比较,并从适应范围、规范形式、内容特征、量化标准4个方面对大陆和台湾中小学图书馆建设专门性标准的内容及特点进行比较分析。[结果/结论]结合实际,对大陆地区中小学图书馆建设标准化提出4方面的建议,包括:切合地区需求,探索符合国情的标准体系;详述细化标准内容,突出可操作性;强化软性建设,注重专业人员建设和阅读推广;加强研究与实践,充分发挥图书馆人的作用; 顺应事业发展,适时修订和调整标准。 相似文献
13.
[目的/意义]了解小学图书馆阅读服务状况不佳的深层原因,有利于从根本上解决问题.[方法/过程]通过对福建省福州市13所城乡小学的学生进行问卷调查,对馆员、校长以及2名地方教育行政管理部门负责人展开深度访谈,多角度探寻小学图书馆阅读服务的实践逻辑与问题.[结果/结论]被调查的小学图书馆奉行一种达标的实践逻辑,因此硬件条件... 相似文献
14.
美国图书馆职业资格认证标准分为公共图书馆员、中小学图书馆员、图书馆管理者3类,其中公共图书馆员职业资格认证标准根据是否需要图书馆学硕士学位或图书馆学与信息科学硕士学位可细分为两类及其对应的不同等级;中小学图书馆员职业资格认证标准分为全国通用的和州立的两种类型,后者较为普遍,涉及教师许可证、硕士学位、图书馆媒体内容测试、其他测试和资格证书评价需满足的条件5个方面;图书馆管理者职业资格认证标准包含预算与经费、技术管理、组织与人事管理、建筑规划与管理等9个领域需达到的要求。上述3类认证的认证机构是不同的,但认证程序基本相同,且都可采用等级认证、学历认证、考试认证或交叉认证。对美国图书馆职业资格认证标准与实施制度的分析有助于为我国图书馆职业资格认证提供借鉴。 相似文献
15.
Peng Han Lim 《International Information and Library Review》2011,(4):250-256
The aim of this paper is to study the development and evolution of secondary school libraries into Media Resource Libraries (MRLs) in Singapore after the Second World War and the rationale to have mandatory school library standards. It is an historical survey analysing published data about the linkages of libraries and librarianship, school library standards, education and school reforms in Singapore. It analyses historical and current documents on the roles played by stakeholders like the Library Association of Singapore (LAS) and the Ministry of Education (MOE) in the introduction and development of school library standards. The need for school libraries standards was first discussed when the Malayan Library Group (MLG) organised the first course on librarianship for school teachers in 1955, but, with no follow through. The need for school libraries standards was also mentioned by the LAS in 1962 in a memorandum to the Commission of Enquiry into Education to train teacher librarians and adopt school library standards. However, this was left out in the final report of the Commission published in 1964. The need for school library standards was discussed in a school library seminar for 150 teacher librarians in 1970. The first Recommended Minimum Standards for Secondary School Libraries was published two years later by the Standing Committee on Libraries set up by the MOE, but it was not mandatory for schools to adopt the standards. In 1997 the MOE launched its “Thinking School Learning Nation” vision to teach thinking skills. Students were expected to do multidisciplinary project work and be independent users of information. The MOE began to convert school libraries into Media Resource Libraries (MRLs) with print and non-print materials. However, a survey conducted in 2001 on the roles and competencies of 112 Library Coordinators (LCs) or teacher librarians revealed that they lack the skills and knowledge to manage MRLs effectively. This is because subsequent school library standards published in 1983 and 2002 did not require trained and full-time teacher librarians to manage the MRLs. Furthermore, it is essential for the standards to be periodically updated with regards to professional staff, collection development, facilities, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure and school library programs. Otherwise, MRLs risk being “hollow shells still considered on the periphery of core educational requirements, and are run by teachers not professionally prepared to do the work” (Hart, 2001, p. 25). The national standards published in the United States from 1918 to 2008 are well researched and provide substantive guidelines to develop school libraries. Therefore, it is essential for the MOE to formulate MRL standards by doing comparative studies of school library standards in other countries. These standards have to be mandatory and fully adopted by the schools. It provides opportunities for stakeholders like the LAS, National Library Board (NLB), the National Institute of Education (NIE), and the Singapore Teachers’ Union, to collaborate in the formulation of these standards and take collective ownership to implement them. 相似文献
16.
[目的/意义]考察澳大利亚中小学图书馆标准演进概况,以期对我国中小学图书馆标准制定和建设等方面提供参考。[方法/过程]采用文献分析法和文本分析法,探讨澳大利亚中小学图书馆的"1979年标准"1993年标准"2001年标准"2005年标准"4个全国性标准,其研制和实施反映了澳大利亚中小学图书馆标准发展历程。[结果/结论]梳理澳大利亚中小学图书馆全国性4个标准演进背景、标准概况,从标准的历史作用、标准重点、理念凸显、标准实施4个方面进行分析,得出三点启示：关注我国中小学图书馆标准建设内在问题,多方协同发挥中小学图书馆功能,建构我国中小学图书馆员能力体系标准。 相似文献
17.
Peng Han Lim 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(4):250-256
The aim of this paper is to study the development and evolution of secondary school libraries into Media Resource Libraries (MRLs) in Singapore after the Second World War and the rationale to have mandatory school library standards. It is an historical survey analysing published data about the linkages of libraries and librarianship, school library standards, education and school reforms in Singapore. It analyses historical and current documents on the roles played by stakeholders like the Library Association of Singapore (LAS) and the Ministry of Education (MOE) in the introduction and development of school library standards. The need for school libraries standards was first discussed when the Malayan Library Group (MLG) organised the first course on librarianship for school teachers in 1955, but, with no follow through. The need for school libraries standards was also mentioned by the LAS in 1962 in a memorandum to the Commission of Enquiry into Education to train teacher librarians and adopt school library standards. However, this was left out in the final report of the Commission published in 1964. The need for school library standards was discussed in a school library seminar for 150 teacher librarians in 1970. The first Recommended Minimum Standards for Secondary School Libraries was published two years later by the Standing Committee on Libraries set up by the MOE, but it was not mandatory for schools to adopt the standards. In 1997 the MOE launched its “Thinking School Learning Nation” vision to teach thinking skills. Students were expected to do multidisciplinary project work and be independent users of information. The MOE began to convert school libraries into Media Resource Libraries (MRLs) with print and non-print materials. However, a survey conducted in 2001 on the roles and competencies of 112 Library Coordinators (LCs) or teacher librarians revealed that they lack the skills and knowledge to manage MRLs effectively. This is because subsequent school library standards published in 1983 and 2002 did not require trained and full-time teacher librarians to manage the MRLs. Furthermore, it is essential for the standards to be periodically updated with regards to professional staff, collection development, facilities, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure and school library programs. Otherwise, MRLs risk being “hollow shells still considered on the periphery of core educational requirements, and are run by teachers not professionally prepared to do the work” (Hart, 2001, p. 25). The national standards published in the United States from 1918 to 2008 are well researched and provide substantive guidelines to develop school libraries. Therefore, it is essential for the MOE to formulate MRL standards by doing comparative studies of school library standards in other countries. These standards have to be mandatory and fully adopted by the schools. It provides opportunities for stakeholders like the LAS, National Library Board (NLB), the National Institute of Education (NIE), and the Singapore Teachers’ Union, to collaborate in the formulation of these standards and take collective ownership to implement them. 相似文献
18.
[目的/意义]通过对教育部发布的最新修订的《普通高等学校图书馆规程》(以下简称《规程》)进行学习解读,总结其修订要点和创新所在,以此推进业界对新版《规程》的理解与遵循。[方法/过程]采用比较对照法,将新版《规程》与原《规程》的内容进行逐条对照,找出新版《规程》调整、修订和增加的部分新内容。通过新、旧版《规程》内容以及修订要点的对照比较发现,新版《规程》是在借鉴和继承原《规程》合理内容,对传统的管理理念和工作方法进行扬弃的基础上,调整、修订增加了部分新条款,体现了高校图书馆与时俱进的普遍共识和实践经验。[结果/结论]新版《规程》的修订,能秉持改革创新、以人为本、努力服务社会等新理念;在专业馆员学历、嵌入式学科化服务、延长开馆时间、信息素质教育等问题上体现出新意;作为高校图书馆的"准法",成为未来高校图书馆建设发展的新纲领。 相似文献
19.
[目的/意义] 介绍美国《学校图书馆国家标准》的框架体系与核心要素,为当前我国学校图书馆标准制定提供借鉴和思考。[方法/过程] 通过对美国《学校图书馆国家标准》进行解析,归纳其框架体系和核心要素,总结对我国学校图书馆标准制定的启示。[结果/结论] 《学校图书馆国家标准》通过6个共享基础（探究、包容、合作、管理、求索、参与）和4个学习领域（思考、创造、共享、成长）将3套单独标准（学习者、馆员、学校图书馆）集成为一个整体框架,在集成效应下分别设置每套单独标准中共享基础对应的学习领域所涵盖的核心能力,总体来看,《学校图书馆国家标准》内容架构融贯,特征理念明确,实施配套详尽,能够为今后我国学校图书馆标准制定提供借鉴和参考。 相似文献