共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 265 毫秒
1.
学术期刊编辑应该具有学术洞察力 总被引：15，自引：0，他引：15
目前,学术期刊刊登的文章存在这样一种现象:虽然不乏真知灼见,但大多数都是不好不坏、在低层次上重复之作.其中缘由,一方面是当前社会职称评审、晋升任职考核制度存在的缺陷和作者庸俗的治学行为等原因所致;另一方面则在于学术期刊的编辑缺乏对科学事业的责任感,缺乏从大量投稿中遴选出高质量文章的学术价值判断或洞察的能力.前者属于社会制度、作者治学态度等问题,它是编辑部外部的问题;后者则属于办刊人的办刊能力及修养问题,它是编辑部内部的问题.办刊人的办刊能力,是决定学术期刊办得好与坏、能否充分发挥学术期刊社会功能的关键所在.为此,本文拟就当前学术编辑的学术洞察力问题进行分析,以此引起学术期刊界对这一问题的关注. 相似文献
2.
3.
最近,中华全国新闻工作者协会邀请中国科学院哲学社会科学学部委员、厦门大学校长王亚南同志,就经济学方面的问题给北京新闻工作者作了一次报告。现征得王亚南同志的同意,把这个报告的记录发表在这里。 相似文献
4.
我国早期科技学术期刊的传播学思想研究 总被引：6，自引：4，他引：2
以清末民初创办的几种期刊为例,剖析中国早期科技学术期刊的传播学思想.认为:期刊这种新的大众传播媒介,在当时社会得到广泛应用和重视,它在宣传西方先进的科学文化和传播国内科技研究成果等方面做出了显著成绩;编辑们在做好把关人、优化传播媒介、注重传播效果的研究诸方面都有很好的尝试;这些办刊经验为我国现代科技学术期刊的发展奠定了良好基础. 相似文献
5.
6.
当前,中国特色社会主义进入新时代。站在新的历史起点上,中国学术期刊应以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导,坚持正确的办刊方向,积极深化办刊理念,努力提升办刊质量,繁荣中国学术,发展中国理论。在此背景下,作为学术期刊的重要组成部分——编辑人员的发展迎来了新的机遇和挑战。 相似文献
7.
数字出版——学术期刊发展的必然趋势 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
学术期刊办刊理念的转变 目前,我国学术期刊不论在期刊的形式、内容还是经营方式和被引频次等方面与美、英等发达国家相比均有较大差距.学术期刊国际化发展一直是我国期刊业的最强音.今天,数字出版的出现为我国学术期刊加快国际化进程提供了契机.结合数字出版的特征,笔者认为我国学术期刊办刊理念需要关注以下转变: 相似文献
8.
利用知识服务与知识传播提升学术期刊品牌影响力 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
学术期刊要重视知识服务与知识传播.引领学科发展,为行业服务,是学术期刊的办刊宗旨;通过多种渠道,加大知识传播,是学术期刊的重要责任.文章以《航空学报》编辑部办刊为例,通过约、组综述稿件,策划出版专刊、专栏,引领学科发展;通过开展科技论文写作讲座,提供知识服务;通过开放存取(OA)、论文推送、搭建微信公众平台等多种渠道,加速知识传播,最终提升期刊的品牌影响力. 相似文献
9.
10.
论学术期刊转企改制的难点与出路设计 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
我国学术期刊的办刊现状是综合性期刊多,办刊单位分散,编辑部规模小,绝大多数期刊的学术影响力弱.形成这种现状的根本原因是办刊体制.在学术期刊转企改制时,要借鉴发达国家的经验,通过组建期刊群整合现有办刊资源,国家按刊号分类别给予财政补贴,扶助学术期刊走上集约化经营之路. 相似文献
11.
The promotion of scholarly journal articles to journalists and bloggers via the dissemination of press releases generates a positive impact on the number of citations that publicized journal articles receive. Research by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. shows that article‐level publicity efforts and media coverage boosts downloads by an average of 1.8 times and were found to increase citations by as much as 2.0–2.2 times in the articles analyzed in this study. We evaluated scholarly journal articles published in nearly 100 Wiley journals, which were also covered in 296 press releases. The results in this case study suggest a need for greater investment in media support for scholarly journals publishing research that sparks interest to a broad news audience, as it could increase citations. 相似文献
12.
《Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services》2000,24(2):239-250
The scholarly journal has remained largely unchanged in purpose and structure during its three-century evolution. Current forces within the publishing industry, technology sector, the academy, and the related research environment are prompting rapid change in scholarly communication. Economic models for journals reflect both the unique challenges of the publisher as well as these broader environmental forces. Several constructs are described, followed by a preliminary report on an experimental project, PEAK (Pricing Electronic Access to Knowledge), which explores models for journal pricing and products. PEAK and other innovative projects that challenge traditional journal models may serve as both catalysts for change as well as prototypes for the scholarly journals of the early 21st century. 相似文献
13.
我国学术期刊影响力评价分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
对学术期刊进行评价不仅是期刊发展的需要,也是对期刊社会功能实现程度的一个检验。学术期刊的学术辐射力和市场占有率不仅是学术期刊影响力的本质特征,也是学术期刊在科研活动、知识加工、知识传播和社会服务中功能和价值的共同体现。对学术期刊影响力进行深层次分析,可以全面、客观地反映学术期刊的学术地位及其国际影响。 相似文献
14.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1-2):52-63
SUMMARY The thesis that scholarly journals should be treated as public goods is based on five arguments. First, scholarly journal articles have many public good characteristics, and many of their private good characteristics are created by choice. Second, our current system undersupplies students with scholarly journals. Third, the supply chain for journals from publisher to user is burdened by many deadweight losses. Fourth, online publishing might reduce those deadweight losses enough to fund a system freely available to scholars. Finally, treating scholarly journals as public goods can meet the needs of all stakeholders. Explanations of the economic concepts of public good, deadweight loss, and Pareto optima are given to support the arguments. 相似文献
15.
David Nicholas Hamid R. Jamali M. Paul Huntington Ian Rowlands 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(3):212-220
This paper presents the results of a major investigation by questionnaire of author attitudes towards scholarly publishing, which was funded by the Publisher's Association. Altogether, the views of nearly 4,000 authors were obtained and this paper concerns just those thousand or so authors who accepted the invitation to write freely about their own personal feelings and experiences. Using QSR N6 textual analysis software, their comments were processed and themes extracted. While the rest of the questionnaire, which was formed of closed‐question, tick‐box type questions, clearly must have had some impact on their thinking, the authors had considerable latitude in regard to what they could say. The paper provides a unique opportunity to hear their views directly. The pressing topics turned out to be (in rough order of concern): the peer‐review system, copyright, journal prices, alternative business models for journal publishing, big deals, Elsevier, electronic publishing and digital journals. 相似文献
16.
以作者参与研发的学术性期刊数字出版云平台为案例,介绍数字出版云平台体系的开发经验,并以《指挥控制与仿真》为例,介绍云平台的应用经验及成效。 相似文献
17.
18.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2020,46(6):102236
Predatory journals and publishers are a growing concern in the scholarly publishing arena. As one type of attempt to address this increasingly important issue, numerous individuals, associations, and companies have begun curating journal watchlists or journal safelists. This study uses a qualitative content analysis to explore the inclusion/exclusion criteria stated by scholarly publishing journal watchlists and safelists to better understand the content of these lists, as well as the larger controversies that continue to surround the phenomenon that has come to be known as predatory publishing. Four watchlists and ten safelists were analyzed through an examination of their published mission statements and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Notable differences that emerged include the remaining influence of librarian Jeffrey Beall in the watchlists, and the explicit disavowal of his methods for the safelists, along with a growing recognition that the “list” approach may not fully address systemic aspects of predatory publishing that go beyond the individual author's ethical decision-making agency. 相似文献
19.
This study examines aspects of scholarly journal publishing in the Nordic countries. On average half of Nordic journals publish online. In most Nordic countries, commercial publishers predominate; however, in Finland the majority are society publishers. The number of open access journals is low, in line with international figures. There is concern to maintain local languages in journal publishing. A majority of the journals publishing in local languages are within social science, humanities, and arts; the STM sector publishes in English. English‐language publications are favoured in research assessments, international recognition, and impact, while the visibility of local‐language scholarly journals in international databases is low. The Nordbib program supports Nordic scholarly journals and fosters co‐operation with publishing companies and learned societies over migration to e‐publishing; it also supports open access. The article discusses future challenges for journal publishing, pointing out the problems of small journal publishers and the need for co‐operation between stakeholders. 相似文献
20.
克罗宁（Blaise Cronin）是世界著名的图书情报学家和科学计量学家,他于2013年获普赖斯奖这一科学计量学与信息计量学最高奖项。以Web of Science数据库收录的其128篇期刊论文为数据基础,运用包括词频统计、共现分析和引文分析在内的科学计量方法,辅以信息可视化技术,对B.Cronin 30多年来的学术成就与影响以及学术交流状况进行定量分析。结果显示,B.Cronin是一位高产作者,基于其工作经历可以划分出4个产出阶段;研究内容虽然涉及引文分析、学者研究、科研合作、网络计量和学术致谢等多个主题,但都体现出对学术交流和学术评价的指向。从H指数、区域扩散和引用者视角,说明B.Cronin同样也是一位具有国际学术影响力的学者。 相似文献