共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
2.
近来,曾经饱受诟病的学术出版失范再次成为出版业关注的焦点.学术出版失范表面上主要表现为引文、注释、参考文献、索引等出版技术规范执行上的不到位,实质上包括各种形式不一、程度不等的涉嫌伪造和篡改、抄袭和剽窃、不当署名、重复发表等学术失范.学术出版失范是学术失范在出版环节的体现,同时也是学术失范得逞的重要表现——各种学术失范行为最终都与论文的发表或学术著作的出版直接或间接相关,二者互为因果,形成错综复杂的局面.学术失范,涉及学术出版技术规范的缺失,涉及学术评价体系不合理、学术审查体系不完整、学术惩罚体系不严格等多种因素.因此,规范学术出版,必须"三把抓"——抓规范,抓落实,抓配套. 相似文献
3.
基于引文的参考文献评价功能的实现及其正确途径 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
引文是参考文献析出信息的直接引语或间接引语。参考文献具有学术论文评价、科技期刊评价、作者水平评判的功能及作用。其实现要以正确引文为基础,依赖于对正确引文的定性与定量分析。切实保证引文的正确性是发挥参考文献客观、公正评价作用的基础;其正确途径是从微观层面审视引文的关联性、准确性、适当性、规范性以及引证效果等,从内容、形式、数量、质量等方面进行细致的综合考量。 相似文献
4.
引文的本质及其学术评价功能辨析 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
为准确理解和利用引文的评价功能,利用概念分析法和社会学原理,分析引文、念的异同,考察引文的含义和引文类型的多样性.以历史学、经济学和图书馆学引文为例,论证在一定条件下引文的有序性和层次性,探讨引文的本质及其一定的评价功能.笔者指出目前对引文评价功能的利用比较片面,并对编制专门的引文评价数据库和提高学术共同体学术理念与引用规范等提出建议.参考文献7. 相似文献
5.
近来,曾经饱受诟病的学术出版失范再次成为出版业关注的焦点。学术出版失范表面上主要表现为引文、注释、参考文献、索引等出版技术规范执行上的不到位,实质上包括各种形式不一、程度不等的涉嫌伪造和篡改、抄袭和剽窃、不当署名、重复发表等学术失范。学术出版失范是学术失范在出版环节的体现,同时也是学术失范得逞的重要表 相似文献
6.
引文和参考文献是学术著作的重要组成部分,其规范著录对提升学术研究水平,助力出版界打造学术精品,提升我国学术国际话语权具有重要意义。尽管相关国家标准和行业标准与规范实施已近十年,但学术著作引文和参考文献著录错误仍然普遍存在。本文结合编辑实践,从引文、引文注释和文后参考文献三个方面对学术著作中引文和参考文献常见著录错误进行辨析,并提出了从出版机构加强制度建设到编辑提高个人学术素养等多方面的解决之策。 相似文献
7.
文章在对引文分析研究及发展历史全面观察思考的基础上,对引文机制的形成过程及影响因素进行理论溯源,具体涉及近代科学发现优先权争论的突显、学会组织的出现和学术期刊的问世、学术界参考习惯的建立及参考文献标注规范的形成等,并从学术规范、检索语言和引证文化三个不同层次对引文机制中蕴涵的价值进行论证分析,以期对引文分析领域的未来发展提供理论启迪。 相似文献
8.
引文是学者在论文写作和文献整理等过程中,通过借鉴别人的观点来辅助论证、解释自身观点的语句.对于学术专著而言,引文的地位十分重要;对编辑而言,引文的核对工作困难较多.为此,编辑需要和作者沟通配合,认真核对引文、规范引文注释格式,以确保成书达到出版要求. 相似文献
9.
在当前的学术期刊评价体制中,影响因子是最重要的指标,因而决定影响因子的"引文数据"受到办刊者空前的重视和追捧。为验证这些"引文数据"的客观性与科学性,本文选取CSSCI来源期刊中六种较优秀的学术期刊,对其中文期刊类引文的著录情况进行调查。调查结果显示,六种期刊的中文类期刊引文著录平均错误率高达25.6%,其中最高的达39.3%。引文著录错误的产生,和期刊编辑的工作责任心有一定关系,但根本原因还在于作者日益浮躁的科研作风,以及人为制造"引文"的不健康的办刊导向。应该让"引文评价"回到它原本的位置,重新确立以学者为中心的学术生产、传播与评价机制,如此才能最终构建一个良好的学术生态系统。 相似文献
10.
学术文献引文推荐研究进展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义]学术文献引文推荐是指对于给定的学术文献,自动化地为其推荐合适的引文和参考文献。借助于引文推荐,用户可以在一定程度上提高撰写学术文献的效率,降低对重要相关文献的漏引。[方法/过程]分析国内外引文推荐研究的最新进展,阐述引文推荐问题的演化过程,从局部引文推荐和全局引文推荐等方面对引文推荐进行梳理,重点归纳文档相似性、主题模型、翻译模型、协同过滤和混合推荐等5种引文推荐常用方法,并总结引文推荐常用数据集和测评方法。[结果/结论]已有引文推荐研究的主要问题在于未考虑用户偏好的动态变化性及研究领域的综合性,在用户研究和实际应用方面仍有所欠缺;未来引文推荐的研究可运用语义化表达方法和自然语言生成技术,从基于上下文的引文推荐和跨语言引文推荐等方面进行展开。 相似文献
11.
参考文献引用质量鉴审的3个基本要素 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为充分发挥参考文献的学术论证作用,并保证基于引文计量分析的学术评价的准确性、真实性和有效性,在审稿过程中应重视参考文献引用质量的鉴审.文章提出参考文献引用质量鉴审的3个基本要素,即引用格式、引文内容和引证作用,并简要阐述有关评审要点. 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义]探索中文学术期刊论文的引文模式及时间窗口的选择对引文模式的影响，建立引文模式的分析框架。[方法/过程]以2006-2008年出版的图书情报领域期刊论文作为研究对象，采用两步聚类法对单篇论文在7年内的绝对被引量与相对被引量进行聚类分析，研究论文主要特征因子与引文模式的相关性。[结果/结论]在绝对被引量视角下，期刊论文均表现为先上升后下降的经典引文模式；在相对下载量视角下，期刊论文共有6种引文模式，其中3种可以归纳为经典引文模式，另外3种分别为"类睡美人型"、正偏型和马拉松型。相对被引量视角下，首年被引量与总被引量呈现了中等甚至较强的相关性，并且平均被引量越高，相关性越强，绝对被引量视角下的结果正好相反。结果表明，期刊论文的初始被引量与总被引量的相关性高低主要取决于引文曲线的峰度而非总被引量的大小。 相似文献
13.
中文医学学术期刊发表英文文章的实践与思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
中文医学学术期刊发表英文文章的现象较为普遍.通过对发表在<吉林大学学报(医学版)>上的112篇英文文章的发表时间、栏目、作者分布及被引用情况和其他3种较权威医学学术期刊发表的英文文章的数量及被引用情况进行分析,发现中文期刊发表的英文文章虽然具有较高的学术价值,但被国内期刊引用率明显低于同期发表的中文文章,SCI-E检索显示被引频次为0,认为中文医学学术期刊发表英文文章并没有起到扩大传播范围、促进期刊国际化的作用,而且浪费宝贵的信息资源.建议中文医学学术期刊不宜刊发英文文章,在国内应首选英文版期刊发表英文文章. 相似文献
14.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(4):824-839
The citations to a set of academic articles are typically unevenly shared, with many articles attracting few citations and few attracting many. It is important to know more precisely how citations are distributed in order to help statistical analyses of citations, especially for sets of articles from a single discipline and a small range of years, as normally used for research evaluation. This article fits discrete versions of the power law, the lognormal distribution and the hooked power law to 20 different Scopus categories, using citations to articles published in 2004 and ignoring uncited articles. The results show that, despite its popularity, the power law is not a suitable model for collections of articles from a single subject and year, even for the purpose of estimating the slope of the tail of the citation data. Both the hooked power law and the lognormal distributions fit best for some subjects but neither is a universal optimal choice and parameter estimates for both seem to be unreliable. Hence only the hooked power law and discrete lognormal distributions should be considered for subject-and-year-based citation analysis in future and parameter estimates should always be interpreted cautiously. 相似文献
15.
Contributing factors to long‐term citation count in marine and freshwater biology articles 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Researchers have investigated factors thought to affect the total number of citations in various academic disciplines, and some general trends have emerged. However, there are still limited data for many fields, including aquatic sciences. Using papers published in 2003–2005 (n = 785), we investigated marine and freshwater biology articles to identify factors that may contribute to the probability of citation and for cumulative citation counts over 10 years. We found no relationships with probability of citation; however, we found evidence that for those that were cited at least once, cumulative citations were related to several factors. Articles cited by books received more citations than those never cited by books, which we hypothesized to be indicative of the impact an article may have in the field. We also found that articles first cited within 2 years of publication received more cumulative citations than those first cited after 2 years. We found no evidence that self‐citation (as the first citation) had a significant effect on total citations. Our findings were compared with previous studies in other disciplines, and it was found that aquatic science citation patterns are comparable to fields in science and technology but less so to humanities and social sciences. 相似文献
16.
《Journal of Informetrics》2022,16(4):101338
Knowledge flow between scientific disciplines has commonly been measured based on citation data. Previous studies using citing relationships have mostly considered direct citations but have paid little attention to indirect citations (IDC) to indicate how knowledge diffusion from one discipline to another via one or more intermediaries. In this study, we measured knowledge flow between disciplines from two perspectives: direct citations (DC) and discipline potential energy (DPE), which is proposed to combine both direct and indirect citations. Data were collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Findings include: (1) DPE overshadows previous measures by considering not only direct citations but also indirect citations between disciplines which was usually ignored in previous measures, and revealed that the knowledge contribution of some disciplines had been underestimated by previous measures, such as Physics and Engineering. (2) The proportion of IDC contribution is close to that of direct knowledge contribution when the discipline scale is removed, which suggests that it is essential to consider IDC to distinguish the knowledge relationship (net-outflow/inflow) between disciplines. (3) Both measurements show that Biology & Biochemistry has always been the top discipline with the highest net outflow of knowledge, which is inconsistent with the history of science that Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry would be the highest net outflow disciplines. The results show that even considering IDC does not fully reveal the knowledge contribution and academic influence of disciplines. This paper also analyzes the potential reasons for citation bias in revealing the contribution of disciplinary knowledge from a citation perspective. Therefore, caution should be taken in the use of citations as a primary measure of knowledge flow. 相似文献
17.
为评价H指数与影响因子、总被引频次的关系,以2009年《中国期刊引证报告》（扩刊版）中166种医学期刊的H指数、影响因子、总被引频次、引用刊数和来源文献量为源数据,采用SPSSl6．0软件作线性、对数、二次多项式、三次多项式回归拟合和Logistic回归。二维散点图和曲线回归拟合分析均发现,H指数与影响因子、总被引频次、引用刊数呈密切相关,但与来源文献量的相关性不强。因此,H指数、影响因子、总被引频次应相互补充,共同用于医学类期刊学术影响力的评价。 相似文献
18.
Daniel Torres-Salinas Rosa Rodríguez-Sánchez Nicolás Robinson-García J. Fdez-Valdivia J.A. García 《Journal of Informetrics》2013,7(2):412-424
In this paper we provide the reader with a visual representation of relationships among the impact of book chapters indexed in the Book Citation Index using information gain values and published by different academic publishers in specific disciplines. The impact of book chapters can be characterized statistically by citations histograms. For instance, we can compute the probability of occurrence of book chapters with a number of citations in different intervals for each academic publisher. We predict the similarity between two citation histograms based on the amount of relative information between such characterizations. We observe that the citation patterns of book chapters follow a Lotkaian distribution. This paper describes the structure of the Book Citation Index using ‘heliocentric clockwise maps’ which allow the reader not only to determine the grade of similarity of a given academic publisher indexed in the Book Citation Index with a specific discipline according to their citation distribution, but also to easily observe the general structure of a discipline, identifying the publishers with higher impact and output. 相似文献