共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 236 毫秒
1.
尤斌 《中国广播电视学刊》2008,(2):61-62
主题性报道是我国新闻报道的一大特色,是实现正确舆论导向的重要途径。近年来,各主流媒体的主题性报道取得了显著成效,在报道中积累了一些宝贵经验。本文将以中央电台的新闻实践为例,在梳理主题性报道经验的基础上,探讨媒体如何在内容和形式上对主题性报道进行创新。 相似文献
2.
电视主题性报道,它主要是上情下达的一种报道形式,是我们国家特有的一种报道形式。面对新媒体时代,有一些人提出了一个观点,认为电视主题性报道正在失去观众,失去市场。然而随着新媒体与传统媒体的竞争日渐激烈,我们发现,正是有了新媒体的出现,电视主题性报道也在悄然发生转变,他们正在适应新媒体时代的到来。那么,电视主题性报道如何引入新媒体思维来为己所用呢?本文以电视主题性报道栏目——《新闻启示录》为例来阐述。 相似文献
3.
4.
主题性报道是电视新闻的常见报道形式,在引导社会舆论发展、传播社会正能量、树立主流意识形态等方面有着关键作用。而在如今的媒介融合背景下,作为传统媒体的代表,电视新闻受到的冲击非常大,要如何顺应媒体市场发展趋势,巩固主题性报道地位,强化主题性报道的传播效果与价值,已成为电视新闻从业者共同聚焦的重要课题。基于此,本文将针对这一课题,对如何强化电视新闻主题性报道的传播效果展开一系列研究。 相似文献
5.
随着科学技术的日新月异,吸引受众眼球的内容的极大丰富,传统的“主题性宣传报道”方式已经远远不能满足新的变化了的市场和受众需求,因此主流传媒的新闻宣传工作如何适应形势变化,适应现阶段经济、政治、文化发展的实际状况和要求,如何让主题性的宣传报道更好地为老百姓服务,更好地宣传社会主义先进文化和中华民族优秀传统文化？在这一过程中,“主题性宣传报道”的创新与突破显得尤为重要。 相似文献
6.
随着时代的发展,对主题性报道进行改革已势在必行。本文从思维方式、写作方式、拍摄要求等方面,探讨了让主题性报道见人、见事、见情、见理,好听、好看的一些做法。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
一、报道:避免两个误区。首先是把主题性报道片面理解为成就性报道,弘扬主旋律的成就性报道虽然属于主题性报道的范畴,但它体现了更为鲜明的政治属性,在时间上更多关注的是“过去”。主题性报道主要针对现阶段的社会热点和时代的亮点,关注更多的是“现在”和“将来”,报道的内容除了总结性外,还有探讨性和前瞻性。其次是把主题性报道片面理解为表扬性报道。虽然在主题性报道中,占大量篇幅的是表扬性质的正面报道,但这并不意味着两者可以划等号,因为主题性报道是在一段时间内围绕一个主题展开的一系列深入系统的报道,是全景式、多角度、多侧… 相似文献
10.
主题性报道是对港澳广播的一种重要节目形式。本文以中央电台华夏之声系列报道《人民问政十二五》为例,阐述如何做好对港澳广播中的主题性报道。 相似文献
11.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3):129-136
Abstract Analyzing serial issues of a monographic nature as a mechanism for connecting users to topical content has been a longstanding practice at the Iowa State University Library. Although studies have shown that monographic analysis of selected journal issues is a method of providing access to topical issues that citation databases often do not provide, the labor cost in providing original cataloging for some of these issues remains high. This article details the rationale and decision making that resulted in the implementation of a new process for reducing the amount of monographic analysis that is provided for uniquely titled journal issues. 相似文献
12.
Denice Adkins 《Public Library Quarterly》2019,38(2):211-233
Scholarly or research-based journal articles related to public librarianship and public libraries are posited in previous literature as not being useful to the public library practitioner, and potentially less valuable to the researcher than other forms of research. Building off previous research, this article explores journal-based public library research literature to determine the trends in authorship, coverage, and venues. Publication venues are relatively static, with Public Library Quarterly and Library Quarterly publishing most public library research literature. LIS educators and public librarians dominate authorship of public library research, and the topical coverage of that research is gradually evolving in response to new technologies and a renewed focus on user services. 相似文献
13.
This study aims to investigate the variations in the search pattern of scholarly databases due to disciplinary differences among graduate students. It is a case study which employed the survey method to solicit the views of purposely selected postgraduate students from six colleges of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST). The findings of the study indicate that differences exist in the extent as well as patterns of use of journal databases among graduate students, and that search patterns are dependent on the degree of scatter of topical content. Knowledge of the internal relationships among scholarly journals will ensure that relevant databases are selected for maximum exploitation. The study provides the domain analytic approach to database use in the Ghanaian situation which is woefully deficient in the literature. 相似文献
14.
期刊引用认同及其被引评价新指标有效性分析 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
以影响因子等引文数据为核心的期刊评价指标体系虽广为使用,但也备受争议.本文从期刊引用认同、期刊被引及期刊国际化等三个方面分析了不仅仅依赖于"影响因子"的评价期刊的新指标,并对相关指标的有效性问题进行讨论.分析表明,基于期刊引用认同视角和基于期刊被引网络视角的很多指标可以与期刊影响因子指标相印证,可用作国内期刊评价的新尝试,而相关期刊国际化评价指标还需在实践中进一步检验. 相似文献
15.
Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
The impact factor of a journal reflects the frequency with which the journal's articles are cited. It is the best available measure of journal quality. For calculation of impact factor, we just count the number of citations, no matter how prestigious the citing journal is. We think that impact factor as a measure of journal quality, may be improved if in its calculation, we not only take into account the number of citations, but also incorporate a factor reflecting the prestige of the citing journals relative to the cited journal. In calculation of this proposed “weighted impact factor,” each citation has a coefficient (weight) the value of which is 1 if the citing journal is as prestigious as the cited journal; is >1 if the citing journal is more prestigious than the cited journal; and is <1 if the citing journal has a lower standing than the cited journal. In this way, journals receiving many citations from prestigious journals are considered prestigious themselves and those cited by low-status journals seek little credit. By considering both the number of citations and the prestige of the citing journals, we expect the weighted impact factor be a better scientometrics measure of journal quality. 相似文献
16.
办好综合性医学期刊的思考 总被引：9，自引：2，他引：7
医学科学的高度分化,促使医药卫生学术期刊向专科化发展,这给综合性医学期刊带来了严重危机.综合性医学期刊只有适应现代医学发展的形势,重新审视自己的内容定位、作者定位、读者定位,正视"作者分流,稿源不足;读者分流,发行下滑;广告分流,经济下降"等问题,要发挥优势,突出"综合",体现特色,才能办好. 相似文献
17.
《Journal of Informetrics》2022,16(1):101241
Usage of field-normalized citation scores is a bibliometric standard. Different methods for field-normalization are in use, but also the choice of field-classification system determines the resulting field-normalized citation scores. Using Web of Science data, we calculated field-normalized citation scores using the same formula but different field-classification systems to answer the question if the resulting scores are different or similar. Six field-classification systems were used: three based on citation relations, one on semantic similarity scores (i.e., a topical relatedness measure), one on journal sets, and one on intellectual classifications. Systems based on journal sets and intellectual classifications agree on at least the moderate level. Two out of the three sets based on citation relations also agree on at least the moderate level. Larger differences were observed for the third data set based on citation relations and semantic similarity scores. The main policy implication is that normalized citation impact scores or rankings based on them should not be compared without deeper knowledge of the classification systems that were used to derive these values or rankings. 相似文献
18.
[目的/意义]针对外文期刊数据库内容质量的双库与多库指标的量化,提出基于统一期刊空间的多库比较算法,实现任意多库之间的期刊识别和比对,提高这些指标的量化准确度。[方法/过程]在分析外文期刊数据库内容质量指标的内容及其复杂性的基础上,设计基于统一期刊空间的多库比较算法,并利用该算法计算出2018年DRAA中57个数据库的JCR刊数量和独有刊数量指标,作为算法有效性和准确性的验证。[结果/结论]作为各种电子资源评价指标系统的延伸研究,本研究能帮助图书馆优化自己的馆藏建设,使得外刊数据库的采购更加经济、合理。 相似文献
19.
期刊订购调整的多元化综合评价 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
阐述了期刊订购调整多元化综合评价的意义与内容,重点探讨了期刊订购综合评价指标体系的建构与方法,提出了面向学科建设的期刊订购调整原则。 相似文献
20.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(2):406-418
The journal impact factor is not comparable among fields of science and social science because of systematic differences in publication and citation behavior across disciplines. In this work, a source normalization of the journal impact factor is proposed. We use the aggregate impact factor of the citing journals as a measure of the citation potential in the journal topic, and we employ this citation potential in the normalization of the journal impact factor to make it comparable between scientific fields. An empirical application comparing some impact indicators with our topic normalized impact factor in a set of 224 journals from four different fields shows that our normalization, using the citation potential in the journal topic, reduces the between-group variance with respect to the within-group variance in a higher proportion than the rest of indicators analyzed. The effect of journal self-citations over the normalization process is also studied. 相似文献