共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
[目的/意义]针对高校图书馆数字资源长期保存过程中的著作权问题进行研究，从法律角度对数字资源长期保存建设主体、客体和行为进行分析，明确著作权风险并提出应对策略。[方法/过程]对研究文献和立法、司法案例进行综合分析；通过法理分析解构高校图书馆数字资源长期保存的主体、客体和行为。[结果/结论]高校图书馆数字资源长期保存在数字复制、技术应用、新型资源建设和超链接服务等方面存在较大著作权风险；可以通过法律途径、合同授权和制度创新等策略应对著作权问题。 相似文献
2.
机构知识库资源种类繁多,使资源的版权归属呈现出复杂性的特征。不论资源版权归属何方,机构知识库对资源合理地进行网络传播、长期保存的首要前提都是获得来自资源版权持有者的授权许可。国家著作权法律法规的大力支持、出版商对机构知识库资源存储行为的许可、机构知识库自身资源管理行为的严格规范、机构知识库用户资源使用行为的约束限制,均是解决机构知识库资源版权问题的有效对策。 相似文献
3.
国外机构知识库运行模式分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文通过总结国外一些成功机构知识库的发展经验,对国外机构知识库建设运行时所牵涉的资金来源、实施对象、内容获取、知识产权、数字保存、服务模式等具体方面进行分析,并在此基础上,对国内机构知识库的建设运行提出两点建议。 相似文献
4.
机构仓储及其在数字图书馆服务中的应用模式研究 总被引：14，自引：1，他引：13
简要介绍机构仓储的概念、产生动因和相关软件。在分析国外众多机构仓储实例的基础上,归纳出机构仓储在数字图书馆服务中的6种应用模式并指出其对国内数字图书馆建设具有的借鉴意义。指出通过机构仓储在学术交流、数字长期保存、教学等领域的应用,数字图书馆的服务内容更加丰富,图书馆职能也会得到改善。 相似文献
5.
机构知识库发展的动力机制与动力模型研究 总被引：9，自引：2，他引：7
在分析不同学者对机构知识库内涵界定的基础上,提出机构知识库是对机构内成员智力产品进行收集、存储、管理并提供开放利用的知识传播与知识服务系统,探讨了机构知识库发展的六大动力因素,即长期保管与存取数字资产的需求、开放获取运动、科学信息与知识的共享及创新、数字化信息技术与标准、机构主体以及理论与实践进展,并分析了机构知识库发展动力因素互动机理,构建了机构知识库发展动力模型。 相似文献
6.
知识共享许可协议已经成为开放存取中解决著作权问题有效的法律工具,而该协议在高校机构知识库的应用无论从理论还是实践仍旧是空白,联系高校机构知识库的建设实践,通过分析高校机构知识库资源的种类和著作权归属,研究了如何运用知识共享许可协议进行著作权授权。 相似文献
7.
知识共享许可协议在高校机构知识库著作权管理中的应用研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
知识共享许可协议已经成为开放存取中解决著作权问题有效的法律工具,而该协议在高校机构知识库的应用无论从理论还是实践仍旧是空白,联系高校机构知识库的建设实践,通过分析高校机构知识库资源的种类和著作权归属,研究了如何运用知识共享许可协议进行著作权授权。 相似文献
8.
云仓储环境下图书馆联盟数字资源长期保存合作模式研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
在分析云仓储环境对数字资源长期保存影响的基础上,探讨图书馆联盟合作方式的转变;归纳出包括数字资源合作保存前置化、存储与保管并重的长期保存、跨系统的宽领域资源保存在内的云仓储环境下图书馆联盟数字资源长期保存合作模式;最后提出图书馆联盟长期保存合作的三种实现方式,即建设支持多种移动终端的资源整合和利用平台、构建私有云平台和提供个性化服务、整合机构库资源和实现联合保管。 相似文献
9.
数字图书馆发展中的知识产权研究 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
从信息资源加工、组织、传播和服务角度分析我国数字图书馆发展中面临的知识产权问题,主要包括馆藏资源的数字化和复制权、网络资源利用中的知识产权、数据库建设和使用中的知识产权、信息网络传播权和馆际互借中的版权风险等问题;并提出了解决这些问题办法。 相似文献
10.
11.
《Journal Of Archival Organization》2013,11(1-2):193-213
SUMMARY This article examines what is implied by the term “trusted” in the phrase “trusted digital repositories.” Digital repositories should be able to preserve electronic materials for periods at least comparable to existing preservation methods. Our collective lack of experience with preserving digital objects and consensus about the reliability of our technological infrastructure raises questions about how we should proceed with digital-based preservation practices, an emerging role for academic libraries and archival institutions. This article reviews issues relating to building a trusted digital repository, highlighting some of the issues raised and possible solutions proposed by the authors in their work of implementing and acculturating a digital repository at Rutgers University Libraries. 相似文献
12.
我国机构知识库模式构建与流程设计 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
本文重点对我国机构知识库建设模式与应用流程进行构建与设计,对建设模式中的建设目标、实施对象、资金来源,软硬件选择、组织方式、管理方式、知识产权、内容收集、服务模式、数字保存等做出详细规划。并以南开大学为例,对我国机构知识库模式应用流程从内容建设流程、数据处理流程、资源共享流程和检索使用流程四部分进行设计分析。 相似文献
13.
Paul Conway 《Archival Science》2011,11(3-4):293-309
Digital archives accept and preserve digital content for long-term use. Increasingly, stakeholders are creating large-scale digital repositories to ingest surrogates of archival resources or digitized books whose intellectual value as surrogates may exceed that of the original sources themselves. Although digital repository developers have expended significant effort to establish the trustworthiness of repository procedures and infrastructures, relatively little attention has been paid to the quality and usefulness of the preserved content itself. In situations where digital content has been created by third-party firms, content quality (or its absence in the form of unacceptable error) may directly influence repository trustworthiness. This article establishes a conceptual foundation for the association of archival quality and information quality research. It outlines a research project that is designed to develop and test measures of quality for digital content preserved in HathiTrust, a large-scale preservation repository. The research establishes methods of measuring error in digitized books at the data, page, and volume level and applies the measures to statistically valid samples of digitized books, adjusting for inter-coder inconsistencies and the effects of sampling strategies. The research findings are then validated with users who conform to one of four use-case scenarios: reading online, printing on demand, data mining, and print collection management. The paper concludes with comments on the implications of assessing archival quality within a digital preservation context. 相似文献
14.
高校图书馆机构知识库法律问题剖析与对策 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
王亚凤 《大学图书情报学刊》2010,28(5):9-11
高校图书馆机构知识库的建设与发展是图情界研究的热点问题之一。而法律问题严重阻滞了论文的作者参与机构知识库建设的积极性与主动性。在分析了高校图书馆机构知识库的学位论文、版权许可、IR软件等法律问题后,文章提出了以下几点对策：1）引进合理使用原则;2）国家许可证制度;3）知识共享协议等来加大机构知识库的响应存储力度。 相似文献
15.
[目的/意义]机构知识库评价研究意义重大,通过对国内外机构知识库评价研究实践的总结和分析,揭示当前机构知识库评价研究进展,为进一步研究提供方向.[方法/过程]基于文献分析,从评价内容、评价指标、评价方法三方面进行机构知识库评价研究评述.其中,机构知识库评价内容主要包括系统软件、数字资源管理、机构成员态度、实践建设、影响因素、绩效评价等方面;评价指标主要包括8种类型;评价方法主要包括平衡记分卡法、焦点小组访谈法、链接分析法等.[结果/结论]目前机构知识库评价研究已取得显著进展,但在用户多元化评价、定量指标设置等方面仍有待进一步研究. 相似文献
16.
Institutional repositories typically have a submission agreement that is meant to protect the institution hosting the repository and inform submitters of their rights and responsibilities. This article examines how various libraries have created submission agreements, enquires as to issues surrounding them, and identifies commonalities and unique statements. The authors deployed a survey to institutional repository administrators listed in OpenDOAR in the United States. Approximately 7% of the 304 potential institutional repository managers responded. Library administrators, institutional repositories managers/architects, and legal counsel were the most likely to have input into the creation of the submission agreement; scholarly communications librarians were involved only 20% of the time. Although submission agreements averaged 282 words arranged in 9 sentences, their reading complexity requires a university degree. Commonalities include characterizing the agreement as a non-exclusive license, indicating the submitter's responsibility for obtaining permissions for any content that they did not produce, and confirming the right of the submitter to enter into the agreement. Submission agreements are generally complex and do not accommodate the common practice of mediated submission. Sharing submission agreements publicly may lead to simplified and standardized language and reduce barriers to submitters. 相似文献
17.
This paper gives a comprehensive introduction of National Cultural Information Resources Sharing Project.It discusses the best practices in creation and long-term preservation of multimedia digital resources,and recommends solutions to the key issues in resource selection,standards & specifications and copyright. 相似文献
18.
在机构知识库建设过程中,复杂的内容资源产权现状会给机构知识库带来各种潜在的法律风险。笔者从权利所有人的角度对机构知识库存储的各种资源进行分类,在明确各种资源的产权现状基础上,参考国内外著名机构库产权政策提出以适用的制度机制为基础、以完善的管理机制为保障,以规范的技术机制为支撑的机构库发展对策。 相似文献
19.
Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Ángel Borrego 《Learned Publishing》2017,30(3):185-192
Despite the increase in the number of institutional repositories worldwide, most of them seem underpopulated. At the same time, scientists are apparently willing to share copies of their publications on academic social networking sites. This paper compares the availability of the scholarly output in the institutional repositories of 13 top Spanish universities and in ResearchGate (RG). Results show that just 11.1% of the articles published in 2014 by researchers at these universities were available in their institutional repository in the first quarter of 2016. However, most of the articles that were not available in institutional repositories (84.5%) were published in journals that allow the deposit of the article in some form. In contrast, 54.8% of the articles were available in full text on RG. When authors who had uploaded copies of their articles to RG but not to their institutional repository were asked about their reasons, most replies focused on two issues: ignorance about the existence or operation of the institutional repository and awareness of the advantages offered by RG. 相似文献
20.
An institutional repository is a system for dissemination and stewardship of the intellectual life and scholarship of an institution. It has become a new way for the institutions to contribute to the broader world of scholarship (Giesecke, 2011). In spite of the global recognition of institutional repositories as an open access scholarly communication channel, institutional repositories are still struggling with the problem of non-participation from contributors in developing countries like India. This study conveys the results of a survey conducted at a minority university of India. The study is an expression of the opinion of 542 faculty members and research scholars pertaining to the possible implications of institutional repositories on their professional and publishing practices. The study is undertaken to: Determine the level of awareness of institutional repository among contributors; identify the reasons for participation and non-participation of contributors; examine the implications of institutional repository on contributors professional and publishing practices; analyze the major obstacles/hindrances in the growth of an institutional repository; and suggest measures for better implementation and development of an institutional repository in future. With the help of the statistical techniques such as chi-square test and weighted mean the study resulted that the majority of the contributors are well aware about the concept of institutional repository, the majority of contributors have not deposited in an institutional repository so far, long term preservation of research materials is the first ranked reason for participation in an institutional repository, copyright and plagiarism concern is the main reason behind contributors’ non-participation in institutional repository, increased accessibility of research output is the major implication of the institutional repository on contributors professional practices, saved cost of publishing in a journal is the biggest implication of institutional repository on contributors publishing practices, and contributors demand more control on ownership, access and security in future for an institutional repository. This article is aimed at the institutions that report low-use and low-deposit repositories. It may be used to convince the contributors about the value of institutional repositories, importance of participating in an institutional repository and possible implications on their professional and publishing practices. The study is also intended at the management of the institutions to take notice of the contributors’ demands for future participation and develop policies accordingly for removing major barriers in the growth of institutional repositories and improving contributions and quality of content in the institutional repositories. 相似文献