共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 104 毫秒
1.
从档案学前辈关于档案全宗理论的不同时期的思想概括出档案全宗有三个等同物:一是档案全宗等同于法人单位档案;二档案全宗等同于档案有机整体;三档案全宗等同于客体全宗.只有综合地理解这三个等同物方能准确地把握全宗的实质.在实践中若不能综合全面地理解档案全宗理论就会感到莫衰一是,不知如何做起,甚或犯下错误.档案全宗理论在今天的档案实体管理和网络档案信息资源的组织等方面仍然具有方法论的意义,指导着档案信息资源的整合工作. 相似文献
2.
在我国档案馆中,档案保管单位除了大量的独立全宗之外,还有诸如联合全宗、全宗汇集、档案汇集等形式.习惯上,我们把前者称为全宗形式,而把后三者作为全宗的补充形式.全宗补充形式也是全宗形式吗?显然,这是一个不能直接用"是"或"否"来回答的问题.因为内容决定着形式,不同的全宗理论对应着不同的外延形式. 相似文献
3.
4.
国家档案全宗是我国全宗理论及档案学中的重要组成部分，在理论上有较高评价，如1988年出版的吴宝康主编的《档案学概论》，1993年出版的《中国大学百科全书档案学分册》都有重要论述。在实践中也体现我国全宗理论原则：遵循档案的形成规律，以档案的来源为前提，以保持文件之间的历史联系为基础，通过对档案的实体整理管理，努力维护立档单位的历史面貌，便于档案的保管和利用。但是近年来，我国档案学界对国家档案全宗概念的理解存在较大的争议，具体表现在：国家档案全宗概念的过时论；国家档案全宗概念的虚实论；国家档案全宗概念的发展和完善论。本文想就这几个问题做如下探讨和论述。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
国内主流教科书对我国档案整理工作的原则的表述是存在欠缺的,现有档案整理工作原则的表述是全宗理论的内容之一,而全宗理论包含于来源原则之中。据此我们认为,来源原则才是档案整理工作的基本原则。 相似文献
8.
本文分析了城建档案馆设置档案全宗的必要性与可行性,重点从档案全宗的设置、划分以及"客体大全宗"设想三方面对城建档案馆档案全宗设置进行探讨,旨在研究新形势下全宗理论如何更好地指导和推动城建档案工作. 相似文献
9.
以往我国档案工作者针对联合全宗、档案汇集、全宗汇集等多种全宗补充形式这一做法,只是依据实践经验总结得出的,却并未能从传统的全宗理论的角度对这一现象进行科学合理的解释,从而造成了档案理论与实践相背离的现象。本文试图对传统全宗构成条件进行修改,并给予这些全宗补充形式以"合法地位",从而使这些补充形式组建的全宗更加便于科学保管和利用。尽管这些特殊形式的全宗构成形式满足了笔者设定的构成条件,但在档案馆组建全宗时,仍需慎重使用这些形式,否则在一定程度上会造成档案实践的混乱。 相似文献
10.
关于全宗理论的再思考：兼与王茂跃先生等商榷 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
进入70年代以来,随着档案工作的深入开展,档案界人士对全宗原则的认识更加深刻.前苏联开始着手解决原有理论的不足,在1970年颁布的全苏国家标准中规定了档案全宗的定义是:"彼此具有历史联系和逻辑联系的交由国家保管的文件综合体".这就意味着某些非同一来源机关而具有逻辑联系的文件集合体也可称为全宗. 相似文献
11.
12.
Geoffrey Yeo 《Journal Of Archival Organization》2015,12(3-4):170-185
This article questions traditional assumptions that archival aggregations must always be rigidly defined. Technology allows archival institutions to respond to users' diverse requirements by empowering them to create multiple groupings and variable orders. To take advantage of these capabilities as archives become increasingly digital, a shift toward item-level orientation will be crucial. Users will still need information about context, but the digital future will almost certainly necessitate abandoning current methods in favor of documenting contextual relationships at item level. Respect for “fonds” and original order will retain some value but will no longer be the primary means of capturing context. 相似文献
13.
14.
数字人文为档案学界和业界提供了新的理论范式和应用方法。游戏作为新媒体时代的传播媒介和数字人文的重要应用之一,在文化资源开发、宣传等方面有着全新的应用。清宫档案在故宫博物院解谜书游戏《谜宫·金榜题名》中发挥了重要作用,该游戏对于档案的运用得失兼有,档案部门开发解谜书不能完全仿照故宫。基于数字人文视角下档案研究的“三原语”模式,历史档案解谜书游戏开发的路径可以分为档案数据库构建、数据处理和故事讲述三步,同时档案部门在开发解谜书游戏时应加快认知转型与行为调整,谨慎选择历史档案资源,基于档案全宗关联设计系列故事。 相似文献
15.
Eric Ketelaar 《Archival Science》1987,1(2):131-141
Archivists and historians usually consider archives as repositories of historical sources and the archivist as a neutral custodian.
Sociologists and anthropologists see “the archive” also as a system of collecting, categorizing, and exploiting memories.
Archivists are hesitantly acknowledging their role in shaping memories. I advocate that archival fonds, archival documents,
archival institutions, and archival systems contain tacit narratives which must be deconstructed in order to understand the
meanings of archives.
Revision of a paper presented, on the invitation of the Master's Programme in Archival Studies, Department of History, University
of Manitoba, in the History Department Colloquium series of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 20 February, 2001. Some
of the arguments were used earlier in two papers I presented in the seminar “Archives, Documentation and the Institutions
of Social Memory”, organized by the Bentley Historical Library and the International Institute of the University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, 14 February, 2001. 相似文献
16.
Tacit narratives: The meanings of archives 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
Eric Ketelaar 《Archival Science》2001,1(2):131-141
Archivists and historians usually consider archives as repositories of historical sources and the archivist as a neutral custodian.
Sociologists and anthropologists see “the archive” also as a system of collecting, categorizing, and exploiting memories.
Archivists are hesitantly acknowledging their role in shaping memories. I advocate that archival fonds, archival documents,
archival institutions, and archival systems contain tacit narratives which must be deconstructed in order to understand the
meanings of archives.
Revision of a paper presented, on the invitation of the Master's Programme in Archival Studies, Department of History, University
of Manitoba, in the History Department Colloquium series of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 20 February, 2001. Some
of the arguments were used earlier in two papers I presented in the seminar “Archives, Documentation and the Institutions
of Social Memory”, organized by the Bentley Historical Library and the International Institute of the University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, 14 February, 2001. 相似文献
17.
Mpho Ngoepe 《档案与原稿》2017,45(1):31-44
Some public entities in South Africa have implemented digital records systems over a period of 20 years. In terms of the South African archival legal framework, there is a need for such entities to transfer the records into archival custody. However, there is consensus among researchers that there is no infrastructure to ingest digital records into archival custody in South Africa. Furthermore, some public entities have migrated from one system to another since implementation and there is a possibility that records might have been lost during migration. This study demonstrates through literature review the unconscious archival orthodoxy of post-custodial realities in South Africa. The study recommends that public entities should apply for exemption from archival legislation in order to develop an interim solution for the preservation of digital records. The National Archives and Records Service of South Africa (NARSSA) is also encouraged to develop a policy on distributed custody to allow government entities to create interim solutions for preserving digital records. Both public entities and NARSSA should invest in capacity development, including training and provision of sustainable infrastructure required to preserve digital records. It is hoped that this study will influence policy-making with regard to custody of digital records. 相似文献