共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
魏来 《图书情报工作动态》2006,(5):21-22
Eprints知识库以实际可行的方式成为语义网的一部分，主要归功于Nature出版集团和它的Connotea系统——免费在线书目管理服务（网址：http：//www．eonnotea．org／）。Connotea由Nature出版集团新技术组开发，主要思想来自于美味书签（http：//del．icio．us）——一种协作式的书签服务系统。Connotea在其思想上又增加了适应科学家需求的特点，能够提供保持所读文章和所用网站相互链接并再次发现它们的功能，也能提供通过与其它用户共享链接的方式发现新的文章和网站的功能。 相似文献
2.
个人文献管理及参考文献创建工具——RefWorks使用技巧 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
本文介绍了个人文献管理数据库及论文参考文献创建工具——RefWorks,并通过实例着重介绍几种书目数据的导入方式及文后参考文献的生成方法,以期广大用户能够灵活运用RefWorks。 相似文献
3.
Connotea中Social Tagging机制研究 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
选取Connotea为研究对象，统计分析标签、被标引资源、标引者两两关联关系，发现标签覆盖资源范围较广，标签共现现象突出，部分用户标引活跃，资源平均标签数较低，用户对内容关注度规律性转移，科研领域的用户比较多地使用规范词。提出增加标引词结构关联和细粒内容定位标引。 相似文献
4.
资源发现是制约Internet应用和发展的瓶颈，元数据则为这一问题的解决提供了可能。本文从元数据的概念出发，首先介绍了几种常见元数据，然后重点阐述了DublinCore的内容和特点，并将DublinCore和其它几种元数据进行了比较，最后指出作为一种网络信息组织和发现的工具，DublinCore极具发展前景。 相似文献
5.
元数据在教育资源发现中的应用 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
元数据在资源发现中起一种间接作用。元数据应用的直接作用是网络资源的结构合理、层次分明的组织,而结构化的组织直接促进了资源的发现和利用。元数据在中文教育资源发现应用中应注意元数据的信任问题、互操作问题、描述粒度问题、元素扩展问题。图2。参考文献14。 相似文献
6.
7.
图书馆组织服务导向是一种基于馆员激励视角建立强化服务传递方案及奖励优质服务而形成的特定组织氛围,是影响服务质量的重要因素。论文对4所高校图书馆的245名馆员进行问卷调查,采用SPSS和AMOS对数据进行因子分析,不仅发现图书馆组织服务导向具有服务匹配、领导引导、服务支持和服务行为评估与奖励四个因子,还发现,馆员感知的组织服务导向对用户感知的服务质量有正向影响,且组织服务导向的不同因子对服务质量的影响存在差异性。基于此,进一步提出图书馆服务导向策略构建的思路。 相似文献
8.
在推进农业产业化进程中,农村专业合作组织有着不可替代的重要作用。农业产业化是专业合作组织发展的基础,专业合作组织是推动农业产业化发展的一种比较好的组织形式。不发展专业合作组织,推进农业产业化经营就不得要领。 相似文献
9.
网络信息组织与发现的有力工具--Dublin Core 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
资源发现是制约Internet应用和发展的瓶颈，元数据则为这一问题的解决提供了可能，本文从元数据的概念出发，首先介绍了几种常见元数据，然后重点阐述了Dublin Core的内容和特点，并将Dublin Core和其它几种元数据进行了比较，最后指出作为一种网络信息组织和发展的工具，Dublin Core极具发展前景。 相似文献
10.
知识组织是信息组织发展到一定阶段的产物,知识组织工具是其在实践中的具体应用形式。目前主要的知识组织工具有分类表、叙词表和知识本体等。对这三种工具近年来在知识组织领域中的研究情况进行分析。并从多个角度对三者进行比较,最后探讨了知识组织工具未来的发展趋势。 相似文献
11.
12.
With the growing population of undergraduate students on our campus and an increased focus on their success, librarians at a large midwestern university were interested in the citation management styles of this university cohort. Our university library spends considerable resources each year to maintain and promote access to the robust bibliographic management tool RefWorks. A team of librarians wondered whether RefWorks might be used by undergraduate students with the same perceived enthusiasm that we have sensed in graduate students and faculty. More generally, we explored how undergraduate students were managing their citations, if and what kinds of tools they were using to ease the process of creating bibliographies, and their general workflow in incorporating citations into their academic work. 相似文献
13.
ABSTRACT This case study of a quarter-long collaborative service-learning project, repeated over several quarters, involves technical communication students and librarians at Eastern Washington University. The librarians needed to promote RefWorks, while the technical communication faculty needed a client with a computer-based tool for students to learn and then teach to others. Working in teams, fifty-eight students planned and executed fifteen RefWorks workshops for students. The majority of students liked using RefWorks and gave successful presentations to their peers. This project increased awareness and usage of RefWorks while also affording librarians a student-centered perspective on teaching and using this tool. In this win–win collaboration, students learned useful skills in addition to developing a sense of community with the library. 相似文献
14.
Jiří Kratochvíl 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2017,43(1):57-66
Bibliographical references to online and printed articles, books, contributions to edited books and web resources generated by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero were compared with manually written references according to the citation instructions in 15 biomedical journals and the NLM citation style. The fewest mistakes were detected in references generated by Zotero for 11 journals and the NLM style, while the second fewest number of mistakes was found in Mendeley. The largest number of mistakes for 9 journals was found in references generated by EndNote and in the other 4 journals the largest number of mistakes was detected in RefWorks references. With regard to the individual types of resources, the lowest number of mistakes was shown by Zotero, while RefWorks had the greatest number of mistakes. All programs had problems especially with generating the URL and the date of access in the reference to online documents. It was also found that several mistakes were caused by technical limitations of the reference managers, while other mistakes originated due to incorrect setting of the citation styles. A comparison showed that Zotero and Mendeley are the most suitable managers. 相似文献
15.
Lindley Homol 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2014,40(6):552-557
Many students struggle when citing sources in their research papers and have turned to web-based citation tools in increasing numbers. In order to test the accuracy of the citations generated by these products, a sample of student-selected electronic journal articles was collected and MLA and APA citations for these articles were created using EBSCO Discovery Service's Cite tool, EndNote Basic, RefWorks, and Zotero. Although EndNote Basic, RefWorks and Zotero's APA citation error rates were significantly lower than that of EBSCO Discovery Service, none of the programs was capable of generating an error-free MLA electronic journal citation. 相似文献
16.
In the past, librarians taught reference management by training library users to use established software programs such as RefWorks or EndNote. In today's environment, there is a proliferation of Web-based programs that are being used by library clientele that offer a new twist on the well-known reference management programs. Basically, these new programs are PDF-manager software (e.g., Mendeley or Papers). Librarians are faced with new questions, issues, and concerns, given the new workflows and pathways that these PDF-manager programs present. This article takes a look at some of those. 相似文献
17.
This article describes the experiences of librarians at the Research Medical Library embedded within clinical teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and their efforts to enhance communication within their teams using Web 2.0 tools. Pros and cons of EndNote Web, Delicious, Connotea, PBWorks, and SharePoint are discussed. 相似文献
18.
In the past, librarians taught reference management by training library users to use established software programs such as RefWorks or EndNote. In today's environment, there is a proliferation of Web-based programs that are being used by library clientele that offer a new twist on the well-known reference management programs. Basically, these new programs are PDF-manager software (e.g., Mendeley or Papers). Librarians are faced with new questions, issues, and concerns, given the new workflows and pathways that these PDF-manager programs present. This article takes a look at some of those. 相似文献
19.
Yingting Zhang 《Medical reference services quarterly》2013,32(1):45-60
Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool's strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools. 相似文献