共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 858 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
6月17日,第五届全国出版科研优秀论文评奖工作圆满结束,经评审委员会全体委员投票表决,评选出优秀论文57篇。本届评选工作于2003年年底启动,评选论文范围是2001年7月1日至2003年12月31日在省和省级以上公开发行的报、刊及论文集上首次发表的有关出版工作和出版学、编辑学、发行 相似文献
9.
《档案学研究》编辑部 《档案学研究》2008,22(6):60-60
为调动作者学术研究的积极性,提高学术创新能力和水平,繁荣档案学术园地,《档案学研究》编辑部决定按年度评选年度优秀论文。评选方法如下: 相似文献
10.
11.
Frank‐Thorsten KRELL 《Learned Publishing》2010,23(1):59-62
The journal impact factor is widely used as a performance indicator for single authors (despite its unsuitably in this respect). Hence, authors are increasingly exercised if there is any sign that impact factors are being manipulated. Editors who ask authors to cite relevant papers from their own journal are accused of acting unethically. This is surprising because, besides publishers, authors are the primary beneficiaries of an increased impact factor of the journal in which they publish, and because the citation process is biased anyway. There is growing evidence that quality and relevance are not always the reasons for choosing references. Authors' biases and personal environments as well as strategic considerations are major factors. As long as an editor does not force authors to cite irrelevant papers from their own journal, I consider it as a matter of caretaking for the journal and its authors if an editor brings recent papers to the authors' attention. It would be unfair to authors and disloyal to the publisher if an editor did not try to increase the impact of his/her own journal. 相似文献
12.
13.
重视科学新闻提升期刊影响 总被引：5，自引：2，他引：3
科学新闻源于期刊所发表的优秀论文.西方科学新闻传播有成熟的网络平台及从事科学新闻传播的媒体及记者.我国缺乏科学新闻传播理念,为此,作者建议从重视科学新闻和提升期刊影响的角度,树立科学新闻传播观念,组织发表有新闻价值的论文,培养科学新闻的撰稿人,构筑科学新闻搜集、发布平台,开设期刊(或主编)博客. 相似文献
14.
作者资源是办好科技期刊的基础。本研究探索以作者为中心,围绕投稿前指导、便捷投稿、快速审稿、及时退修、数字化出版、快速推送、引用反馈等7方面创新调整传统的编辑出版流程,建设科技期刊作者服务体系。从作者服务体系建设层面,推动科技期刊质量控制与规范化建设。同时从作者服务体系建设层面,培育优秀作者群,吸引优秀论文回归。本文重点介绍其中快速审稿环节的建设成果,通过快速送审、快速审稿、快速退修、免收审理费、短信即时通知来实现快速审稿。通过流程再造,已经实现数分钟内送审、退修,初审周期1d,复审周期10d,终审周期5d。 相似文献
15.
16.
《Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services》2007,31(1):1-11
This study describes the key findings of the Korean Electronic Site License Initiative (KESLI), established by the National Digital Science Library to develop a digital archive of electronic journals in Korea. Research and relevant activities included developing a system architecture, suggesting journal selection criteria and publisher selection criteria, choosing a set of metadata elements, and addressing stakeholders' concerns. Recommendations for further tasks have been made in order to have the system fully operating by December 2007. 相似文献
17.
《资料收集管理》2013,38(3):29-36
A comparison of a Bradford-ranked list of journals in the field of mathematics with a list of the same journals ranked by citation counts finds little correlation between the two. A previous study by Lamb shows a high correlation between a ranking based on citation frequency for these journals and a ranking based on the prestige of individual contributors. Lamb's study suggests that a selection policy based on choosing journals publishing the most papers on a topic will result in the acquisition of high quality papers. The results of this study cast doubt on Lamb's conclusions. 相似文献
18.
在国内目前论文造假现象比较严重的情况下,科技期刊不得不付出大量的心血用于防范学术不端文献的发表。本文作者在工作中偶然遇到因作者所留电话号码归属地与作者单位不一致而发现的代写代投论文这一事实,总结出代写代投论文的稿件基本信息的一些特点,为编辑同人从论文基本信息入手发现学术不端的线索提供参考,并再次呼吁编辑同行提高防范学术不端论文的警惕性,当好学术出版的守门人。 相似文献
19.
Rubriq is on a mission to put lost time back into research. We estimate that 15 million hours are lost each year to redundant peer review as papers get rejected and flow down the journal prestige pyramid. Rubriq uses an author‐pays model to facilitate fast, independent, and standardized peer review performed by three academic peers who are financially compensated for their efforts. Authors receive the reviews as well as a detailed journal recommendation report in 1–2 weeks. This service is designed to improve journal selection, supplement editorial reviews, and make peer review more portable between journals. The creation of the standardized scorecard is just the first phase of Rubriq's plans to improve the scholarly communication workflow. Through lessons learned over the past year, the Rubriq approach is evolving into a broader set of tools, software, and services designed to speed and improve the scholarly communication process. 相似文献
20.