Analyzing Food Science Research for Publishing Characteristics as a Model for Understanding the Needs of Researchers     

Lutishoor Salisbury  Jeremy J. Smith  Abayomi Omotola Omolewu 《资料收集管理》2020,45(4):335-353

Abstract

This paper provides a methodology to study the characteristics of the research output from a university department. The faculty publications and their cited references over a 10-year period were used as the basis for this study to identify their publishing patterns and the types of material they are publishing; a core set of journals and other resources they are publishing in and citing over this period; the characteristics of the journals in which they publish and cite; the degree of openness of their publications and their citation advantage; and the age of resources that are referenced.  相似文献   

Using the Information Structure Model to Compare Profile-Based Information Filtering Systems     

Yuval Elovici  Bracha Shapira  Paul B. Kantor 《Information Retrieval》2003,6(1):75-97

In the IR field it is clear that the value of a system depends on the cost and benefit profiles of its users. It would seem obvious that different users would prefer different systems. In the TREC-9 filtering track, systems are evaluated by a utility measure specifying a given cost and benefit. However, in the study of decision systems it is known that, in some cases, one system may be unconditionally better than another. In this paper we employ a decision theoretic approach to find conditions under which an Information Filtering (IF) system is unconditionally superior to another for all users regardless of their cost and benefit profiles.It is well known that if two IF systems have equal precision the system with better recall will be preferred by all users. Similarly, with equal recall, better precision is universally preferred. We confirm these known results and discover an unexpected dominance relation in which a system with lower recall will be universally preferred provided its precision is sufficiently higher.  相似文献   

对体育科技期刊封页设计的分析及探讨     

王瑛 《北京体育大学学报》2003,26(3):326-327

通过对44种2002年出版发行的体育科技期刊的封面设计形式,封面、封底标识,封二、封三刊载内容调查,从中发现我国体育科技期刊封页设计的整体水平有所提高,但一定程度上存在对封面设计不够重视的情况,美术编辑的艺术创作能力有待提高。  相似文献   

中、日、美、英体育教学发展共同趋向研究   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

张细谦  韩晓东  叶强华 《北京体育大学学报》2003,26(3):358-360

世纪之交,为了适应本国社会发展的需要,中国、日本、美国和英国都在深化体育教学改革。运用比较分析法等研究方法,对中、日、美、英体育教学的发展动向进行了研究。研究发现:中、日、美、英体育教学目标向着健康化、终身化、多元化的方向发展;体育教学内容越来越关注学生身心健康发展和终身体育的需要,体育教学评价更加注重过程性评价和个体评价,评价内容日益多元化。  相似文献   

体育课教学质量评估研究     

毕研洁  周志强  史琦兰 《天津体育学院学报》2003,18(1):75-76

评价一堂体育课，总要有几条简明扼要的标准。传统的评价标准在一定阶段促进了我国学校体育的发展，但在实施素质教育的今天，已不能完全适应时代的要求，有时甚至阻碍了素质教育的发展。一堂好的体育课要作到全力引导全体学生参与，提高学生参加活动兴趣，使其有愉快的心理体验。同时保证教学的目标、教材、手段相配套，课堂教育的度、量、序安排科学，这样才能建立师生间民主合作的人际关系。１研究对象和方法１．１研究对象笔者对兰州大学２０００、２００１级文理科各１２００名男女学生进行问卷调查，年龄均在１８～２０岁之间。调查后…  相似文献   

未来八年我国体育科技、教育发展的战略构想与政策建议   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

韩丁 《山东体育学院学报》2003,19(1):11-15

当代体育科技、教育体系是科技教育体系的重要组成部分，有相当的体育科学技术学科是科学技术母体学科在体育领域的应用、渗透而形成的，由此构成了体育科学技术体系的重要内容。21世纪现代奥林匹克的进一步发展，将更加需要高新技术的发展和渗透，而在我国举办奥运这一新历史环境下，国家创新体系将延伸成为体育创新体系的重要部分，使体育科学体系出现个体学科突增发展、学科群落拓展优化的趋向；体育教育传播体系将更加开放、普及和优化，使各类高等教育体系出现超前创建体育新专业契合社会化、健康服务需求的态势。  相似文献   

湖南省大学生有氧耐力评价标准研究   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

邬似刚  熊曼丽  孙洪涛  王铁生 《中国体育科技》2003,39(3):54-55

对湖南省文、理、工、医、农 5类专业 6 0 0名二年级与四年级男、女大学生进行 12min跑测验 ,并用RPE值对运动负荷进行监控。结果显示 ,用 12min跑间接测定大学生的最大耗氧量是可行的 ,据此制定了湖南省大学生有氧耐力评价标准。  相似文献   

实践教学环节的质量评价体系平台的研究   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

陈传海  李雪 《安徽职业技术学院学报》2003,2(3):27-32

高职高专院校实践教学环节是高职高专教学中的一个非常重要的组成部分 ,它直接关系到能否实现高职高专教育人才培养目标。目前大多数高职高专院校对实践教学环节开始重视 ,但对实践教学环节质量的考核、评价还停留在原来的评价手段和方法上。本文是立足高职高专教育的人才培养目标 ,构建高职高专实践教学环节的质量评价的新平台。通过质量评价体系评价 ,客观、公正、科学、合理的评价学生的实践技能 ,同时改变那些不符合要求的实践技能培养模式  相似文献   

图书馆馆藏文献资源评价：层次分析法应用的理论研究   总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2  

郑孝玉 《情报杂志》1992,11(3):55-59

在分析文献资源的特征的基础上,以大学图书馆为例,研究了层次分析法实际应用的客观环境、评价目标、评价模型的厘定以及评价方法。  相似文献   

The impact of digital technology on archival science     

Luciana Duranti 《Archival Science》2001,1(1):39-55

Archival science is to be regarded as a system. The properties of that system can be investigated and integrated. The methodology to do so has been tested in two research projects which are presented in this article as examples of the way in which the view of archival science as a system supports the development of new knowledge and as a demonstration of the stability of archival theory. This article presupposes that the archival discipline is also a “science”. Many have argued against the idea on the basis of a common perception that a science is a type of study entirely objective by virtue of the rigorous manner in which it is carried out and the restricted range of topics to which it applies. In fact, the activity of science is based upon a complex framework of assumptions that make it possible for the landscape of the scientific endeavour to be redrawn over time, and, while striving towards objectivity, considers it to be an unattainable ideal.  相似文献