排序方式： 共有85条查询结果，搜索用时 531 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Innovative Higher Education - Learning gains associated with multiple-choice testing formats that provide immediate feedback (e.g., IFAT®) are often greater than those for typical... 相似文献
4.
Noah Weeth Feinstein Jeppe Læssøe Nicole Blum Dianne Chambers 《Environmental Education Research》2013,19(2):198-205
In 2009, a think tank called the International Alliance of Leading Education Institutes (IALEI) announced the results of a study entitled Climate Change and Sustainable Development: The Response from Education. Intended for a policy audience, the study offered a glimpse into the status of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and an early look at the emergence of Climate Change Education (CCE), in 10 different nations. As with most international reports, the IALEI report provoked many questions, some of which are more broadly relevant to scholarship and practice. This paper introduces a review symposium that addresses three such questions: (1) How coherent is the concept of ESD across national contexts and what conceptual tensions continue to surround ESD and CCE? (2) Can nation-level analyses tell us anything useful about countries where education is not centrally governed? and (3) In light of the evolving relationship between educational research and policy, how should researchers engage with ongoing policy debates? 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
Renate Nestvogel Harold J. Noah Sixten Marklund Richard Noonan John Nisbet Desmond J. Keegan Jeremy Greenland Robert G. Thomas Douglas Thom Mina J. Moore-Rinvolucri Wolfgang Tietze A. Harry Passow Michael A. White D. S. Anderson Philip G. Altbach R. Gardner Bogdan Suchodolski Malcolm Rosier Ronald H. Wilson David H. Partington 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1983,29(4):493-521
9.
Larry Peterson Tom Anderson Dan Blumenthal Dean Casey David Clark Deborah Estrin Joe Evans Mike Reiter Scott Shenker John Wroclawski 洪丹 陈茂科 《中国教育网络》2006,(11):18-20
2006年8月,GEN(I网络创新的全球化环境)项目组公布其项目的设计原则。来自普林斯顿大学、麻省理工大学、华盛顿大学等学校的十二位专家编写了这份报告。该报告阐述了GENI的研究范围、用户的需求、需求的内在压力,以及工程设计的原则。报告指出了GENI的价值主张,广泛的部署、多样化可扩展的网络技术集合、对真实用户流量的支持仍是GENI关注的原则和方向。上期已经介绍第一部分——“分布式需求定义GENI的重心”,本期刊出第二部分——“解决分布式需求的内在冲突”。 相似文献
10.
Dependency theory in comparative education: The new simplicitude 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2