排序方式： 共有4条查询结果，搜索用时 360 毫秒
1
1.
Research in Science Education - The meaning-making practices of science are multimodal and include representational forms such as spoken and written language, diagrams, graphs, equations, and... 相似文献
2.
In the learning sciences, students’ understanding of scientific concepts has often been approached in terms of conceptual change. These studies are grounded in a cognitive or a socio-cognitive approach to students’ understanding and imply a focus on the
individuals’ mental representations of scientific concepts and ideas. We approach students’ conceptual change from a socio-cultural
perspective as they make new meaning in genetics. Adhering to a socio-cultural perspective, we emphasize the discursive and
interactional aspects of human learning and understanding. This perspective implies that the focus is on students’ meaning
making processes in collaborative learning activities. In the study, we conduct an analysis of a group of students’ who interact
while working to solve problems in genetics. In our analyses we emphasize four analytical aspects of the students’ meaning
making: (a) the students’ use of resources in problematizing, (b) teacher interventions, (c) changes in interactional accomplishments,
and (d) the institutional aspect of meaning making. Our findings suggest that students’ meaning making surrounding genetics
concepts relates not only to an epistemic concern but also to an interactional and an institutional concern.
Anniken Furberg is a PhD student in education at InterMedia, the University of Oslo. After earning a master’s degree in education at the University of Oslo (1998) she spent four years working as a researcher at Telenor R&I. She still has her position in Telenor R&I but performs her PhD work on a daily basis at InterMedia, the University of Oslo. Her research interests include the socio-cultural approach to collaborative learning, socio-scientific issues, computer-supported learning, and analyses of students’ and teachers’ classroom talk. Hans Christian Arnseth is an associate professor/research director at the Network for IT-Research and Competence in Education, University of Oslo. In 2004 he earned his PhD in education at the University of Oslo. He currently works with initializing and coordinating national and international research programs related to ICT in education. His research explores computer-supported collaborative learning, computer gaming and learning, and analyses of students’ classroom interaction. 相似文献
| Anniken FurbergEmail: |
Anniken Furberg is a PhD student in education at InterMedia, the University of Oslo. After earning a master’s degree in education at the University of Oslo (1998) she spent four years working as a researcher at Telenor R&I. She still has her position in Telenor R&I but performs her PhD work on a daily basis at InterMedia, the University of Oslo. Her research interests include the socio-cultural approach to collaborative learning, socio-scientific issues, computer-supported learning, and analyses of students’ and teachers’ classroom talk. Hans Christian Arnseth is an associate professor/research director at the Network for IT-Research and Competence in Education, University of Oslo. In 2004 he earned his PhD in education at the University of Oslo. He currently works with initializing and coordinating national and international research programs related to ICT in education. His research explores computer-supported collaborative learning, computer gaming and learning, and analyses of students’ classroom interaction. 相似文献
3.
This article reports on a study concerning secondary school students’ meaning‐making of socio‐scientific issues in Information and Communication Technology‐mediated settings. Our theoretical argument has as its point of departure the analytical distinction between ‘doing science’ and ‘doing school,’ as two different forms of classroom activity. In the study we conducted an analysis of students working with web‐based groupware systems concerned with genetics. The analysis identified how the students oriented their accounts of scientific concepts and how they attempted to understand the socio‐scientific task in different ways. Their orientations were directed towards finding scientific explanations, towards exploring the ethical and social consequences, and towards ‘fact‐finding.’ The students’ different orientations seemed to contribute to an ambivalent tension, which, on the one hand, was productive because it urged them into ongoing discussions and explicit meaning‐making. On the other hand, however, the tension elucidated how complex and challenging collaborative learning situations can be. Our findings suggest that in order to obtain a deeper understanding of students’ meaning‐making of socio‐scientific issues in Information and Communication Technology‐mediated settings, it is important not only to address how students perform the activity of ‘doing science.’ It is equally important to be sensitive with respect to how students orient their talk and activity towards more or less explicit values, demands, and expectations embedded in the educational setting. In other words, how students perform the activity of ‘doing school.’ 相似文献
4.
In this rejoinder to Ann Kindfield and Grady Venville’s comments on our article “Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural
perspective: Analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities,” we elaborate on some of
the critical issues they raise. Their comments make apparent some of the crucial differences between a socio-cultural and
a socio-cognitive approach towards conceptual change. We have selected some issues that are addressed, either implicitly or
explicitly, in their comments. The main issues discussed are talk and interaction as data, the significance of context in
interaction studies, the feasibility of generic claims in small-scale interaction studies, and the difference between studying
students’ understanding of science concepts as opposed to studying the construction of meaning.
相似文献
| Anniken FurbergEmail: |
1