| 研究报告评价标准的界定与联想 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张力为.研究报告评价标准的界定与联想[J].北京体育大学学报,2002,25(1):71-73. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张力为 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京体育大学,北京,100084 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 研究报告是研究质量和作者水平的综合体现.提出了评价研究报告质量的10项标准,它们分别是理论贡献、因果关系、方法创新、实际意义、积累力度、效果大小、精细程度、外推能力、吸引魅力和可信程度.特别指出,如果从简洁性出发,最重要的标准应该是研究报告是否能够改变读者的传统观念.此点与研究的创新性密切相关.建议研究者参考这10项标准设计研究和撰写报告.
|
| 关 键 词： | 研究报告 理论 方法 创新 标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-3612(2002)01-0071-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年12月4日 |
Establishment of Evaluation Criterions of Research Reports and Association |
| |
| ZHANG Li-wei.Establishment of Evaluation Criterions of Research Reports and Association[J].Journal of Beijing Sport University,2002,25(1):71-73. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Li-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | The quality of a research and the researcher's qualification are synthetically manifested in a research report. Ten criterions for evaluating a report were proposed. They are theoretical contribution, causal relationship, methodological creativity, practical importance, accumulation, magnitude of effects, articulation of results, generality of effects as well as interestingness and credibility of argument. In particular, it was pointed out that from a viewpoint of succinctness, the most important criterion might be whether a research report has the power to change the readers' traditional approach to thinking a problem. This criterion is closely related to creativity. It was suggested that researchers refer to those 10 criterions when designing and writing their reports. |
| |
| Keywords: | research report theory method creativity criterion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
