共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
社会科学引文的离散性研究——基于JCR社科版指标分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
《期刊引证报告》(JCR)是美国科技信息研究所于1975年出版的一种独特的多学科期刊分析评价工具。通过对2005年的JCR社会科学版数据的统计分析可知,社会科学引文在基本符合布拉德福定律的情况下离散程度有所缩小,在社会科学领域较多的期刊承担着学术交流任务,因此不能笼统地说社会科学引文在期刊中的分布符合布拉德福定律,而应该注意到它的集中分散有一定的特殊性。 相似文献
2.
《期刊引证报告》（JCR）是美国科技信息研究所于1975年出版的一种独特的多学科期刊分析评价工具。通过对2005年的JCR社会科学版数据的统计分析可知,社会科学引文在基本符合布拉德福定律的情况下离散程度有所缩小,在社会科学领域较多的期刊承担着学术交流任务,因此不能笼统地说社会科学引文在期刊中的分布符合布拉德福定律,而应该注意到它的集中分散有一定的特殊性。 相似文献
3.
《人文社会科学评价理论与实践》是国内第一部全面地、系统地对人文社会科学评价的理论进行深入研究,并将相关研究成果用于评价实践的著作。通过人文社会科学评价理论、人文社会科学评价体系和人文社会科学评价实践三个方面的内容的创新性研究,构建了一个包括理论、方法与实践相结合的人文社会科学评价体系。 相似文献
4.
5.
[目的/意义] 试图探明Altmetrics应用于我国人文社会科学学术图书影响力评价中面临的主要挑战及应对措施。探索如何应用Altmetrics评价我国人文社会科学学术图书学术影响力及社会影响力。[方法/过程] 采用文献回顾及网络调查的方法,对国内外Altmetrics研究理论与实践成果进行分析。[结果/结论] 我国人文社会科学学术图书Altmetrics评价面临六大挑战,但这些挑战并不会贬损其价值,而是提供了开展深入研究的空间。虽然我国人文社会科学学术图书Altmetrics评价面临挑战,但这些挑战是可应对的。应用Altmetrics可分析我国人文社会科学学术图书的学术影响力及社会影响力。 相似文献
6.
期刊学术影响力、期刊对稿件的录用标准和期刊载文的学术影响力三者之间存在同向加强的机制,来自较高影响力期刊的引用具有较高的评价意义。作者的择刊引用和择刊发表使得较低学术影响力的期刊较少被较高影响力期刊引用。因而,可以通过同时考察构成期刊引证形象的施引期刊的学术影响力及其施引频次来评价被引期刊的学术影响力。以综合性期刊Nature和Science 2010年的引证形象为例,将期刊影响因子作为学术影响力的初评结果,提出了以施引频次对施引期刊影响因子加权的计算方法,以期通过量化的引证形象实现对期刊的评价。 相似文献
7.
[目的/意义]数字人文作为新兴的跨学科研究领域,受到许多学科的广泛关注。本文旨在探析数字人文在图情档学科中的知识扩散,供数字人文和图情档发展借鉴。[方法/过程]以Web of Science核心数据集为数据来源,通过对数字人文在图情档的目标文献以及目标文献的图情档施引文献两部分数据的期刊扩散性和主题扩散性两个维度进行分析。其中,期刊扩散性采用来自传播学的期刊双向传播理论以及改良的消除时间因素影响的期刊引证系数两个指标进行分析,主题扩散性采用基于关键词的词云图和基于关键词的聚类进行分析。[结果/结论]研究表明,期刊双向传播中扩散性大于1的期刊共有13个,JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS为双向扩散性能最好的期刊;数字人文在图情档学科所属学科期刊引证系数排名靠前的期刊有JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS、SCIENTOMETRICS、JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY等;期刊引证系数均呈现上下波动的现象,但是基本上top10的期刊在2006、2012、2016年出现了峰值,表明这些期刊在这些年份的影响力较大;数字人文研究现状、数字人文与图书馆融合、数字人文在教学中的应用、数字人文的激励措施在目标文献和施引文献的主题中均形成了规模,可以认为这四个方向的主题为数字人文在图情档的重点研究内容。 相似文献
8.
李有梅 《现代图书情报技术》1996,12(1):16-19
本文讨论了引证关系对情报检索的影响以及引文检索的可实现性。利用检索系统所提供的数据可以进行引证分析, 对文献的使用进行合理的引导, 提高文献的利用率。 相似文献
9.
文章针对高校人文社会科学研究成果评价监督存在的不足,提出了"三个层次,两个系统"的高校人文社会科学研究成果评价监督体系的理想框架。基于此框架分析了优化高校人文社会科学研究成果评价监督的基本思路,并对高校人文社会科学研究成果评价监督的优化措施进行了设计。 相似文献
10.
从新媒体环境、网络时代期刊文献集群文献利用特点、数字时代的阅读和学术研究方式、人文社会科学学术期刊的强烈人文性色彩等多元角度,提出人文社会科学学术期刊评价指标体系研究新思路,即构建一个人文的、技术的、前瞻的、关联的新指标体系,阐述了若干传统指标的修正意见和创新指标的设计原理、依据,并给出了一个详细的研究流程和方法说明。 相似文献
11.
人文社会科学评价中“质”与“量”相结合的评价框架研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
12.
Multidisciplinary cooperation is now common in research since social issues inevitably involve multiple disciplines. In research articles, reference information, especially citation content, is an important representation of communication among different disciplines. Analyzing the distribution characteristics of references from different disciplines in research articles is basic to detecting the sources of referred information and identifying contributions of different disciplines. This work takes articles in PLoS as the data and characterizes the references from different disciplines based on Citation Content Analysis (CCA). First, we download 210,334 full-text articles from PLoS and collect the information of the in-text citations. Then, we identify the discipline of each reference in these academic articles. To characterize the distribution of these references, we analyze three characteristics, namely, the number of citations, the average cited intensity and the average citation length. Finally, we conclude that the distributions of references from different disciplines are significantly different. Although most references come from Natural Science, Humanities and Social Sciences play important roles in the Introduction and Background sections of the articles. Basic disciplines, such as Mathematics, mainly provide research methods in the articles in PLoS. Citations mentioned in the Results and Discussion sections of articles are mainly in-discipline citations, such as citations from Nursing and Medicine in PLoS. 相似文献
13.
14.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2023,49(4):102734
This research provides insight into the complex relationship between open access, funding, and citation advantage. It presents an analysis of research articles and their citations in the Scopus database across 40 subject categories. The sample includes 12 categories from Health Sciences, 7 from Life Sciences, 10 from Physical Sciences & Engineering, and 11 from Social Sciences & Humanities. Specifically, the analysis focuses on articles published in 2016 and the citations they received from 2016 to 2020. Our findings show that open access articles published in hybrid journals receive considerably more citations than those published in gold open access journals. Articles under the hybrid gold modality are cited on average twice as much as those in the gold modality, regardless of funding. Furthermore, we found that funded articles generally obtain 50 % more citations than unfunded ones within the same publication modality. Open access repositories significantly increase citations, particularly for articles without funding. Thus, articles in open access repositories receive 50 % more citations than paywalled ones. 相似文献
15.
16.
1998-2000年《现代图书情报技术》 引文及影响因子分析 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
依据1998—2000《中文社会科学引文索引》数据库(CSSCI)中的数据，对《现代图书情报技术》的引文和影响因子进行统计分析，并对该刊的学术影响力和办刊风格等进行了评价。 相似文献
17.
This paper explores the use of Library Catalog Analysis (LCA), defined as the application of bibliometric or informetric techniques to a set of library online catalogs, to describe quantitatively a scientific-scholarly field on the basis of published book titles. It focuses on its value as a tool in studies of Social Sciences and Humanities, especially its cognitive structures, main book publishers and the research performance of its actors. The paper proposes an analogy model between traditional citation analysis of journal articles and Library Catalog Analysis of book titles. It presents the outcomes of an exploratory study of book titles in Economics included in 42 academic library catalogs from 7 countries. It describes the process of data collection and cleaning, and applies a series of indicators and thematic mapping techniques. It illustrates how LCA can be fruitfully used to assess book production and research performance at the level of an individual researcher, a research department, an entire country and a book publisher. It discusses a number of issues that should be addressed in follow-up studies and concludes that LCA of published book titles can be developed into a powerful and useful tool in studies of Social Sciences and Humanities. 相似文献
18.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(1):234-240
This paper introduces a novel application in bibliometrics of the barycenter method. Using places of publication barycenters, we measure internationalization of book publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Based on 2002–2011 data for Flanders, Belgium, we demonstrate how the geographic center of weight of book publishing is different for the Social Sciences than for the Humanities. Whereas the latter still rely predominantly on domestic Flemish and continental European publishers, the former are firmly Anglo-Saxon oriented. The Humanities, however, show a more pronounced evolution toward further internationalization. For the already largely internationally oriented Social Sciences, in most recent years, the share of British publishers has grown. The barycenter method proves to be a valuable tool in the representation of research internationalization of book publications. This is especially the case when applied non-Anglophone countries. 相似文献
19.
中文学术期刊评价中引文分析指标间关系的实证研究——基于2010年版中国期刊引证报告（扩刊版） 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文针对用于中文学术期刊评价的引文分析指标,尝试通过相关性分析、因子分析来探寻这些指标之间的定量关系。通过对《2010年版中国期刊引证报告（扩刊版）》中的引文分析指标数据进行实证分析发现,这些引文指标之间存在重叠,但又不可完全替代,同时也揭示出不同学科领域的各个引文分析指标的确存在差异。 相似文献