共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 328 毫秒
1.
借鉴当前美国图书馆界最有影响的服务质量评估方法LibQUAL+TM模式,同时借助免费的网络调查平台——知己知彼网,制定了海南省高校图书馆读者满意度测评指标体系,并在省内高校图书馆进行了调查。 相似文献
2.
LibQUAL+TM是针对高校及研究型图书馆设计的以读者知觉体验为中心的服务质量评价模型,在借鉴国内部分图书馆采用LibQUAL+TM进行服务绩效成功评价的基础上,以广东交通职业技术学院图书馆为测评对象,对其服务绩效进行了评价和分析。 相似文献
3.
LibQUAL+TM服务质量评价体系是美国图书馆界2004年以来最有影响的服务质量评估体系和方法,引用其来评价河南民办高校图书馆的服务质量是一个新的尝试。结合工作实际,基于LibQUAL+~TM服务质量评价体系和方法,在河南省四所民办高校图书馆进行问卷调查,根据相关数据做了分析研究,提出了服务质量的改进意见。 相似文献
4.
图书馆管理目标是通过馆员的努力为用户提供高质量的信息服务,图书馆服务质量控制是图书馆管理的重要内容。LibQUAL+TM是一种用户视角下的满意度测量,可以被看成是图书馆服务质量反馈控制的评价工具,ClimateQUALTM是一种馆员视角下的包含员工工作满意度的工作气候测评,可以被看成是图书馆服务质量过程控制的评价工具。该文从理论基础、测评指标、应用前景等方面对LibQUAL+TM与ClimateQUALTM进行了评析,并讨论了这两种评价工具在图书馆服务质量控制方面所体现的相关性。论文的结论是:LibQUAL+TM与Climate-QUALTM都可以为图书馆服务质量控制提供决策支持,面向图书馆服务质量控制的评价工具应是两者的协同运用,我们需要从观念培育、指标本地化改造、制度完善、测评结果利用等方面全面努力,建设能够协同运用两种评价工具的图书馆评估文化。 相似文献
5.
LibQUAL＋ 图书馆服务质量评价研究综述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
文章介绍了LibQUAL＋ 图书馆服务质量评价研究现状,然后翻译分析了LibQUAL＋ 2010年最新版本,以了解图书馆服务质量评价的发展情况,最后指出LibQUAL＋ 图书馆服务质量评价研究意义。参考文献14。 相似文献
6.
文章介绍了LibQUAL+(R)图书馆服务质量评价研究现状,然后翻译分析了LibQUAL+(R)2010年最新版本,以了解图书馆服务质量评价的发展情况,最后指出LibQUAL+(R)图书馆服务质量评价研究意义.参考文献14. 相似文献
7.
继承SERVQUAL的评价方法和工作机理,LibQUAL+®经历了一个不断修订的过程,其最新的发展动态是LibQUAL+®精简版LibQUAL+®Lite的实验。我国先后有数十个图书馆运用SERVQUAL原型、LibQUAL+®的修正模型进行图书馆服务质量评价的实证研究。评价模型主要围绕文献资源、服务效果、图书馆环境、图书馆员、图书馆设施5个方面。清华大学图书馆的实践表明,LibQUAL+®的思路和模式也基本适用于国内大学图书馆。清华大学图书馆在已有工作的基础上,从国内研究图书馆的实际状况出发,站在用户的角度和立场上,从用户对图书馆的需求出发,研制了一套基于用户需求的图书馆服务质量评价方法与模式,并通过多个图书馆的实证,为国内研究图书馆进行本土化的服务质量评价提供了具有借鉴价值的模型和体系。 相似文献
8.
应用LibQUAL+TM对我国部分图书馆服务质量进行评价调查,结合ARL和日本三所大学的调查结果,比较中日美三国图书馆服务质量状况及不同文化背景下读者对大学图书馆服务质量评价结果的差异,给出我国图书馆服务质量改进方向。最后提出我国图书馆进行基于LibQUAL+TM的服务质量评价的实施方案的建议。 相似文献
9.
LIBQUAL+TM-图书馆服务质量评价方法新进展 总被引：69，自引：2，他引：67
LibQUAL+~(TM)是美国研究图书馆协会正在实施的试验项目,试图对SERVQUAL进行改造,从而建立适合于图书馆的服务质量评价体系。本文对LibQUAL+~(TM)的产生背景、发展历史、评价项目、作用等方面进行了较为详细的介绍。 相似文献
10.
LibQUAL+TM作为一种基于用户的图书馆服务质量评价体系,为大学图书馆服务质量评价提供了一个有效的测度工具.基于东北财经大学图书馆调研活动中研究型用户反馈的《图书馆需求调查、征求意见活动问卷调查表》进行归纳整理,在修正LibQUAL+TM的基础上,对东北财经大学图书馆的服务质量进行了评价分析. 相似文献
11.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2020,46(2):102102
The LibQUAL+ instrument serves as an indicator of user satisfaction. While offering clear insights into user satisfaction levels, it lacks interpretability when seeking to judge overall library success. This study aims at adopting LibQUAL+ as a measurement tool to predict library users' intention to patronize the library more in future. A theoretical model is presented to measure the relationships among the three LibQUAL+ service dimensions and the overall library user satisfaction. We estimate the effects of the three service dimensions on two indicators of students' attitudes and beliefs (Overall Satisfaction and Perceived Academic Success) and, in turn, the effects of those two variables on students' anticipated library use. We tested the research model using structural equation modeling. Our study results reveal that the three dimensions, Library as Place, Affect of Service and Information Control have considerably different impact on Satisfaction and Perceived Academic Success. Similarly, the two mediating variables, Satisfaction and Perceived Academic Success, have different impact on the Intention to Use [the] Library More in future. Our work is meant to explain how an effective and widely used measurement tool can become more effective and informative through SEM analysis and to provide a broader model to predicting library success. 相似文献
12.
The LibQUAL+® instrument measures users' perceptions of library service quality; three factors are evaluated: Affect of Service, Information Control, and Library as Place. Although previous studies have assessed the factorial invariance of LibQUAL+®, factorial invariance by itself is insufficient for score comparability across groups. Stronger levels of measurement invariance need to be established. This study systematically tested the measurement and structural invariance of LibQUAL+® scores in a sample of 1551 undergraduate students, 707 graduate students, and 134 faculty members. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses showed that full measurement invariance did hold between students and faculty for the complete instrument. Building on the measurement invariance, structural invariance models showed that factor variances were equivalent across user groups, but factor covariances and means differed. Faculty had higher perceptions of Affect of Service and undergraduate students had higher perceptions of Library as Place compared to the other groups. 相似文献
13.
图书馆通过LibQUAL+TM评价模式不仅能够获得用户对图书馆实际服务绩效的评价,还可以了解用户对服务的期望,从而通过改进服务、不断缩小实际服务质量与用户期望之间的差距,最大限度地满足用户的需求。基于LibQUAL+TM的图书馆服务质量评价体系应以用户需求为导向,以用户满意度和关注度作为指标测度,通过不断完善资源配置和运行管理机制提高图书馆服务水平,推进图书馆事业健康发展。 相似文献
14.
Forrest C. Lane Baaska Anderson Hector F. Ponce Prathiba Natesan 《Library & information science research》2012
LibQUAL+® is an instrument purported to measure three dimensions of library service quality: service affect, library as a place, and information control. After changes were made to the instrument in 2003, however, no confirmatory factor analyses have been published in peer-reviewed journals affirming the three-factor structure of LibQUAL+®. These deficiencies were addressed by testing the hypothesized three-factor structure and the stability of that structure over time. Specifically, data from three samples (n = 550; n = 3261; n = 2103) were collected over a five-year period and analyzed using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Results suggest that the theoretical model fit the data across the three samples and demonstrates factorial invariance over time. Multicollinearity between affect of service and information control, however, indicate that service quality may be measured as two dimensions rather than three, providing a more parsimonious explanation of service quality. 相似文献
15.
The LibQUAL+? survey was used in 2006 to assess library service quality at the University of Notre Dame. While results showed that the Libraries were meeting users’ expectations for service in most areas, a closer examination of the data revealed dissatisfaction from a subgroup of users in one particular dimension of library services. This study focuses on the deficient area, information control, and the dissatisfied group, faculty, by comparing local results with results from other ARL libraries that also participated in the 2006 survey. In addition, an analysis was conducted to determine the relationships between selected institutional characteristics and LibQUAL+? scores for the service quality dimension of information control at the University of Notre Dame and other ARL Libraries. This analysis, with a narrowed focus on faculty and information control, increased the library’s awareness about which library services were most important to faculty and clearly identified areas needing improvement. 相似文献
16.
17.
国外图书馆信息服务评价的理论模型及其应用--从服务导向质量理论到LibQUAL+评价模型 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
图书馆信息服务评价的核心是图书馆信息服务质量评价。图书馆信息服务质量评价要依据用户的知觉和用户对服务的期望，才能准确衡量服务提供者的表现。国外图书馆界运用服务导向质量理论建立LibOUAL＋评价模型，可以准确评价用户的满意率，改进图书馆的服务工作。目前，国内已经有图书馆借鉴LibOUAL＋的评价思路和方法，通过用户调查评价图书馆服务质量，这预示了我国图书馆服务质量评价的发展方向。 相似文献
18.
研究运用LibQUAL+^■评价工具,修正并构建包括“空间环境”“馆员服务”“资源设备”三个层面22个指标的图书馆空间服务质量评估指标体系,并结合问卷调查和IPA分析法,探讨用户对图书馆整体空间的使用需求和效果评估。调查显示用户的图书馆空间理念有待转变,用户青睐安静的个人学习空间,图书馆员的职业素养有待改善,用户仍重视图书馆资源的提供。研究提出发挥图书馆空间价值引导作用,配置符合用户需求的馆舍空间,前瞻性地改变图书馆员角色,优化图书馆资源建设策略。 相似文献